Download as a PDF

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Blood transfusion wikipedia , lookup

Platelet wikipedia , lookup

Autotransfusion wikipedia , lookup

Blood type wikipedia , lookup

Men who have sex with men blood donor controversy wikipedia , lookup

Jehovah's Witnesses and blood transfusions wikipedia , lookup

Blood bank wikipedia , lookup

Hemolytic-uremic syndrome wikipedia , lookup

Plateletpheresis wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
BJA Advance Access published July 26, 2004
British Journal of Anaesthesia Page 1 of 17
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aeh227
Perioperative systemic haemostatic agents
A. M. Mahdy and N. R. Webster*
Academic Unit of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
*Corresponding author: Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Institute of Medical Sciences, Foresterhill,
Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK. E-mail: [email protected]
Br J Anaesth 2004
Keywords: blood, factor VIIa; blood, haemostasis; blood, loss; polypeptides, aprotinin
Skilful surgery combined with blood saving methods and
careful management of blood coagulation will all help reduce
unnecessary blood loss and transfusion requirements. Excessive surgical bleeding causes hypovolaemia, haemodynamic
instability, anaemia and reduced oxygen delivery to tissues
with a subsequent increase in postoperative morbidity and
mortality.46 Adverse effects of allogeneic blood transfusion
include transmission of infectious diseases, immunosuppression, transfusion-related acute lung injury, transfusion reactions and graft-vs-host reactions. The cost implication for
blood transfusion is also significant and includes the direct
blood transfusion costs as well as indirect costs originating
from additional treatments and prolonged hospitalization. In
a study conducted in the USA, avoiding allogeneic transfusions reduced total treatment costs in abdominal surgery by
approximately $5000 per patient.65
The role of anaesthetists in managing surgical blood loss
has grown greatly in the last decade. Intraoperative blood loss
varies according to the anaesthetic agent used7 and with
the type of anaesthesia.71 75 Simple elevation of the surgical
site may reduce blood loss, but may risk embolism in regions
with non-collapsing veins.135 Maintaining normothermia
reduces blood loss, because of the deleterious effects of
hypothermia on platelet function.76 Blood coagulation can
also be compromised by fluid replacement and profound
haemodilution. Moderate crystalloid substitution accelerates
rather than inhibits blood coagulation; however, with
advanced crystalloid haemodilution blood coagulation may
become compromised.127 The use of colloids may also compromise coagulation, hydroxyethyl starch more than gelatin
and serum albumin.31 A combination of generous amounts of
#
crystalloids with some colloids may be optimal to maintain
blood coagulation and avoid blood loss as resulting from
coagulopathy.146 Controlled hypotension has been used to
decrease surgical blood loss. The limited efficacy of this
technique may be related to the fact that relatively low
blood pressures are commonly tolerated in routine anaesthesia; thus, a further decrease in mean arterial pressure to
approximately 50 mm Hg may only offer limited benefit.146
Some surgical procedures may be associated with
excessive blood loss and/or deranged haemostasis in patients
without pre-existing haemostatic abnormalities (cardiopulmonary bypass, orthotopic liver transplantation, prostatic
surgery and some orthopaedic procedures). Moreover, we
are increasingly confronted with subgroups of patients
who refuse blood transfusion or who are likely to lose
more blood in the perioperative period (e.g. patients on antiplatelet agents or anticoagulants, patients with hepatic cirrhosis, and those with chronic renal failure). Several
pharmacological haemostatic agents are currently being
used by anaesthetists as blood-saving agents in such
circumstances.
After a brief discussion of the physiology of haemostasis,
we will review the evidence for the role of such agents
in reducing perioperative blood loss and transfusion
requirements.
Physiology of haemostasis in surgery and
trauma
Haemostasis depends on a successful balance between the
coagulation, complement and fibrinolytic pathways, with
The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2004
Downloaded from http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/ at Pennsylvania State University on February 23, 2013
Skilful surgery combined with blood-saving methods and careful management of blood coagulation
will all help reduce unnecessary blood loss and transfusion requirements. Excessive surgical bleeding causes hypovolaemia, haemodynamic instability, anaemia and reduced oxygen delivery to
tissues, with a subsequent increase in postoperative morbidity and mortality. The role of anaesthetists in managing surgical blood loss has increased greatly in the last decade. Position of the
patient during surgery and the provision of a hypotensive anaesthetic regimen were once considered the most important contributions of the anaesthetist to decreasing blood loss. Now,
