Download Section 6 - Cambridgeshire County Council

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Pensions crisis wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Section 6
Statistical Tables
163
Section 6
Business Plan for Cambridgeshire 2013-2014
Introduction
Reason for inclusion
Preparation and review
Section 6 contains an overview of diagrammatic
and statistical data relating to the county with
comparative national data shown where relevant.
This research data was pulled together at the very
beginning of the planning process as part of an
in-depth exercise to identify the big issues facing the
county, to understand the current and likely future
needs of communities, and to inform our priorities as
an organisation.
The data is included here in this documentation as
evidence that the formulation of the Business Plan
and in particular the identification of priorities,
our choice of investments and the activity of the
organisation is informed by research and analysis.
The context in which decisions were made and how
resources were allocated are key to understanding
how the plan was formed and what it is trying to
achieve.
The information on the tables has been prepared by
the County’s Research Team with input from other
officers. The information has been fed into planning
workshops and other meetings during the formation
of the Plan (June through December). The research
team continually updates its intelligence and
analysis, as up-to-date data becomes available.
The data was presented in the informal workshops
at the start of the planning cycle, and was used
by Members and officers to shape our vision and
corporate priorities (Section 1). The data then played
a key role in developing the Strategic Framework
(Section 2). Through a more robust understanding
about the economic well-being of the county, the
life chances and quality of life experienced by our
communities, and how we might best target our
support for the vulnerable, we were able to ensure
that our activity as an organisation flowed from a
clear evidence base and towards specific outcomes.
Structure of tables
The research intelligence then continued to inform
the development of proposals and choice of
investments throughout the process, ensuring that
any decisions taken were underpinned by a robust
understanding of the county and its needs.
164
Each table has the following characteristics:
• a title bar
• a map, chart or table (with key)
• key points of interpretation and analysis
• a hyperlink is provided to the full research data
and report
Statistical Tables
Section 6
Index
Cambridgeshire local government boundaries
166
Political representation on Cambridgeshire County Council
167
Political representation in Parliament
168
Population structure - Census 2011
169
Population structure aged over 75 by ward - Census 2011
170
Population structure aged over 85 by ward - Census 2011
171
Forecast population change 2011-16
172
Population density - Census 2011
173
Population urban/rural split on standard classification
174
Population urban/rural split on Output Area Classification (OAC)
175
Economy - Gross Value Added
176
Economy - employment rate 16–64 years old
177
Economy - employment rate over 65s
178
Economy - businesses in Cambridgeshire
179
Economy - priority investment sites
180
Housing - stock and tenure
181
Housing - need and future supply
182
Indices of Multiple Deprivation
183
Deprivation - percentage of all children in poverty
184
Benefit - claimant rates working age
185
Benefits - pupils eligible for free school meals
186
Health - recorded prevalence of diseases
187
Education - GCSE and equivalent results
188
Skills in Cambridgeshire - percentage of population with qualifications
189
Libraries
190
165
Section 6
Business Plan for Cambridgeshire 2013-2014
Overview - Cambridgeshire map
Key points
Cambridgeshire covers five district councils:
Cambridge, East Cambridgeshire, Fenland, Huntingdonshire,
South Cambridgeshire
166
Statistical Tables
Section 6
Political representation on the County Council
Key points
• The County Council has a majority Conservative Administration – 41 out of 69
councillors.
• Fenland electoral divisions are all Conservative.
• There are no Conservative electoral divisions in Cambridge City; the majority
are Liberal Democrat.
• 21 councillors are Liberal Democrats; the majority being in Cambridge City
and South Cambridgeshire.
• There are three Labour councillors, all in Cambridge.
• In terms of other parties:
• 2 UKIP councillors in Ramsey and Bourn
• 1 Green councillor in Abbey
• 1 Independent councillor in Petersfield
Link
http://www.cambridgeshire.gov.uk/council/
167
Section 6
Business Plan for Cambridgeshire 2013-2014
Political representation in Parliament
Political representation in Parliament
Key points
Key points
• Five of the six parliamentary constituencies in Cambridgeshire are currently
Conservative MPs.
Cambridge is currently
Liberal Democrat.
