Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
854 Biotechnol. Prog. 2000, 16, 854−858 Application of a Serum-Free Medium for the Growth of Vero Cells and the Production of Reovirus M. Butler,*,† A. Burgener,† M. Patrick,‡ M. Berry,†,§ D. Moffatt,† N. Huzel,† N. Barnabé,†,| and K. Coombs‡ Departments of Microbiology and Medical Microbiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2N2, Canada Two strains of reovirus (serotype 1 Lang/TIL and serotype 3 Dearing/T3D) were propagated in Vero cells grown in stationary or agitated cultures in a serum-free medium, M-VSFM. Solid microcarriers (Cytodex-1) were used to support cell growth in agitated cultures with a normal doubling time of 25 h. Cell yields of 1 × 106 cells/ mL were obtained from an inoculum of 2 × 105 cells/mL in 4 days in microcarrier cultures. The growth profile and cell yield was not significantly different from serumsupplemented cultures. The virus titer increased by 3-4 orders of magnitude over a culture period of 150 h. The maximum virus titer in stationary cultures reached >1 × 109 pfu/mL for both strains of reovirus in M-VSFM. M-VSFM also supported high viral yields in microcarrier cultures. Both the specific productivity and final viral yield was higher in M-VSFM than serum-supplemented cultures. The high viral productivity suggests that this is a suitable system for the production of reovirus as an oncolytic agent for human therapeutic use. Introduction The mammalian reoviruses are members of the orthoreovirus genus of the family Reoviridae. The Reoviridae include a number of important human and animal pathogens such as rotavirus (Kapikian and Chanock, 1996) and orbivirus (Roy, 1996). Rotavirus infection is estimated to be directly responsible for 5-25 million deaths each year, and despite intensive efforts (Fifth Rotavirus Vaccine Workshop, 1996), an effective vaccine for these agents remains elusive. Reovirus, the prototype of this family, remains an effective model for studying the characteristics of the double-stranded RNA viruses (Tyler and Fields, 1996). Recent work from the University of Calgary, which gained a significant amount of international publicity, was the discovery that reovirus could be used as a cancer cure through its property as an oncolytic agent (Coffey et al., 1998). In the experiments, they showed sufficient tumor regression in animal models to suggest the possibilities of the development of a new type of anticancer agent which has been termed oncolytic. This finding suggests the need to produce large quantities of reovirus for human therapeutic use. The virus is routinely grown in either monolayer or stirred cultures of mouse L929 fibroblasts (Nibert et al., 1996). However, it has also been reported that reovirus * Department of Microbiology, 118 Buller Bldg., University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 2N2. Telephone: 204-474-6543. Fax: 204-474-7603. E-mail: [email protected]. † Department of Microbiology. ‡ Department of Medical Microbiology. § Present address: Department of Pharmacy, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2N2. | Present address: Aventis Pasteur, 1755 Steeles Ave. West, Willowdale, Ontario MAR 3T4. 10.1021/bp000110+ CCC: $19.00 will grow in a number of other cell lines, including Vero and Chinese hamster ovary (Taber et al., 1976; Davis et al., 1990). Vero cells have been accepted for viral vaccine production under specified regulatory guidelines (WHO, 1987a,b) and are presently used in the commercial manufacture of human and animal rabies vaccine as well as human polio vaccine (El-Karamany, 1987; Shevitz et al., 1990; Beale, 1992). Vero cells have been shown to be good substrates for the propagation of bovine vesicular stomatitis virus (Nikolai and Hu, 1992), herpes simplex virus (HSV) (Griffiths et al., 1981; Griffiths and Thornton, 