Download SuperB Experimental hall

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
SuperB Accelerator Organization
•Nearest tasks
•WP matrix
•Organization
•Time schedule
4 August 2017
Nearest tasks
Project move from Conceptual Design Phase to technical
design phase
Fixing of the footprint to start infrastructure construction
Organization: strong local team/collaboration (WP matrix
structure)
MAC endorsement
4 August 2017
SuperB @ Tor Vergata
(S. Tomassini)
Beamlines
Injection complex
8/4/2017
From CD phase to TD phase
Thanks to everybody who explained in the talks a status
and “to do” list for the accelerator systems.
Most important accelerator issues to complete CDR:
Low energy option with relevant parameters
SR option acceptable for HEP program and SL users
New injection scheme for the Tor Vergata site
Minor issues (optics cosmetic, beam dynamics,
polarization, etc.)
8/4/2017
Work Package Approach
The WP matrix was proposed by Pantaleo Raimondi at the
Elba’11 meeting and it based on two arguments:
The project can not be built by a single institution. We need to
split it in more or less separate parts (deliverables, WPs). One
group is responsible for one or more WPs
In the end, a strong and efficient accelerator laboratory (Cabibbo
Lab accelerator division?) will be established to provide
operation and maintenance of the machine. Hence, this lab
should (a) specify parameters of WPs, (b) inspect WPs during the
project realization, (c) integrate activity of different WP groups
8/4/2017
Work Package Matrix
Area services/
groups of
Cabibbo Lab 
Work Packages/
Collaborators 
WP1
WP2
WP3
WP4
WP5
WP6
WP7
WP8
WP9
WP10
WP11
WP12
WP13
WP14
WP15
WP16
WP17
WP18
WP19
WP20
8/4/2017
Accel.
Physics
Magnets
Vacuum
Diagnostics
Feedbacks
RF
Power
supplies
Cooling
Pulsed
magnets
Civil
Engeneering
Local accelerator structure based on
LNF and other INFN labs and sections
International and Italian collaborators
Cryogenics
Controls
Work Package Matrix Staff
Local accelerator structure. Leading role of LNF/INFN
accelerator division!!! Today afternoon we’ll meet LNF acc
personel who expressed their willing to participate in SuperB.
More than 50% of the red line in the matrix (as it seems) can
be filled in nearest future.
On 14-15.12.2011 first interviewing of new candidates (~20
persons) was arranged
WP collaborators. Not so many: INFN, JAI+, LAL+, BINP, SLAC,
…
8/4/2017
Organization
Three pillars (three legs – stable!) structure:
INFN – staff + WPs
BINP – integration and coordination of the
project + WPs
(under some conditions – support of c-tau
factory from Cabibbo Lab)
SLAC – PEPII equipment
8/4/2017
SuperB
Accelerator Management and
Coordination
Structure more or less clear but personally is under discussion:
- Cabibbo Lab Director General
- Accelerator Director
- Director Board: Technical Manager, Division Leaders
(collider, injector, SR, MDI, engineering, ???), +LNF Acc
Div Director
- Group Leaders (red line)
Very preliminary!
8/4/2017
Time schedule for 2012
Depends on a readiness of Cabibbo Lab!!!
- Proto-management (acc) meeting and discussion first meeting around
middle of January, Frascati
Till that moment a report on the accelerator status (physics, techniques, organization,
plans, etc.) based on this meeting results should be prepared (Levichev/Biagini)
- Fixing of the last accelerator problems (injection, polarization, etc.), which is
needed to freeze the footprint (January – March)
Results will be discussed at the March collaboration meeting in Frascati
- First discussion and specification for civil engineering – April/May
-Accelerator groups (at least, leaders) shaping completion till March (LNF
leading role!!!)
- First MoU for TDR (damping rind, arc magnets and vacuum chambers,
positron/electron sources, etc.) may start in or even earlier March
- MAC meeting and report - Autumn
8/4/2017
Conclusions
- Accelerator is basically in a good shape (main problems:
low energy, polarization, SR option, injection at Tor
Vergata)
-Formation of accelerator structure has started
-Negotiation with possible WP groups is under way
-Management structure is under discussion
8/4/2017