Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Multilateration wikipedia , lookup
Group action wikipedia , lookup
Analytic geometry wikipedia , lookup
Pythagorean theorem wikipedia , lookup
Tensors in curvilinear coordinates wikipedia , lookup
Trigonometric functions wikipedia , lookup
Approximations of π wikipedia , lookup
Integer triangle wikipedia , lookup
Rational trigonometry wikipedia , lookup
History of trigonometry wikipedia , lookup
CURRICULUM INSPIRATIONS: www.maa.org/ci Math for America DC: www.mathforamerica.org/DC Innovative Online Courses: www.gdaymath.com Tanton Tidbits: www.jamestanton.com Wockin’ COOL MATH! CURIOUS MATHEMATICS FOR FUN AND JOY APRIL 2014 PROMOTIONAL CORNER: Have you an event, a workshop, a website, some materials you would like to share with the world? Let me know! If the work is about deep and joyous and real mathematical doing I would be delighted to mention it here. *** Looking for really cool ways to teach problem-solving and connect it to the curriculum? And/or do you want to learn how to solve problems and also think about really innovative and curious mathematics? Check out MAA Curriculum Inspirations: www.maa.org/ci. PUZZLER: Quadrilateral ABCD has AB = 2 , BC = 5 and CD = 7 . What must AD be so that the quadrilateral contains a circle just touching all four sides? What is the largest possible radius of such an incircle? © James Tanton 2014 FLOPPY QUADRILATERALS WITH INCIRCLES And by expanding that circle, we can grow it to a size that makes it touch a third side. The two tangents theorem from circle geometry (see this month’s CURRICULUM ESSAY) shows that if a quadrilateral circumscribes a circle, then opposite sides of that quadrilateral have lengths that sum to the same value. Must this circle touch the fourth side as well? Is there anything mathematically amiss if it does not? Since AB + CD = 2 + 7 = 9 this suggests we need AD = 4 . But this is assuming first that the quadrilateral has an inscribed circle! Is setting AD = 4 enough to ensure that an inscribed circle exists? We can certainly draw within this figure a circle that is tangent to two of its sides. Question: It seems we are assuming that the quadrilateral is convex. Can a concave quadrilateral circumscribe a circle? If the circle fails to touch the fourth side, draw a line as indicated to make a triangle with one side tangent to the circle. Call the lengths of the two sides of that triangle x and y . We have within this picture a quadrilateral with all four sides tangent to a circle, so opposite pairs of its sidelengths must sum to the same value: 5+ y = 2+7− x. It follows that x + y = 4 . But now look at the triangle. As two sides of a triangle must always sum to a value greater than the length of the third side, something is www.jamestanton.com and www.gdaymath.com © James Tanton 2014 indeed mathematically amiss: we should have x + y > 4 . It must be the case that the circle touches all four sides of the original quadrilateral after all. This work can be generalized to establish: Theorem: A convex quadrilateral ABCD possesses an inscribed circle if, and only if, opposite pairs of sides have the same sum of lengths: AB + CD = BC + AD . I find this result really quite astounding! Imagine four rods of lengths 2 , 5 , 7 , and 4 hinged together to make a floppy model of a quadrilateral. Each and every convex figure one makes with this model is sure to possess an inscribed circle! THE INCIRCLE RADIUS Part two of the puzzle wants us to compute the radius of the largest possible incircle that could appear. For any quadrilateral (or any polygon for that matter) possessing an inscribed circle, the radius r of the inscribed circle can be computed from the area A and the perimeter P of the quadrilateral as follows: If the sides of the quadrilateral have lengths a , b , c , and d , then dividing the quadrilateral into four triangles with heights given by the radius r of the incircle gives: 1 1 1 1 A = ar + br + cr + dr 2 2 2 2 1 = (a + b + c + d ) r 2 1 = P⋅r 2 Wow! In any case, setting AD = 4 certainly does the trick in answering the first part of the opening puzzle. 