Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
AB 1763 Page 1 CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS AB 1763 (Gipson) As Amended June 27, 2016 Majority vote ASSEMBLY: 67-5 (June 2, 2016) SENATE: 24-12 (August 18, 2016) Original Committee Reference: HEALTH SUMMARY: Requires health care service plan (health plan) and health insurance coverage without cost sharing for specified colorectal cancer screening examinations and laboratory tests for individuals at average risk, and requires coverage for additional colorectal cancer screening examinations without cost-sharing for individuals at high risk, as specified. Prohibits the imposition of cost sharing on colonoscopies, including the removal of polyps, for an enrollee who is between 50 and 75 years of age and has received a positive test, as specified. The Senate amendments add language specifying that this bill does not require a health plan or insurer with a network of providers to provide benefits for out-of-network services nor does it preclude a health plan or insurer with a network of providers from imposing cost-sharing requirements for out-of-network provider services. FISCAL EFFECT: According to the Senate Appropriations Committee: 1) No fiscal impact on the Medi-Cal program is anticipated, as program beneficiaries are not subject to cost sharing. 2) Increased costs of $1.3 million per year to CalPERS, due to increased utilization of screening tests (various funds). According to an analysis of a prior version of this bill by the California Health Benefits Review Program (CHBRP), prohibiting cost sharing for specified screening will modestly increase utilization of screening examinations. Overall, CHBRP projects that about 2,500 additional individuals per year will receive colorectal screening exams due to the elimination of cost sharing. The proportional impact of that increased utilization on the CalPERS system is $1.3 million. According to CHBRP, subsequent amendments to this bill since that analysis was prepared will not substantially change the projected costs. 3) No state cost to subsidize health care coverage through Covered California is anticipated. Under federal law, any new mandated health benefit that exceeds the benefits in the states essential health benefits benchmark plan would be a state responsibility. In other words, to the extent that the state imposes a new benefit mandate that exceeds the essential health benefits benchmark, the state would be responsible for paying for the cost to subsidize that benefit for those individuals who receive subsidized coverage through Covered California. Because this bill does not mandate a new benefit, but only change the terms of an existing benefit, this bill is not expected to result in the state being responsible for subsidizing coverage. 4) One-time costs of about $90,000 over the first two years and ongoing costs of $25,000 per year for reviews of insurance plan compliance by the Department of Insurance (CDI Insurance Fund). AB 1763 Page 2 5) Ongoing costs of less than $50,000 per year for review of health plan compliance by the Department of Managed Health Care (DMHC Managed Care Fund). COMMENTS: According to the author, stool blood tests are an important colorectal cancer screening option. Availability is better than for colonoscopy, the cost is lower, and they offer the opportunity to increase the overall screening rate which would reduce incidence and mortality. Some individuals, including those from low income communities and communities of color may not have initial access to screening colonoscopy. Some prefer a stool blood test because the procedure is simpler, there is lower risk of complications and it is less invasive. Screening with stool blood tests has been shown to decrease incidence and mortality in randomized controlled trials, and years of life saved are essentially the same as with colonoscopy screening. However, the benefits of stool blood tests as a strategy to reach more Californians, especially in communities with lower access to colonoscopy services are not realized when there is a cost to patients. A co-pay or cost-sharing can be a barrier, preventing some individuals with positive stool blood tests from getting a follow up colonoscopy to complete the colorectal cancer screening process, defeating the purpose of screening. A policy that removes the cost to patients will make stool blood tests a more viable screening option and will reduce costs to payers. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) Preventive Services Mandate. The ACA requires coverage for and elimination of cost-sharing on certain recommended preventive health services, for policies renewing on or after September 23, 2010, based on guidelines from the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF). There are 15 covered preventive services for adults which include one-time screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm, screening and counseling for alcohol misuse, aspirin, blood pressure screening, cholesterol screening, depression screening, screening for Type 2 Diabetes, diet counseling, HIV screening, immunizations, obesity screening and counseling, prevention counseling for sexually transmitted infection, screening and cessation interventions for tobacco use, and colorectal cancer screening for adults over 50. Colorectal Cancer Screening. According to the National Cancer Institute, colorectal cancer is a disease in which malignant (cancer) cells form in the tissues of the colon or the rectum. Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of death from cancer in the United States. For the vast majority of adults, the most important risk factor for colorectal cancer is older age. Most cases of colorectal cancer occur among adults older than 50 years; the median age at diagnosis is 68 years. A positive family history (excluding known inherited familial syndromes) is thought to be linked to about 20% of cases of colorectal cancer. The final USPSTF recommendation for colorectal cancer screening recommends screening with one of several approved methodologies for colorectal cancer starting at age 50 years and continuing until age 75 years. The decision to screen for colorectal cancer in adults aged 76 to 85 years should be an individual one, taking into account the patients overall health and prior screening history. The screening modalities and intervals are fecal occult blood test (FOBT), which has received an A or B recommendation from the USPSTF and Fecal immunochemical test (FIT), which is recommended in the 2016 draft updated guidelines. Both tests are suggested annually to detect cancer. A flexible sigmoidoscopy is recommended every five years to detect polyps and cancer and has received an A or B recommendation from the USPSTF. A colonoscopy is recommended every 10 years to detect polyps and cancer and has received an A or B recommendation. It is also recommended that a colonoscopy should be performed if test results are positive. Analysis Prepared by: Kristene Mapile / HEALTH / (916) 319-2097 FN: 0004119