Download Generalized β Closed Sets In Intuitionistic Fuzzy Topological Spaces.

International Journal of Advance Foundation And Research In Science & Engineering (IJAFRSE)
Volume 1, Issue 7, December 2014. Impact Factor: 1.036, Science Central Value: 10.33
Generalized β Closed Sets In Intuitionistic Fuzzy
Topological Spaces.
D. Jayanthi
Department of Mathematics, Avinashilingam University, Coimbatore,Tamil Nadu, India
Email: [email protected]
ABSTRACT
In this paper we have introduced intuitionistic fuzzy generalized β closed sets, intuitionistic fuzzy
generalized β open sets and intuitionistic fuzzy generalized β T1/2 space. We investigated some of
their properties. Also we characterized the intuitionistic fuzzy generalized β closed sets.
Index Terms : Intuitionistic fuzzy topology, intuitionistic fuzzy generalized β closed sets,
intuitionistic fuzzy generalized β open sets, intuitionistic fuzzy points, intuitionistic fuzzy
generalized β T1/2 space and intuitionistic fuzzy generalized β T*1/2 space.
I.
INTRODUCTION
Fuzzy set is introduced by Zadeh [7]. After that Atanassov [1] introduced the notion of intuitionistic fuzzy
sets and Coker [3] introduced the notion of intuitionistic fuzzy topological spaces. β open sets are
introduced by Coker [3]. Intuitionistic fuzzy generalized semipre closed sets, intuitionistic fuzzy
generalized semipre open sets are introduced and investigated by Jayanthi [5]. In this paper we have
introduced intuitionistic fuzzy generalized β closed sets, intuitionistic fuzzy generalized β open sets and
the intuitionistic fuzzy generalized β T1/2 space. We investigated some of their properties.
II. PRELIMINARIES
Definition 2.1: [1] An intuitionistic fuzzy set (IFS in short) A in X is an object having the form
A = {〈x, μA (x), νA(x)〉/ x∈X}
where the functions μA : X →[0,1] and νA: X →[0,1] denote the degree of membership (namely μA(x)) and
the degree of non-membership (namely νA(x)) of each element x ∈X to the set A, respectively, and 0 ≤ μA
(x) + νA(x) ≤ 1 for each x ∈X. Denote by IFS (X), the set of all intuitionistic fuzzy sets in X.
Definition 2.2: [1] Let A and B be IFSs of the form A = {〈x, μA (x), νA(x)〉/ x∈X} and B = {〈x, μB (x), νB(x)〉/
x∈X}. Then
(a) A ⊆ B if and only if μA (x) ≤ μB (x) and νA(x) ≥ νB(x) for all x ∈X
(b) A = B if and only if A ⊆ B and B ⊆ A
(c) Ac = {〈x, νA(x), μA(x)〉/ x ∈X}
(d) A ∪ B = {〈x, μA (x) ∨ μB (x), νA(x) ∧νB(x)〉/ x ∈X}
(e) A ∩B = {〈x, μA (x) ∧ μB (x), νA(x) ∨ νB(x)〉/ x ∈X}
The intuitionistic fuzzy sets 0~ = {〈x, 0, 1〉/ x ∈X} and 1~ = {〈x, 1, 0〉/ x ∈X} are respectively the empty set
and the whole set of X.
For the sake of simplicity, we shall use the notation A = 〈x, μA, νA 〉 instead of A = {〈x, μA (x), νA(x)〉/ x ∈X}.
39 | © 2014, IJAFRSE All Rights Reserved
www.ijafrse.org
International Journal of Advance Foundation And Research In Science & Engineering (IJAFRSE)
Volume 1, Issue 7, December 2014. Impact Factor: 1.036, Science Central Value: 10.33
Definition 2.3: [3] An intuitionistic fuzzy topology (IFT for short) on X is a family τ of IFSs in X satisfying
the following axioms.
(i) 0~, 1~ ∈τ
(ii) G 1 ∪ G2 ∈τ for any G1, G2 ∈τ
(iii) ∪ Gi ∈τ for any family {Gi / i ∈J} ⊆ τ.
In this case the pair (X, τ) is called an intuitionistic fuzzy topological space (IFTS in short) and any IFS in τ
is known as an intuitionistic fuzzy open set (IFOS in short) in X. The complement Ac of an IFOS A in IFTS
(X, τ ) is called an intuitionistic fuzzy closed set (IFCS in short) in X.
