Download Analysis of Safety Data

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Integrated Analyses of Safety
Data needed!
Marie Louise Valentin, MD
Director of Corporate Drug Safety
Agenda
Integrated Safety Outputs (ISOs):
•
•
•
•
Regulatory purposes
Signal Detection
Presentations: Consistency and Clarity
Risk Management Plans (RMPs)
MedDRA:
– Standardised MedDRA Queries (SMQs)
The Issue
• Applications and regulatory documents only summarize
the safety database
• Statisticians today only analyse safety data across
trials, when:
– Potential problems arise or
– The application is for a product from a class with a known
safety concern
Future
• Health Authorities require more regular integrated
safety analyses
Purpose of Integrated Safety Outputs
Many regulatory documents require reporting of
safety information:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
IND Annual Report (FDA)
Annual Safety Report (EMEA)
Investigator’s Brochure
Risk Management Plans
DMC Data Packages
Investigational Medical Product Dossier
(Risk/Benefit)
7. Integrated Safety Summary – CTD
Integrated Safety Outputs
• Regular Integrated Safety Reviews
– To be produced at least annually
– Pool or combine data across studies
– Present data from several studies in a single
•
display
Gain
– Provide coordinated and routine review of
integrated safety data
– Assist with the compilation of regulatory documents
reporting safety information/ DMC data/RMP
updates etc.
Considerations for Pooling or Combining Data
Main goal
• More precise estimates by increasing the safety database
In general, ISO produced by indication or formulation:
• Backgound AE may differ according to patient population
• Severity of disease may lead to different assessments of
risk/benefit
• The dose, formulation and duration of treatment may differ
Across indication/formulations beneficial:
• Investigational product developed for related indications
• Characterize a particular AE of interest
• Investigate class effects
The AE profile may be related to…
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Route of administration
Dose
Number of dosages
Duration of exposure
Time since dosing
Indication
Stage of disease treated
Concomitant medication/disease
Effect on target cell/organ e.g. B-lymphocytes
Demography
Signal Detection
• No systematic tools or methods in use within the
industry
• Need to account for all safety data, not just AE records
• Monitor laboratory results for an increase in
abnormalities
• Currently done manually, more efficient and consistent with
standard checks pre-defined and applied to all studies
• Focus on three main areas (the most common reasons
to terminate projects):
– Hepatotoxicity
– Nephrotoxicity
– Haematotoxicity
(Liver)
(Kidney)
(Blood)
Operational Issues
• Maintenance of treatment blind
– Should not be an impediment to a full ongoing
•
•
•
review of safety data?
Who should have access to data and results?
Should DMCs review un-blinded data?
False signals
– Problem or proactive pharmacovigilance?
• A policy for ’Integrated Safety Outputs’ should
be prepared
Risk Management Plans (RMP)
The overall purpose of a Risk Management Plan
is to describe efforts in:
– Identifying
– Estimating
– Evaluating
– Communicating
– Minimising
risks that may be associated with the product.
Risk Management Plans
EMEA:
• Guideline on Risk Management Systems for
Medicinal Products for human use
– Effective date 20 November 2005
FDA:
• Guidance for Industry: Good
Pharmacovigilance Practices and
Pharmacoepidemiological Assessment
• Pre-marketing Guidance
• Pharmacovigilance Guidance (postmarketing)
• March 2005
Risk Management Plans
• Be product-specific
• Balance assessment of risks and benefits
• Monitor difference between clinical trials and
•
•
•
”real life”
Identify what is known at licensing
Identify what is not known
Clarify epidemiology of disease and known
adverse effects
What we know and don’t know
Know:
• Population treated
• Time treated
• Time to adverse events
• Identify specific risk groups
• Stratify analysis by dose, duration etc
Don’t know:
• Interactions
• Populations not studied: Children, elderly, pregnancy
• Relevance of class effects
• Long term effects
When do we need a
Risk Management Plan?
When initiating trials in
• New active substances
• New indications – incl extension to a
•
different population
New routes/formulations
Standardised MedDRA Queries
• After the initial effort to implement and use
MedDRA, the industry now focuses on data
analysis with MedDRA
– How to produce data summaries based on a more
granular terminology
• Standardised MedDRA Queries (SMQs):
– Groupings of MedDRA terms that are related to a
–
defined medical condition
Include terms related to signs, symptoms,
diagnoses, syndromes, physical findings,
laboratory test data
Standardised MedDRA Queries
• Developed in a collaboration with CIOMS, industry and
regulators
(Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences, WHO
and UNESCO in 1949 )
• Tested in industry and regulatory databases
• Focus on significant safety issues
• Currently, 16 in production and 70 in development
SMQ’s in Production
• Rhabdomyolysis/myopathy
• Torsade de pointes/QT
•
•
•
•
•
•
prologation
Acute renal failure
Hepatic disorders
Haemolytic disorders
Severe cutaneous adverse
reactions
Anaphylactic reactions
Acute pancreatitis
•
•
•
•
•
Agranulocytosis
Angioedema
Asthma/bronchospasm
Dyslipidaemia
Haematopoietic
cytopenias
• Lack of efficacy/effect
• Lactic acidosis
• Peripheral neuropathy
SMQs in 2nd phase of development
• Adverse pregnancy
•
•
•
•
outcome/reproductive
toxicity
Anticholinergic
syndrome
Cardiac arrhythmias
Cerebrovascular
disorders
Convulsions
• Dementia
• Embolic and
•
•
•
thrombotic events
Pseudomembranous
colitis
Retroperitoneal
fibrosis
Shock
Standardised MedDRA Queries
Available in
MedDRA version 9.0
Questions