Download Neutrino DS at ESGARD - GDR neutrino

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Neutrino wikipedia , lookup

Standard solar model wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Neutrino Oscillation Facility
Design Study in FP7
14 mars 2007
M. Dracos, Neutrino Design Study
1
Neutrino Oscillation Facility Design
Study in FP7
• FP7 call and first discussion with EU
officers
• DS structure
• Future actions
14 mars 2007
M. Dracos, Neutrino Design Study
2
Work Program: Capacities
14 mars 2007
M. Dracos, Neutrino Design Study
3
FP7 Capacities Work Programme:
Infrastructures
14 mars 2007
M. Dracos, Neutrino Design Study
4
Design Studies budget
14 mars 2007
M. Dracos, Neutrino Design Study
5
ESFRI and CERN strategy
group report
14 mars 2007
M. Dracos, Neutrino Design Study
6
Discussion with EU officers
(meeting the 05/01/07 with D. Pasini and C. Kurrer)
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Encouragements for a neutrino DS,
not more than 5 M€ by EU,
duration: 4 years,
possibility to extent the DS using the 2010 call,
meanwhile possible to participate to IA proposals,
but very difficult to obtain funding for R&D,
IA more for improving existing facilities,
investigate for ERC grants (young physicists).
14 mars 2007
M. Dracos, Neutrino Design Study
7
Neutrino Oscillation Facility Design
Study in FP7
Title:
European Design Study of a High Intensity Neutrino Facility
Acronym:
EURO-n
Aim:
Study and comparison (physics performances and cost) of the different
options in order the neutrino European community to be ready for the
particle physics decisions of 2010-2012.
Duration:
4 years
Cost:
<5 M€ (+institutes participation ~50% with a minimum of 25%)
Coordinating person:
R. Edgecock
Host institutes:
CCLRC
more details in: http://gdrneutrino.in2p3.fr/documents/euro_nu_DS.pdf
14 mars 2007
M. Dracos, Neutrino Design Study
8
Overview
q13
technologies
CPV
SB
MSW
BB
…
(non-acc.
 ?)
NF
physics
facilities
p-driver
Cerenkov
target
LAr
collector
m front-end
Emulsions
m accel.
magnetized
stor. ring
b beam
14 mars 2007
optional or not baseline
M. Dracos, Neutrino Design Study
detectors
9
Work Packages
in order to underline synergies…
technologies
p-driver
target
Super-Beam
Beam instr.
collector
Near det.
Detectors
m front-end
Far det.
m accel.
Neutrino Factory
Perform.
stor. ring
b beam
14 mars 2007
Beta-Beam
Comparison
M. Dracos, Neutrino Design Study
Physics
10
Work Packages
1. Management (R. Edgecock, M. Lindroos, M. Dracos)
2. Super-Beam (M. Zito, C. Densham)
3. Neutrino Factory (K. Long, J. Pozimski)
4. Beta-Beam (complementarities with EURISOL DS) (A. Fabich,
M. Benedikt)
5. Detectors (near, far, beam instrumentation) (P. Soler, xx)
6. Physics (performances, comparisons) (P. Hernandez, A. Donini)
14 mars 2007
M. Dracos, Neutrino Design Study
11
Distribution of resources
WP
14 mars 2007
months
%
Management
48
7.4
Super-Beam
168
25.9
(78 target
36 horn
24 p-driver
30 integration)
(12.0 target
5.6 horn
3.7 p-driver
4.6 integration)
Neutrino Factory
144
22.2
Beta-Beam
132
20.4
detectors
84
13.0
physics
72
11.1
TOTAL
648
~13.5 FTE/year
M. Dracos, Neutrino Design Study
12
EURO-n and ESGARD
•
ESGARD supports the DS on neutrinos with all the partners ready to contribute. It is in
line with the strategy document and would enhance the EU role in this field.
•
P-driver is studied elsewhere. Therefore, it should only be in this DS for consistency of
the whole project, with a lower priority and without asking for money.
•
Detectors should not be a large part of the DS and be only included for consistency of
the project. Astrophysics community is working on detector proposals.
•
Caveat:
1.
all ingredients must be part of the project so that its success does not depend on
institutes external to the collaboration.
2.
There must be a unique coordinator who can be helped by additional scientific
coordinators if necessary.
14 mars 2007
M. Dracos, Neutrino Design Study
13
Proposal preparation
•
Proposal preparation: R. Edgecock, M. Lindroos, M. Dracos (under BENE SG
supervision).
•
Identify all interested institutes: under way (summary of the project already
prepared: http://bene.web.cern.ch/bene/euro_nu_DS.pdf)
•
Propose WP coordinators: finished
•
Proposal presentation: 7 Feb. (BENE SG meeting) and 28th March(?).
•
Draft to be sent to the participating institutes for approval: end of March
•
Discussion with Brussels: end of March
•
Signature by participating institutions: beginning of April
•
Final proposal agreed: 20 Apr.
•
Proposal delivery: 2nd May
14 mars 2007
M. Dracos, Neutrino Design Study
14
END
14 mars 2007
M. Dracos, Neutrino Design Study
15
Possible participants
Bulgaria:
Sofia
France:
Grenoble, Saclay, Strasbourg
Germany:
Julich, Rostock
Italy:
Bari, Genoa, LNF, LNGS, LNL, LNS, Milan
Latvia:
IPUL
Russia:
Dubna, ITEP, Novosibirsk
Sweden:
Uppsala
Switzerland:
CERN, ETH, Geneva, PSI
UK:
Brunel, CCLRC, IC, Oxford, Sheffield, Warwick
Poland:
Cracow
14 mars 2007
M. Dracos, Neutrino Design Study
16
Work Package Proposal 1
•
WP1 – Management:
Coordinator: Edgecock
Lead lab: CCLRC
Consortium Board
Membership: DS coordinators
WP coordinators
1 member/institute
Purpose:
Oversight of DS
Meetings:
Twice per year or as required
Steering Committee
Membership: DS coordinators
WP coordinators
IDS representatives
Others ex-officio as required
Purpose:
Running the DS
Meetings:
Every two months
14 mars 2007
M. Dracos, Neutrino Design Study
17