Download Dodo Bird Veridct vs. ranking in Higher Education: Who Stands for

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Dodo Bird Verdict vs. Ranking in
Higher Education:
Who Stands for Competitiveness?
Professor, Ph.D., Daniel DAVID
Babeş-Bolyai University
http://www.clinicalpsychology.ro
The Problem
• There are (too) many actors in education and
research
• Education/research resources are limited
• Strategies to access resources:
– Access resources by competition
• Dodo Bird Strategy vs. Rigorous Rankings
– Access resources by (more or less) “equal”
distribution
• Rarely today (in some former communist countries)
About Dodo Bird...
• In L. Carroll’s Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland
(1865), at a certain point of the story some
characters become wet - Problem
• In order to dry themselves, the Dodo Bird decided to
start a competition - Aim
• Everyone was to run around a lake until they were
dry. However, nobody cared to measure how far, in
what direction, and from where each person had run,
nor how long etc. - Rules
• When they asked the Dodo who had won, he thought
long and hard and then said wisely: "Everybody has
won and all must have prizes“ - Results
About Academic Rankings
• International vs. Local Rankings
– International
• QS Word University Ranking (Times)
• Academic Word University Ranking (Shanghai)
• Taiwanese Word Academic ranking
– Local
• US News and World Report Ranking
• RAE – UK
• Various criteria and indicators
– Global vs. Specific
– Research vs. Education/Research
About Academic Rankings
• Attitudes to Academic Rankings
– Mixed
• Positive
– Used to marketing the university
• Negative
– US (Stanford University vs. US News and World
Report), Canada, EU debates
• Neutral
– Behave as the ranking does not...
About Academic Rankings
• The first Romanian ranking of universities (David &
Ad-Astra, 2005)
– Based on Web of Science – Thomson/ISI and the number of
faculty
• Follow-up investigation
– Quantitative analysis (N=150 professionals; survey type)
• Negative attitude: 70%
• Neutral – 20%
• Positive – 10%
– Qualitative analyses – content analyses based on
newspapers, articles, papers
• Negative framing and gross distortions of the Web of Science
system!
Evolutionary Concepts
• A dominance hierarchy is the
organization of individuals in a group
that occurs when competition for
resources is strong (e.g., lack of
resources, many actors etc.
– such social structures lead to more stable
system, with reduced tension among
individuals.
• Natural tendency!
Evolutionary Concept
• Social ranking
– Stability
• Each member knows his/her position
• Each member is important for the
system (even the “omega” position)
• Based on that position each member will
access appropriate resources
Academic Ranking
• Instability
• Members do not know or do not publically
assume their real position in the system (if they
are not in the top)
• Most of the members are not important for the
system
• Access to the resources can be influenced by
other means (e.g., lobby, power) than
competitiveness
Implications
•
A Rigorous and Influential Academic Ranking must have the following profile in order to get accepted:
– Clear objectives + (almost all rankings)
• Ranking - a mean to reach an aim (e.g., better education/research) not an aim! - (few of the
rankings)
• Diagnostic/assessment (where/how we are – where/how we want to be)
• Developmental strategies
– Criteria and indicators
–
Clear rules (methodology) + (almost all rankings, but see the “peer/review” debate)
– Criteria and indicators
–
•
Clear role prescriptions for each position in the ranking
• Each position is publically available + (almost all rankings but see the “peer/review” debate)
• Each position is important for the system (minimum standards) – (almost none of the
rankings)
• Each position allow access to some resources - (almost none of the rankings)
Romanian case:
– New law which ask for ranking in the national system!
– Research and education strategy (where/how we are – where/how we want to be)
– Each position is important for the system (minimum standards)
• ARACIS / minimum standards to enter into national system
– Each position allow access to some resources • Advanced research universities vs. Research and education universities vs. Education
universities
• Global vs. Specific (domain) rankings
DODO VERDICT Versus RIGOROUS RANKINGS