Download Anomalously high charge/orbital ordering

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Edward Sabine wikipedia , lookup

Lorentz force wikipedia , lookup

Electromagnetism wikipedia , lookup

Electromagnetic field wikipedia , lookup

Superconducting magnet wikipedia , lookup

Magnetic stripe card wikipedia , lookup

Earth's magnetic field wikipedia , lookup

Magnetometer wikipedia , lookup

Magnetic monopole wikipedia , lookup

Magnetic nanoparticles wikipedia , lookup

Electromagnet wikipedia , lookup

Magnet wikipedia , lookup

Magnetotactic bacteria wikipedia , lookup

Neutron magnetic moment wikipedia , lookup

Force between magnets wikipedia , lookup

Ferrofluid wikipedia , lookup

Magnetoreception wikipedia , lookup

Magnetohydrodynamics wikipedia , lookup

Giant magnetoresistance wikipedia , lookup

Magnetism wikipedia , lookup

History of geomagnetism wikipedia , lookup

Magnetotellurics wikipedia , lookup

Multiferroics wikipedia , lookup

Ferromagnetism wikipedia , lookup

Magnetochemistry wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Appl. Phys. A 74 [Suppl.], S1787–S1789 (2002) / Digital Object Identifier (DOI) 10.1007/s003390201765
Applied Physics A
Materials
Science & Processing
Anomalously high charge/orbital ordering temperature
in Bi0.5Sr0.5MnO3
C. Frontera1,∗,∗∗ , J.L. Garcı́a-Muñoz1 , M.A.G. Aranda2 , C. Ritter3 , A. Llobet4 , L. Ranno5 , M. Respaud6 , J. Vanacken7 ,
J.M. Broto6 , A.E. Carrillo1 , A. Calleja8 , J. Garcı́a8
1 ICMAB- CSIC, Campus de Bellaterra, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain
2 Depto. de Quı́mica Inorgánica, Cristalografı́a y Mineralogı́a, Univ. de Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain
3 Institut Laue-Langevin, 38042 Grenoble-Cedex, France
4 Condensed Matter & Thermal Physics Group Los Alamos ational Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA
5 Lab. Louis Néel-CNRS, 38042-BP166, Grenoble Cedex 9, France
6 SNCMP and LPMC,INSA, Complexe Scientifique du Rangueil, 31077 Toulouse, France
7 LVSM, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium
8 Dept. d’Enginyeria Quı́mica i Metallúrgia, Facultat de Quı́mica, Univ. de Barcelona, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
Received: 19 July 2001/Accepted: 11 December 2001 –  Springer-Verlag 2002
Abstract. Neutron/synchrotron diffraction data and magnetic
measurements provide direct evidence of charge/orbital ordering at anomalously high temperatures in Bi0.5 Sr0.5 MnO3 ,
as well as in other (Bi, Sr)MnO3 manganites. We report on
the electronic and magnetic transitions of these oxides. The
origin of the high value of the charge/orbital ordering temperature is discussed.
PACS: 72.25.+z; 71.45.Lr; 71.38.-k
Charge-ordering (CO) is a fascinating phenomenon in transition metal oxides with important implications in the ‘colossal’ magnetoresistance (CMR) of manganese perovskites.
The discovery of CMR, in Ln1−x Mx MnO3 manganites (Ln
= trivalent lanthanide, M = Ca, Sr, Ba) has led to an explosion of interest in the tendency displayed by many of
these manganites to form nanoscopic inhomogeneous states:
electronic phase separation and CO phenomena. The stability of CO is determined by the Coulomb repulsion between charges and the elastic energy from the static JahnTeller (JT) deformations that accommodate the associated
orbital ordering (OO). Although covalency effects can be
significant, the ionic picture describes the CO as a real
space ordering of the eg electrons. The bandwidth tuning
mechanism has been widely used to quantitatively justify
the TCO variation in the Ln1/2 M1/2 MnO3 family of compounds [1]. We present in this paper some results on Bi
based manganites that do not follow this bandwidth tuning
mechanism.
It is known that, in some compounds, Bi3+ ions play the
same role than Ln3+ ions. In others the highly polarizable
6s2 lone pair produces marked different features. We have investigated the high temperature electronic transitions and low
temperature magnetic properties of Bi0.5 Sr0.5 MnO3 and other
(Bi, Sr)MnO3 compounds.
∗ Corresponding
author.
(Fax: +34-935/805729; E-mail: [email protected])
∗∗ On leave at DSM/DRFMC/SPSMS/MDN, CEA-Grenoble, 17 Rue des
Martyrs, 38054 Grenoble, France
1 Experimental details
Details about the synthesis of polycrystalline Bi1−x Srx MnO3
oxides are given elsewhere [2, 3]. Neutron (NPD) and synchrotron (SXRPD) diffraction data were collected at the ILL
