Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download 143-150 July 15, 1996
Document related concepts
Transcript
Cost-effectiveness of a Coronary Care Unit Versus an Intermediate Care Unit for Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain by Anna N.A. Tosteson, Lee Goldman, I. Steven Udvarhelyi, and Thomas H. Lee Circulation Volume 94(2):143-150 July 15, 1996 Copyright © American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Representation of decision model used to assess the cost-effectiveness of the coronary care unit (CCU) relative to the intermediate care unit (SDU) for patients with and without acute myocardial infarction (AMI ruled in and AMI ruled out, respectively). Anna N.A. Tosteson et al. Circulation. 1996;94:143-150 Copyright © American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Cost per year-of-life-saved for each age group as the probability of acute myocardial infarction is varied from 0 (0%) to 1 (100%). Anna N.A. Tosteson et al. Circulation. 1996;94:143-150 Copyright © American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Impact of lower costs (25th percentile) and higher 48-hour mortality for acute myocardial infarction patients (upper 95% confidence interval) on cost per year-of-life-saved for each age group as the probability of acute myocardial infarction is varied from 0 (0%) to 1 (100%). Anna N.A. Tosteson et al. Circulation. 1996;94:143-150 Copyright © American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved.