Fiverepresented
of the sixby
parliamentary
constituencies
in
•
Cambridgeshire are currently represented by
Conservative MPs. Cambridge is currently Liberal
Democrat.
168
Statistical Tables
Section 6
Population - county population structure, Census 2011
Key points
• There were 621,200 people living in Cambridgeshire in March 2011.
• The county has a significant ageing population causing pressure on services.
• The 40-49 bulge represents the relatively high levels of births in the 1960s.
• The 20-24 bulge represents the high student and young professional
population in and around Cambridge.
Link
http://www.cambridgeshire.gov.uk/business/research/
Source: Census 2011
169
Section 6
Business Plan for Cambridgeshire 2013-2014
Population aged over 75 by ward, Census 2011
Key points
• In South Cambridgeshire, around Ely and Littleport and in Fenland, the
proportion of the population aged over 75 is higher than other areas.
Link
http://www.cambridgeshire.gov.uk/business/research/
Source: Census 2011
170
Statistical Tables
Section 6
Population aged over 85 by ward, Census 2011
Key points
• Around March, Ely and Littleport and in wards around Cambridge, the
proportion of the population aged over 85 is higher than other areas.
Link
http://www.cambridgeshire.gov.uk/business/research/
Source: Census 2011
171
Section 6
Business Plan for Cambridgeshire 2013-2014
Forecast
population
change, 2011-16
Forecast
Population
Change,
2011-16
Key points
85+
Key points
80-84
• The population in most age groups is projected to increase.
• The population in most age groups is
to increase
• projected
The age groups
with the biggest increase over the next five years are those
75-79
70-74
aged 65-69, 70-74 and 50-54.
65-69
• The age groups with the biggest increase
• over
The increase
in five
the 5-9
age group
will require
the next
years
are those
aged the
65-provision of more primary
school
accommodation
with
later
impact
on
secondary
places.
69, 70-74 and 50-54.
60-64
55-59
50-54
• •The
in the
ageage
groups
is likely
Theincrease
increase
in older
the 5-9
group
willto put more pressure on adult
social care services.
45-49
require the provision of more primary school
accommodation with later impact on
secondary places.
Link
40-44
35-39
30-34
• The increase in the older age groups is
25-29
http://www.cambridgeshire.gov.uk/business/research/
likely to put more pressure on adult social
20-24
care services
15-19
10-14
5-9
0-4
-10,000
-5,000
0
5,000
10,000
Source: Research and Performance Team Population Forecasts, 2010 base
Source: Research and Performance Team Population Forecasts, 2010 base
Hyperlink
http://www.cambridgeshire.gov.uk/business/research/
Section 6
172
Page 10
Statistical Tables
Section 6
Population density, Census 2011
Key points
Urban areas and large villages have the highest population densities.
Many rural wards have relatively low population densities.
Link
http://www.cambridgeshire.gov.uk/business/research/
Source: Census 2011
173
Section 6
Business Plan for Cambridgeshire 2013-2014
Population - rural : urban split based on standard classification
Key points
On this standard classification based on population density:
• The centre of Cambridgeshire is dominated by wards in the Town and Fringe
category (orange).
• Cambridge, Wisbech area, Ely area and the three market towns in
Huntingdonshire are in the Urban category (grey).
• The Village category (green) covers less area than might be expected based
on other classifications, such as a social classification.
174
Statistical Tables
Section 6
Population - rural : urban split based on standard classification (OAC)
Key points
OAC is a social classification tool developed by the Office of National Statistics
(ONS). It offers sociodemographic data for local neighbourhoods and allows
public services to understand local areas and improve upon their service delivery.
The geography of Cambridgeshire is dominated by three social classifications in
OAC - people who live in:
• Village life
• Accessible Countryside
• Agriculture
These are shown by the shades of green on the map. The geography of
Cambridge is dominated by:
• City Living (yellow)
• Prospering Suburbs (red)
People in the Prospering Suburbs category (red) are represented across the
county.
Based on Census 2001 data.