Definition 2.4: [3] An IFS A = 〈x, μA, νA 〉 in an IFTS ( X, τ) is said to be
(i) intuitionistic fuzzy β closed set (IFβCS for short) if int(cl(int(A))) ⊆ A.
(ii)intuitionistic fuzzy β open set (IFβOS for short) if A ⊆ cl(int(cl(A))).
Definition 2.5: [7] An IFS A is an intuitionistic fuzzy generalized closed set (IFGCS for short) if cl(A) ⊆ U
whenever A ⊆ U and U is an IFOS. The complement of an IFGCS is called an intuitionistic fuzzy generalized
open set (IFGOS for short).
Definition 2.6: [7] Two IFSs A and B are said to be q-coincident (A q B in short) if and only if there exists
an element x ∈ X such that μA (x) > νB(x) or νA(x) < μB (x).
Definition 2.7: [7] Two IFSs A and B are said to be not q-coincident (A qc B in short) if and only if A ⊆ Bc.
Definition 2.8: [7] An IFTS (X, τ) is said to be an IFT1/2 space if every IFGCS in (X, τ) is an IFCS in (X, τ).
Definition 2.9: [6] An IFS A in (X, τ) is an IFQ-set if int(cl(A)) = cl(int(A)).
III. INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY GENERALIZED β CLOSED SETS
In this section we introduce intuitionistic fuzzy generalized β closed sets and intuitionistic fuzzy
generalized β open sets. We investigate some of their properties.
Definition 3.1: Let A be an IFS in an IFTS (X, τ). Then the β-interior and the β-closure of A are defined as
βint (A) = ∪ { G / G is an IFβOS in X and G ⊆ A }.
βcl (A) = ∩ { K / K is an IFβCS in X and A ⊆ K }.
Note that for any IFS A in (X, τ), we have βcl(Ac) = (βint(A))c and βint(Ac) = (βcl(A))c.
Definition 3.2: [4] An IFS A in an IFTS (X,τ) is said to be an intuitionistic fuzzy generalized β closed set
(IFGβCS for short) if βcl(A) ⊆ U whenever A ⊆ U and U is an IFOS in (X, τ). The complement Ac of an
IFGβCS A in an IFTS (X,τ) is called an intuitionistic fuzzy generalized β open set (IFGβOS for short) in X.
Example 3.3: Let X = {a, b} and G = 〈x, (0.5a, 0.4b), (0.5a, 0.6b)〉. Then τ = {0~, G, 1~} is an IFT on X and the
IFS A = 〈x, (0.4a, 0.2b), (0.6a, 0.7b)〉 is an IFGβCS in (X, τ).
In the following diagram, we have provided relations between various types of intuitionistic fuzzy
closedness.
40 | © 2014, IJAFRSE All Rights Reserved
www.ijafrse.org
International Journal of Advance Foundation And Research In Science & Engineering (IJAFRSE)
Volume 1, Issue 7, December 2014. Impact Factor: 1.036, Science Central Value: 10.33
IFCS
IFRCS
IFαCS
IFSCS
IFGCS
IFPCS
IFGβCS
IFSPCS
IFβCS
The reverse implications are not true in general in the above diagram. This can be easily seen from the
following examples. In this space IFβCS not implies IFSPCS [4].
Example 3.4: In Example 3.3 the IFS A = 〈x, (0.4a, 0.2b), (0.6a, 0.7b)〉 is an IFGβCS but not an IFCS, IFGCS,
IFRCS, IFαCS.
Example 3.5: Let X = {a, b} and let τ = {0~, G1, G2, G3, 1~} where G1 = 〈x, (0.6a, 0.7b), (0.2a, 0.3b)〉, G2 = 〈x,
(0.2a, 0.1b), (0.7a, 0.8b)〉 and G3 = 〈x, (0.5a, 0.6b), (0.5a, 0.4b)〉 then the IFS A = 〈x, (0.5a, 0.7b), (0.5a, 0.3b)〉 is
an IFGβCS in (X, τ) but not an IFSPCS, IFβCS in (X, τ).
Example 3.6: Let X = {a, b} and G = 〈x, (0.6a, 0.7b), (0.4a, 0.3b)〉. Then τ = {0~, G, 1~} is an IFT on X and the
IFS A = 〈x, (0.5a, 0.3b), (0.5a, 0.7b)〉 is an IFGβCS in (X, τ) but not an IFSCS in X.
