* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Journal of Strategic and Development Studies, Vol. I, Number I, April
Survey
Document related concepts
Gender inequality wikipedia , lookup
Judith Lorber wikipedia , lookup
Second-wave feminism wikipedia , lookup
Feminism (international relations) wikipedia , lookup
Gender and development wikipedia , lookup
Media and gender wikipedia , lookup
Muted group theory wikipedia , lookup
Exploitation of women in mass media wikipedia , lookup
First-wave feminism wikipedia , lookup
Women in ancient Egypt wikipedia , lookup
Raunch aesthetics wikipedia , lookup
Feminist movement wikipedia , lookup
Sociology of gender wikipedia , lookup
New feminism wikipedia , lookup
Protofeminism wikipedia , lookup
Feminism in the United States wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
Journal of Strategic and Development Studies, Vol. I, Number I, April, 2016 ISSN 2536-6742 THE PLACE AND ROLE OF WOMEN IN CONTEMPORARY NIGERIAN SOCIETY: WHAT HAS CHANGED AND WHAT HAS NOT Adaora Osondu-Oti, PhD Department of International Relations and Diplomacy Afe Babalola University, Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria E-mail: [email protected] It is a well known fact that Nigerian society just like many other African societies is highly patriarchal in nature. Gender roles and relations are well separated and defined. For instance, there are roles women are meant to perform and men are not. There are also certain limitations to women’s participation in public life and even pursuit of career, as the society believes that women’s lives are to be lived managing the home. Undeniably many of these cultural/traditional norms and patterns have not only been demeaning and challenging for women when compared to the men but have limited the significant contribution of women in the societal development. However, changes are being witnessed as more Nigerian women are now challenging the status quo with the increase in educational attainment. According to the 2008 National Demographic Health Survey data, 54% of women age 15–49 and 77% of men 15–59 are literate. Nigerian women now hold important political offices; for instance in the present government administration, there are 7 women Senators out of 109 and 19 women House of Representative members out of 360. In spite of the changes (though minimal), there are still things that have not changed especially in rural communities with regards to gender relations. For instance in such community development projects where community members combine their efforts with that of government or non-government bodies to improve and develop community socially, economically and culturally, women are hardly involved in project discussion and execution. In most cases, women are not allowed to partake in community meetings and gatherings, and their voices, expertise and experiences are still left unheard. It is against this backdrop that this paper seeks to examine the place and role of women in Community Development Projects with particular reference to Amoli Community in Enugu State, Nigeria where various community development projects (such as provision of pipe borne water, rural electrification, road construction etc) are ongoing. Key Words: Women, Role, Community Development, Projects, Amoli, Enugu, Nigeria 1 Introduction It is a well known fact that Nigerian society just like many other African societies is highly patriarchal in nature. Gender roles and relations are well separated and defined. There are roles women are meant to perform and men are not. There are also certain limitations to women’s participation in public life and even pursuit of career, as the society believes that women’s lives are to be lived managing the home. Undeniably many of these cultural/traditional norms and patterns have not only been demeaning and challenging for women when compared to the men but have limited the significant contribution of women in the societal development. However, in the last few decades, there have been noticeable changes in the role of women in the society, shown in women acquiring more education and attaining career heights. Over the years, there has been a marked increase in the number of women enrolling for university management courses and obtaining employment. Women are now increasingly educated and hold more jobs worldwide than ever before (Akanbi and Salami, 2011). In Nigeria today, women make up almost 50% of the labour force (Akanbi and Salami, 2011). According to the 2008 National Demographic Health Survey data, 54% of women age 15-49 and 77% of men 15–59 are literate. This is an increase from the 2003 NDHS when 48% of women and 73% of men in the same age groups were literate (National Population Commission and ICF Macro, 2009). It is quite impressive when compared with the ‘backward’ position of Nigerian women two decades ago. Until recently, women are expected to be homemakers with the traditional and socially approved roles of child bearing, housekeeping and farming. Today, Nigerian women are found in every aspect of development and in every sector of the economy. 