Link:
http://www.cambridgeshire.gov.uk/business/research/
Social+Classification.htm
175
Section 6
Business Plan for Cambridgeshire 2013-2014
Economy
Gross
Value
Economy
- Gross-Value
Added
(GVA), £Added
per head (GVA),
£ per head
Key points
£30,000
• Cambridgeshire has performed consistently
better than the East of England regional average
Keyand
Points
the UK average. Trends suggest that this is
•Cambridgeshire
likely to continue.has
£25,000
GVA per head
£20,000
England
East of England
£15,000
Cambridgeshire CC
Peterborough
Norfolk
£10,000
Suffolk
performed consistently
• GVAthan
per head
better
the reduced
East ofslightly in 2009 and
resumed
an
upward
trend in 2010.
England regional average
and the UK average.
Trends suggest that this
is likely to continue.
•GVA per head reduced
slightly in 2009 and
resumed an upward trend
in 2010.
£5,000
20
10
(p
ro
vi
si
on
al
)
20
11
20
09
20
08
20
07
20
06
20
05
20
04
20
03
20
02
20
01
20
00
19
99
19
98
19
97
£0
Year
Source: Regional Gross Value Added (Income Approach), Office for National Statistics
Source:
Regional
Gross Value
Released:
12 December
2012 Added (Income Approach), Office for National Statistics Released: 12 December 2012
http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/regional-accounts/regional-gross-value-added--income-approach-/december-2012/stb-regional-gva-2011.html
http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/regional-accounts/regional-gross-value-added--income-approach-/december-2012/stb-regional-gva-2011.html
Section 6
176
Page 14
Statistical Tables
Section 6
Economy - Employment Rate among Working Age Adults (16–64 years old) (%)
Economy - employment rate among working age adults (16–64 years old) (%)
Key points
90.0
85.0
Cambridgeshire
Cambridge
Percentage (%)
80.0
East Cambridgeshire
Fenland
75.0
Huntingdonshire
South Cambridgeshire
70.0
England
East
65.0
60.0
Apr 2004Mar 2005
Apr 2005Mar 2006
Apr 2006Mar 2007
Apr 2007Mar 2008
Apr 2008Mar 2009
Apr 2009Mar 2010
Apr 2010Mar 2011
Apr 2011Mar 2012
Key Points
• Cambridgeshire (dashed
line)
has a consistently
• Cambridgeshire
(dashed line) has a consistently
higher
employment
higher employment
raterate
compared to the England
compared
to the England
average.
average.
• Overall the employment rate in the county has been
since
2004.
• decreasing
Overall the
employment
rate in the county has
• East and South Cambridgeshire currently have the
been decreasing since
highest employment rates of the county.
2004.
• Fenland has seen the sharpest decrease in
• employment
East and South
rate since 2004, dropping by over 10%.
Cambridgeshire currently
have the highest
employment rates of the
county.
• Fenland has seen the
sharpest decrease in
employment rate since
2004 dropping by over
10%.
Source: Annual Population Survey
ONS Crown
Copyright
Reserved
[from Nomis on 17 December 2012]
Source:
Annual
Population
Survey
https://www.nomisweb.co.uk
ONS Crown Copyright Reserved [from Nomis on 17 December 2012]
Section 6
https://www.nomisweb.co.uk
Page 15
177
Section 6
Business Plan for Cambridgeshire 2013-2014
Economy - Employment Rate among over 65s (%)
Economy - employment rate among over 65s (%)
Key points
14.0
• Employment in the over 65s has been increasing
the county. This suggests that people are
Key in
Points
continuing to work for longer throughout the
• Employment in the
county.
12.0
Percentage (%)
10.0
8.0
Cambridgeshire
England
United Kingdom
6.0
• Cambridgeshire has
a higher percentage
of over 65s working
than the national
average.
4.0
2.0
0.0
over 65s has been
increasing
in the has a higher percentage of over
• Cambridgeshire
county.
This
suggests
65s working
than the national average.
that people are
continuing to work for
longer throughout the
county.