Example 3.7: Let X = {a, b} and let τ = {0~, G1, G2, 1~} where G1 = 〈x, (0.5a, 0.6b), (0.5a, 0.4b)〉 and G2 = 〈x,
(0.4a, 0.1b), (0.6a, 0.7b)〉, then the IFS A = 〈x, (0.4a, 0.2b), (0.6a, 0.7b)〉 is an IFGβCS in (X, τ) but not an IFPCS
in (X, τ).
Remark 3.8: The union of any two IFGβCSs is not an IFGβCS in general as seen from the following
example.
Example 3.9: Let X = {a, b} and let τ = {0~, G1, G2, 1~} where G1 = 〈x, (0.7a, 0.8b), (0.3a, 0.2b)〉 and G2 = 〈x,
(0.6a, 0.7b), (0.4a, 0.3b)〉, then the IFSs A = 〈x, (0.6a, 0.4b), (0.4a, 0.3b)〉 and B = 〈x, (0.4a, 0.8b), (0.4a, 0.2b)〉 are
IFGβCSs in (X, τ) but A ∪ B is not an IFGβCS in (X, τ), since A ∪ B = 〈x, (0.6a, 0.8b), (0.4a, 0.2b)〉 ⊆ G1 but
βcl(A∪B) = 1~ ⊄ G1.
Remark 3.10: The intersection of two IFGβCSs is not an IFGβCS in general as seen in the following
example.
Example 3.11: Let X = {a, b} and let τ = {0~, G1, G2, G3, G4, 1~} where G1 = 〈x, (0.7a, 0.8b), (0.3a, 0.2b)〉, G2 =
〈x, (0.2a, 0.1b), (0.8a, 0.9b)〉, G3 = 〈x, (0.5a, 0.6b), (0.5a, 0.4b)〉 and G4 = 〈x, (0.6a, 0.7b), (0.4a, 0.3b)〉, then the
IFSs A = 〈x, (0.6a, 0.7b), (0.4a, 0.2b)〉 and B = 〈x, (0.7a, 0.6b), (0.3a, 0.4b)〉 are IFGβCSs in (X, τ) but A ∩ B is not
an IFGβCS in (X, τ). Since
A ∩ B = 〈x, (0.6a, 0.6b), (0.4a, 0.4b)〉 ⊆ G4 but βcl(A ∩ B) = G1 ⊄ G4.
Theorem 3.12: An IFS A of an IFTS (X, τ) is an IFGβCS if and only if A qc F ⇒ βcl(A) qc F for every IFCS F of
X.
Proof: Necessity: Let F be an IFCS and A
q
41 | © 2014, IJAFRSE All Rights Reserved
c
F, then by Definition 2.7, A ⊆ Fc, where Fc is an IFOS. Then
www.ijafrse.org
International Journal of Advance Foundation And Research In Science & Engineering (IJAFRSE)
Volume 1, Issue 7, December 2014. Impact Factor: 1.036, Science Central Value: 10.33
βcl(A) ⊆ Fc, by hypothesis. Hence again by Definition 2.7, βcl(A) qc F.
Sufficiency: Let U be an IFOS such that A ⊆ U. Then Uc is an IFCS and A ⊆ (Uc)c. By hypothesis, A qc Uc ⇒
βcl(A) qc Uc. Hence by Definition 2.7 , βcl(A) ⊆ (Uc)c = U. Therefore βcl(A) ⊆ U. Hence A is an IFGβCS.
Theorem 3.13: Let A be an IFGβCS in (X, τ) and c(α, β) [7] be an IFP in X such that c(α, β) q βcl(A), then
cl(c(α, β)) q A.
Proof: Let A be an IFGβCS and let c(α, β) q βcl(A). If cl(c(α, β)) qc A, then by Definition 2.7, A ⊆ [cl(c(α,
β))]c where [cl(c(α, β))]c is an IFOS. Then by hypothesis, βcl(A) ⊆ [cl(c(α, β))]c ⊆ (c(α, β))c. Therefore by
Definition 2.7, c(α, β) qc βcl(A), which is a contradiction to the hypothesis. Hence cl(c(α, β)) q A.
Theorem 3.14: For an IFS A, the following conditions are equivalent:
(i)
A is an IFOS and an IFGβCS
(ii)
A is an IFROS
Proof: (i) ⇒ (ii) Let A be an IFOS and an IFGβCS. Then βcl(A) ⊆ A. This implies that int(cl(int(A))) ⊆ A.