2 Nigerian women are now Managing Directors/Chief Executive Officers, Professors, Pilot, Engineers, Accountants, Lawyers, Ministers and Doctors etc. There are also fields dominated by women such as Nursing, Secretarial work, Fashion Designing and other related jobs. Nigerian women have also joined politics. At the moment, women holding political positions in Nigeria are increasing: in the present government 13 women Ministers were appointed,1 11 women Ambassadors (out of 93 Ambassadors), 7 Senators (out of 109) and 19 women (out of 360 members in the Nigerian house of representative). In academics, Nigerian women are also represented even though men still outnumber them. For instance, in 2006, University of Ibadan had an academic staff strength of 3081, out of which 2574 were males and 507 females; Obafemi Awolowo University had 1207 academic staff members out of which 210 were females (Ogbogu, 2011). Even though the number of Nigerian women in all the fields above is still minimal compare to men, there is still hope as more women are now attaining higher education. Clearly, more women are being empowered to take the mantle of leadership in organisations as against discrimination, stereotyping, prejudice and unfairness that characterised the old order (Eagly and Carli, 2003). In spite of the changes (though minimal), there are still areas that have not changed with regards to gender relations and roles, especially in rural settings in Nigeria. For instance in community leadership and development projects, women are hardly involved in discussion and project execution. Men often assume, are elected or appointed into leadership roles in issues involving the entire communities. In most cases, rural women are not allowed to partake in community meetings and gatherings, 1 Note that among the 9 ministers sacked by the President, Goodluck Jonathan on 11 th September, 2013, four women ministers were involved: Minister of Education, Professor Rufai; Minister of Housing and Development, Ama Peppple; Minister of State for Defence, Olusola Obada; Minister of Environment, Hadiza Mailafia 3 and their voices, expertise and experiences are still left unheard, due to the patriarchal nature of Nigerian society. Women are sometimes ‘forbidden’ to appear in forum where community issues are deliberated, thus being in positions of authority or community leadership is still a distant dream. The ‘old’ perception that a woman’s place is in the home, and should not be extended outside still exists. It is against this backdrop that this paper seeks to examine the place and role of women in community development projects with particular reference to Amoli community in Enugu State, Nigeria where various community development projects (such as provision of pipe borne water, rural electrification, road construction etc) are ongoing. The major argument of the paper is that even though changes are seen in Nigeria with regards to women participation and inclusion in society matters, women in some rural communities in Nigeria are still socially constrained, as they are often separated from positions of authority and leadership. With introduction as Section I, Section 2 examines gender construction from the perspective of social role theory. Section 3 discusses women in community development, with particular reference to Amoli women in Enugu State. Section 4 concludes and makes recommendations. Gender/Social Role Theory Before examining the gender/social role theory, it is important to understand the meaning of the term role. A role is the expected behavior associated with a status. And a status is a category or position a person occupies that is a significant determinant of how she or he will be defined and treated. Roles are performed according to social norms, shared rules that guide people’s behavior in specific situations. Roles may be achieved or ascribed or they can be accidental in different situations. An achieved role is a position that a person assumes voluntarily which 4 reflects personal skills, abilities, and efforts. An ascribed role is a position assigned to individuals or groups without regard for merit but because of certain traits beyond their control, (Stark, 2007), and is usually forced upon a person. The most important ascribed status is gender. Gender has acquired a social meaning where the word now defines how male and female relates in the society and how duties are allocated on the basis of one’s sex. Thus, gender role theory has been used to explain the behaviour of women and men, and also to ascribe functions and roles in the society. Gender role theory is grounded in the supposition that individuals socially as males and females tend to occupy different ascribed roles within social structures and tend to be judged against divergent expectations for how they ought to behave. As a consequence, the theory predicts that male and females will develop different skills and attitudes and that they will behave differently. Given that gender is socially constructed, the idea of social role emanated. Historically, social role theory developed during the 1980s as a gender related theory. Eagly in 1987 published a book on the theory titled, ‘Sex Differences in Social Behavior: a Social Role Interpretation.’ Eagly (1987) saw that social roles that regulate behavior in the society had not been explored and then proceeded to show how a theory of sex-typed behavior could explain differences in men and women. Eagly (1987) used gender roles as a term for the social roles that a society designates to men and women. Social role theory uses a structural approach to sex differences. Its argument is that people have social roles based on gender and that structural pressures (family, organizations, and communities) have caused men and women to behave in different ways, making gender roles to be stereotypic. Thus, these stereotypic gender roles are formed by social norms that apply to people of a certain category or social position. According to 5 Eagly (1987) society has shared expectations about women, and these expectations form female gender roles, and also shared expectations about men form male gender roles. Social role theory is the major theory that explained why gender stereotypes are confirmed (Eagly, 1987). Social role theory proposes that one reason gender stereotypes are confirmed is because women and men act in accordance with their social roles, which are often segregated along gender lines (Eagly, 1987). Ordinarily, gender differences associate women and men with a variety of behavioral and attitudinal patterns. Thus, women and men are expected to behave, act and function in certain ways based on social construction of sex. For instance, women are socially assigned caregivers and nurturers, and thus are associated feminine traits and behaviours. Men on the other hand, are more likely to work outside of the home, more frequently exhibit traditionally masculine behaviors such as assertiveness and leadership qualities. These traditional gender roles have helped sustain gender stereotypes what men should or should not do and, what women should and should not do. Women and Community Development Community Development Exchange (CDE), defines community development as the process of developing active and sustainable communities. Community development is also an inclusive programme targeted towards the betterment of a certain community. It is therefore means that it should mainstream gender. Usually, community development involves influencing power structures to remove barriers that prevent people from participating in the issues that affect their lives. Women’s participation in community development thus becomes vital within the aspect of gender mainstreaming. The UN decade for women (1976-1985) highlighted the 6 importance of women in the development process, establishing that women perform two thirds of the world’s work, yet receive only ten percent of the world’s income, and own only one percent of the means of production (Mosse, 1993). Women have had relative powerlessness in decision making about development but in many cases workloads and problems have increased due to development activities (Gabriel, 1991). As it had been pointed out by Lovel and Feuerstein (1985), that it is strange that when people think about ‘community’ they often think mostly about women and children and when people think about ‘development’ they often think mostly of men. Managing community affairs in many African countries have been the domain of men. In community administration, there are notable gender imbalances. Rural women have been left out in local politics and community management. Even though times are changing and there is now an acceptance that women can and do play a vital role in community development, particularly in contributing to the achievement of community security, growth and progress, their impact are hardly recognised. In some communities, women have established themselves as leaders in their respective women groups and have brought positive change to their communities. For instance, some women have used their community women association to raise funds for needy members and assist other women to train their children in school. Devising what they called self help groups (SHGs), women mobilize their own savings, and use it as loans to group members (IFAD, 2012). Earnings from interest income are converted into group equity. SHGs managing their own savings have been particularly successful with rural women. It is also known that in rural communities (and urban communities too), not only is it the women who usually care for both the young and the old, but also they procure key resources such as water and fuel and are involved in agriculture and 7 livestock production, and engage in trading activities all which are necessary for the survival of the family unit. Notwithstanding their roles, the contributions of women in community development have been neglected and sidelined. The sidelining of women is even more visible in rural areas. For instance, women are responsible for 60%-80% of agricultural production; women perform 90% of the work of processing food crops and providing household water and fuel wood; women are responsible for 80% of the work of food storage and transport from farm to village; women do 90% of the work of hoeing and weeding; women do 60% of the work of harvesting and marketing; women are the backbone of rural development, they provide for the general needs of rural households, bring home heavy loads of firewood and carry buckets of water from far-away water sources, and yet they are often not consulted on community development issues (World Bank, 2002). In the case of women in Amoli community in Enugu State, sidelining women in community development