Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
INTRODUCTION TO CORPORATE FINANCE Laurence Booth • W. Sean Cleary Prepared by Ken Hartviksen CHAPTER 10 Market Efficiency Lecture Agenda • • • • • • • • Learning Objectives Important Terms The Importance of Market Efficiency Market Efficiency Defined The Efficient Market Hypothesis Empirical Evidence Regarding Market Efficiency Implications of EMH Summary and Conclusions – Concept Review Questions CHAPTER 10 – Market Efficiency 10 - 3 Learning Objectives 1. What is meant by market efficiency 2. How to differentiate among different levels of efficiency 3. How to use the concepts in this chapter to judge corporate decisions 4. How the concepts in this chapter are used in regulating market activity CHAPTER 10 – Market Efficiency 10 - 4 Important Chapter Terms • • • • • • • • • • • Abnormal returns Allocational efficiency Anomalies Buy side analysts Disclosure Efficient market Efficient market hypothesis (EMH) Event study Informational efficiency Material facts Momentum • • • • • • • • • Operational efficiency Random walk hypothesis Securities law Sell side analysts Semi-strong form efficient market hypothesis Size effect Strong form efficient market hypothesis Technical analysis Weak form efficient market hypothesis CHAPTER 10 – Market Efficiency 10 - 5 The Importance of Market Efficiency • Understanding how securities are valued provides guidelines to managers about how they should manage businesses on behalf of shareholders • The discount rate that represents shareholders’ required rate of return is established as a result of benchmark rates in the capital markets, such as the risk-free rate (RF) and the market risk premium. • Do market prices reflect the actions of managers? – If they do, then managers must learn what actions they should take in order toEfficiency fulfill their legal and CHAPTER 10 – Market managerial responsibilities to shareholders. 10 - 6 The Importance of Market Efficiency Three Elements to Market Efficiency • Operational Efficiency – Transactions costs are low, thereby enhancing trading of securities • Allocational Efficiency – There are enough securities to efficiently allocate risk • Informational Efficiency – Market prices fairly and quickly reflect all available information CHAPTER 10 – Market Efficiency 10 - 7 The Importance of Market Efficiency Informational Efficiency • The closer the link between managers’ actions and the value of the firm, the more informationally efficient the capital market CHAPTER 10 – Market Efficiency 10 - 8 The Importance of Market Efficiency Securities Laws Affecting Public-Issuers of Securities • The closer the link between managers’ actions and the value of the firm, the more informationally efficient the capital market • Securities laws in Canada reflect the belief that there is (or should be) a strong connection between information and stock prices and these laws reflect a number of common principles related to parties, transactions, and access to information: – Continuous disclosure of all material information about the firm – Fair and equal treatment of all market participants through disclosure requirements that ensure all participants have simultaneous access to the same information about publicly-traded firms CHAPTER 10 – Market Efficiency 10 - 9 Asymmetric Information • Asymmetric information is when one party to a transaction has access to more a complete and accurate set of facts than the other party. – When this condition exists, it is possible for the party with better information to use that at their own personal gain, and at the expense of the other. CHAPTER 10 – Market Efficiency 10 - 10 Asymmetric Information An Example – The Used Car! • An example of asymmetric information from everyday life might be the situation between a buyer and seller of a used car in a private transaction – The seller has intimate knowledge of recent car history including past owners, collisions, repairs, and problems – The buyer (presuming no expertise as a mechanic) has only limited skills of observation and investigation to inform the purchase decision • It is possible, in the absence of rules and regulations, for the seller to take advantage of the buyer because of information asymmetry • This means the buyer is likely to pay more for the car than the car is worth; the seller reaps the rewards of superior information – In some provinces, before such a transaction can occur, a sellers information package must be obtained from the Ministry of Transportation. This package will include an estimate of wholesale and retail price of the used car, and a list of past owners; this is an example of government regulation to try to reduce the information advantage sellers have over buyers CHAPTER 10 – Market Efficiency 10 - 11 Disclosure and Market Efficiency The Asymmetric Information Challenge • If informational advantages were widely permitted, and if there were a persistent advantage of some market participants over others, the credibility of the markets would be shaken • Under such circumstances, many people would choose not to invest in securities, choosing, instead to put their money into managed deposits, or worse, choosing to hide their money under a pillow. • This would significantly reduce the number of market participants, and the amounts of