1982; Marique et al., 1993), and rabies virus (Mendonca et al., 1993). These processes involve the culture of Vero cells on solid microcarriers (Cytodex-1) in large bioreactors up to 1000 liters (Montagnon et al., 1981, 1984). The production of Vero cells in a culture system for reovirus propagation has been studied previously in our laboratory (Berry et al., 1999). Microcarrier cultures (Cytodex-1 or Cultispher-G) in a serum-based medium were shown to support successfully the propagation of two serotypes of reovirus (type-1 Lang (T1L) and type-3 Dearing (T3D)). However, serum-containing culture systems are becoming undesirable for the large-scale production of vaccines. There are a number of disadvantages of serum supplementation including batch-to-batch variation in composition, the high protein content which hinders product purification, and the potential for viral, mycoplasma, or prion contamination. Furthermore, the recent threat to human health caused by the undefined agents of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) is likely to limit the continued use of bovine serum in culture processes used for the synthesis of health-care products such as viral vaccines. © 2000 American Chemical Society and American Institute of Chemical Engineers Published on Web 09/21/2000 Biotechnol. Prog., 2000, Vol. 16, No. 5 We have recently developed a novel serum-free formulation (designated M-VSFM) for the growth of Vero and other anchorage-dependent mammalian cell lines. The media does not contain any animal products and has a very low protein content, <90 µg/L. In this report, we investigate the characteristics of this serum-free medium in supporting Vero cell growth and in the propagation of reovirus. Materials and Methods (1) Maintenance of Vero Cultures. Adaptation to M-VSFM. The cells were passaged directly into M-VSFM (modified Vero serum-free medium) from serum-containing media without any adaptation protocol. The maximal growth rate and cell yield were obtained after a few passages of this transfer. Cultures. Cells were maintained in T-flasks (75 cm2) at 37 °C with a 10% CO2 overlay. The cells were passaged every 5 days with a starting inoculum of 2.5 × 104 cells/ cm2 with 25 mL of pre-warmed medium. Microcarrier cultures were established in 100 mL spinner flasks (Bellco) with 2 g/L Cytodex-1 (Amersham-Pharmacia) and an inoculation of 2 × 105 cells/mL. Cell Passaging. The cells were first washed with 10 mL of PBS-EDTA (0.25%) and then treated with 1.0 mL of trypsin (0.25%). After approximately 10 min, the cells dislodged from surface attachment, at which point 1.5 mL of trypsin inhibitor (0.25% w/v) was added with 7.5 mL PBS. The cells are then centrifuged and resuspended in fresh media. (2) Growth Determination. Microcarrier Cultures. Samples (1 mL) were taken from an agitated culture and placed into 1.8 mL Eppendorf tubes. Microcarriers were allowed to settle, supernatants were discarded, and microcarriers with cells were washed with PBS-EDTA and then resuspended in 0.95 mL of 0.25% trypsin-EDTA to dislodge the cells. Each sample was mixed with an equal volume of Trypan Blue and counted with a hemocytometer. (3) Media Preparation. M-VSFM was prepared as a 10× liquid concentrate. Samples of this medium are available upon request (Department of Microbiology, University of Manitoba). Complete growth medium was prepared by the addition of 10 vol % of M-VSFM concentrate to DMEM. Serum-based growth medium was prepared by the addition of 10 vol % of fetal bovine serum (FBS) to DMEM. (4) Virus Infection. Multiwell Plate Cultures, Replicate plates were infected by removing 90% of the medium and adding the virus sample at a multiplicities of infection (MOI) of 0.5 and 5.0. The plates were gently rocked every 10 min for 1 h after infection. Fresh media was added to the flasks and incubated at 37 °C