several pharmacological haemostatic agents are being used by anaesthetists as blood-saving agents.
After a brief discussion of the physiology of haemostasis, this article will review the evidence for the
role of such agents in reducing perioperative blood loss and transfusion requirements.
Mahdy and Webster
Coagulation cascade
Coagulation involves the laying down of a strong fibrin mesh
through the primary platelet plug and is brought about by the
action of a sequence of pro-enzymes and cofactors that work
in concert to generate the final enzyme, thrombin. Thrombin
then directly cleaves fibrinogen to produce fibrin (Fig. 1). The
enzymes involved in blood coagulation belong to a family of
proteases known as serine proteases, a class of enzymes with a
common mechanism of enzymatic action that requires the
catalytic triad of serine, aspartic acid and histidine within the
active site.
Injury to the arterial or venous wall exposes perivascular,
tissue factor-expressing cells to blood. Tissue factor (TF) is a
cellular receptor for activated factor VII (factor VIIa) and
factor VII. It is expressed constitutively in most non-vascular
cells and can be induced in monocytes, endothelial cells,
smooth muscle cells, circulating monocytes, tissue macrophages and fibroblasts. Factor VIIa, found in small amounts in
normal plasma, binds to exposed TF. Once bound to TF,
factor VIIa can catalyse the activation of factor VII, which
also binds to exposed TF. The factor VIIa–TF complex then
activates factors IX and X in the presence of Ca2+, leading to
the generation of factors IXa and Xa respectively. Activation
of factor X through the above mechanism is referred to as the
extrinsic pathway.
The intrinsic pathway is initiated by activation of factor XII
by kallikrein on foreign surfaces or damaged endothelium,
and is facilitated by kininogen. The active form of factor XII,
factor XIIa, catalyses the conversion of factor XI to its active
form, factor XIa. In the presence of Ca2+, factor XIa activates
factor IX to its active form, factor IXa. Factor IXa binds to the
cofactor factor VIIIa bound on membrane surfaces in the
presence of calcium ions to generate a complex with
enzymatic activity known as ‘tenase’, a nickname for the
enzymatic activity that acts on factor X.
Activation of factor X to factor Xa by the extrinsic or
intrinsic pathways is the start of the common pathway of
coagulation. The latter pathway is thought to be of little significance in vivo since patients with factor XII, prekallikrein
or kininogen deficiency have no bleeding disorders. These
proteins are not required for haemostasis. However, they may
play a role in fibrinolysis and in fibrin formation during
inflammation and wound healing. When factor Xa is generated, it complexes with factor Va, phospholipid and calcium
to form the prothrombinase complex, which converts prothrombin to its active form, thrombin. The generated thrombin: (i) cleaves fibrinogen, releasing fibrin; (ii) activates
factor XIII, responsible for cross-linking the fibrin polymer,
rendering it resistant to fibrinolysis; (iii) activates factors V
Fig 1 The coagulation cascade. *A small quantity of activated factor VII is physiologically present in the plasma and is responsible for the initial binding
with tissue factor (TF). Ca2+, calcium ion; PF3, platelet factor-3; HMWK, high molecular weight kininogen.
Page 2 of 17
Downloaded from http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/ at Pennsylvania State University on February 23, 2013
complex interactions between plasma proteins, platelets,
blood flow and viscosity, and the endothelium. Formation
of the primary haemostatic plug at the site of a damaged
vessel is the first event in the control of bleeding. Von
Willebrand factor binds to the exposed subendothelium,
exposing multiple intrinsic binding sites for a specific platelet
membrane structure termed GPIb. This is followed by platelet
activation, adhesion and generation of a platelet plug.
Platelets adhering at the site of injury are exposed to several
activating stimuli, which enhance the initial adhesion
and allow other platelets to accrete on those already
attached. Activation of platelets by thrombin, ADP and
von Willebrand factor–GPIb progresses through several
metabolic pathways to induce spreading of the platelets
over the damaged surface.
Perioperative systemic haemostatic agents
and VIII, generating factors Va and VIIIa, which are cofactors
for factors Xa and IXa; and (iv) is a potent platelet-aggregating agent.
Activation of the coagulation cascade triggers several physiological pathways that tend to counteract and limit the
spread of coagulation to the area of injury.
Antithrombin
Protein C pathway
In addition to inactivation by antithrombin, thrombin is also
inhibited by binding thrombomodulin, a thrombin receptor
found on the endothelium. Once bound to thrombomodulin,
thrombin undergoes a conformational change at its active site
that converts it from a procoagulant enzyme into a potent
activator of protein C. Activated protein C serves as an anticoagulant by proteolytically degrading and inactivating factors Va and VIIIa, thereby blocking thrombin generation.
Tissue factor pathway inhibitor
