Download Practical Challenges in Delivering the Areal Density Performance

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Magnetometer wikipedia , lookup

Earth's magnetic field wikipedia , lookup

Neutron magnetic moment wikipedia , lookup

Magnetic monopole wikipedia , lookup

Magnet wikipedia , lookup

Magnetic stripe card wikipedia , lookup

Magnetotactic bacteria wikipedia , lookup

Electromagnet wikipedia , lookup

Force between magnets wikipedia , lookup

Magnetism wikipedia , lookup

Giant magnetoresistance wikipedia , lookup

Ferrofluid wikipedia , lookup

Magnetohydrodynamics wikipedia , lookup

Magnetoreception wikipedia , lookup

Multiferroics wikipedia , lookup

History of geomagnetism wikipedia , lookup

Ferromagnetism wikipedia , lookup

Magnetochemistry wikipedia , lookup

Magnetotellurics wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Magnetic Recording Disk Technology: Practical
Challenges in Delivering the Areal Density Performance
Tom Yamashita
Komag Inc.
1710 Automation Parkway
San Jose, Ca. 95131
Magnetic recording media used in current hard
disk drives have recording densities of the order of ~ 60G
bits/in2 today. For a typical desktop PC drive using 95mm
diameter disks, this areal density translates to 80G-bytes
per platter of data capacity, and roughly 40 G-bytes per
platter for a 65mm diameter disk used in a mobile drive.
The industry as a whole has been increasing the areal
density at a blistering pace of 100% compound annual
rate of growth for many years, which provided fuel for
rapid increase in inexpensive storage capacity for so many
new applications of Winchester drive technology from
traditional data storage in PC’s and laptops, to HD video
recorders and MP-3 players. In the last year or two
however, the rate of growth has slowed significantly to
around 50-60 % by some estimates. Figure 1 illustrates
the current areal density trends. The reason for the
decrease in rate of growth is due to many factors, but key
amongst them is the difficulty in achieving the necessary
SNR performance in the drive. Improvements in the key
components such as heads and media, and the channel
electronics are not coming fast enough anymore to sustain
the high rate of growth. In this paper, the challenges faced
by the media manufacturer in delivering the desired
recording density will be outlined.
Areal Density & Capacity vs. Time
Areal Density (Gb/in2)
1000
1280
Long. AD Demo
135 Gb/in2
853 kbpi, 158 ktpi
960
640
HAMR
480
320
Perp. AD Demo
100 111Gb/in2
120
850 kbpi, 131 ktpi 80
240
Patterned
160
Perpendicular
60
40
30
15
10
SAF
20
100% CAGR
60% CAGR
40% CAGR
DTR @ MR160
DTR @ MR240
DTR @ MR320
10
Conventional
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
Year
Figure 1. Areal density growth curve and projection
Current magnetic recording method employs
longitudinal magnetic recording technology which has
been in use for the last 40 years. The film structure
consists typically of several Cr alloy underlayers, several
layers of CoPt-based magnetic alloys which are now often
separated by Ru layer in an AFC (antiferromagnetically
coupled) configuration, and carbon overcoat film for
protection. Aluminum plated with electroless NiP or
glass are the only substrate material used today. It is
worth mentioning that about 10 nm of magnetic film is
used to store information in current media. The vast
amount of valuable data in the world are now entrusted to
this thin layer of cobalt alloy film which is only about 50
atomic layers thick. Considerable amount of materials
science goes into making such thin film perform at the
desired recording density, and also have the reliability for
entrusting valuable data to it.
Perpendicular magnetic recording is gaining
strong momentum now as it is considered to be the next
enabling technology that will provide continued rate of
growth in areal density. Current perpendicular media
structure is illustrated in cross section TEM micrograph
shown in figure 2. However, there are still considerable
technical and practical challenges in migrating to
perpendicular recording which will be outlined in this
paper [1]. Another technology that can potentially play in
extending the areal density curve for both longitudinal
and perpendicular technology is DTR or discrete track
technology, which utilize embossing method to lay down
discrete tracks on the disk surface [2].
Magnetic Film
UnderlayerFilm
14.5 nm
17.5 nm
1.8 nm
Soft UnderlayerFilm
102 nm
2 nm
206 nm
102 nm
Figure 2. Cross section TEM micrograph of
perpendicular media
Besides the magnetic recording requirements, there
are reliability requirements placed on the media that are
just as important as the magnetic performance. Drive
customers and end-users demand utmost reliability to
insure that valuable data is not lost. The recording heads
fly today at around 10 nm above the media, which has all
but 2-3 nm of protective carbon film and 1 nm of
lubricant separating the head from the magnetic media.
Disk can rotate up to 15,000 rpm, and the temperature
inside the drive can reach 70-80 Co. These are extremely
demanding conditions, and variety of tactics are used to
assure end-user reliability of the drives. All of this
performance then has to be delivered at very low cost.
This paper hopes to outline the basic technical issues
involved in delivering the performance and the solution
path that the media manufacturer are taking.
1.
G. Bertero, D. Wachencshwanz, W. Jiang, S.
Malhotra, S. Velu, “Granular Perpendicular Magnetic
Recording Media”, IDEMA Perpendicular Recording
Symposium, Feb 26, 2004
2.
D.Wachenschwanz, “Performance and
manufacturability of discrete track recording (DTR)
media”, Journal of Applied Physics Letters,
submitted 2004