(D2B) and the ESRF (BM16) in Grenoble in the temperature range 1.5–700 K. Moreover, X-ray laboratory thermodiffractometry, magnetotransport up to 8 T, and magnetization
measurements up to 700 K were also carried out. High magnetic field studies were performed at the facilities of the
LVSM (Leuven). Using the discharge of a bank capacitor in
the coil, pulsed fields up to 50 T with a duration time of 20 ms
were used.
2 Results and discussion
First indications for the presence of CO at high temperatures were seen in the susceptibility data. Figure 1 presents
the inverse of the susceptibility of Bi0.5 Ca0.5 MnO3 and
Bi0.5 Sr0.5 MnO3 measured under 1 T of applied field up to
800 K. CO/OO transition produces a peak in χ −1 (T ) curves.
This is due to the change from ferromagnetic (FM), T > TCO ,
to antiferromagnetic (AFM), T < TCO , correlations of the
fluctuating (paramagnetic) moments produced by the OO. It
can be clearly appreciated that the anomaly in the χ −1 (T )
curve of Bi0.5 Sr0.5 MnO3 takes place (≈ 525 K) well above
than that of Bi0.5 Ca0.5 MnO3 (≈ 320 K). Such a high temperature transition can also be identified in Bi0.33 Sr0.67 MnO3
(≈ 475 K) compound (inset of Fig. 1). Based on high temperature NPD and SXRPD data, we observed the appearance,
below the high temperature transition, of q = 1/2b∗ structural
modulations in the Bi0.5 Sr0.5 MnO3 sample. These modulations are associated to the periodic ordering concomitant with
the OO/CO phase. To illustrate this, the inset of Fig. 2 shows,
as a function of temperature, in the integrated intensity of
the (1 12 0) superlattice peak (SXRPD, λ = 0.45023 Å) as
measured for Bi0.5 Sr0.5 MnO3 on heating. Its evolution confirms that the q = 1/2b∗ structural modulation induced by
the periodic OO disappears at TCO ≈ 500 K. Above TCO ,
neutron data was consistent with a single-phase diffraction
S1788
pattern (Pbnm). However, the sample actually splits into two
macroscopic phases with slightly different lattice parameters
when cooled below TCO . Figure 2 illustrates the evolution of
the refined lattice parameters for, hereafter, Orth1 (55 wt. %,
q = 1/2b∗ ) and Orth2 (45 wt. %, q = 0) phases, as obtained
from laboratory X-ray data. Those phases present different JT
deformation parameter σJT ≡ 13 i (dMn−Oi − dMn−O )2 :
σJT = 0.023 and 0.016 at RT and σJT = 0.030 and 0.017 at
T = 1.5 K for Orth1 and Orth2 phases respectively.
NPD data have confirmed that Orht1 and Orht2 phases
present different magnetic structures below TN ≈ 110 K [4].
The q = 1/2b∗ modulated phase (Orth1) adopts the AFM
CE type structure while Orth2 orders with the AFM A-type
structure [refined ordered moment, 2.7(1)µB/Mn]. Macroscopic phase separation is commonly observed in samples
with even very small compositional fluctuations as the CE and
A type phases have very similar energies [5]. Actually, magnetic intensities for Orth1 indicate the simultaneous presence
of CE and pseudo-CE magnetic peaks. These two sets can be
satisfactorily reproduced by assuming that m x and m y components of the magnetic moment display CE-type ordering,
while the component along the [0 0 1] direction (m z ) presents
a pseudo-CE-type order [6] [refined ordered moments, 2.5(1)
and 2.3(1)µB /Mn at the two Mn sites of CE structure]. The
corresponding magnetic structures are shown in Fig. 3. The
gray arrows in Fig. 3a are projections of the moments at the
z = 0 plane to illustrate the angle between the moments of
neighboring Mn ions.
Furthermore, we want to emphasize some interesting features of the Orth2 phase (A-type). We believe that the current picture for manganites with x ≈ 0.5 and A-type magnetic ordering (the “metallic antiferromagnetic” picture having conducting FM planes) is not valid in the present case.
The reasons are: first, the very high resistivity and the absence of magnetoresistance (at µ0 H = 8 T) displayed by
this phase, as shown in Fig. 4a (it must be taken in to
account that the amount of Orth2 phase found, 45 wt. %,
ensures that it percolates the sample). Second, the much
higher values of TOO compared to previous OO manganites presenting A-type magnetic ordering, which evidences
a very high stability of this phase. As reported in [3], the
weakly screened 6s2 Bi electrons in Bi−Sr−Mn−O perovskites makes the charges to be much more localized than,
Fig. 2. Temperature
evolution of the lattice parameters (a, circles; b,
√
squares; and c/ 2, triangles) of Orth1 and Orth2 phases (open and filled