Apr 2004- Apr 2005Mar 2005 Mar 2006
Apr 2006Mar 2007
Apr 2007- Apr 2008Mar 2008 Mar 2009
Apr 2009Mar 2010
Apr 2010- Apr 2011Mar 2011 Mar 2012
Source: Annual Population Survey
Source:
Annual Population Survey
ONS Crown Copyright Reserved [from Nomis on 17 December 2012]
https://www.nomisweb.co.uk
ONS Crown Copyright Reserved [from Nomis on 17 December 2012]
Section 6
https://www.nomisweb.co.uk
178
Page 16
Statistical Tables
Section 6
Economy - Businesses in Cambridgeshire
Economy - businesses in Cambridgeshire
Agriculture, forestry &
fishing
Cambridge City
East
Cambridgeshire
Fenland
Huntingdonshire
South
Cambridgeshire
Cambridgeshire
County
100
455
425
515
540
2,035
Production
200
255
290
560
485
1,790
Construction
340
605
540
900
910
3,295
Motor trades
90
150
175
255
225
895
Wholesale
190
190
190
460
365
1,395
Retail
695
305
390
635
430
2,455
Transport & storage (inc.
postal)
65
165
210
310
215
965
Accommodation & food
services
485
175
200
365
315
1,540
Information &
communication
675
220
125
575
730
2,325
Finance & insurance
130
60
70
150
120
530
Property
180
115
80
240
240
855
1,060
520
300
1,155
1,450
4,485
Business administration and
support services
385
265
210
550
540
1,950
Public administration and
defence
80
40
30
85
70
305
Education
400
90
70
190
205
955
Health
330
135
175
330
345
1,315
Arts, entertainment,
recreation and other services
445
275
195
495
430
1,840
5,850
4,020
3,675
7,770
7,615
28,930
Professional, scientific &
technical
TOTAL
Key points
• Huntingdonshire has the highest number of
registered businesses within the county.
Key Points
• The highest proportion of businesses within
• Huntingdonshire
has the
the county is in the professional, scientific and
highest
number
of
technical sector.
registered businesses
•within
Therethe
are relatively
county.few businesses in financial
services across all districts.
• The highest proportion
of businesses within the
county is in the
professional, scientific
and technical sector.
• There are relatively few
businesses in financial
services across all
districts.
Source: Analysis of UK Local Units in VAT and/or PAYE Based Enterprises (Number of active businesses), March 2012, Office for National Statistics
Released:
03 October
2012
Source:
Analysis
of UK
Local Units in VAT and/or PAYE Based Enterprises (Number of active businesses),
http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/publications/re-reference-tables.html?edition=tcm%3A77-254601
March 2012, Office for National Statistics, Released: 03 October 2012
Section 6
http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/publications/re-reference-tables.html?edition=tcm%3A77-254601Key
Page 17
179
Section 6
Business Plan for Cambridgeshire 2013-2014
Economy - priority investment sites
The Enterprise Zone proposal for Alconbury is
designed to:
• encourage investment
• attract innovative companies
• create around 8,000 jobs.
Benefits
• 100% business rate discount (worth up to
£275,000 over a five year period) for businesses
that move into the site.
• All business rates growth within the zone for at
least 25 years retained and shared by the LA in
the LEP area.
• Government and LA help to develop the planning
approaches in the zone.
• Government support to ensure roll out of
superfast broadband.
Links
Alconbury Enterprise Zone | Local Enterprise Partnership
http://www.yourlocalenterprisepartnership.co.uk/alconbury-enterprise-zone-success
RAF Alconbury Environmental Impact Assessment
http://tinyurl.com/alconburyEIA
180
Housing - Stock and Tenure
Statistical Tables
Section 6
Housing - stock and tenure
Total dwelling stock, March 2011
Total dwelling stock, March 2011
Cambridge City
100%
90%
48,130
80%
Cambridge City
48,130
70%
East Cambridgeshire
36,270
50%
Fenland
Huntingdonshire
42,200
71,800
30%
South Cambridgeshire
Huntingdonshire
61,220
71,800
10%
East Cambridgeshire
Fenland
South Cambridgeshire
36,270
42,200
61,220
17%
15%
67%
17%
15%
13%
14%
12%
13%
14%
70%
71%
72%
72%
East Cambridgeshire
Fenland
Huntingdonshire
South Cambridgeshire
49%
20%
0%
16%
24%
60%
40%
28%
Cambridgeshire
Cambridge
Owner Occupiers
Social tenants
Private tenants
Key points
Key points
•The graph above shows the tenure split in 2011. 67% of households in Cambridgeshire are owner-occupied. The proportion
• Theoccupiers
graph aboveisshows
tenureinsplit
in 2011. 67%
households
Cambridgeshire
owner-occupied.