for 10 days. Microcarrier Cultures. The cultures were infected by removing 90% of the medium and adding the virus sample at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 5.0. The flasks were agitated intermittently at 40 rpm for 1 min every 10 min for 1 h. Fresh media was then added to the flasks and then placed at 37 °C for 10 days. Flasks were then set at a stir rate of 40 rpm. (5) Virus Sampling. Multiwell Plate Cultures. Sets of infected plates were removed from the 37 °C incubator each day and frozen at -70 °C for viral plaque assays. The samples were freeze-thawed three times to ensure complete lysis of the cells to release the virus. Microcarrier Cultures. Samples (1 mL) of an evenly distributed culture were taken daily and stored at -70 855 °C until required. The samples were then freeze-thawed three times to ensure complete lysis of the cells. (6) Viral Plaque Assay. The viral titers were determined by plaque formation on monolayers of mouse L929 cells. The thrice freeze-thawed samples were serially diluted in gel-saline and added to subconfluent layers of the cells in 6-well cluster plates. The plates were left for 1 h with occasional rocking to ensure viral infection. The cells were then overlaid with 2 mL per well of a 1:1 v/v mixture of 2% Bacto-agar and complete 2× media 199 (Gibco) and incubated at 37 °C. The wells were overlaid a second time with 2 mL per well of the complete agar/199 3 days later. A final layer of medium 199 that contained 1.0% agar and 0.04% neutral red was placed into the wells on day 6 postinfection. Plaques were counted 18-24 h after the last overlay. Results The Development of a Serum-Free Medium. Serum-free media formulations have not generally been available for anchorage-dependent cells largely because of the complex nutrient and micronutrient requirements of these cells. Specific proteins are required to ensure the effective attachment of the cells on to a surface prior to cell spreading and growth. Further difficulties may be encountered in serial passages in the low protein environment where the activity of trypsin may persist. The medium (M-VSFM) described in this report was developed by incremental improvements over several years. Two important criteria in developing the medium were the establishment of a minimal protein content and the use of nonanimal-derived components. The initial prototype medium contained a high protein content, but this was gradually reduced as the cells were adapted to a medium containing a minimal content of nonanimalderived proteins. The final medium formulation contains 90 µg/L of recombinant growth factors derived from transformed bacteria as well as a range of other nonproteinacious cofactors, all of which are nonanimal-derived. The media also contains a range of trace elements which are essential for the long-term growth and stability of the cells. An important protocol in allowing this transition of cells from a serum-based medium was the trypsinization method described earlier for routine cell passaging. This method minimizes the required quantity of trypsin to a level that can easily be neutralized by trypsin inhibitor in the absence of serum. The medium developed was shown to be suitable for the growth of a number of anchorage-dependent mammalian cell lines, including MDCK and BHK, as well as Vero. Growth rates and cell yields for these cell lines were comparable between the serum-free and serum-supplemented media. Growth Profile of Vero Cells in M-VSFM. The ability of M-VSFM to support Vero cell growth was shown in microcarrier (Cytodex-1) cultures (Figure 1). The cells were inoculated at a concentration of 2.0 × 105 cells/mL with 2.0 g/L Cytodex-1 microcarriers in 100 mL spinner flasks for both M-VSFM and 10% FBS (fetal bovine serum)-supplemented DMEM media. The cells reached a maximum density of 1.0 × 106 