Inhibition of the factor VIIa–TF complex is affected by
tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI), the majority of
which is bound to endothelium. Tissue factor pathway inhibitor first complexes and inactivates factor Xa and then the
TFPI–factor Xa complex inactivates factor VIIa within the
factor VIIa–TF complex.
Fibrinolytic system
Designed to remove intravascular fibrin, thereby restoring
blood flow, fibrinolysis is initiated by plasminogen activators
that convert plasminogen to plasmin. Plasmin degrades fibrin
into soluble fibrin degradation products. It inactivates factors
Va and VIIIa, amplifies its own generation, disrupts platelet
function and degrades matrix proteins. Human plasminogen
harbours within its structure specific lysine-binding sites that
mediate the binding of plasminogen to fibrin and play a crucial role in the regulation of fibrinolysis. Regulation and
control of the fibrinolytic system is mediated by specific
molecular interactions among its main components, and by
controlled synthesis and release of plasminogen activators
and plasminogen activator inhibitors, primarily from
endothelial cells (Fig. 2). Enzymes of the fibrinolytic system
are serine proteases, whereas the inhibitors of the
fibrinolytic system are grouped into the serpin (serine
proteinase inhibitor) superfamily.
Fig 2 The fibrinolytic system. t-PA, tissue type plasminogen activator;
u-PA, urokinase type plasminogen activator; PAI-1, plasminogen activator
inhibitor I; PAI-II, plasminogen activator inhibitor II; HMWK, high molecular weight kininogen; TAFI, thrombin activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor.
Two immunologically distinct physiological plasminogen
activators have been identified in blood: tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) and urokinase-type plasminogen activator (u-PA). Tissue-type plasminogen activator, which is
synthesized and secreted by endothelial cells, mediates intravascular plasminogen activation and is primarily involved in
the dissolution of fibrin in the circulation. In contrast, u-PA
binds to specific cellular receptors, resulting in enhanced
activation of cell-bound plasminogen, and is primarily
involved in tissue remodelling and repair. The fibrinolytic
system can be inhibited at two levels. Plasminogen activator
inhibitors, the most important of which is endothelial cellderived type 1 plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI-1), block
t-PA and u-PA, whereas a2-antiplasmin inhibits plasmin.
Although a2-antiplasmin rapidly complexes and inactivates
free plasmin, fibrin-bound plasmin is relatively protected
from inactivation, so that fibrinolysis can occur despite
physiological levels of this inhibitor.
A limited number of pharmacological agents have been in
use for correction of haemostatic defects in the perioperative
period. The lack of clear insight into the pathogenesis of
perioperative bleeding as well as its multifactorial origins
has hampered the development of specific and new haemostatic agents and added more confusion and ambiguity to the
mechanisms of action and clinical applications of currently
available agents.
Vasopressin analogues
Desmopressin
Desmopressin acetate, 1-desamino-8-D-arginine vasopressin (DDAVP), is a synthetic vasopressin analogue. It
is pharmacologically altered from naturally occurring vasopressin by deamination of hemicysteine at position 1 and
Page 3 of 17
Downloaded from http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/ at Pennsylvania State University on February 23, 2013
Antithrombin inhibits thrombin, factor Xa and other
activated clotting factors, but these reactions are slow in
the absence of heparin. With heparin, however, the rate of
inhibition is accelerated 1000-fold. Although heparin is not
normally found in the blood, vascular endothelium is rich in
heparan sulphate. Most of the heparan sulphate is located on
the non-luminal surface of the endothelium and is exposed
only when the vessel lining is damaged.
Mahdy and Webster
Desmopressin in cardiac surgery
Cardiac surgery is one of the classic situations in which there
is a call for blood-saving measures. Factors contributing to
the relatively large blood losses include the size of the surgical wound, the exposure of blood to artificial surfaces in the
extracorporeal circuit, enzymatic and mechanical injury to
platelets and coagulation factors, and hyperfibrinolysis during and after cardiopulmonary bypass. In the mid-1980s,
there was considerable interest in the haemostatic effect of
desmopressin in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary
bypass. However, the initial promise suggested by preliminary studies was never confirmed by larger trials. In 1995,
Cattaneo and colleagues17 published a meta-analysis of 17
randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trials which
included 1171 patients undergoing cardiac surgery; 579 of
them were treated with desmopressin and 592 with placebo.
Desmopressin significantly reduced postoperative blood loss
by 9% but had no significant effect on transfusion requirements. In a subanalysis of trials in which the mean blood loss