Thetenants.
proportion of owner occupiers is much lower in
of owner
muchthelower
Cambridge
Cityof(49%),
andinthere
are moreare
private
and social
Cambridge City (49%), and there are more private and social tenants.
• Nationally, the number and proportion of households in the private rented sector has increased in the last ten years
and•thisNationally,
has alsothebeen
reflected
locally.of households in the private rented sector has increased in the last ten years and this has also been reflected locally.
number
and proportion
•Affordable housing includes social rented, affordable rented and intermediate housing provided to eligible households whose
• are
Affordable
housing
includes
social rented, affordable rented and intermediate housing provided to eligible households whose needs are not met by the market.
needs
not met
by the
market
Source:
Source:
Dwelling stock: Live tables on dwelling stock, CLG, https://www.gov.uk/government/statistical-data-sets/live-tables-on-dwelling-stock-including-vacants
TenureDwelling
split: Census
2011Live tables on dwelling stock, CLG, https://www.gov.uk/government/statistical-data-sets/live-tables-on-dwelling-stock-including-vacants
stock:
Strategic Housing Market Assessment (SHMA) http://www.cambridgeshire.gov.uk/business/research/housing/
Tenure split: Census 2011
Section 6
Page 19
Strategic Housing Market Assessment (SHMA) http://www.cambridgeshire.gov.uk/business/research/housing/
181
Section 6
Business Plan for Cambridgeshire 2013-2014
Housing - Need and Future Supply
Housing - need and future supply
Cambridge City
East
Cambridgeshire
Fenland
Dwellings Completed 2002-12 (net)
4,871
5,248
5,584
Affordable Dwellings Completed 2002-12 (gross)
1,465
1,079
667
331
370
209
875
Area
Dwellings Completed 2011-12 (net)
South
Cambridgeshire
Cambridgeshire
7,255
7,834
30,792
1,809
2,452
7,472
696
2,481
Huntingdonshire
Affordable Dwellings Completed 2011-12 (gross)
67
82
7
256
192
604
Planned future dwellings (total commitments)
10,366
1,239
3,239
3,386
16,699
34,929
Current affordable housing need
1,744
535
641
921
1,272
6,857
196
65
80
179
230
750
Total affordable housing stock available
Current annual net need for affordable housing
1,548
470
561
742
1,042
4,363
Newly arising need for affordable housing (annual)
1,151
509
519
720
740
3,639
559
319
345
460
309
1,992
592
190
174
260
431
1,647
2,140
660
735
1,002
1,474
6,011
Annual supply of affordable housing (average of
proposed for next 2 years)
Projected net need for affordable housing
Total net need
Key Points
• Thepoints
number of total dwellings completed in 2011-12 was slightly lower than the previous year.
Key
• In 2011-12, the percentage of affordable dwellings built was 23%, slightly lower than the previous year when it was 29%.
• The number of planned developments throughout the county will see a significant increase in the dwelling stock in
next
10 years.
• the
The
number
of total dwellings completed in 2011-12 was slightly lower than the previous year.
• Cambridge City and South Cambridgeshire have the highest levels of affordable housing need. These are the areas
the highestthe
house
prices and
• with
In 2011-12,
percentage
of rents.
affordable dwellings built was 23%, slightly lower than the previous year when it was 29%.
Source
Need (based of
on 2009-10
figures):
Strategic Housing Market
Assessment (SHMA)
http://www.cambridgeshireinsight.org.uk/housing/consultation-shma-chapters
•Affordable
The number
planned
developments
throughout
the county
will see a significant increase in the dwelling stock in the next 10 years.
Dwelling Completions: Cambridgeshire County Council Research and Monitoring,
http://www.cambridgeshire.gov.uk/environment/planning/policies/monitoring/Housing+development.htm
• Cambridge City and South Cambridgeshire have the highest levels of affordable housing need. These are the areas with the highest house prices and rents.