cells/mL within 4 days after inoculation in M-VSFM. Cell-surface attachment was maintained throughout the cultures, and there was no evidence of cell aggregation. Reovirus Production in Stationary Cultures. Reovirus strains type 1 Lang (T1L) and type 3 Dearing (T3D) were propagated in 6-well cluster dishes on monolayers of Vero cells grown in M-VSFM and 10% FBS-DMEM 856 Biotechnol. Prog., 2000, Vol. 16, No. 5 Figure 1. Growth of Vero cells in M-VSFM (2) and 10% FBSsupplemented DMEM (b) in microcarrier culture. The cells were grown in 100 mL spinner flasks incubated at 37 °C with a 10% CO2 overlay. Cytodex-1 microcarriers were added at a concentration of 2.0 g/L. The cells were added at a concentration of 2.0 × 105 cells/mL. media (Figure 2a,b). The Vero cells were grown to a density of 2.0 × 105 cells/cm2 prior to infection with the virus. The propagation of virus was monitored in cultures infected with virus at different MOI’s (multiplicities of infection of 0.5 and 5.0). The production of the T1L strain is shown in Figure 2a. In both media types, an MOI of 5.0 gave a high yield of virus. Yields in M-VSFM reached a maximal titer of 1 × 109 pfu/mL after 5 days, and cells in 10% FBS-DMEM reached a maximal titer of 2.2 × 108 pfu/mL after 4 days. At an MOI of 0.5, M-VSFM supported a maximum yield of 1.6 × 108 pfu/mL (8 days), whereas 10% FBS-DMEM supported a maximum yield of 1.1 × 107 pfu/mL (3 days). The propagation of the T3D strain is shown in Figure 2b. Similar to the T1L strain, an MOI of 5.0 gave a high yield of virus. M-VSFM gave a maximum titer of 1.9 × 109 pfu/mL after 3 days, whereas 10% FBS-DMEM gave a maximum titer of 1.2 × 109 pfu/mL. At an MOI of 0.5, M-VSFM supported a maximum yield of 1.5 × 109 pfu/ mL after 4 days. At the same MOI, cells in 10% FBSDMEM reached 0.9 × 109 pfu/mL in 2 days. Reovirus Production in Agitated Microcarrier Cultures. The propagation of reovirus (T1L and T3D) is shown in Figure 3a,b. Cells were grown in spinner flasks containing 2.0 g/L Cytodex-1 microcarriers. The flasks were inoculated with 2 × 105 cells/mL in both the M-VSFM and 10% FBS-DMEM cultures. The cells were infected with virus (Type 1 Lang and Type 3 Dearing) when the cells reached a density of 1.0 × 106 cells/mL (4 days). The cells were infected at an MOI of 5.0 with a stirring regime as outlined in the Materials and Methods section. The viral yield was monitored over a period of 9 days after infection. Production of the T1L strain is shown in Figure 3a. A maximum titer was reached within 2 days for cells grown in M-VSFM. The highest titer reached was 6.6 × 107 pfu/ mL, and then steadily decreased with time. The cells grown in 10% FBS-DMEM gave a maximum titer of 3.8 × 107 pfu/mL, a little more than one-half that of MVSFM. Figure 2. Reovirus production from Vero cells in M-VSFM and 10% FBS-DMEM in stationary culture. Reovirus strains (a) Type 1 Lang (T1L) virus or (b) Type 3 Dearing (T3D) virus were propagated in 6-well cluster dishes from monolayers of Vero cells grown in M-VSFM (1, 3) or 10% FBS-DMEM media (b, O). The cells were infected with an MOI of 0.5 (3, O) or 5.0 (2, b). A similar production pattern was observed for the T3D strain (Figure 3b). Here, M-VSFM supported significantly higher titers of the virus, which reached a maximum yield of 1.1 × 109 pfu/mL after 2 days. Cells grown in 10% FBS-DMEM reached a titer of 6.1 × 108 pfu/mL in the same time period. The final yield of the T3D strain (1.1 × 109 pfu/mL) was higher than the T1L strain (6.6 × 107 pfu/mL) from the cells grown in M-VSFM. This may have been due to the initial viability of the type 1 Lang sample used to infect the microcarrier cultures. This did not affect the growth profile, however, as the maximum titer for both strains was reached during the time when the cells were at their highest density of 1.0 × 106 cells/mL. Infectivity