symbols respectively). Inset: integrated intensities of (1 12 0) superlattice
peak (SXRPD). The solid line is a guide to the eyes
a
b
Fig. 1. Temperature evolution of χ −1 measured with an applied field of 1 T
for Bi0.5 Sr0.5 MnO3 () and Bi0.5 Ca0.5 MnO3 ( ). The inset shows χ −1 for
Bi0.33 Sr0.67 MnO3 , measured under the same conditions
◦
Fig. 3a,b. Magnetic structures of Orth1 (a) and Orth2 (b) phases that coexist
in the studied Bi0.5 Sr0.5 MnO3 sample. The gray arrows in the upper (0 0 1)
plane in a shows the angle between the magnetic moments of neighboring
Mn ions
S1789
CE-type phase are much more stable than in other rare-earth
based manganites like Pr0.5 Sr0.5 MnO3 or Nd0.5 Sr0.5 MnO3
and is in agreement with the very high TCO reported for this
compound.
Phase coexistence below TCO has been also observed
in the Bi0.33 Sr0.67 MnO3 sample, one phase being pseudotetragonal (45 wt. %) and the other orthorhombic (55 wt. %)
and presenting a q = 1/3b∗ structural modulation. Below
TN ≈ 200 K, the latter exhibits a magnetic ordering similar
to that reported for the CO phase of La0.33 Ca0.67 MnO3 [8].
The former (having q = 0), exhibits a pseudo A-type magnetic structure with the magnetic moments displaying partial
misalignment probably due to the presence of defects and/or
inhomogeneities.
a
3 Conclusions
b
Fig. 4. a Temperature dependence of the electric resistivity without applied
field ( ) and with 8 T (). It is worth to mention the large value of ρ
at low temperature, and the absolute absence of magnetoresistance at 8 T.
b Magnetization vs µ0 H (left axis) curve and its derivative, dµdMH (µ0 H),
0
(right axis) of Bi0.5 Sr0.5 MnO3 at T = 4.2 K
◦
for instance, in Pr0.5 Sr0.5 MnO3 or Nd0.5 Sr0.5 MnO3 (for which
the resistivity at low temperature is ∼ 107 times lower).
The lone pair effect is, due to this charge localization, responsible of the high TCO in Bi0.5 Sr0.5 MnO3. Such localization, thus, evidences that the FM planes cannot be conducting or metallic in the present Orth2 A-type phase. In
addition, the lattice strain energy due to Jahn-Teller distortions and the Coulomb repulsion favor the ordered pattern
of eg electrons, instead of they being randomly placed. In
the last case, we would expect a higher magnetic disorder.
Therefore, we are led to conclude that the presence of CO
of the type pointed out theoretically in [7] (with q = 0) is
very probably the ground state of the present Orth2 A-type
phase.
The isothermal M(H ) curve and its derivative dµdM
of
0H
Bi0.5 Sr0.5 MnO3 (Fig. 4b) at T = 4.2 K indicates that a field
induced transition is only achieved at µ0 H ≈ 37 T. Moreover, a magnetic field µ0 H = 48 T is not enough to saturate
the magnetic moment of the Mn ions (3.5 µB /Mn). This evidences that the OO of the A-type phase, and the CO of the
To conclude, the reported CO/OO transitions occur some
≈ 450 K above the expected temperature in the current scenario (bandwidth tuning mechanism) for (Ln, Ca, Sr)MnO3
manganites. The possibility that Bi and Sr form some kind
of ordering was examined and has to be ruled out in these
oxides. According to the discussion given in [3] the 6s2 lone
pair character is probably strongly screened in (Bi, Ca)MnO3
compounds but not in those doped with Sr. This pushes TCO
up to 525 K and makes that Orth2 A-type phase probably
presents CO.
Acknowledgements. Financial support by the CICyT (No. MAT97-0699),
MEC (No. PB97-1175), CIRIT (No. GRQ95-8029), and the EC (OXSEN
network); and the provision of beam time at ILL (neutrons) and ESRF
(synchrotron X-rays) facilities are acknowledged.
References
1. C.N.R. Rao, A. Arulraj, P.N. Santosh, A.K. Cheetham: Chem. Mater.
10, 2714 (1998)
2. C. Frontera, J.L. Garcı́a-Muñoz, A. Llobet, M.A.G. Aranda, C. Ritter,
M. Respaud, J. Vanacken: J. Phys.: Cond. Matter 13, 1071 (2001)
3. J.L. Garcı́a-Muñoz, C. Frontera, M.A.G. Aranda, A. Llobet, C. Ritter:
Phys. Rev. B 63, 064415 (2001)
4. C. Frontera, J.L. Garcı́a-Muñoz, M.A.G. Aranda, C. Ritter, A. Llobet,
M. Respaud, J. Vanacken: Phys. Rev. B 64, 054401 (2001)
5. P.M. Woodward, D.E. Cox, T. Vogt, C.N.R. Rao, A.K. Cheetham:
Chem. Mater. 11, 3528 (1999)
6. C. Frontera, J.L. Garcı́a-Muñoz, A. Llobet, C. Ritter, J.A. Alonso,
J. Rodrı́guez-Cavajal: Phys. Rev. B 62, 3002 (2000)
7. T. Mizokawa, A. Fujimori: Phys. Rev. B 56, R493 (1997)
8. M.T. Fernández-Dı́az, J.L. Martı́nez, J.M. Alonso, E. Herrero: Phys.
Rev. B 59, 1277 (1999)