Download Analytical methods to identify genes for complex traits in Genome

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Genome evolution wikipedia , lookup

Genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup

Epigenetics of human development wikipedia , lookup

Twin study wikipedia , lookup

Deoxyribozyme wikipedia , lookup

Biology and consumer behaviour wikipedia , lookup

Molecular Inversion Probe wikipedia , lookup

Vectors in gene therapy wikipedia , lookup

Therapeutic gene modulation wikipedia , lookup

Genome (book) wikipedia , lookup

Cell-free fetal DNA wikipedia , lookup

Gene wikipedia , lookup

Site-specific recombinase technology wikipedia , lookup

Non-coding DNA wikipedia , lookup

Human genetic variation wikipedia , lookup

Behavioural genetics wikipedia , lookup

Heritability of IQ wikipedia , lookup

Nutriepigenomics wikipedia , lookup

Bisulfite sequencing wikipedia , lookup

Genealogical DNA test wikipedia , lookup

Helitron (biology) wikipedia , lookup

Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup

Genomics wikipedia , lookup

History of genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup

Pathogenomics wikipedia , lookup

Gene expression profiling wikipedia , lookup

Microevolution wikipedia , lookup

SNP genotyping wikipedia , lookup

Quantitative trait locus wikipedia , lookup

Public health genomics wikipedia , lookup

RNA-Seq wikipedia , lookup

Designer baby wikipedia , lookup

Metagenomics wikipedia , lookup

Tag SNP wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Analytical methods to identify genes for complex
traits in Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS)
Fabio Macciardi
Dept of Science and Biomedical Technologies, University of Milano.
[email protected]
Abstract
Current methods for GWA studies look for the association of simple DNA variants
(eg, SNPs) with a complex trait of interest reducing the complexity of the approach to
“n” simple univariate tests, with “n” equal to the total number of DNA variants under
scrutiny. In this case, analyzing the genetic bases of, say, schizophrenia in a casecontrol study with a 1M SNPs array, resolve into calculating 1M chi-square tests, with
or without a proper correction for multiple testing.
While this approach makes a GWA analysis easy to perform, we lose the “big picture”
that can be captured with analyses that are closer to the underlying biological reality.
In fact, a thorough analysis must include a detailed evaluation of the genomic context
for the SNPs found significantly associated (the LD structure and the SNP-to-gene
relationship), of the gene/block-based haplotypes and of the multivariate SNP-SNP (as
proxies for gene-gene) interactions, in addition to extended annotation for the
associated SNPs. Jointly with SNP association, analysis of Copy Number Variants
(CNVs) and Polymorphisms (CNPs) is warranted. A second step of the analysis should
try to (re)build the pathway(s) and/or the network of genes found associated, thus
moving toward the generation of functional hypotheses. The careful consideration of
the phenotypic complexity (e.g., the clinical heterogeneity) of the trait and the need to
replicate the findings in a different and independent sample, possibly via a joint
analysis, would reasonably give more grounds to any finding.
Such an integrated method not only needs advanced multivariate statistical techniques,
but also requires sound bioinformatics approaches from computational to graph
analyses.
181