money invested in the markets CHAPTER 10 – Market Efficiency 10 - 12 Disclosure and Market Efficiency The Asymmetric Information Challenge • The result would be: less market efficiency; lower security prices, infrequent trading of securities • Ultimately, the capital market would not be able to channel sufficient surplus funds to underwrite economic activity such as plant expansions, research and development, etc. In the end, companies would lack capital, and increasingly become inefficient and ineffective in their markets. Jobs would be lost and the standard of living of all would decline CHAPTER 10 – Market Efficiency 10 - 13 Defining Market Efficiency • An efficient market is a market that reacts quickly and relatively accurately to new public information, which results in prices that are correct, on average CHAPTER 10 – Market Efficiency 10 - 14 Market Efficiency Requisite Conditions For markets to operate efficiently some conditions must exist: 1. A large number of rational, profit-maximizing investors exist, who actively participate in the market by analyzing, valuing, and trading securities. The markets must be competitive, meaning no one investor can significantly affect the price of the security through their own buying or selling. 2. Information is costless and widely available to market participants at the same time. 3. Information arrives randomly and therefore announcements over time are not serially connected. 4. Investors react quickly and fully (and reasonably accurately) to the new information, which is reflected in stock prices. CHAPTER 10 – Market Efficiency 10 - 15 Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) • The efficient market hypothesis is the theory that markets are efficient and therefore, in its strictest sense, implies that prices accurately reflect all available information at any given time CHAPTER 10 – Market Efficiency 10 - 16 Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) • Weak form EMH is the theory that security prices reflect all market data, referring to all past price and volume trading information • Implication: – If weak form efficient, historical trading data will already be reflected (discounted) in current prices and should be of no value in predicting future price changes CHAPTER 10 – Market Efficiency 10 - 17 Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) • Semi-strong form EMH is the theory that all publicly known and available information is reflected in security prices • Assumes the weak-form set of information as well as all public information pertinent to the security such as: – – – – Earnings Dividends Corporate investments, Management changes • Implication: – If semi-strong efficient, it is futile to analyze public information such as earnings projections and financial statements in an attempt to identify underpriced or overpriced securities CHAPTER 10 – Market Efficiency 10 - 18 Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) • Strong form EMH is the theory that stock prices fully reflect all information, which includes both public and private information • Implications: – Stock prices are fairly priced. – It is not possible to use public information to identify over-priced or under-priced stocks – It is not possible to use insider information to identify over-priced or under-priced stocks CHAPTER 10 – Market Efficiency 10 - 19 Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) Tests of EMH • All tests of the EMH try to demonstrate that using a particular source of information allows an investor to consistently earn ‘abnormal’ returns • Abnormal returns are percentage returns that are greater than a naïve buy-and-hold strategy where the investor passively buying a market index portfolio such as the S&P/TSX 60 composite index In other words, can an active investment strategy, using a particular trading rule or source of information, generate greater risk-adjusted returns than a passive, naïve, yet achievable, investment strategy? CHAPTER 10 – Market Efficiency 10 - 20 Empirical Evidence on Market Efficiency Anomalies • Anomalies are exceptions to a rule or theory – An identified anomaly may not violate the theory, especially if it cannot be exploited profitably after transactions costs and taxes, or if it cannot be exploited consistently CHAPTER 10 – Market Efficiency 10 - 21 Empirical Evidence on Market Efficiency Weak Form Evidence • The Random Walk Hypothesis states prices follow a random walk with price changes over time being independent of one another – This hypothesis is logical if information arrives randomly, as it should, and if investors react quickly to it • Tests of weak form efficiency include: – Serial correlation tests – Runs (or signs tests) – Testing of trading rules used by technical analysts CHAPTER 10 – Market Efficiency 10 - 22 Empirical Evidence on Market Efficiency Weak Form Evidence - Anomalies Anomalies that contest weak form market efficiency are: – Investors have been found to overreact to new information and this leads to stock prices over-shooting and undershooting their intrinsic value and this results in stock price reversals favouring in some cases, contrarian trading strategies – Evidence of momentum in stock returns (See Figure 10-1) – Evidence of seasonal patterns in stock returns including the January effect, the