2A . For our quadrilateral we P have P = 2 + 5 + 7 + 4 = 18 and so 1 r = A . We see that the incircle of 9 largest radius sits within the convex quadrilateral of largest possible area. Thus r = So how do we get a quadrilateral of largest possible area? www.jamestanton.com and www.gdaymath.com © James Tanton 2014 THE AREA OF A QUADRILATERAL I know three formulas for the area A of a quadrilateral with one side of length zero. (The quadrilateral is usually then called a triangle!) The first two are basically the same formula: 1 A = × base × height 2 1 A = ab sin θ 2 Here a and b are two sides of the triangle and θ is the angle between them. The second formula is really the first formula with the sophistication of trigonometry thrown in: base = a and height = b sin θ . If the third side of the triangle is length c then the law of cosines says: Heron’s formula for the area of a triangle. So what if the fourth side of the quadrilateral is not of zero length? Do any of these formulas generalize? DREAM: It seems that Heron’s formula is easiest to generalize. Wouldn’t it be lovely if the area A of a quadrilateral with sides of lengths a , b , c , and d is just: A= ( s − a )( s − b )( s − c )( s − d ) a+b+c+d ? This is Heron’s 2 formula when d = 0 . where s = Let’s follow the trigonometric approach used to derive Heron’s formula and see where get. (What follows look very scary, but each step forward is straightforward in concept.) Consider a quadrilateral with four sides of lengths a , b , c , and d and two interior angles as shown. We’ve also drawn a diagonal of length p . c 2 = a 2 + b 2 − 2 ab cos θ . So we have: 2A ab c2 − a 2 − b2 cos θ = 2ab Substituting into sin 2 θ + cos 2 θ = 1 gives a formula involving only the symbols A , a , b and c . sin θ = A page of algebraic manipulation, if you are up for it, then gives: A = s ( s − a )( s − b )( s − c ) a+b+c is the semi2 perimeter of the triangle. This is where s = The area A of the quadrilateral is: 1 1 A = ab sin θ1 + cd sin θ 2 . 2 2 The law of cosines gives: a 2 + b 2 − 2ab cos θ1 = c 2 + d 2 − 2cd cos θ 2 (both sides are p 2 ). As before, can we use the famous relation sin 2 θ + cos 2 θ = 1 to get a www.jamestanton.com and www.gdaymath.com © James Tanton 2014 formula involving only A and the four side lengths? Let’s try! Think of this as: 16 A2 = ( ( c + d ) − ( a − b ) ) ( ( c + d ) + ( a − b ) ) × (( a + b ) − ( c − d )) (( a + b) + ( c − d )) Squaring the first equation gives: to get: 4 A2 = a 2 b 2 sin 2 θ1 + c 2 d 2 sin 2 θ 2 ( 2 16A2 = ( c + d ) − ( a − b ) + 2abcd sin θ1 sin θ 2 2 ) (( a + b) 2 − (c − d ) × ( 2ab + 2cd − c 2 − d 2 + a 2 + b 2 ) 2 = ( 2ab + 2cd ) − ( c 2 + d 2 − a 2 − b 2 ) 2 which is: 16 A2 = 4a 2 b 2 + 4c 2 d 2 − ( c 2 + d 2 − a 2 − b 2 ) − 2abcd cos θ1 cos θ 2 Adding these two yields: Our dream formula matches our actual formula only if cos (θ1 + θ 2 ) = −1 , that 2 1 2 a + b2 − c 2 − d 2 ) ( 4 2 2 = a b + c2 d 2 is, if θ1 + θ 2 = 180o . Hmm. But this work has revealed to us that: − 2abcd ( cos θ1 cos θ 2 − sin θ1 sin θ 2 ) 16 ( s − a )( s − b )( s − c )( s − d ) = a 2 b 2 + c 2 d 2 − 2abcd cos (θ1 + θ 2 ) = 4 a 2 b 2 + 4c 2 d 2 − ( a 2 + b 2 − c 2 − d 2 ) This can be rewritten: How does this compare with the “dream formula” 2 + 8abcd Let’s use this observation to rewrite our actual, non-dream formula: 16 A2 = 4a 2 b 2 + 4c 2 d 2 − ( a 2 + b 2 − c 2 − d 2 ) 2 − 8abcd cos (θ1 + θ 2 ) A= ( s − a )( s − b )( s − c )( s − d ) ? It is hard to tell. Let’s square both sides and rewrite this formula without the semi-perimeter s : A2 = 2 + 8abcd 4 A2 + − 8abcd cos (θ1 + θ 2 ) ( −a + b + c + d )( a − b + c + d )( a + b − c + d )( a + b + c − d ) 16 We can expand this by noting lots of differences of two squares! ) This is: 16 A2 = ( 2ab + 2cd + c 2 + d 2 − a 2 − b 2 ) Rewriting the second equation as: a2 + b2 − c2 − d 2 = ab cos θ1 − cd cos θ 2 2 and squaring gives: 1 2 a + b2 − c2 − d 2 ) ( 4 = a 2 b 2 cos 2 θ1 + c 2 d 2 cos 2 θ 2 16 A2 = 4a 2 b 2 + 4c 2 d 2 − ( a 2 + b 2 − c 2 − d 2 ) 2 = 16 ( s − a )( s − b )( s − c )( s − d ) − 8abcd − 8abcd cos (θ1 + θ 2 ) = 16 ( s − a )( s − b )( s − c )( s − d ) − 8abcd ( cos (θ1 + θ 2 ) + 1) Noting that cos ( 2 x ) = 2 cos 2 ( x ) − 1 this can be