Section 6
Page 20
Source:
Affordable Need (based on 2009-10 figures): Strategic Housing Market Assessment (SHMA)
http://www.cambridgeshireinsight.org.uk/housing/consultation-shma-chapters
Dwelling Completions: Cambridgeshire County Council Research and Monitoring,
http://www.cambridgeshire.gov.uk/environment/planning/policies/monitoring/Housing+development.htm
182
Statistical Tables
Section 6
Deprivation - Indices of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) –2010
Key points
The pattern of deprivation has remained largely the same over previous years
concentrated in Fenland and urban areas.
Fenland (most deprived)
• Since 2007 Fenland’s relative national rank has increased.
• 11 of the 20 most deprived Lower Super Output Areas (LSOAs) in
Cambridgeshire are in Fenland, some of which are in the 20% most deprived
nationally.
• 3 Wisbech wards are amongst the most deprived 10% of the country.
Cambridge City
• Since 2007 Cambridge City’s relative national rank has increased.
• 7 of the 20 most deprived LSOAs in Cambridgeshire are in Cambridge City,
some of which are in the 20% most deprived nationally.
East Cambridgeshire
• Since 2007 East Cambridgeshire’s relative national rank has decreased.
Huntingdonshire
• Since 2007 Huntingdonshire’s relative national rank has increased.
• 2 of the 20 most deprived LSOAs in Cambridgeshire are in Huntingdonshire.
South Cambridgeshire (Least Deprived)
• Since 2007 South Cambridgeshire’s relative national rank has remained the
same.
Links
http://atlas.cambridgeshire.gov.uk/IMD/AllDeprivation/atlas.htmlv
http://www.cambridgeshirejsna.org.uk/
183
Section 6
Business Plan for Cambridgeshire 2013-2014
Deprivation - percentage of all children in poverty (2010)
Key points
This map shows the geographical distribution of child poverty in Cambridgeshire.
The number of children in poverty is defined as the number of dependent
children under the age of 20 living in families in receipt of Child Tax Credit (CTC)
whose reported income is less than 60 per cent of the median income or in
receipt of Income Support or (Income-Based) Job Seekers Allowance, divided by
the total number of children in the area (determined by Child Benefit data).
The concentration of poverty varies significantly across Cambridgeshire.
The concentration of poverty is mostly in urban areas for example, St Neots,
March, Huntingdon, and the north of Cambridge City.
Fenland in particular has a high percentage of children in poverty, especially in
the ward of Waterlees in Wisbech.
Links
http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/statistics/child-poverty-stats.htm
184
Statistical Tables
Section 6
Benefits - claimant rates – working age
Key points
Figures are for all benefits claimants age 16–64 including:
• job seekers
• lone parents
• disabled people and others
Rates vary from 0.5% in one Lower Super Output Area (LSOA) in the ward of
Newnham in Cambridge to 32% in an LSOA in the ward of Staithe in Wisbech.
• There are pockets of benefit dependency across the county, but in general
there is more in the north and less in the south.
• The five most ‘benefit dependant’ LSOAs are in Fenland.
Links
http://www.nomisweb.co.uk/
185
Section 6
Business Plan for Cambridgeshire 2013-2014
Benefits - pupils aged 4 -15 eligible for free school meals
District
Cambridge City
East Cambridgeshire
Fenland
% Eligible in 2009
% Eligible in 2010
% Eligible in 2011*
% Eligible in 2012**
14.0
15.2
14.9
15.3
6.9
8.7
8.8
9.8
13.3
15.6
16.3
17.4
Huntingdonshire
8.4
10.1
10.2
10.3
South Cambridgeshire
5.2
6.8
7.2
7.3
Source: January Pupil Level Annual School Census
Key points
Data for 2009 and 2010 is for all pupils living in Cambridgeshire and attending a
Local Authority maintained school in either Cambridgeshire or Peterborough.
• Percentage of pupils eligible for free school meals varies across the county:
*Note the 2011 data is only for pupils living in Cambridgeshire and attending a
Cambridgeshire Local Authority maintained school, and does not include pupils on roll at
Crosshall Infant or Junior School.
** Note: 2012 data is for children living in Cambridgeshire and attending Cambridgeshire
schools only.
