* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Anomalously high charge/orbital ordering
Edward Sabine wikipedia , lookup
Lorentz force wikipedia , lookup
Electromagnetism wikipedia , lookup
Electromagnetic field wikipedia , lookup
Superconducting magnet wikipedia , lookup
Magnetic stripe card wikipedia , lookup
Earth's magnetic field wikipedia , lookup
Magnetometer wikipedia , lookup
Magnetic monopole wikipedia , lookup
Magnetic nanoparticles wikipedia , lookup
Electromagnet wikipedia , lookup
Magnetotactic bacteria wikipedia , lookup
Neutron magnetic moment wikipedia , lookup
Force between magnets wikipedia , lookup
Magnetoreception wikipedia , lookup
Magnetohydrodynamics wikipedia , lookup
Giant magnetoresistance wikipedia , lookup
History of geomagnetism wikipedia , lookup
Magnetotellurics wikipedia , lookup
Multiferroics wikipedia , lookup
Appl. Phys. A 74 [Suppl.], S1787–S1789 (2002) / Digital Object Identifier (DOI) 10.1007/s003390201765 Applied Physics A Materials Science & Processing Anomalously high charge/orbital ordering temperature in Bi0.5Sr0.5MnO3 C. Frontera1,∗,∗∗ , J.L. Garcı́a-Muñoz1 , M.A.G. Aranda2 , C. Ritter3 , A. Llobet4 , L. Ranno5 , M. Respaud6 , J. Vanacken7 , J.M. Broto6 , A.E. Carrillo1 , A. Calleja8 , J. Garcı́a8 1 ICMAB- CSIC, Campus de Bellaterra, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain 2 Depto. de Quı́mica Inorgánica, Cristalografı́a y Mineralogı́a, Univ. de Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain 3 Institut Laue-Langevin, 38042 Grenoble-Cedex, France 4 Condensed Matter & Thermal Physics Group Los Alamos ational Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA 5 Lab. Louis Néel-CNRS, 38042-BP166, Grenoble Cedex 9, France 6 SNCMP and LPMC,INSA, Complexe Scientifique du Rangueil, 31077 Toulouse, France 7 LVSM, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium 8 Dept. d’Enginyeria Quı́mica i Metallúrgia, Facultat de Quı́mica, Univ. de Barcelona, 08028 Barcelona, Spain Received: 19 July 2001/Accepted: 11 December 2001 – Springer-Verlag 2002 Abstract. Neutron/synchrotron diffraction data and magnetic measurements provide direct evidence of charge/orbital ordering at anomalously high temperatures in Bi0.5 Sr0.5 MnO3 , as well as in other (Bi, Sr)MnO3 manganites. We report on the electronic and magnetic transitions of these oxides. The origin of the high value of the charge/orbital ordering temperature is discussed. PACS: 72.25.+z; 71.45.Lr; 71.38.-k Charge-ordering (CO) is a fascinating phenomenon in transition metal oxides with important implications in the ‘colossal’ magnetoresistance (CMR) of manganese perovskites. The discovery of CMR, in Ln1−x Mx MnO3 manganites (Ln = trivalent lanthanide, M = Ca, Sr, Ba) has led to an explosion of interest in the tendency displayed by many of these manganites to form nanoscopic inhomogeneous states: electronic phase separation and CO phenomena. The stability of CO is determined by the Coulomb repulsion between charges and the elastic energy from the static JahnTeller (JT) deformations that accommodate the associated orbital ordering (OO). Although covalency effects can be significant, the ionic picture describes the CO as a real space ordering of the eg electrons. The bandwidth tuning mechanism has been widely used to quantitatively justify the TCO variation in the Ln1/2 M1/2 MnO3 family of compounds [1]. We present in this paper some results on Bi based manganites that do not follow this bandwidth tuning mechanism. It is known that, in some compounds, Bi3+ ions play the same role than Ln3+ ions. In others the highly polarizable 6s2 lone pair produces marked different features. We have investigated the high temperature electronic transitions and low temperature magnetic properties of Bi0.5 Sr0.5 MnO3 and other (Bi, Sr)MnO3 compounds. ∗ Corresponding author. (Fax: +34-935/805729; E-mail: [email protected]) ∗∗ On leave at DSM/DRFMC/SPSMS/MDN, CEA-Grenoble, 17 Rue des Martyrs, 38054 Grenoble, France 1 Experimental details Details about the synthesis of polycrystalline Bi1−x Srx MnO3 oxides are given elsewhere [2, 3]. Neutron (NPD) and synchrotron (SXRPD) diffraction data were collected at the ILL (D2B) and the ESRF (BM16) in Grenoble in the temperature range 1.5–700 K. Moreover, X-ray laboratory thermodiffractometry, magnetotransport up to 8 T, and magnetization measurements