Download GUEST VIEWPOINT: Refugee from Oaxacan conflict granted asylum

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
GUEST VIEWPOINT: Refugee from Oaxacan conflict
granted asylum in Oregon
(http://www.registerguard.com/csp/cms/sites/web/opinion/18367446-46/story.csp)
By Lynn Stephen
Appeared in print: Wednesday, Aug 12, 2009
Opinion: Editorials & Letters: Story
On the third anniversary of his detention, torture and imprisonment under false
charges, biologist Ramiro Aragon Pérez can breathe freely. He’s the first person
from the Oaxaca, Mexico, conflict of 2006 who has received political asylum in
the United States, granted in the state of Oregon.
Aragon Pérez’s asylum case was built from careful documentation provided by
Mexican and international human rights organizations and delegations.
From June through November 2006, a pluralistic social movement interrupted the
usual functions of the Oaxaca state government. The movement was centered
on a democratic teacher’s union, Local 22 of the National Educational Workers
Union; and a coalition of more than 300 labor, indigenous, student, women’s,
human rights, peasant and left organizations known as the Popular Assembly of
the Peoples of Oaxaca.
The movement began to construct a parallel police force, constitution and state
assembly that was geared toward a more inclusive and participatory political
vision for the state.
They were met with strong repression. In the course of just six months, at least
23 individuals were killed, hundreds were arrested and imprisoned, and more
than 1,200 complaints were filed with human rights commissions.
Aragon Pérez is a biologist specializing in ornithology. At about 1 a.m. on Aug.
10, 2006, he was detained forcibly with his brother-in-law Elionai Santiago
Sánchez and Juan Gabriel Ríos, both teachers.
Aragon Pérez’s face was burned with a cigarette. He was continuously beaten
and kicked.His hair was pulled out, and he was threatened with death and rape.
Santiago Sánchez’s ear almost was severed from his head.
When Aragon Pérez was processed through the federal attorney general’s office
on Aug. 12, 2006, in the city of San Bartolo Coyotepec, he was told he was
charged with a federal crime — possession of a mosqueton, a musket from 1924
— which was for exclusive use of the Mexican armed forces. The charges were
federal charges for which bail was not permitted.
The two teachers were also charged with illegal possession of firearms, but those
charges were of a lesser nature, and that permitted them to released on bail.
Later, they were found guilty and sentenced to three years in jail. They avoided
prison by paying a large fine, but if they ever are arrested for anything again, the
three-year sentence will be added to whatever new sentence they might receive.
They perceive this order as a way of discouraging them for participating in any
political activities, such as marches. They continue vehemently to label the
original charges as fabrications.
For almost three months, Aragon Pérez remained in jail while his parents and
many others maintained a daily vigil. He was freed mysteriously on Oct. 30,
2006, after being presented to the public in a press conference in a government
building.
The criminal case against him was left in legal limbo; he was released while still
charged with a federal crime. He feared that he could be attacked or arrested at
any time if he returned to Oaxaca.
Aragon Pérez fled to the United States with his wife, Ruth Guzmán, and his two
small children, who are U.S. citizens. In January 2008, Aragon Pérez and his
wife filed for political asylum in Oregon.
On July 28, 2009, Guzmán and Aragon Pérez received notification from the U.S.
Department of Justice and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security that their
political asylum application had been accepted.
The case is significant in light of the ability of the Oaxacan state government and
the federal government of Mexico consistently to deny the seriousness of the
human rights abuses in Oaxaca during 2006-07.
On July 31, 2007, Amnesty International presented a report that documents
“grave violations of human rights” in Oaxaca between June 2006 and April 2007.
Oaxaca Gov. Ulises Ruiz Ortiz dismissed the report in a press conference.
Unlike Ruiz Ortiz, the U.S. Department of Justice and the U.S. Department of
Homeland Security apparently found credible this and other Amnesty reports.
Based in part on the documents, Aragon Pérez was granted political asylum.
This is no small feat. A recent report from the Mexican magazine Milenio, based
on data from the U.S. Department of Justice, states that of the 75,000 Mexicans
who have solicited political asylum in the United States during the past 10 years,
only 548 have had their cases accepted — a rate of less than 1 percent. Thus it
seems that if the case can hold up and receive a positive decision by the U.S.
authorities, it should receive similar treatment in the Mexican justice system.
Unfortunately, this does not appear to be the case. So far, there has been no
investigation of the people who abducted and tortured Aragon Pérez and his two
companions, and no compensation for the emotional and physical damage they
suffered or for the time spent in prison on false charges.
While he’s free in the United States, Aragon Pérez — like many others in Oaxaca
— still is waiting for justice in Mexico.
Lynn Stephen is distinguished professor of anthropology and ethnic studies and
director of the Center for Latino/a and Latin American Studies at the University of
Oregon. “Making Rights a Reality,” her digital ethnography Web site about the
Oaxaca social movement of 2006, can be found at www.mraroaxaca
.uoregon.edu.