Download 2016 report

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Special Interest Group Gerodontology
Meeting Budapest
Thursday 29th September 2016,
15:00-17.15
Chairs: prof. dr. Jacques Vanobbergen & prof. dr. Luc De Visschere
Report
1/ Welcome and brief introduction of the participants
Sixteen participants attended the meeting and the number of
participants is stable over time.
Heidelberg (2008):
Tromsö (2009):
Constanta (2010):
Rome (2011):
London (2012):
Malta (2013):
Gothenburg (2014):
Istanbul (2015):
Budapest (2016):
14
14
9
29
15
17
22
18
16
The participants in Budapest represent 8 different countries: Belgium (2);
Brazil (1); Denmark (1); England (3); Finland (3); France (1); Hungary (2)
and Norway (3)
name
surname
De Visschere Luc
VanobbergenJacques
Giraudeau Nicolas
Ansteinsson Vibeke
Sinikka
Varsio
Siukosaari Paivi
Nihtila
Annamari
Nagy
Akos
Krogenas
Anne
Hilgert
Juliana
Dahl
Jeppe-Jensen
Basra
Ashvir
Humphreys Katie
Allen
Yasmin
Keremi
Beata
Ahlsen
Kirsten
country
Belgium
Belgium
France
Norway
Finland
Finland
Finland
Hungary
Norway
Brazil
Denmark
England
England
England
Hungary
Norway
e-mail
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
2/ Evaluation of the E-learning module Colgate (www.colgateelderlycare.com)
The E-learning module is developed to educate nurses and caregivers of
older community dwelling people and older people residing in nursing
homes.
Part of the participants received at home a link to the E-learning module.
They were asked to give their perceptions on the E-learning module in
order to prepare the focus group discussion. Therefore a guiding
questionnaire was send in advance.
Memory refresh by short power point presentation by prof. dr. Luc De
Visschere (see addendum I).
The participants were informed that the module was developed by
Colgate in cooperation with a dental hygienist involved by Colgate and
the department of Community Dentistry & Oral Public Health, University
Ghent.
E-learning module Colgate: focus group talk
Eight of the participants received at home a link to the E-learning
module. They were asked to give their perceptions on the E-learning
module in order to prepare the focus group discussion.
Therefore a guiding questionnaire was send in advance with following
questions:





What are you first impressions?
What are your ideas about the concept/format?
Why should you or why should you not recommend this module?
SWOT analysis
Do you have any suggestions to ameliorate this module?
Results of the focus group:
It was surprising that no one of the participants was aware of the
existence of this E-learning module.
This finding has been confirmed during the Saturday Meeting were no
one of more than 100 participants was aware of the existence of the Elearning.
Strengths
 Online accessibility
 Design
 Concept ‘Cases’ with 3 # types of care dependency
 Train the trainer section
Weaknesses
 It takes too long?
 Only in English
 In some cases real life images are lacking
 Focus on knowledge, skills, less on attitude
Treats
 Complex accessibility with login procedure.
 Navigation procedure is not clear
 Credit system
 Time needed
Opportunities
 All caregivers
 Adaptable for other target groups
3/ Preventive oral health strategies: state of the art
A comprehensive Evidence Based overview of the use of fluoride mouth
rinses, gels, foams and varnishes for the prevention of dental caries in
older people was given by prof. dr. Jacques Vanobbergen.
See handouts of the powerpoint (addendum II)
Conclusion:
A general consensus was that all these products are not used neither
self-applied and/or professionally applied by dental professionals in the
preventive programs of frail elderly people?
These products are indeed an extra preventive tool in addition to the
daily use of fluoride toothpaste.
4/ Dental auxiliaries and oral health care in older people: development
of questionnaire
The aim: to have an idea on the involvement of auxiliaries in the
organisation of oral health care in dependent older people (home
dwelling or nursing homes) in # countries
M&M:
Development of questionnaire by members of the SIGG
Step 1: draft (during SIGG)
Step 2: beta version: validation (SIGG) by email
Step 3: dissemination by email based on participants list filled out during
the Saturday EADPH session (36 participants) (Addendum III)
Content of the questionnaire:
Questions on demographics:
Country (regions)
Function of the person who will fill out the questionnaire
Different kinds of auxiliaries
Number of different kinds of auxiliaries
Educational level of different kinds of auxiliaries
Professional status:
Self-employed without supervision
Self-employed or salaried under prescription of an dentist
Salaried autonomously
Salaried under supervision
Other
How are these auxiliaries involved in:
Nursing home/care home care
Sheltered home care/home care
Payment systems for different kind of auxiliaries:
Salaried by the organisation
Salaried by the insurance company
Salaried by the government
Fee for service
Combinations
Other