Since A is an IFOS, int(A) = A. Therefore int(cl(A)) ⊆ A. Since A is an IFOS, it is an IFPOS. Hence A ⊆
int(cl(A)). Therefore A = int(cl(A)). Hence A is an IFROS.
(ii) ⇒ (i) Let A be an IFROS. Therefore A = int(cl(A)). Since every IFROS in an IFOS, A is an IFOS and A ⊆
A. This implies int(cl(A)) ⊆ A. That is int(cl(int(A))) ⊆ A. Therefore A is an IFβCS. Hence A is an IFGβCS.
Theorem 3.15: For an IFOS A in (X, τ), the following conditions are equivalent.
(i)
A is an IFCS
(ii)
A is an IFGβCS and an IFQ-set
Proof: (i) ⇒ (ii) Since A is an IFCS, it is an IFGβCS. Now int(cl(A)) = int(A) = A = cl(A) = cl(int(A)), by
hypothesis. Hence A is an IFQ-set.
(ii) ⇒ (i) Since A is an IFOS and an IFGβCS, by Theorem 3.14 , A is an IFROS. Therefore A = int(cl(A)) =
cl(int(A)) = cl(A), by hypothesis. Hence A is an IFCS.
Theorem 3.16: An IFS A of an IFTS (X, τ) is an IFGβOS if and only if F ⊆ βint(A) whenever F is an IFCS
and F ⊆ A.
Proof: Necessity: Suppose A is an IFGβOS. Let F be an IFCS such that F ⊆ A. Then Fc is an IFOS and Ac ⊆
Fc. By hypothesis Ac is an IFGβCS, we have βcl(Ac) ⊆ Fc. Therefore F ⊆ βint(A).
Sufficiency: Let U be an IFOS such that Ac ⊆ U, then Uc ⊆ βint(A). Therefore βcl(Ac) ⊆ U and Ac is an
IFGβCS. Hence A is an IFGβOS.
IV. APPLICATIONS OF INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY GENERALIZED β CLOSED SETS
In this section we have provided some applications of intuitionistic fuzzy generalized β closed sets.
42 | © 2014, IJAFRSE All Rights Reserved
www.ijafrse.org
International Journal of Advance Foundation And Research In Science & Engineering (IJAFRSE)
Volume 1, Issue 7, December 2014. Impact Factor: 1.036, Science Central Value: 10.33
Definition 4.1: If every IFGβCS in (X, τ) is an IFβCS in (X, τ), then the space can be called as an
intuitionistic fuzzy β T1/2 space (IFβT1/2 for short).
Theorem 4.2: An IFTS (X, τ) is an IFβT1/2 space if and only if IFβO(X) = IFGβO(X).
Proof: Necessity: Let A be an IFGβOS in (X, τ), then Ac is an IFGβCS in (X, τ). By hypothesis, Ac is an IFβCS
in (X, τ) and therefore A is an IFβOS in (X, τ). Hence IFβO(X) = IFGβO(X).
Sufficiency: Let A be an IFGβCS in (X, τ). Then Ac is an IFGβOS in (X, τ). By hypothesis, Ac is an IFβOS in
(X, τ) and therefore A is an IFβCS in (X, τ). Hence (X, τ) is an IFβT1/2 space.
Remark 4.3: Not every IFβT1/2 space is an IFT1/2 space. This can be seen easily by the following example.
Example 4.4: Let X = {a, b} and let τ = {0~, G, 1~} where G = 〈x, (0.5a, 0.4b), (0.5a, 0.6b)〉, then X is an IFβT1/2
space but not an IFT1/2 space.
Theorem 4.5: For any IFS A in (X, τ) where X is an IFβT1/2 space, A ∈ IFGβO(X) if and only if for every
IFP c(α, β) ∈ A, there exists an IFGβOS in X such that c(α, β) ∈ B ⊆ A.
Proof: Necessity: If A ∈ IFGβO(X), then we can take B = A so that c(α, β) ∈ B ⊆ A for every IFP c(α, β) ∈ A.
Sufficiency: Let A be an IFS in (X, τ) and assume that there exists B ∈ IFGβO(X) such that c(α, β) ∈ B ⊆ A.
Since X is an IFβT1/2 space, B is an IFβOS. Then A = ∪c(α, β)∈ A{c(α, β)} ⊆ ∪c(α, β)∈ A B ⊆ A. Therefore A = ∪c(α,
β)∈ A B, which is an IFβOS. Hence A is an IFGβOS.