of Reovirus in M-VSFM and FBSDMEM Cultures. The initial viral uptake by the cells was determined in both stationary and microcarrier cultures containing either M-VSFM or serum-supplemented medium (Table 1). After viral infection of the cultures, samples of culture supernatant were withdrawn after 1 h, and the extracellular virus titer was measured. This revealed significant differences between the serumfree and serum-supplemented cultures. For stationary cultures containing M-VSFM and infected with the T1L strain, >97% of the extracellular Biotechnol. Prog., 2000, Vol. 16, No. 5 857 Table 1. Comparison of Virus Uptake in M-VSFM and FBS-DMEM during the Initial Infection Perioda M-VSFM virus titer (pfu/mL)c reovirus serotype culture type T1L stationary T3D microcarrier stationary microcarrier FBS-DMEM virus titer (pfu/mL) MOIb initial after 1 h initial after 1 h 0.5 5.0 5.0 0.5 5.0 5.0 3.8 × 105 3.8 × 106 5.0 × 106 3.8 × 105 3.8 × 106 5.0 × 106 1.1 × 104 9.8 × 104 2.3 × 106 7.3 × 103 7.5 × 104 2.5 × 106 3.8 × 105 3.8 × 106 5.0 × 106 3.8 × 105 3.8 × 106 5.0 × 106 5.0 × 104 6.3 × 105 4.3 × 106 1.2 × 105 1.2 × 106 4.0 × 106 aSamples of the culture supernatant were taken after 1 hour of infection to determine the extracellular virus titer. of infection. c PFU ) plaque forming units. b MOI ) multiplicity Table 2. Comparison of Specific Productivity of Reovirus (T1L and T3D) from Vero Cells Grown in Microcarrier Cultures with M-VSFM or FBS-DMEMa media T1L specific prod. pfu/cell day T3D specific prod. pfu/cell day M-VSFM FBS-DMEM 28.5 16.1 584 364 a The values were taken from the first 2 days postinfection, when viral productivity was at a maximum. that high of uptake rates and only reached an 85% decrease in the extracellular viral titer during this period. For the T3D strain, the extracellular viral titer decreased by 98% during this period in M-VSFM, whereas only 68% was taken up by the cells in FBS-DMEM. Similar results were seen in the microcarrier cultures. For the T1L strain, the extracellular titer decreased by >50% in M-VSFM during the postinfection period and only 14% in FBS-DMEM. For the T3D strain, the extracellular titer decreased by 50% during the first hour in M-VSFM, but only by 20% in FBS-DMEM. Comparison of Specific Virus Yields between M-VSFM and FBS-DMEM. Table 2 shows the specific productivity (pfu/cell per day) of either strain of reovirus, T1L and T3D, in both types of media. The values were determined at the peak of productivity during the first 2 days postinfection. The viral productivity was significantly higher in cultures containing M-VSFM. For the T1L strain, M-VSFM resulted in a 173% increase in viral productivity per cell compared to cells grown in FBSDMEM. Similarly, for the T3D strain, cells in M-VSFM were 175% more productive in generating the virus. Discussion Figure 3. Reovirus production in microcarrier cultures of Vero cells in M-VSFM and 10% FBS-DMEM. The cells were grown in 100 mL spinner flasks incubated at 37 °C with a 10% CO2 overlay. Cytodex-1 microcarriers were added at a concentration of 2.0 g/L. The flasks were inoculated with 2 × 105 cells/mL in both the M-VSFM and 10% FBS-DMEM cultures. The cells were infected (indicated by arrow) with either (a) Type 1 Lang virus or (b) Type 3 Dearing virus when the cells reached confluence (4 days). The points show cell growth for M-VSFM (4) or 10% FBS-DMEM (O) and viral titer for M-VSFM (2) or 10% FBSDMEM (b). virus decreased during the first hour in M-VSFM. However, cultures containing FBS-DMEM did not show The serum-free medium (M-VSFM) which we have developed supports the growth of the anchorage-dependent cell line Vero in stationary and agitated microcarrier cultures. M-VSFM is free of any animal-derived components and has a low content of nonanimal-derived protein (90 µg/L). Vero cells adapted directly to