in placebo-treated patients fell in the upper third of distribution of blood loss, desmopressin significantly decreased postoperative blood loss by 34%. In 1997, Laupacis and
Fergusson78 published another meta-analysis showing that
desmopressin was ineffective in reducing blood loss in cardiac surgery. The primary outcome was the proportion of
patients who received at least one perioperative allogeneic
red cell transfusion. The most recent meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials studying the role of desmopressin in
cardiac surgery was performed by Levi and colleagues86 in
1999, in which the use of desmopressin resulted in a small
decrease in perioperative blood loss but was not associated
with a beneficial effect on other clinical outcomes (mortality,
repeat thoracotomy, proportion of patients receiving transfusion). Moreover, desmopressin was associated with a 2.4-fold
increase in the risk of myocardial infarction.
Therefore, the routine use of desmopressin in uncomplicated cardiac operations in patients without pre-existing
bleeding disorders cannot be recommended. However, its
use may be beneficial in subgroups of patients with an
increased risk of bleeding. In an attempt to identify a
group of patients that might benefit from desmopressin therapy, Mongan and Hosking100 used postoperative thromboelastography to stratify patients according to haemostatic
function. They found that desmopressin reduced blood loss
and transfusion needs in patients with low maximal amplitudes (<50 mm), but no decrease in blood loss occurred in
those patients with a maximal amplitude >50 mm. Despotis
and colleagues21 used a new point-of-care test (hemoSTATUS) to identify patients at risk of excessive bleeding during
cardiac surgery. Patients with abnormal hemoSTATUS
results after discontinuation of cardiopulmonary bypass
were randomly assigned desmopressin or placebo. Patients
who received desmopressin had less blood loss, required less
transfusion of red blood cells, platelets and fresh-frozen
plasma, and had less total blood-donor exposures. It should
be noted, however, that in another study values derived from
the hemoSTATUS system did not correlate with mediastinal
chest tube drainage after cardiopulmonary bypass, which
cast some doubt on the strategy used by Despotis and
colleagues.38
Desmopressin has also been useful in treating patients with
aspirin-induced platelet dysfunction undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass surgery; randomized trials have shown
decreased blood loss and transfusion requirements.27 141
Desmopressin in non-cardiac surgery
There are few clinical trials evaluating the use of prophylactic desmopressin in reducing bleeding in non-cardiac
surgery. There have been two studies evaluating the use of
desmopressin in patients having spinal fusion surgery.
Kobrinsky and colleagues72 reported a beneficial effect in
Page 4 of 17
Downloaded from http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/ at Pennsylvania State University on February 23, 2013
substitution of D-arginine for L-arginine at position 8. These
changes virtually eliminate vasopressor (V1 receptor agonist)
activity, and enhance the antidiuretic (V2 receptor agonist)
action. It also prolongs the duration of action from
2–6 h to 6–24 h by increasing resistance to enzymatic
cleavage.39 Desmopressin is also more potent than arginine
vasopressin in stimulating the endothelial release of factor
VIII and von Willebrand factor into the plasma (V2 receptormediated effect), where they form a complex with platelets
and enhance their ability to aggregate.39 This effect, which
mimics replacement therapy with blood products, forms the
rationale for the use of desmopressin in the treatment of
patients with mild haemophilia A and type I von Willebrand’s
disease, who have spontaneous bleeding or are scheduled to
undergo surgery.113
For haemophilia A, von Willebrand’s disease, uraemic
thrombocytopathy, and when used perioperatively, desmopressin is given in a dose of 0.3 mg kg 1 and infused slowly
because of the risk of acute hypotension.39 Plasma concentrations of factor VIII and von Willebrand factor are approximately doubled or quadrupled, reaching a peak 30–60 min
after i.v. infusion.84 These doses can be repeated as clinically
necessary at intervals of 12 to 24 h, but tachyphylaxis may
occur after three or four doses.92 After i.v. injection, desmopressin has a distribution half-life of 7–8 min and an elimination half-life of 2.5–4.4 h.62
Desmopressin shortens the bleeding time in a variety of
congenital platelet function defects. The ability to shorten the
bleeding time in these patients is unpredictable and must be
assessed individually in each patient.118 Desmopressin can
shorten the prolonged bleeding time in patients with hepatic
cirrhosis and in chronic uraemia,91 despite the fact that von
Willebrand factor and factor VIII are within normal levels. It
is therefore used to prevent haemorrhage after biopsies or
minor surgical procedures or to control acute bleeding in such
patients.128 Patients with prolonged bleeding time secondary
to antiplatelet drugs (aspirin or ticlopidine) may also benefit
from the effect of desmopressin as it promptly normalizes
primary haemostasis and shortens the bleeding time in most
