Download NMR quantum computer

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Canonical quantization wikipedia , lookup

Quantum teleportation wikipedia , lookup

EPR paradox wikipedia , lookup

Molecular Hamiltonian wikipedia , lookup

Interpretations of quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

T-symmetry wikipedia , lookup

Two-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy wikipedia , lookup

Hidden variable theory wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Financial supports from Kinki Univ.,
MEXT and JSPS
Liquid State NMR
Quantum Computing
Mikio Nakahara,
Research Centre for Quantum
Computing, Kinki University, Japan
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran,
Jan. 2009
1
Plan of Talk








1. Introduction
2. NMR
3. NMR Hamiltonian
4. Gate Operations
5. Pseudopure State
6. Measurement
7. DiVincenzo Criteria
8. Summary
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran,
Jan. 2009
2
1. Introduction
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran,
Jan. 2009
3
Qubits in NMR Molecule
Trichloroethylene
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran,
Jan. 2009
4
Plan of Talk








1. Introduction
2. NMR
3. NMR Hamiltonian
4. Gate Operations
5. Pseudo-Pure State
6. Measurement
7. DiVincenzo Criteria
8. Summary
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran,
Jan. 2009
5
NMR (Nuclear Magnetic Resonance )
=MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging)
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran,
Jan. 2009
6
NMR
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran,
Jan. 2009
7
Schematic of NMR
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran,
Jan. 2009
8
Molecules used in NMR QC
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran,
Jan. 2009
9
Plan of Talk








1. Introduction
2. NMR
3. NMR Hamiltonian
4. Gate Operations
5. Pseudopure State
6. Measurement
7. DiVincenzo Criteria
8. Summary
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran,
Jan. 2009
10
3.1 Single-Qubit Hamiltonian
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran,
Jan. 2009
11
Hamiltonian in Rotating Frame
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran,
Jan. 2009
12
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran,
Jan. 2009
13
2-Qubit Hamiltonian
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran,
Jan. 2009
14
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran,
Jan. 2009
15
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran,
Jan. 2009
16
Plan of Talk








1. Introduction
2. NMR
3. NMR Hamiltonian
4. Gate Operations
5. Pseudopure State
6. Measurement
7. DiVincenzo Criteria
8. Summary
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran,
Jan. 2009
17
1-Qubit Gates
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran,
Jan. 2009
18
Example: Hadamard gate
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran,
Jan. 2009
19
Example: Hadamard gate 2
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran,
Jan. 2009
20
Selective addressing
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran,
Jan. 2009
21
In resonance:
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran,
Jan. 2009
.
22
0.1
1.000
0.995
0.990
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran,
Jan. 2009
23
0.05
1.000
0.999
0.998
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.05
0.05
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran,
Jan. 2009
24
2-Qubit Gates: CNOT
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran,
Jan. 2009
25
Plan of Talk








1. Introduction
2. NMR
3. NMR Hamiltonian
4. Gate Operations
5. Pseudopure State
6. Measurement
7. DiVincenzo Criteria
8. Summary
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran,
Jan. 2009
26
Spins are in mixed state!
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran,
Jan. 2009
27
Preparation of a pseudopure state in
terms of temporal average method
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran,
Jan. 2009
28
Temporal average method
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran,
Jan. 2009
29
Averaging three contributions
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran,
Jan. 2009
30
Plan of Talk








1. Introduction
2. NMR
3. NMR Hamiltonian
4. Gate Operations
5. Pseudopure State
6. Measurement
7. DiVincenzo Criteria
8. Summary
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran,
Jan. 2009
31
6.1 Free Induction Decay (FID)
|00〉
|01〉
|10〉
|11〉
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran,
Jan. 2009
32
Free Induction Decay (FID)
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran,
Jan. 2009
33
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran,
Jan. 2009
34
6.2 Quantum State Tomography
We want to “measure” the density matrix.
 Measure observable such as
magnetizations to find linear combinations
of the matrix elements of the density
matrix.
 Not enough equations are obtained.
 Deform the density matrix with pulses to
obtain enough number of equations.

Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran,
Jan. 2009
35
2-Qubit QST
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran,
Jan. 2009
36
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran,
Jan. 2009
37
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran,
Jan. 2009
38
Plan of Talk








1. Introduction
2. NMR
3. NMR Hamiltonian
4. Gate Operations
5. Pseudopure State
6. Measurement
7. DiVincenzo Criteria
8. Summary
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran,
Jan. 2009
39
DiVincenzo Criteria for NMR QC
A scalable physical system with well
characterized qubits.
 The ability to initialize the state of the qubits
to a simple fiducial state, such as |00…0>.
 Long decoherence times, much longer than
the gate operation time.
 A “universal” set of quantum gates.
 A qubit-specific measurement capability.

Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran,
Jan. 2009
40
Scalability
Selective addressing to each qubit
becomes harder and hader as the # of
qubits increases. Limited # of nuclear
spices and overlap of resonance freqs.
 Signal strength is suppressed as the # of
qubits increases. Readout problem.

Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran,
Jan. 2009
41
Initialization (pseudopure state)
# of steps required to prepare a
pseudopure state increases exponentially
as the # of qubits increases.
 No real entanglement

Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran,
Jan. 2009
42
Long decoherence time
Decoherence time
 Single-qubit gate operation time
 Two-qubit gate op. time
 May execute Shor’s algorithm for 21=3X7.

Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran,
Jan. 2009
43
A “universal” set of quantum gates.
One-qubit gates by Rabi oscillation.
 Two-qubit gates by J-coupling.
 Cannot turn off interactions; reforcusing
technique becomes complicated as the #
of qubits increases.

Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran,
Jan. 2009
44
Measurement capability.
FID is a well-established techunique.
 Quantum State Tomograpy and Quantum
Process Tomography are OK.
 S/N scales as
, which limits
the # of qubits to ~ 10.

Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran,
Jan. 2009
45
Still…





NMR QC is commercially available.
It can execute small scale quantum algorithms.
It serves as a test bed for a real QC to come.
May ideas in other realizations are inspired from
NMR.
We use NMR QC to demonstrate theoretical ideas,
such as decoherence suppression, optimal control
of a Hamiltonian etc.
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran,
Jan. 2009
46
Plan of Talk








1. Introduction
2. NMR
3. NMR Hamiltonian
4. Gate Operations
5. Pseudopure State
6. Measurement
7. DiVincenzo Criteria
8. Summary
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran,
Jan. 2009
47





Liquid state NMR QC is based on a wellestablished technology. Most of the materials
introduced here have been already known in the
NMR community for decades.
There are still many papers on NMR QC.
It is required to find a breakthrogh for a liquid
state NMR to be a candidate of a working QC.
ENDOR, Solid state NMR…
Thank you for your attention.
Physical Realizations of QC @ Tehran,
Jan. 2009
48