January effect for smaller firms, the day-ofthe week effect (average negative Monday returns statistically different than the other trading days of the week), and the tendency for returns to be higher on the last trading day of each month CHAPTER 10 – Market Efficiency 10 - 23 Weak Form Evidence Momentum in Canadian Stock Returns, 1980 - 1999 FIGURE 10-1 January 1980 – December 1999 Six-Month Holding Period Returns (%) 25 20.7 6 20 14.75 15 6.10 5.9 9 10 5 0 Top 30 Bottom 30 Top-Bottom CHAPTER 10 – Market Efficiency TSX 10 - 24 Empirical Evidence on Market Efficiency Weak Form Evidence - Conclusion • The anomalies identified are very difficult and risky to exploit: – Transactions costs reduce or eliminate the economic advantage – The anomalies don’t happen consistently enough to make them a reliable source of abnormal returns In conclusion, the capital markets appear to be weak form efficient. CHAPTER 10 – Market Efficiency 10 - 25 Empirical Evidence on Semi-strong Efficiency Semi-Strong Form Evidence • Tests of the Semi-strong Form of EMH include: – Event (announcement) studies including ‘earnings surprises’ and corporate announcements to examine the impact of particular events on stock prices – Examination of the performance of investors to see if they can use publicly available information to consistently generate abnormal returns CHAPTER 10 – Market Efficiency 10 - 26 Empirical Evidence on Semi-strong Efficiency Event Studies • Event studies examine stock returns to determine the impact of a particular event on stock prices, in particular, what happens to the stock price, before, during and following the event Figure 10-2 illustrates the price adjustment process for: (A) – an efficient market (B) - overreaction in an efficient market (C) - slow reaction in an efficient market • Events include: – – company-specific announcements such as stock splits, takeover announcements, dividend changes, accounting changes. Economy-wide changes such as unexpected interest rate changes CHAPTER 10 – Market Efficiency 10 - 27 Empirical Evidence on Semi-strong Efficiency Efficient (A) and Inefficient Markets (B) and (C) FIGURE 10-2 Stock Price B A C $23 $20 t Time Announcement Date CHAPTER 10 – Market Efficiency 10 - 28 Empirical Evidence on Semi-strong Efficiency Typical Event Study Results • Most event studies have shown that stock prices change before the announcement, as demonstrated in Figure 10-3 • These results demonstrate that an investor cannot move quickly enough at the time an event occurs (announcement is made) to profit from the change, so this speaks to market efficiency in the semistrong form, On the other hand… • This evidence does not provide support for the strong form of the EMH because some investors are profiting from private information about impending 10 - 29 price changes. CHAPTER 10 – Market Efficiency Empirical Evidence on Semi-strong EMH Typical Event Study Result for Good News Event FIGURE 10 - 3 Stock Price B A C $23 $20 t Time Announcement Date CHAPTER 10 – Market Efficiency 10 - 30 Semi-strong Anomalies Earnings Surprises • Several studies have confirmed a lag exists when earnings either exceed or fall short of concensus earnings estimates – Largest positive earnings surprises displayed superior subsequent performance – Low or negative earnings surprises displayed poor subsequent performance • The substantial adjustments after the announcement date contradicts the semi-strong form of the EMH CHAPTER 10 – Market Efficiency 10 - 31 Semi-strong Anomaly Tests on Investors • These are tests to determine whether investors can use publicly-available information to obtain abnormal returns. • The strongest evidence of semi-strong market efficiency is the fact that professional fund managers with all the training, expertise, technological capability and access to data do not outperform the market on a risk-adjusted basis, on average. • After expenses, average professional fund manager performance is substantially worse than their performance benchmarks (by as much as 50 to 200 basis points) CHAPTER 10 – Market Efficiency 10 - 32 Semi-strong Anomaly Tests on Investors Investment Styles • Tests to determine whether investors can use publiclyavailable information to obtain abnormal returns have shown that ‘value’ investment styles have consistently outperformed ‘growth’ styles • Value stocks are those that have: – below-average price-to-earnings (P/E) and market-to-book (M/B) ratios, and – above-average dividend yields • Growth stocks are those that investors are prepared to pay a premium price for because expected future growth in earnings and share price and have: – above-average P/E and M/B ratios, and – below-average dividend yields (Figure 10-4 shows the relative performance of the two investment styles from 1982 to 2006) CHAPTER 10 – Market Efficiency 10 - 33 Empirical Evidence on Semi-strong Efficiency Growth and Value Stocks in Canada FIGURE 10-4 CHAPTER 10 – Market Efficiency 10 - 34 Semi-strong Anomalies Small Firm Effect • Figure 10-5 depicts the returns on Canadian small cap stocks versus the broad market • Over this period small caps outperformed the broader index providing an annual return of 16.25% versus 11.91% – Smaller cap stock returns are much more volatile (24.8% versus 15.12%), and – Transactions costs are greater for