Download essay1prompts

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Intensive short-term dynamic psychotherapy wikipedia , lookup

Freud's psychoanalytic theories wikipedia , lookup

Alice: Madness Returns wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Methods of Literary and Cultural Studies: Critical Essay
Due Tuesday, February 3, at the beginning of the class, in hard copy
From the syllabus:
One critical essay. (3-5 pages, normal-looking font.) This is a short, sharp critical engagement
with one or more texts covered in class: an academic paper in the standard form, denuded of
excess verbiage, bold of argument, and shined, prosewise, to a glistening polish. It can make
use of your own earlier blog posts. Prompts will be provided, but you are encouraged to
break from them to compose your own questions and topics.
Please construct a well-organized, revised, proofread essay of no fewer than three full pages on one of the following
topics. You may also create your own topic, or (perhaps best of all) take a swerve on one of the topics I’ve
provided, turning it toward your own intellectual purpose. Remember that a successful essay will make a point
or interlocked series of points (an argument), then use evidence (close, local readings of specific moments in
the text, logical transitions, and sound analysis) to argue in support of those points.
Further directions:
NO NOT:
1. Begin writing this paper the night before it’s due.
2. Think in ungrounded abstractions.
3. Write filler.
4. Quote great men, maxims, or dictionaries that are not the OED (see #3).
DO:
Link formal observations to analysis of content. Connect local observation to larger claims. Cite
properly (use MLA style). Support creatively. Edit mercilessly, over a period of days and drafts.
Shine your prose to a glistening polish. Be fearless.
AND MOST OF ALL: READ CLOSELY
Grammar, syntax, metaphor, word choice, figures of speech, and the fanatically local detail: note
and analyze these, then connect them to bigger questions.
POSSIBLE TOPICS:
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
9)
10)
11)
12)
13)
14)
15)
16)
17)
Pick one poem by Gerard Manley Hopkins and perform a hypothetical, speculative interpretation of it
using any two “levels” of literary reading in Richter’s target-shaped diagram of various hermeneutic (or
“interpretive”) models. You may label your interpretations “Fake Essay 1” and “Fake Essay 2” and
describe the type of arguments you would make, and what evidence you would use, were you actually
writing such an essay.
Perform a close reading of the moments of transition in Alice and/or Looking Glass, in which Alice
moves from one realm to the other. What happens in these moments of transfer or carrying-over?
How does the text stage this episode of conversion, and (this is the real challenge) what is at stake in
this transition?
Perform a close reading of the moments of conversion or carrying-over that Freud describes in “The
Interpretation of Dreams”: what are the “levels” in Freud, and what happens in the transition
between them?
Combine questions 2 and 3 to make a super-essay about metaphor (“carrying-over”), conversion, and
translation in Carroll and Freud.
Why is Alice a girl? Or, more generally, what work does gender do in Alice? Consider, perhaps, the
social conventions made visible in the novel, the role of class, and/or the differences between
Wonderland and the world above the rabbit hole.
In what sense does Alice’s journey represent a journey into another structure of language or meaning
or what we called in class, another “regime of signification”? Choosing specific moments around
which to frame your essay, describe the friction or interface between the worlds of “sense” (bourgeois
Victorian propriety) and of “nonsense.”
Is Freud in love with Irma? What evidence tells you so?
Is Freud a good reader? What evidence tells you so?
Marx calls commodities “social hieroglyphics.” In what sense are they like texts, calling for
hermeneutic disencryption? You may choose to focus your essay on only Marx, or examine this
question in relation to Gerard Manley Hopkins’ “God’s Grandeur” or another poem.
Make an argument about the importance of games and/or systems of rules in Alice in Wonderland.
Why are these organized and socially-enforced sets of conventions important to the conceptual
content of the novel?
Alice is about sex. Discuss this proposition with attention to things like the role of appetites, desire,
secret gardens, attraction, and “burning.” Enrich your analysis from concepts and readings from class.
Alice is about language. Discuss this proposition with attention to the role of tropes, puns,
confusions, jokes, and wordplay. Enrich your analysis with concepts from readings & class.
Alice about violence and authority. Discuss this proposition with attention to things like power, size,
the enforcement of meaning, eating, and beheadings. Enrich your analysis with concepts from
readings & class.
Alice is a policeman for the bourgeois (i.e. moneyed middle-class) order, a defender of the status quo.
Discuss this proposition using attention to Eagleton’s critique of English as ideology, in “Rise of
English.”
Deleuze’s reading of the obsession with “surfaces” in Through the Looking Glass positions it as a
countermodel to the diagrams of depth-penetration that Alice shares with Marxian and Freudian
models of hermeneutics. What do you make of this distinction between going down the rabbit hole
versus through a looking glass. What is the conceptual distinction between these? Why does it
matter?
Choose a small section of either Alice or Looking Glass that you find particularly interesting in terms of
language, grammar, or punctuation. Find that section in at least two audiobook versions of the same
text (check youtube.com, librivix.com or bookshouldbefree.com for free audio versions of the book)
and analyze the way it is read aloud. In what ways does the specificity of the medium determine the
content of this passage?
Perform a close reading of no more than four lines of a Hopkins poem, paying special attention to the
role of conventions, “literary language,” and framing that Culler discusses in his chapter, “What is
Literature.” Does this poem “make sense”? Can we “make it out” (as Alice says, in Through the
Looking Glass)? If so, why? If not, why not? And if something different from those options, what?