Download MSET review 01.07.2017

Gateshead LSCB Child Sexual Exploitation
Review Assessment (MSET review form) – Stage 4
Child’s name
Alias
Address
Gender
Ethnicity
Language
DOB
AGE
Sexuality
Religion
Disability (if
applicable)
Carefirst Ref (if
Care Status
applicable)
(tick if applicable)
LAC
Children’s Social Care
Practitioner
Team Manager
CP
CIN
Other
Legal
Order
TAF
Completion Date
Team
Individuals who have contributed to the Initial CSE Assessment
Child
Parent/Carer
Other
Other
Other
Previous overall risk
level
Previous Matrix
Score
Low
Med
Nature/model of Exploitation (please tick those applicable) *see appendix 5 for
guidance
Peer on Peer
Exploitation through befriending and grooming
Boyfriend/Girlfriend Model
Party Model
Details of any identified perpetrator(s) (Name, age, DOB, description)
Note: no child under 13 or scoring 3 in any area can be assessed as low risk.
High

Scoring Matrix
Note: only complete the evidence box which relates to the identified indicator of risk.
Missing from home/care
Score
Indicator
Evidence
0
No staying out late or missing episodes
Some concerns regarding late return
1
home and/or missing episodes
Significant concerns regarding late
2
return home and/or missing episodes
Direct evidence of late return home and
3
missing episodes are associated with
CSE
Score
0
1
2
3
Score
0
1
2
3
Child’s presentation
Indicator
No concerns regarding recent changes
in the child’s physical, emotional or
behavioural presentation.
Some concerns regarding recent
changes in the child’s physical,
emotional or behavioural presentation.
Significant concerns regarding recent
changes in the child’s physical,
emotional or behavioural presentation.
Direct evidence of concerns regarding
recent changes in the child’s physical,
emotional or behavioural presentation
being associated with CSE
Gangs association
Indicator
No concerns regarding child’s
association with gangs, gang fights or
gang membership.
Some concerns regarding child’s
association with gangs, gang fights or
gang membership.
Significant concerns regarding child’s
association with gangs, gang fights or
gang membership.
Direct evidence of child’s association
with gangs, gang fights or gang
membership being associated with CSE
Evidence
Evidence
Score
0
1
2
3
Score
0
1
2
3
Associates / Peers
Indicator
No concerns regarding the child
associating with those at risk of CSE,
offending or other assessed
vulnerabilities.
Some concerns regarding the child
associating with those at risk of/or pose
a risk of CSE, offending or other
assessed vulnerabilities.
Significant concerns regarding the child
associating with those at risk of/or pose
a risk of CSE, offending or other
assessed vulnerabilities.
Direct evidence of the child’s
association with peers at risk of/pose a
risk of CSE, offending or other
assessed vulnerabilities being
associated with CSE
Evidence
Internet / Social Media / Mobile Phones
Indicator
Evidence
No concerns relating to the child’s use
of the internet or social media
Some concerns relating to the child’s
use of the internet or social media
Significant concerns relating to the
child’s use of the internet or social
media
Direct evidence the child’s use of the
internet and social media is associated
with CSE
Lifestyle
Score
0
1
2
3
Indicator
No concerns that the child’s life style
exposes them to risk.
Some concerns that the child’s life style
exposes them to risk
Significant concerns that the child’s life
style exposes them to risk
Direct evidence of CSE and this
impacting upon opportunities for the
child to engage in a healthy lifestyle.
Evidence
Score
0
1
2
3
Score
0
1
2
3
Score
0
1
2
3
Family/personal relationships
Indicator
No concerns regarding the quality and
nature of family and personal
relationships.
Some concerns regarding the quality
and nature of family and personal
relationships.
Significant concerns regarding the
quality and nature of family and
personal relationships.
Direct evidence family and personal
relationships either fail to ensure the
child is protected from CSE or
contributes to CSE risks.
Physical/Sexual/Mental Health
Indicator
No concerns regarding the child’s
physical/sexual/mental health and
awareness.
Some concerns regarding the child’s
physical/sexual/mental health and
awareness.
Significant concerns regarding the
child’s physical/sexual/mental health
and awareness.
Direct evidence that the child’s
physical/sexual/mental health and
awareness is associated with CSE risks
Drug and alcohol
Indicator
No concerns regarding drug and/or
alcohol use.
Some concerns regarding drug and/or
alcohol use.
Significant concern regarding drug
and/or alcohol use.
Direct evidence that the child’s drug
and/or alcohol use is associated with
CSE
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Score
0
1
2
3
Score
0
1
2
3
Education/Training/Employment Attendance, punctuality and attainment
Indicator
Evidence
No ETE attendance, punctuality or
attainment concerns
Some ETE attendance, punctuality or
attainment concerns
Significant ETE attendance, punctuality
or attainment concerns
Direct evidence that the child’s ETE
attendance, punctuality or attainment is
associated with CSE
Accommodation stability and suitability
Indicator
Evidence
No accommodation stability and/or
suitability concerns.
Some accommodation stability and/or
suitability concerns.
Significant accommodation stability
and/or suitability concerns.
Direct evidence accommodation
stability and/or suitability is associated
with CSE
Overall Matrix Score
Level
Low (0-11)
Med (12-22)
High (23-33)
Child’s Views
Parents/carer’s views
Diversity considerations (include the relevance of age, gender, sexuality, religion, disability
and any individual needs of the child which impacts upon safeguarding the child from CSE
and risk management e.g maturity, levels of comprehension etc)
Identified gaps in assessment and action required to obtain information
Overall analysis of identified Child Sexual Exploitation (including analysis of risk and balance
of any identified protective factors to inform professional judgement).
Professional judgement of overall risk level
(giving consideration to the Matrix Score and overall
Low
Med
analysis)
Note: no child under 13 or scoring 3 in any area can be assessed as low risk.
High