small cap stocks Therefore, attempting to capitalize on the small firm effect is not a ‘free lunch’ CHAPTER 10 – Market Efficiency 10 - 35 Empirical Evidence on Semi-strong EMH S&P/TSX Composite Index versus Small Cap Stocks in Canada FIGURE 10-5 CHAPTER 10 – Market Efficiency 10 - 36 Semi-strong Anomalies Value Line Investment Survey Effect – Value Line Investment Survey is a widely followed stock publication that ranks a large universe of stocks from 1 (best) to 5 (worst) – Substantial evidence suggests that stocks ranked 1 or 2 experience superior performance over the following 12 months…and those in lower-ranked categories perform poorly. • These findings contradict the semi-strong EMH • However, again, transactions costs make it difficult to profit from this anomaly CHAPTER 10 – Market Efficiency 10 - 37 Empirical Evidence on Market Efficiency Semi-Strong Form Evidence - Conclusions • Most studies support the semi-strong form of the EMH • A number of anomalies (or exceptions) have been identified including: – The “value” investment style has consistently outperformed the “growth” style – The “size effect” that shows that small market cap stock tend to outperform large cap stocks on a riskadjusted return basis – The Value Line Investment Survey effect CHAPTER 10 – Market Efficiency 10 - 38 Empirical Evidence on Strong Form Efficiency Strong Form Evidence • The strong form asserts that prices reflect all public and private information • If a market is strong-form efficient, then insiders could not profit from inside information not known by the public • Tests of this hypothesis include determining whether any group of investors has information that allows them to earn abnormal profits consistently – Several studies found consistent abnormal profits – Others found only slightly better than average returns CHAPTER 10 – Market Efficiency 10 - 39 Empirical Evidence on Strong Form Efficiency Strong Form Evidence - Conclusions On balance, evidence does not support the strong form of the EMH It should be noted that insider trading laws do restrict the ability of insiders to act and therefore, profit from their inside information, so this is one reason why evidence may be muted of the ‘degree’ of advantage insiders enjoy under current law CHAPTER 10 – Market Efficiency 10 - 40 Summary of Empirical Evidence 1. Weak form efficiency is very well supported, and it is reasonable to conclude that markets are weak form efficient, although a few anomalies do exist. 2. Semi-strong form efficiency is well supported; however, more contradictory evidence exists for this version of the EMH than for the weak form. 3. Strong form efficiency is not very well supported by the evidence, and it is reasonable to conclude that markets are not strong form efficient in the strictest sense. CHAPTER 10 – Market Efficiency 10 - 41 Implications of Market Efficiency • Empirical Evidence suggests: – Markets reach quickly and relatively accurately to new public information – Market prices are correct on average • Markets may not be perfectly efficient, but they are relatively efficient CHAPTER 10 – Market Efficiency 10 - 42 Implications of Market Efficiency Implications for Investors 1. Technical analysis is not likely to be rewarded. 2. Fundamental analysis is also unlikely to be successful at generating abnormal profits after transactions costs, research costs and taxes. 3. Active trading strategies are unlikely to outperform “passive” buy-and-hold strategies…favouring index mutual funds or exchange-traded funds (ETFs) 4. Investors should focus on the basics of good investing by defining investment goals in terms of expected return and acceptable risk levels. CHAPTER 10 – Market Efficiency 10 - 43 Implications of Market Efficiency Implications for Corporate Officers 1. Timing of security issues or share repurchases in unimportant because prices are correct on average. 2. Management should monitor the price of the firm’s securities to see whether price changes reflect new information or short-run momentum and/or overreaction. CHAPTER 10 – Market Efficiency 10 - 44 Summary and Conclusions In this chapter you have learned: – That an efficient market is one that reacts quickly and relatively accurately to new information, and therefore its prices are correct on average. – That the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) is tested in three forms; weak, semi-strong and strong. – That empirical evidence suggests that markets are reasonably efficient, but not perfectly so. – Investors and corporate officers should modify their behaviours and expectations in light of the evidence of market efficiency. CHAPTER 10 – Market Efficiency 10 - 45 Copyright Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. All rights reserved. Reproduction or translation of this work beyond that permitted by Access Copyright (the Canadian copyright licensing agency) is unlawful. Requests for further information should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. The purchaser may make back-up copies for his or her own use only and not for distribution or resale. The author and the publisher assume no responsibility for errors, omissions, or damages caused by the use of these files or programs or from the use of the information contained herein. CHAPTER 10 – Market Efficiency 10 - 46