Theorem 4.6: Let (X, τ) be an IFTS and X is an IFβT1/2 space, then the following conditions are equivalent
(i) A ∈ IFGβO(X)
(ii) A ⊆ cl(int(cl(A)))
(iii) cl(A) ∈ IFRC(X).
Proof: (i) ⇒ (ii) Let A be an IFGβOS. Then since X is an IFβT1/2 space, A is an IFβOS. Therefore A ⊆
cl(int(cl(A))).
(ii) ⇒ (iii) If A ⊆ cl(int(cl(A))), then cl(A) = cl(int(cl(A))). This implies cl(A) ∈ IFRC(X).
(iii) ⇒ (i) Since cl(A) is an IFRCS, cl(A) = cl(int(cl(A))) and since A ⊆ cl(A), A ⊆ cl(int(cl(A))). Therefore A
is an IFβOS. Hence A ∈ IFGβO(X).
Theorem 4.7: Let (X, τ) be an IFTS and let X be an IFβT1/2 space, then the following conditions are
equivalent.
(i) A ∈ IFGβC(X)
(ii) int(cl(int(A))) ⊆ A
(iii) int(A) ∈ IFRO(X)
Proof: (i) ⇒ (ii) Let A be an IFGβCS. Then since X is an IFβT1/2 space, A is an IFβCS. Therefore
int(cl(int(A))) ⊆ A.
(ii) ⇒ (iii) If int(cl(int(A))) ⊆ A, then int(A) = int(cl(int(A))). This implies int(A) ∈ IFRO(X).
(iii) ⇒ (i) Since int(A) is an IFROS, int(A) = int(cl(int(A))) and since int(A) ⊆ A, int(cl(int(A))) ⊆ A.
Therefore A is an IFβCS. Hence A ∈ IFGβC(X).
Definition 4.8: An IFTS (X, τ) is said to be an intuitionistic fuzzy β T*1/2 space (IFβT*1/2 space for short) if
every IFGβCS is an IFCS in (X, τ).
43 | © 2014, IJAFRSE All Rights Reserved
www.ijafrse.org
International Journal of Advance Foundation And Research In Science & Engineering (IJAFRSE)
Volume 1, Issue 7, December 2014. Impact Factor: 1.036, Science Central Value: 10.33
Remark 4.9: Every IFβT*1/2 space is an IFβT1/2 space but not conversely.
Proof: Let (X, τ) be an IFβT*1/2 space. Let A be an IFGβCS in (X, τ). By hypothesis, A is an IFCS. Since every
IFCS is an IFβCS, A is an IFβCS in (X, τ). Hence (X, τ) is an IFβT1/2 space.
Example 4.10: Let X = {a, b}and τ = {0~, M, 1~} be an IFT on X, where M = 〈x, (0.5a,0.4b), (0.5a, 0.6b)〉.
Then
(X, τ) is an IFβT1/2 space, but not an IFβT*1/2 space, since the IFS M is an IFGβCS in (X, τ) but not
an IFCS in (X, τ), since cl(M) = Mc ≠ M.
V. REFERENCES
[1]
K. Atanassov, Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1986, 87-96.
[2]
C. Chang, Fuzzy topological spaces, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 1968, 182- 190.
[3]
D. Coker, An introduction to intuitionistic fuzzy topological space, Fuzzy sets and systems,
1997, 81-89.
[4]
D. Jayanthi, Relation between semipreclosed sets and beta closed sets in intuitionistic fuzzy
topological spaces, Notes on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets, 19, 2013, 53-56.
[5]
R. Santhi and D. Jayanthi, Intuitionistic fuzzy generalized semi-pre closed sets, Tripura math.
Soc., 12(2010), 10-20.
[6]
R. Santhi and D. Jayanthi, Generalized semi-pre connectedness in intuitionistic fuzzy
topological spaces, Annals of Fuzzy Mathematics and Informatics, 3, 2012, 243-253.
[7]
S. S. Thakur and Rekha Chaturvedi, Regular generalized closed sets in intuitionistic fuzzy
topological spaces, Universitatea Din Bacau,Studii Si Cercetari Stiintifice, Seria: Matematica,
2006, 257-272.
[8]
Young Bae Jun and Seok- Zun Song, Intuitionistic fuzzy semi-pre open sets and Intuitionistic
semi-pre continuous mappings, jour. of Appl. Math & computing, 2005, 467-474.
[9]
L. A. Zadeh, Fuzzy sets, Information and control, 1965, 338-353.
44 | © 2014, IJAFRSE All Rights Reserved
www.ijafrse.org