Download movement research note

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Private equity wikipedia , lookup

Early history of private equity wikipedia , lookup

Arbitrage wikipedia , lookup

Rate of return wikipedia , lookup

Socially responsible investing wikipedia , lookup

Short (finance) wikipedia , lookup

Securities fraud wikipedia , lookup

Stock trader wikipedia , lookup

Yield curve wikipedia , lookup

Fixed-income attribution wikipedia , lookup

Investment management wikipedia , lookup

United States Treasury security wikipedia , lookup

Market sentiment wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
MOV E M EN T
R E SE A RC H
N OT E
WHAT KEEPS ME UP AT NIGHT?
In short, a rise in the correlation between stocks and bonds right when they both have historically high valuations.
Would it surprise you to learn that stocks and bonds do not always move in opposite directions? Anti-correlation between the
two is a recent phenomenon. There have been periods in the past where both stocks and bonds rise and fall together. This
type of environment wreaks havoc on people
who construct static stock/bond portfolios.
They think they’ve achieved diversification. In
reality, they have a portfolio that’s acting like
one big position.
Rolling 3yr Correlation Between Stock & Bond Returns
100%
50%
0%
The graph to the right plots the three-year
rolling correlation between the annual returns
of stocks (S&P 500) and bonds (long-term
Treasuries). When the line is above 0%, that
-50%
-100%
1990
1995
2000
2005
2010
2015
means stocks and bonds were either going up or going down together. This was the case from 1990-2000. When the line is
below 0%, that means they were moving in opposite directions. This has been the case since 2000.
Correlation between stocks and bonds isn’t necessarily a bad thing if both asset classes are cheaply valued and have a high
probability of offering attractive future returns. This was the case in the early 1990s.
As a quick refresher, my preferred method for estimating future returns from stocks is based off of the average amount
investors have allocated to equities in their portfolios. On average, if people have a ton of money in stocks (late 1990s),
future returns will be low
The
The Predictive
Predictive Power
Power of
of Average
Average Investor
Investor Equity
Stock Allocations
Allocations
because there will be little
future buying pressure.
Who’s left to buy stocks
when everybody owns
them? On the flip side,
if people on average are
-6%
53%
1%
43%
8%
33%
15%
drastically under-exposed 23%
to stocks (early 1990s),
that’s historically been a
good sign future returns
will be high. In the early
13%
1975
22%
1985
1985
1995
1995
Current
Current Avg
Avg Investor
Investor Equity
Stock Allocation
Allocation(left
(leftaxis)
axis)
2005
2005
20152015
Subsequent
Subsequent 10-Year
10-Year CAGR
CAGR (right
(right axis)
axis)
1990s, this model correctly predicted a ~18% CAGR for the S&P 500 from 1990 to 2000. Now? Around 2-3% CAGR from
2016 to 2026.
MOV E M EN T
R E SE A RC H
N OT E
FUTURE RETURNS AND MOVEMENT ALLOCATIONS
Estimating future bond returns is pretty simple. Just take the starting yield. The chart below plots the starting yield of the
5-year Treasury vs. the subsequent 10-year compound annual growth rate of holding a constant maturity portfolio of 5-year
Treasuries. The correlation between the
two measures is 84%. So you can say
the starting yield of bonds is a good
Starting Yields vs. Future Returns
9.0%
predictor of long-term returns. What is
the current 5-year yield? 1.3%. What
6.0%
about the 10 year? 1.7%.
So we’re looking at 2-3% from stocks
and ~1.5% from bonds per year over the
next ten years. Paired together with the
fact that the correlation between stocks
and bonds has been rising, what do you
3.0%
0.0%
1992
1996
2000
Starting 5-Year Treasury Yield
2004
2008
2012
Subsequent 10-Year CAGR
get? A non-diversified portfolio that has a high probability of achieving low long-term returns.
SOURCES AND DISCLOSURES
Average investor equity allocation data is sourced from the St. Louis Federal Reserve’s FRED database. Subsequent 10-year
CAGR data is calculated based on the returns of the Wilshire 5000. Subsequent returns were simulated and hypothetical and
were not realized in a client account. Starting bond yield data is for the 5-year U.S. Treasury and is also sourced from FRED.
Subsequent 10-year CAGR bond data is calculated by taking the 10-year compounded growth rate of VFITX, a mutual fund
that hold 5-year U.S. Treasuries.
MVMT Capital LLC (“Movement”) is a registered investment adviser located in Jackson, MS and is registered in the state of
Mississippi. Movement may only transact business in those states in which it is registered, or qualifies for an exemption or
exclusion from registration requirements. Movement’s website and research notes are limited to the dissemination of general
information pertaining to its advisory services. The publication of Movement’s research notes should not be construed by
any consumer and/or prospective client as Movement’s solicitation to effect transactions in securities or as personalized
investment advice. Movement does not make any representations or warranties as to the accuracy, timeliness, suitability,
completeness, or relevance of any information prepared by any unaffiliated third party incorporated herein, and takes no
responsibility. Movement's past performance and advice regarding client accounts cannot guarantee future results. As with all
market investments, client investments can appreciate or depreciate. Investments involve risk and are not guaranteed.