M-VSFM from serum-based media. The growth profile of cells in MVSFM can be maintained for >10 passages in T-flasks. The growth profile and cell yield was not significantly different from serum-supplemented cultures having a normal doubling time of 25 h. The formulation can be prepared as a complete liquid medium (1×) or as a concentrated (10×) serum-free supplement to be added to a standard growth medium. The growth characteristics of these cultures are superior to alternative commercial media tested or reported in the literature. We have shown that two types of reovirus can be propagated from our serum-free medium M-VSFM in both stationary and agitated culture. The final viral yield was higher in both types of culture systems over the yield obtained from cells grown in serum-supplemented medium. 858 Biotechnol. Prog., 2000, Vol. 16, No. 5 M-VSFM showed a clear difference in the specific productivity of the virus in agitated culture. For the two strains, a substantial increase in viral productivity was found over the serum-containing system. Cells in MVSFM produced the virus >170% over cells grown with serum. This suggests that the cells in M-VSFM may be in a metabolic state more favorable for viral infection than in the serum-supplemented medium. Indeed, serum contains many undefined components that could hinder the infectivity of the virus or possibly enhance the cytopathic effects mediated by the virus. This is consistent with our observations of a sharper decline in the cell viability in the serum-containing cultures. Infectivity of reovirus seems to be hindered by the presence of serum. The uptake of virus into the cells is higher in M-VSFM than in traditional serum media. The high protein content in serum may inhibit the infection of the virus, or by some other means. This further supports the advantage of serum-free formulations for these types of processes. The stability of reovirus was higher in M-VSFM than in FBS-DMEM. In the microcarrier cultures, for both the T3D and T1L strain, a sharper decline in the viral titer was observed in FBS-DMEM. This would suggest that serum contains viral inhibitors, such as proteases, that decreases the stability of the virus. This further supports a conclusion that M-VSFM is better suited for a largescale process. The overall yield of the two strains was significantly different in the microcarrier cultures. The maximum yield of the type 1 Lang was only 6.6 × 107 pfu/mL, whereas the type 3 Dearing strain reached titers of 1.1 × 109 pfu/mL. It is not known why there is a discrepancy in the overall production yields. High viral titers have been achieved in previous microcarrier cultures of Vero cells in our lab (Berry et al., 1999). In conclusion, M-VSFM is suitable for the production of reovirus from Vero cell culture. M-VSFM is found to be superior to serum-containing media in both cell growth and virus production. Infection of the Vero cells with two strains of reovirus (type 1 Lang and type 3 Dearing) resulted in a high viral titer in M-VSFM. M-VSFM supports the growth of these cells comparable to serumcontaining media, and it is suitable for production of high yields of reovirus. Productivity of the virus is superior in M-VSFM than serum-supplemented cultures. This system is suitable for the development of a bioprocess for the production of reovirus for human therapeutic use. Acknowledgment This work was supported by a grant from the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada. References and Notes Beale, A.J. The production of viruses for human vaccines from animal cells in culture. In Animal Cell Biotechnology; Spier, R. E., Griffiths, J. B., Eds.; Butterworth Publishers: Oxford, U.K., 1992; Vol. 5, p 189-200. Berry, J.; Barnabe, N.; Coombs, K.; Butler, M. Production of reovirus type-1 and type-3 from Vero cells grown on solid and macroporous microcarriers. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1999, 62, 1219. Coffey, M.; Strong, J.; Forsyth, P.; Lee, P. Reovirus therapy of tumors with activated ras pathway. Science 1998, 282, 18821334. Davis, B. D., Dulbecco, R., Eisen, H. N., Gmsberg, H. S., Eds. Microbiology; Lippincott: Philadelphia, 1990; Vol. 4. EI-Karamany, R.M. Production in Vero cells of an inactivated rabies vaccine from strain FRV/K for animal and human use. Acta Virol. 1987, 31, 321-328. Fifth Rotavirus Vaccine Workshop. J. Infect. Dis. 1996, 174 (Suppl. 1), Si-Si 24. Griffiths, J. B.; Thomton, B.; McEntee, I. D. The development and use of microcarrier and microsphere culture techniques for the production of herpes simplex viruses. Dev. Biol. Stand. 1981, 50, 103-108. Griffiths, J. B; Thornton, B. Use of microcarrier culture for the production of herpes simplex virus (type 2) in MRC-5 cells. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 1982, 32, 324-329. Kapikian, A. Z.; Chanock, R. M. Rotaviruses. In Fields Virology, 3rd ed.; Fields, R. N., Knipe, D. M., Howley, P. M., Chanock, R. M., Melnick J. L., Monath T. P., Roizman, B., Straus, S. E, Eds.; Lippincott-Raven: Philadelphia, 1996; Vol. 2, pp 1657-1708. Marique, T.; Malarme, D.; Stagier, P.; Werenne, J. On-line monitoring of growth and viral infection of Vero cells in collagen microspheres in a fluidised-bed reactor. In Animal Cell Technology: Products of Today, Prospects For Tomorrow; European Society for Animal Cell Technology. ButterworthHeinemann Ltd.: Oxford, 1994. Mendonca, R. Z.; Ioshimoto, L. M.; Mendonca, R. M. Z.; deFranco, M.; Valentini, E. J. G; Becak, W.; Raw, I.; Pareira, C. A. Preparation of human rabies vaccine in Vero cell culture using a microcarrier system. Braz. J. Mod. Biol. Res. 1993, 26, 1305-1317. Montagnon, B.; Vincent-Falquet, J. C.; Fanget, B. Thousand litre scale microcarrier culture of Vero cells for killed polio virus vaccine: Promising results. Dev. Biol. Stand. 1984, 55, 3738. Montagnon, B. J.; Fanget, B.; Nicolas, A. J. The large scale cultivation of Vero cells in microcarrier culture for virus vaccine production: Preliminary results for killed poliovirus vaccine. Dev. Biol. Stand. 1981, 47, 55-64. Nibert, M. L.; Schiff, L. A.; Fields, B. N. Reoviruses and their replication. In Fields Virology; Fields, B. N., Knipe, D. M., Howley, P. M., Chanock, R. M., Melnick, J. L., Monath, T. P., Roizman, B., Straus, S. E., Eds. Lippincott-Raven: Philadelphia, 1996; Vol. 2, pp 1557-1596. Nikolai, T. J.; Hu, W.-S. Cultivation of mammalian cells in macroporous microcarriers. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1992, 14, 203-208. Roy, P. Orbiviruses and their replication. In Fields Virology, 3rd ed.; Fields, R. N., Knipe, D. M., Howley, P. M., Chanock, R. M., Melnick J. L., Monath T. P., Roizman, B., Straus, S. E, Eds.; Lippincott-Raven: Philadelphia, 1996; Vol. 2, pp 1709-1734. Shevitz, J.; LaPorte, T. L.; Stinnett, T. E. Production of viral vaccines in stirred bioreactors. In Advances in Biotechnological Processes: Viral Vaccines; Mizrahi, A., ed.; Wiley-Liss Pub.: New York, 1990; Vol. 14, pp 1-35. Taber, R.; Alexander, V.; Wald, N., Jr. The selection of virusresistant Chinese hamster ovary cells. Cell 1976, 8, 529-533. Tyler, K. L.; Fields, B. N. Reoviruses. In Fields Virology, 3rd ed.; Fields, R. N., Knipe, D. M., Howley, P. M., Chanock, R. M., Melnick J. L., Monath T. P., Roizman, B., Straus, S. E, Eds.; Lippincott-Raven: Philadelphia, 1996; Vol. 2, pp 15971623. World Health Organization. Requirements for continuous cell lines used for biological substances. WHO Tech. Rep. Ser. 1987a, 745, 99-115. World Health Organization. Requirements for rabies vaccine (inactivated) for human use produced in continuous cell lines. WHO Tech. Rep. Ser. 1987b, 760, 167-189. Accepted for publication August 21, 2000. BP000110+