up to 700 K were also carried out. High magnetic field studies were performed at the facilities of the LVSM (Leuven). Using the discharge of a bank capacitor in the coil, pulsed fields up to 50 T with a duration time of 20 ms were used. 2 Results and discussion First indications for the presence of CO at high temperatures were seen in the susceptibility data. Figure 1 presents the inverse of the susceptibility of Bi0.5 Ca0.5 MnO3 and Bi0.5 Sr0.5 MnO3 measured under 1 T of applied field up to 800 K. CO/OO transition produces a peak in χ −1 (T ) curves. This is due to the change from ferromagnetic (FM), T > TCO , to antiferromagnetic (AFM), T < TCO , correlations of the fluctuating (paramagnetic) moments produced by the OO. It can be clearly appreciated that the anomaly in the χ −1 (T ) curve of Bi0.5 Sr0.5 MnO3 takes place (≈ 525 K) well above than that of Bi0.5 Ca0.5 MnO3 (≈ 320 K). Such a high temperature transition can also be identified in Bi0.33 Sr0.67 MnO3 (≈ 475 K) compound (inset of Fig. 1). Based on high temperature NPD and SXRPD data, we observed the appearance, below the high temperature transition, of q = 1/2b∗ structural modulations in the Bi0.5 Sr0.5 MnO3 sample. These modulations are associated to the periodic ordering concomitant with the OO/CO phase. To illustrate this, the inset of Fig. 2 shows, as a function of temperature, in the integrated intensity of the (1 12 0) superlattice peak (SXRPD, λ = 0.45023 Å) as measured for Bi0.5 Sr0.5 MnO3 on heating. Its evolution confirms that the q = 1/2b∗ structural modulation induced by the periodic OO disappears at TCO ≈ 500 K. Above TCO , neutron data was consistent with a single-phase diffraction S1788 pattern (Pbnm). However, the sample actually splits into two macroscopic phases with slightly different lattice parameters when cooled below TCO . Figure 2 illustrates the evolution of the refined lattice parameters for, hereafter, Orth1 (55 wt. %, q = 1/2b∗ ) and Orth2 (45 wt. %, q = 0) phases, as obtained from laboratory X-ray data. Those phases present different JT deformation parameter σJT ≡ 13 i (dMn−Oi − dMn−O )2 : σJT = 0.023 and 0.016 at RT and σJT = 0.030 and 0.017 at T = 1.5 K for Orth1 and Orth2 phases respectively. NPD data have confirmed that Orht1 and Orht2 phases present different magnetic structures below TN ≈ 110 K [4]. The q = 1/2b∗ modulated phase (Orth1) adopts the AFM CE type structure while Orth2 orders with the AFM A-type structure [refined ordered moment, 2.7(1)µB/Mn]. Macroscopic phase separation is commonly observed in samples with even very small compositional fluctuations as the CE and A type phases have very similar energies [5]. Actually, magnetic intensities for Orth1 indicate the simultaneous presence of CE and pseudo-CE magnetic peaks. These two sets can be satisfactorily reproduced by assuming that m x and m y components of the magnetic moment display CE-type ordering, while the component along the [0 0 1] direction (m z ) presents a pseudo-CE-type order [6] [refined ordered moments, 2.5(1) and 2.3(1)µB /Mn at the two Mn sites of CE structure]. The corresponding magnetic structures are shown in Fig. 3. The gray arrows in Fig. 3a are projections of the moments at the z = 0 plane to illustrate the angle between the moments of neighboring Mn ions. Furthermore, we want to emphasize some interesting features of the Orth2 phase (A-type). We believe that the current picture for manganites with x ≈ 0.5 and A-type magnetic ordering (the “metallic antiferromagnetic” picture having conducting FM planes) is not valid in the present case. The reasons are: first, the very high resistivity and the absence of magnetoresistance (at µ0 H = 8 T) displayed by this phase, as shown in Fig. 4a (it must be taken in to account that the amount of Orth2 phase found, 45 wt. %, ensures that it percolates the sample). Second, the much higher values of TOO compared to previous OO manganites presenting A-type magnetic ordering, which evidences a very high stability of this phase. As reported in [3], the weakly screened 6s2 Bi electrons in Bi−Sr−Mn−O perovskites makes the charges to be much more localized than, Fig. 2. Temperature evolution of the lattice parameters (a, circles; b, √ squares; and c/ 2, triangles) of Orth1 and Orth2 phases (open and filled symbols respectively). Inset: integrated intensities of (1 