Download Forest and soil carbon do not offset fossil fuel emissions

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Public opinion on global warming wikipedia , lookup

Fossil fuel phase-out wikipedia , lookup

Global warming wikipedia , lookup

Emissions trading wikipedia , lookup

German Climate Action Plan 2050 wikipedia , lookup

Economics of global warming wikipedia , lookup

Climate governance wikipedia , lookup

Climate change and poverty wikipedia , lookup

Climate engineering wikipedia , lookup

Solar radiation management wikipedia , lookup

Climate change feedback wikipedia , lookup

Views on the Kyoto Protocol wikipedia , lookup

2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference wikipedia , lookup

Carbon pricing in Australia wikipedia , lookup

Decarbonisation measures in proposed UK electricity market reform wikipedia , lookup

Climate change mitigation wikipedia , lookup

Economics of climate change mitigation wikipedia , lookup

Climate-friendly gardening wikipedia , lookup

Climate change in New Zealand wikipedia , lookup

IPCC Fourth Assessment Report wikipedia , lookup

Citizens' Climate Lobby wikipedia , lookup

Mitigation of global warming in Australia wikipedia , lookup

Low-carbon economy wikipedia , lookup

Politics of global warming wikipedia , lookup

Carbon emission trading wikipedia , lookup

Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme wikipedia , lookup

Biosequestration wikipedia , lookup

Business action on climate change wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
www.ecosmagazine.com
Published: 3 June 2013
Forest and soil carbon do not offset fossil fuel emissions
Climate change experts have thrown cold water on the idea that planting trees can offset carbon dioxide
emissions from fossil fuels.
Credit: ScienceImage
Professor Brendan Mackey of Griffith University Climate Change Response Program is the lead author of an
international study involving researchers from Australia and the UK. Their findings are reported in a recent article
‘Untangling the confusion around land carbon science and climate change mitigation policy’, published in the scientific
journal Nature Climate Change.
‘While protecting and restoring natural forests is part of the solution, the reality is that for all practical purposes fossil
fuel CO2 emissions are irreversible,’ Professor Mackey said.
The findings highlight the urgent need for policy-makers worldwide to re-think the issue as many decision-makers,
national and internationally, assume that fossil fuel emissions can be offset through sequestering carbon by planting
trees and other land management practices.
‘There is a danger in believing that land carbon sinks can solve the problem of atmospheric carbon emissions because
this legitimises the ongoing use of fossil fuels’, Professor Mackey said.
The study found that protecting natural forests avoids emissions that would otherwise result from logging and land
clearing while also conserving biodiversity. Restoring degraded ecosystems or planting new forests also helps store
some of the carbon dioxide that was emitted from past land use activities.
‘These land management actions should be rewarded as they are an important part of the solution,’ Professor Mackay
said.
‘However, no amount of reafforestation or growing of new trees will ultimately off-set continuing CO2 emissions due
to environmental constraints on plant growth and the large amounts of remaining fossil fuel reserves.
‘Unfortunately there is no option but to cut fossil fuel emissions deeply, as about a third of the CO2 stays in the
atmosphere for 2 to 20 millennia.’
Source: Griffith University
From ECOS online http://www.ecosmagazine.com/?paper=EC13127