186
• lowest in South Cambridgeshire – 7.3 % in January 2012
• highest in Fenland – 17.4% in January 2012 (over double the proportion
in South Cambridgeshire)
• Overall it appears that the % eligible for free school meals is increasing.
Statistical Tables
Section 6
Asthma
Atrial Fibrillation
Cancer
Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) Primary Prevention
Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) (ages 18+)
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
Coronary Heart Disease (CHD)
Dementia
Depression (ages 18+)
Diabetes Mellitus (Diabetes) (ages 17+)
Hypertension
Mental Health
Obesity (ages 16+)
Stroke or Transient Ischaemic Attacks (TIA)
6.2 6.0
1.3 1.4
1.7 1.5
1.2 1.0
3.6 3.2
1.7 1.3
3.2 2.5
0.5 0.7
14.2 11.3
5.7 4.0
14.5 11.0
0.6 1.0
11.7 7.9
1.6 1.4
Wisbech
Isle of Ely
Hunts Health
Hunts Care
Partnership
Total CATCH
South Villages
North Villages
Herts
Granta
City Suburb
Prevalence (%) by LCG / Locality
CATCH
Cambridge
City
CamHealth
Integrated Care
Disease/Condition
Borderline*
Health
- recorded
prevalence of
diseases by Localof
Commissioning
Health
- recorded
prevalence
diseasesGroup
by (LCG)
LCG2010-2011
2010/11
4.9 6.0 6.1 7.7 6.3 7.4 6.3 7.4 6.8 6.8 6.2
0.9 1.7 0.9 1.5 1.3 1.8 1.3 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.7
1.2 2.2 1.4 1.9 2.1 2.1 1.7 1.8 1.7 2.0 2.0
0.5 1.0 1.3 1.2 0.8 1.4 1.0 1.5 1.6 1.2 1.7
1.5 3.0 2.3 2.4 2.3 3.0 2.4 4.7 4.8 4.7 3.7
0.7 1.1 1.0 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.7 1.6 1.6 2.3
1.7 3.0 1.6 2.8 2.7 3.4 2.5 3.6 3.2 3.3 4.0
0.3 0.5 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5
8.8 9.9 11.3 13.9 8.3 10.4 10.3 14.2 15.5 13.7 16.5
2.4 4.3 3.0 4.4 4.3 4.9 3.8 5.9 5.4 5.9 6.7
7.6 12.2 7.7 13.2 12.5 14.0 10.9 14.7 14.7 13.2 15.1
0.9 1.0 1.2 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5
4.8 6.6 7.0 10.2 9.5 7.3 7.0 10.7 11.2 12.0 13.7
1.0 1.6 0.9 1.5 1.4 1.7 1.3 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.9
Source: NHS Information Centre - Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF)
Notes:
Notes:
LCG - Local Commissioning Group
CATCH
- Cambridgeshire
Association
LCG
- Local
Commissioning
Group to Commission Health
* The Borderline Local Commissioning Group (LCG) includes data from two practices in Northamptonshire
CATCH - Cambridgeshire Association to Commission Health
It is important to note that these data are not age-standardised and so LCGs/localities with older populations will have
higher prevalences of diseases that are associated with old age.
* The Borderline Local Commissioning Group (LCG) includes data from two practices in Northamptonshire
QOF data are based on general practice ascertainment and recording of disease, which may be affected by a range of
factors. This may result in an underestimate of the true prevalence in the population.
Key points
Key Facts, Figures and Issues
•The
most
prevalent
diseases
•The most
prevalent
diseases
and conditions in
and
conditionsamong
in
Cambridgeshire,
those presented, are
depression (among people
aged
18 and over),
Cambridgeshire,
among
those
hypertension,
and
obesity
(among
presented, are depression people aged 16+
years). people aged 18 and
(among
over),
hypertension,
and
obesity disease/
•The LCG/locality
in which
a particular
(among
people
aged
16+
years).
condition is most prevalent varies,
but Wisbech
often has the highest prevalence.
•The LCG/locality in which a
•The prevalence of many diseases/conditions is
particular
disease/condition is
associated with wider determinants of health such
most
prevalent
but
as lifestyle
choicesvaries,
and deprivation.