12 0) superlattice peak (SXRPD). The solid line is a guide to the eyes a b Fig. 1. Temperature evolution of χ −1 measured with an applied field of 1 T for Bi0.5 Sr0.5 MnO3 () and Bi0.5 Ca0.5 MnO3 ( ). The inset shows χ −1 for Bi0.33 Sr0.67 MnO3 , measured under the same conditions ◦ Fig. 3a,b. Magnetic structures of Orth1 (a) and Orth2 (b) phases that coexist in the studied Bi0.5 Sr0.5 MnO3 sample. The gray arrows in the upper (0 0 1) plane in a shows the angle between the magnetic moments of neighboring Mn ions S1789 CE-type phase are much more stable than in other rare-earth based manganites like Pr0.5 Sr0.5 MnO3 or Nd0.5 Sr0.5 MnO3 and is in agreement with the very high TCO reported for this compound. Phase coexistence below TCO has been also observed in the Bi0.33 Sr0.67 MnO3 sample, one phase being pseudotetragonal (45 wt. %) and the other orthorhombic (55 wt. %) and presenting a q = 1/3b∗ structural modulation. Below TN ≈ 200 K, the latter exhibits a magnetic ordering similar to that reported for the CO phase of La0.33 Ca0.67 MnO3 [8]. The former (having q = 0), exhibits a pseudo A-type magnetic structure with the magnetic moments displaying partial misalignment probably due to the presence of defects and/or inhomogeneities. a 3 Conclusions b Fig. 4. a Temperature dependence of the electric resistivity without applied field ( ) and with 8 T (). It is worth to mention the large value of ρ at low temperature, and the absolute absence of magnetoresistance at 8 T. b Magnetization vs µ0 H (left axis) curve and its derivative, dµdMH (µ0 H), 0 (right axis) of Bi0.5 Sr0.5 MnO3 at T = 4.2 K ◦ for instance, in Pr0.5 Sr0.5 MnO3 or Nd0.5 Sr0.5 MnO3 (for which the resistivity at low temperature is ∼ 107 times lower). The lone pair effect is, due to this charge localization, responsible of the high TCO in Bi0.5 Sr0.5 MnO3. Such localization, thus, evidences that the FM planes cannot be conducting or metallic in the present Orth2 A-type phase. In addition, the lattice strain energy due to Jahn-Teller distortions and the Coulomb repulsion favor the ordered pattern of eg electrons, instead of they being randomly placed. In the last case, we would expect a higher magnetic disorder. Therefore, we are led to conclude that the presence of CO of the type pointed out theoretically in [7] (with q = 0) is very probably the ground state of the present Orth2 A-type phase. The isothermal M(H ) curve and its derivative dµdM of 0H Bi0.5 Sr0.5 MnO3 (Fig. 4b) at T = 4.2 K indicates that a field induced transition is only achieved at µ0 H ≈ 37 T. Moreover, a magnetic field µ0 H = 48 T is not enough to saturate the magnetic moment of the Mn ions (3.5 µB /Mn). This evidences that the OO of the A-type phase, and the CO of the To conclude, the reported CO/OO transitions occur some ≈ 450 K above the expected temperature in the current scenario (bandwidth tuning mechanism) for (Ln, Ca, Sr)MnO3 manganites. The possibility that Bi and Sr form some kind of ordering was examined and has to be ruled out in these oxides. According to the discussion given in [3] the 6s2 lone pair character is probably strongly screened in (Bi, Ca)MnO3 compounds but not in those doped with Sr. This pushes TCO up to 525 K and makes that Orth2 A-type phase probably presents CO. Acknowledgements. Financial support by the CICyT (No. MAT97-0699), MEC (No. PB97-1175), CIRIT (No. GRQ95-8029), and the EC (OXSEN network); and the provision of beam time at ILL (neutrons) and ESRF (synchrotron X-rays) facilities are acknowledged. References 1. C.N.R. Rao, A. Arulraj, P.N. Santosh, A.K. Cheetham: Chem. Mater. 10, 2714 (1998) 2. C. Frontera, J.L. Garcı́a-Muñoz, A. Llobet, M.A.G. Aranda, C. Ritter, M. Respaud, J. Vanacken: J. Phys.: Cond. Matter 13, 1071 (2001) 3. J.L. Garcı́a-Muñoz, C. Frontera, M.A.G. Aranda, A. Llobet, C. Ritter: Phys. Rev. B 63, 064415 (2001) 4. C. Frontera, J.L. Garcı́a-Muñoz, M.A.G. Aranda, C. Ritter, A. Llobet, M. Respaud, J. Vanacken: Phys. Rev. B 64, 054401 (2001) 5. P.M. Woodward, D.E. Cox, T. Vogt, C.N.R. Rao, A.K. Cheetham: Chem. Mater. 11, 3528 (1999) 6. C. Frontera, J.L. Garcı́a-Muñoz, A. Llobet, C. Ritter, J.A. Alonso, J. Rodrı́guez-Cavajal: Phys. Rev. B 62, 3002 (2000) 7. T. Mizokawa, A. Fujimori: Phys. Rev. B 56, R493 (1997) 8. M.T. Fernández-Dı́az, J.L. Martı́nez, J.M. Alonso, E. Herrero: Phys. Rev. B 59, 1277 (1999)