Download Towards a quantum gas of polar RbCs RbCs molecules

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Antimatter wikipedia , lookup

Max Born wikipedia , lookup

Hidden variable theory wikipedia , lookup

Electron configuration wikipedia , lookup

Franck–Condon principle wikipedia , lookup

Hydrogen atom wikipedia , lookup

Ferromagnetism wikipedia , lookup

Ultrafast laser spectroscopy wikipedia , lookup

T-symmetry wikipedia , lookup

Atomic theory wikipedia , lookup

Rotational–vibrational spectroscopy wikipedia , lookup

Rotational spectroscopy wikipedia , lookup

Magnetic circular dichroism wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Towards a quantum gas of polar RbCs molecules
D. J. McCarron, D. L. Jenkin and S. L. Cornish
Department of Physics, Durham University, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK
Quantum degenerate mixtures of two or more atomic species open up many exciting avenues of physics research. Such mixtures offer a route to the formation of ultracold ground
state heteronuclear molecules as has recently been demonstrated using magneto-association followed by stimulated Raman adiabatic passage (STIRAP)[1-3]. These molecules have a
large permanent electric dipole moment and may provide an alternative approach to quantum information processing[4]. We present an apparatus designed to study ultracold mixtures
of 133Cs and 87Rb with the long term goal of creating rovibrational ground state molecules. At present, however, interspecies collisions between 133Cs and 87Rb are not well understood
and there is insufficient experimental data[5-7] to constrain theoretical models. To date we have performed Feshbach spectroscopy from 165G to 370G in a baseball magnetic trap for
the F=3,mF=-3 and F=1, mF=-1 states of Cs and Rb, respectively and have observed no strong resonances. Here we report our current work to extend this search to magnetic fields in
excess of 1000G using the absolute internal ground states confined in an optical dipole trap and outline our plans for future experiments.
Why rubidium and caesium?
Complementary properties
Scattering Length (Bohr)
• 87Rb is easily condensed due to its
favourable collisional properties.
• 133Cs is more difficult to condense, but
has a rich Feshbach structure that is
highly suited to the production of cold
molecular samples of both dimers[8] and
Efimov trimers[9].
4000
PUSH
3 ,− 3
3000
3 ,+ 3
BEAM
2000
Rb
1000
0
1,−1
Rubidium
1,+1
push off
-1000
-2000
-200
-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
Magnetic Field (G)
Cs
OD
• Near identical magnetic moment to mass ratios offer several key advantages:
For
|1,±1〉 - Cs |3,±3〉:
m
m
Rb
Separation:
Cs
Δz =
⎞
⎟⎟ ≈ 1 . 02
⎠
Cs
g
ω12
−
≈ 0.02
gravity
9 1% difference in trap frequencies
9 Levitated with same gradient
9 Almost identical gravitational sag
9 Excellent spatial overlap
g
ω 22
g
ω
2
Pyramid
chamber
Locking with modulation transfer
and FM spectroscopy[10]
Quadrupole
UHV Science cell
Interspecies light assisted inelastic collisions can severely limit the loading in a twospecies MOT. We find the interspecies collision rates are an order of magnitude higher
than the single species rates in line with previous measurements[12-14].
16
10
3
8
Rb added
6
4
1
2
0
0
0
50 100 150
300 400 500 600 700
Cs atom number
4
15 5
10
15
NCs = 4(1) x 108
10
8
10
7
10
6
Large Volume
Dipole Trap
Load
Dimple Trap
Evaporation
in Dimple Trap