Wisbech often has the highest
prevalence.
Links
•The prevalence of many
diseases/conditions
is associated
APHO General Practice Profiles:
with wider determinants of health
http://www.apho.org.uk/pracprof/
such
as lifestyle choices and
deprivation.
JSNA website homepage:
http://www.cambridgeshirejsna.org.uk/
It is important to note that these data are not age-standardised and so LCGs/localities with older populations
will have higher prevalences of diseases that are associated with old age.
Links
QOF
data
are based
on general
practice
ascertainment and recording of disease, which may be affected by a
APHO
General
Practice
Profiles:
http://www.apho.org.uk/pracprof/
range
of
factors.
This
may
result
in
an
underestimate
of the true prevalence in the population.
JSNA website homepage: http://www.cambridgeshirejsna.org.uk/
187
Section 6
Business Plan for Cambridgeshire 2013-2014
Education -GCSE and equivalent results, % of pupils achieving 5+ A*-C
Education - GCSE and Equivalent Results, % of Pupils achieving 5+ A*- C
Key points
95
• Results in Cambridgeshire are generally similar to
the average for the East of England and England.
85
Cambridge
75
East Cambridgeshire
Fenland
Huntingdonshire
65
South Cambridgeshire
Cambridgeshire
Links
East
55
England
Source: Department for Education, GCSE
45
35
http://www.education.gov.uk/inyourarea/results/
lea_873_pconlas_3.shtml
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Key points
•Results in Cambridgeshire are generally similar to the average for the East of England and England.
•Results in Fenland are much lower than other areas in Cambridgeshire. Results in South Cambridgeshire are
higher than other areas in Cambridgeshire.
Hyperlinks
Source: Department for Education, GCSE http://www.education.gov.uk/inyourarea/results/lea_873_pconlas_3.shtml
Section 6
188
• Results in Fenland are much lower than other
areas in Cambridgeshire. Results in South
Cambridgeshire are higher than other areas in
Cambridgeshire.
Page 26
Statistical Tables
Section 6
Skills in Cambridgeshire - percentage of population with qualifications
NVQ4+
NVQ3+
NVQ2+
NVQ1+
Qualifications
Other
None
Cambridge City
52.2
67.3
76.4
86.1
6.7
7.1
East Cambridgeshire
36.3
59.1
71.7
83.7
10.8
5.5
Fenland
18.4
35.2
48.8
72.2
14.5
13.3
Huntingdonshire
30.4
49.7
67.3
85.6
5.5
8.9
South Cambridgeshire
38.9
61.8
79.1
90.4
5.2
4.4
Cambridgeshire
36.4
55.7
70.0
84.6
6.6
9.6
East
29.2
49.9
68.5
83.8
6.6
9.6
United Kingdom
32.9
52.7
69.7
82.7
6.7
10.6
Note: NVQ levels are defined as follows: Level 1: Foundation GNVQ; 4-5 GCSEs grade D-E or equivalents
Level 2: Intermediate GNVQ; 5 GCSEs A*-C; 2 A/S Levels or equivalents
Level 3: 2 A Levels A-E; 4 A/S Levels or equivalents
Key points
• A larger proportion of people in Cambridgeshire
are qualified to a higher NVQ level than in the
East or the UK. This is likely to continue.
• Over half the population of Cambridge is
qualified to level 4+ making it one of the highest
of all local authorities in the country.
• Fenland has the highest percentage of individuals
with no qualifications and also just 49% of
people have level 2 qualifications which is well
below the national average.
• There is a great deal of inequality in terms of
high level qualifications within the county.
Level 4+: Foundation or first degree; degree level professional qualifications; HNC/HND; higher degrees
Source: Annual Population Survey, Office for National Statistics
Date: Jan 2011-Dec 2011
https://www.nomisweb.co.uk/
189
Section 6
Business Plan for Cambridgeshire 2013-2014
Cambridgeshire County Council libraries, December 2012
Key points
• There are 32 libraries, four mobile library vehicles and ten library
access points in Cambridgeshire.
• Roughly one in four of the population uses a library service.
Links
Libraries
http://www.cambridgeshire.gov.uk/leisure/libraries/
190