rewritten: www.jamestanton.com and www.gdaymath.com 2 © James Tanton 2014 16 A2 = 16 ( s − a )( s − b )( s − c )( s − d ) − 16abcd cos 2 (θ ) where θ = A= θ1 + θ 2 2 A= . We see: ( s − a )( s − b )( s − c )( s − d ) − abcd cos2 (θ ) We have established: Bretschneider’s Formula: The area A of a quadrilateral with side lengths a , b , c , and d is given by: A= Brahmagupta’s Formula: If a cyclic quadrilateral has side lengths a , b , c , and d , then its area A of is given by: ( s − a )( s − b )( s − c )( s − d ) . So we see now that our dream formula applies only to cyclic quadrilaterals. Note that every triangle is cyclic. (Again see this month’s CURRICULUM ESSAY. That essay has it all!) FINISHING THE PUZZLER 2 ( s − a )( s − b )( s − c )( s − d ) − abcd cos (θ ) a+b+c+d is its semi2 perimeter and θ is the average of the measures of a pair of opposite angles in the quadrilateral. where s = To remind us… We have a quadrilateral with sides of lengths 2 , 5 , 7 and 4 possessing an incircle. The radius of that 1 incircle is r = A where the area A is 9 given by Bretscneider’s formula: ( 9 − 2 )( 9 − 5)( 9 − 7 )( 9 − 4 ) − 2 ⋅ 5 ⋅ 7 ⋅ 9 cos2 (θ ) Comment: Since cos 2 (180o − x ) = cos 2 ( x ) it does not A= matter which pair of opposite interior angles one chooses to work with. with θ the average of a pair of opposite angles. The value of θ can change, depending on how we “flop” those four side lengths about to create quadrilaterals. CYCLIC QUADRILATERALS = 280 − 630 cos 2 (θ ) A quadrilateral is called cyclic if all four of its vertices lie on a common circle. We learned in this month’s CURRICULUM ESSAY their complete characterization: Theorem: A quadrilateral is cyclic if, and only if, pairs of opposite angles in the quadrilateral sum to 180o . Since the average measure of opposite angles in a cyclic quadrilateral is 90o and cos ( 90o ) = 0 we have: The puzzle asks for the largest possible value of r . To find it we need the largest possible value of A . This maximal area occurs if we can arrange matters so that cos (θ ) = 0 , that is, if we can arrange that opposite angles x and y in the diagram satisfy www.jamestanton.com and www.gdaymath.com © James Tanton 2014 x + y = 180o . That is, if we can make the quadrilateral cyclic! Then A = 280 1 and r = 280 is the largest possible 9 inradius. Definition: A quadrilateral is bicyclic if it both circumscribes a circle (that is, has an incircle) and is circumscribed by a circle (that is, is cyclic). Our solution to the puzzle is bicyclic! So only one issue remains to complete this puzzle: Is it possible to maneuver the rods of a floppy quadrilateral with sides 2 , 5 , 7 and 4 , so that the opposite angles x and y sum to 180o to actually obtain this alleged quadrilateral with largest possible incircle? The answer is yes! Start by pivoting the rod of length 2 to turn the quadrilateral into triangle as shown, with angle x becoming 180o . In this extreme, x + y = 180o + y > 180o . Question: A bicyclic quadrilateral has sides of lengths a , b , c , and d . Show that its area is A = abcd . RESEARCH CORNER: Consider a (very degenerate) polygon with two sides, each necessarily the same length. We can think of this as a cyclic quadrilateral with a = b , c = 0 , d = 0 . Brahmangupta’s formula gives the correct value for the area of this bigon. (Can you see why?) Brahmagupta’s formula is also correct for all triangles, which are cyclic polygons with d = 0 . Next pivot the rod of length 2 in the opposite direction to make a second triangl. As all three angles in a triangle sum to 180o , we have that x + y < 180o . The obvious generalization of Brahmagupta’s formula to cyclic pentagons, namely, A= ( s − a )( s − b )( s − c )( s − d )( s − e ) alas, cannot hold: the left side is a quantity in units squared but the right side is units to the 2.5 th power, whatever that means. Can anything of interest be said about the areas of cyclic pentagons? There must be some intermediate pivot position for that rod of length 2 that has x + y = 180o , finally proving that the maximal inradius we identified actually does happen! © 2014 James Tanton [email protected] www.jamestanton.com and www.gdaymath.com