Stimulated Raman Adiabatic Passage (STIRAP)
The production of deeply bound molecules using the
STIRAP process has seen remarkable success[1-3].
Cs alone
Cs with Rb
Single-species
cold collisions
7
12
Rb atom number (x10 )
14
7
Cs atom number (x10 )
Cs alone
10
We are currently implementing a crossed beam optical trap
generated by a 30W 1.5μm SF Erbium fibre laser and loaded with a
pre-cooled gas from a quadrupole trap. Initial experiments in the
optical trap will focus on an interspecies Feshbach resonance
search in the 87Rb |1,+1〉 and Cs |3,+3〉 states up to bias fields of
1000G. Further cooling will be achieved using a dimple potential
created by a 2 W Nd:YAG laser.
Dimple
Trap
Collisions and loss in a two-species MOT[11]
6
15 5
Future work: Optical Trapping
Nd:YAG Dimple beam
Bias 2
Bias 3
10
An interspecies Feshbach search between
165G and 370G was performed. No clear
loss signatures were found, though the
sensitivity was limited by the relatively high
temperature of the gas.
Bias 1
MOT
15 5
T~15μK, 5G steps
~3G spread across cloud
30x60cm Base-plate
-50
10
55ls-1 Ion
Pump
Coil Setup
2
5
Cs alone: T ~ 3μK
40ls-1 Ion
Pump
5
3
2
1
0
The sensitivity of the apparatus was
tested using two well characterised Cs
Feshbach resonances.
The vacuum apparatus incorporates a two-species pyramid magneto-optical trap
(MOT) as a cold atom source for a UHV 6-beam ‘science’ MOT in a quartz cell.
Two-species pyramid MOT
produces cold atomic beam[9]
push on
Feshbach Resonances
Experimental setup
Maximum Bias Field ~ 1150G
push off
Using this method we can load Rb-Cs MOTs with: NRb = 9(1) x 108
Rb
⎛ μ Rb
⎜⎜
⎝ μ Cs
Caesium
push on
200
Technical advantages
87Rb
16mm
Displaced two-species MOT[11]
5000
Magneto-association
Background gas
collisions
Stimulated Raman
Adiabatic Passage
Two-species
cold collisions
0
10
20
~1550nm
30
40
50
60
a3Σ+
Feshbach
Molecule
Free
Atoms
Time (s)
Time (s)
Model and Results:
~980nm
βRbRb
2.1(1) x 10-11 cm3s-1
βCsCs
1.5(2) x 10-11 cm3s-1
βRbCs
16(4) x 10-11 cm3s-1
βCsRb
10(6) x 10-11 cm3s-116mm
X1Σ+
Deeply Bound Molecule
We plan to utilise this approach to produce ultracold
polar molecules in the rovibrational ground state
from weakly bound RbCs Feshbach molecules. It is
predicted that for RbCs this will be possible via a
single two-photon transfer step[15].
References
[1] J. G. Danzl et. al., Science, 321, 5892, (2008).
[2] K.-K. Ni et. al., Science, 322, 5899, (2008).
[3] F. Lang et. al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 133005 (2008).
[4] D. DeMille, Phys. Rev. Lett., 88, 067901 (2002).
[5] M. Anderlini et. al., Phys. Rev. A. 71, 061401(R) (2005).
[6] K. Pilch et. al., arXiv:0812.3287 (2008).
[7] M. Haas et. al., New J. Phys., 9, 147, (2007).
[8] J. Herbig, T. Kraemer, M. Mark , T. Weber, C. Chin, H. C. Nägerl and R. Grimm, Science 301, 1510 (2003).
[9] T. Kraemer et al., Nature 440, 315 (2006).
[10] D. J. McCarron, S. A. King and S. L. Cornish, Meas. Sci. Technol 19, 105601 (2008).
Acknowledgements
[11] M. L. Harris, P. Tierney and S. L. Cornish, J. Phys. B 41, 035303 (2008).
[12] N. Lunblad et al., J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 21, 3 (2004).
[13] J. Weiner, Cold and ultracold collisions in quantum microscopic and mesoscopic systems, Cambridge UP (2003)
[14] G. D. Telles et al., Phys. Rev. A 63 033406 (2001).
[15] W. C. Stwalley. Eur. Phys. J. D 31, 221, (2004).
This work is funded by EPSRC grants GR/S78339/01, EP/E041604/1
SLC – Royal Society URF