Download Set Theory II

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Computability theory wikipedia , lookup

Truth-bearer wikipedia , lookup

Model theory wikipedia , lookup

Quantum logic wikipedia , lookup

Laws of Form wikipedia , lookup

Foundations of mathematics wikipedia , lookup

Curry–Howard correspondence wikipedia , lookup

History of the Church–Turing thesis wikipedia , lookup

Mereology wikipedia , lookup

Law of thought wikipedia , lookup

History of the function concept wikipedia , lookup

Quasi-set theory wikipedia , lookup

Mathematical logic wikipedia , lookup

List of first-order theories wikipedia , lookup

Peano axioms wikipedia , lookup

Axiom wikipedia , lookup

Set theory wikipedia , lookup

Principia Mathematica wikipedia , lookup

Axiom of reducibility wikipedia , lookup

Naive set theory wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Set Theory II
Last time we discussed the Axioms of Extension, Specification, Unordered Pairs, and Unions.
Some more aioms of set theory
Powers For each set there exists a collection of sets that contains among its elements all
the subsets of the given set. (Combined with the Axiom of Specification, it follows
that if A is a set, then P(A) = {B : B ⊆ A} is also a set.)
Regularity Every non-empty set contains an element that is disjoint from itself.
Notes:
• The Axiom of Regularity is not in Halmos’ book, and much of set theory can be
developed without it, but I am including it here to discuss the issue of a set being an
element of itself.
• We are omitting the Axiom of Replacement, which says that the image of a set under
a function is a set. We will discuss functions in much more details later.
1. (Russell paradox) Prove that “There is no Universe” without using the Axiom of Regularity. (Let A be a set and B = {x ∈ A : x ∈
/ x}. Prove that B ∈
/ A.)
2. Write the Axiom of Regularity in symbolic logic.
3. Prove that if we assume the Axiom of Regularity (and the four axiom from last class),
then a set cannot be an element of itself.
(Let A be a set. Apply the Axiom of Regularity to {A}.)
4. Prove that “There is no Universe” using the Axiom of Regularity.
5. Explain why the intersection of an empty collection of sets is undefined.
6. Let A and B be sets. Explain how the Cartesian product A × B can be defined so that
its existence follows from the Axioms we have seen.