projects is obvious. In the community, for instance, many community development projects have been ongoing since 2011, when the incumbent government administration was elected into power. These projects include the provision of pipe borne water, rural electrification and road construction. The handling, organisation, supervision and management of funds for these projects are in the hands of men. Ordinarily, community projects are handed over to community leaders and chiefs, which are all male. Women groups are often left out with the perception that issues of decision making and leadership in communities are for men. In an interaction with the traditional ruler in Amoli, I was meant to understand that not even a single woman or women group were represented at the initial deliberation community projects with government officials. During discussion of areas that deserve government attention in the community, the community chiefs and village 8 heads (all male representatives) pointed out creation of road networks and rural electrification as major problems that need intervention. While these areas require development, the leader of women group in the community pointed to the fact that the sidelining of women has made their own ideas about development muted. According to Mrs Justina, the leader of women group, there are pressing areas that women want government to intervene such as provision of health centres and services, building and equipping the schools for their children, among others. All these areas were not given priority because women’s voices, knowledge and experiences were not brought in dominant traditional beliefs still existing in rural settings in Nigeria. Nevertheless, there is the acknowledgement that household activities, including agricultural activities, are undertaken by women, but any decision making, power and control either in the household or community are reserved for men. Given that men are the main planners and administrators, there is often lack of differentiation between men and women’s needs in development projects, as seen in the case of Amoli community; while women would have opted for provision of health care services and schools; men opted for road construction and rural electrification. According to Mrs Justina (the women group leader), while rural electrification and road construction are good, and will benefit women too, the women group would have included provision of health care services, which matters most for the women at this time, especially pregnant women that experience complications in child delivery due to lack of adequate health care delivery. The general perception from what the study gathered is that men represent and speak on behalf of the women or their families as the case may be. According to leader of one of the villages in Amoli (Ugwunagbo village), ‘there is absolute no need to involve women, because community projects are entirely men affairs and women 9 can contribute little or nothing; we are part of the community projects to represent our families and communities interests as well.’ Clearly, the patriarchal structure of the Nigerian society and stereotyping of women, consciously or subconsciously are the major contributors to women marginalisation in the community. Patriarchy reinforces the belief that women should be subordinate to men, in terms of power and status, and that it is right and proper for men to command and women to obey. This has become a general belief in the community and has extended to all parts of the Amoli community’s life, relations and administration. The same kind of gender construction ad relations is also visible in many rural communities in Nigeria. Community affairs, management, leadership and control in Nigeria are to a larger extent seen as the terrain of men, and whatever decisions reached would be relayed back to the women by men (if men find it necessary). Thus, many still believe men are better suited for leadership (Mordi et al, 2010; Ehigie, 2003). It is a well known fact that Nigeria has the highest population in Africa, with over 160 million people. Of this magnitude, forty-nine percent are female (estimated at 80.2 million girls and women). Yet, women live within the confines of rigid gender norms, which frequently result in disproportionate access to essential services, discrimination and ultimately violations of their human rights. Despite a general commitment to the principle of non-discrimination as enshrined in the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and Nigeria’s ratification of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, Nigeria falls short of the desired result of giving males and females equal opportunities. For instance, section 17 (1) of the 1999 Constitution states ‘that the Federal Republic of Nigeria shall abide on the principles of freedom, equality and social justice for all.’ The Nigerian government has been scaling up its effort towards 10 meeting the goal of gender equality with the introduction of National Gender Policy in 2007 and the Strategic Implementation Framework for the policy in 2008. While Nigerian government is pursuing the 35% agenda of women representation in public offices as stated in the 2007 Gender Policy Document, the rural women, majorily uneducated, still face discriminatory practices. Legally as stated in the Nigerian Constitution, women have a right to equal place with men in decision-making bodies. In practice, the situation is not that simple due to customary and traditional beliefs; there is still a wide gap between what is written in the Constitution and what is practiced, especially in the rural setting, where women cannot defend their rights due to lack of education and where poverty has constrained women too. As a result socially constructed gender roles are still common. Traditional perceptions and some sort of stereotypes have skewed women into some jobs and roles, leaving them absent in some others. Evidently, Women in Development (WID) approach, developed throughout the United Nations Decade for women (1975-1985), recognises that women are active, although, unacknowledged participants in the development process, providing a critical contribution to the economic growth. WID had argud that women are an untapped resource that must be integrated into the development process in order to achieve sustainable development in nations of the world. Hence, if in the real sense development means the alleviation of mass poverty, the marginalization of women would lead to feminization of poverty since they will not be participating in decisionmaking, planning and implementation of community development programmes, as seen in the Amoli Community in Enugu State, Nigeria. 11 Conclusion and Recommendations There is no gainsaying that women’s roles in development have been acknowledged globally. Women are playing active roles in community development through their active participation in homes, farms and trades, but are never consulted in community development projects. They bear the burden of development in their homes but are never allowed to participate in decision making and leadership of the community. In cases where government want to assist provide basic amenities for development of the community, women’s voices are rarely (or never) lended. The patriarchal nature of the Nigerian society coupled with the traditional beliefs and norms have been a major challenge to rural women. There is the general perception that men should decide and women should accept and that men should be the voice for their women. Such traditional beliefs have put rural women in perpetual domination. While things are changing and more women are acquiring education and attaining public and political offices/positions, the societal construction of gender roles and relations have not changed for rural women, who still face discriminatory practices and marginalisation in development issues and women in Amoli Community in Enugu State is a case in point. This work then recommends government elimination of the various traditional beliefs and norms that constrain rural women through implementation of laws that gets to the grassroots. There is the need to address the contributions, needs and importance of women in development when planning development policies and projects within rural communities. With the incorporation of women, women’s needs and agendas into the development process, projects will be more suited to those that are central to development, that is, women. 12 References Akanbi, T.A and Salami, A.O (2011), ‘Women in Managerial Positions: Problems and Prospects’, Journal of Business and Organisational Development, Volume 3, March 2011 Eagly, A. H and Carli, L. L (2003), ‘The Female Leadership Advantage: An Evaluation of the Evidence. Leadership Quarterly, 14, 807-834 Eagly, A.H. (1987), Sex differences in Social Behavior: A Social-Role Interpretation, Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ehigie, B.O (2003), Problem and Prospects of Women and Labour in Africa: A Psychological Perspective, In Udegbe B (ed.), Transforming Health Policies in Gender Equity in Nigeria Organisations, Ibadan: Macmillan Gabriel, T (1991), The Human Factor in Rural Development, London and New York: Belhaven Press IFAD (2012), ‘Enhancing the Role of Indigenous Women in Sustainable Development: IFAD Experience with Indigenous Women in Latin America and Asia’, Third Session of the Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues, http://www.ifad.org Accessed May 21, 2014 Lovel, H and Feuerstein, M (1985), ‘Women, Poverty and Community Development in the Third World. Editorial, Community Development Journal, Vol. 120, No.3. In C. King 2007. (ed.) Paper on Gender and Rural Community Development: An Analysis of Policy Approaches to Development Mordi , C, Simpson, R, Singh, S and Okafor, C (2010), ‘Motivation to be a Female Entrepreneur in Sub-Saharan Africa’, Gender in Management: An International Journal, Vol.25, pp. 5-25 Mosse, J.C (1993), Half the World, Half a Chance: An Introduction to Gender and Development, Oxfam: Osford National Population Commission (NPC) and ICF Macro. 2009. Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey 2008: Key Findings. Calverton, Maryland, USA: NPC and ICF Macro Ogbogu, Christiana O (2011), ‘Gender Inequality in Academia: Evidence from Nigeria’, Contemporary Issues in Education Research, Vol.4, No.9, pp 1-8 Stark, Rodney (2007), Sociology, Tenth Edition, Baylor University California: Thomson Wadsworth World Bank (2002), World development Report, Oxford University Press for the World Bank. 13