of these patients.128
Perioperative systemic haemostatic agents
Adverse effects
Adverse effects of desmopressin include mild facial flushing,
headache, palpitations and hypotension. Other adverse
effects are the result of the potent antidiuretic action of
this agent, and include water retention, hyponatraemia and
seizures. Desmopressin should also be used with caution
during pregnancy, as it may induce premature labour.113
Desmopressin promotes the release into plasma of tissuetype plasminogen activator, resulting in a short-lived generation of plasmin, which is promptly neutralized by circulating
antiplasmin; no fibrinolytic activation occurs in vivo. Accordingly, inhibiting fibrinolysis when desmopressin is administered is not usually needed.128
One of the concerns that has not been substantiated to date
is the ability of desmopressin to induce a potentially prothrombotic state through enhanced platelet aggregation
and increased factor VIII activity. A recent meta-analysis
of 12 randomized controlled trials using DDAVP in cardiac
surgery reported an incidence of myocardial infarction of
4.4% in the DDAVP-treated group vs 1.6% in the placebotreated group (odds ratio=2.07; 95% confidence interval
0.74–5.85; P=0.19).78 Pooled data from 17 randomized
controlled trials in cardiac and vascular surgery that
specifically mentioned the presence or absence of thrombotic events showed an incidence of myocardial infarction
of 3.9% in the DDAVP-treated group and 3.1% in the
placebo group with an odds ratio of 1.25 (confidence interval
0.72–2.14; P=0.43).157
hyperfibrinolysis are operations requiring cardiopulmonary
bypass, orthotopic liver transplantation, and some urological
and orthopaedic operations. However, antifibrinolytics have
also been widely and successfully used in surgical procedures
not associated with hyperfibrinolysis.
Plasmin, the final enzyme in the fibrinolytic pathway, is a
serine protease. It is not surprising, therefore, that inhibitors
of serine proteases possess antifibrinolytic properties. They
do so by forming reversible enzyme–inhibitor complexes
with plasmin and other serine proteases.90 It is important
to note that coagulation enzymes are serine proteases and
therefore serine protease inhibitors will possess anticoagulation in addition to antifibrinolytic properties.
Lysine analogues reversibly bind to the lysine-binding site
on plasminogen, thereby inhibiting the conversion of plasminogen into plasmin on the surface of fibrin (Fig. 3).90 They
also prevent plasmin degradation of platelet glycoprotein lb
receptors.157 Lysine analogues can potentially enhance haemostasis when bleeding is associated with primary fibrinolysis (hyperplasminaemia). They should not, however, be
used in disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) as
this may increase intravascular thrombosis, unless lowdose heparin is given concomitantly. The reason is that lysine
analogues inhibit both circulating plasmin and fibrin-bound
plasmin and therefore interfere with the dissolution of clots in
Antifibrinolytics
Antifibrinolytic agents in current use include the naturally
occurring serine protease inhibitor aprotinin, the
synthetic protease inhibitor nafamostat and the synthetic
lysine analogues aminocaproic acid and tranexamic acid.
Antifibrinolytic drugs should ideally be used only in those
situations in which hyperfibrinolysis can be detected.
Typical surgical procedures which may be associated with
Fig 3 Mechanism of action of lysine analogues. On the left, EACA or
tranexamic acid (lysine analogues) blocks the lysine-binding site on plasminogen, which is essential for binding to fibrin, and thereby prevents the
activation of plasminogen on the surface of fibrin. Binding of lysine analogues to plasminogen prevents the breakdown of fibrin, even though plasmin is generated (lower left).
Page 5 of 17
Downloaded from http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/ at Pennsylvania State University on February 23, 2013
terms of blood loss and transfusion requirements, while Guay
and colleagues48 found no benefit. Three trials showed no
significant differences in blood loss or transfusion requirements when desmopressin was used in elective total hip/knee
arthroplasty.37 67 136 In aortoiliac surgery, Lethagen and colleagues85 reported a small difference in blood loss with desmopressin, although this difference was not statistically
significant. However, a subgroup analysis showed that in
patients with a basal von Willebrand factor antigen concentration <150 IU dl 1, when treated with desmopressin bled
significantly less than those given placebo. Another more
recent randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
found no benefit in elective aortic surgery when desmopressin
(20 mg i.v.) was given at the time of aortic clamp placement.19
The overall evidence therefore does not support a beneficial
effect of desmopressin in haemostatically normal patients
undergoing elective non-cardiac surgical procedures.
Mahdy and Webster
Epsilon-aminocaproic acid
Epsilon-aminocaproic acid (6-aminohexanoic acid; EACA)
is a competitive inhibitor of plasminogen activation and
inhibits plasmin to a lesser extent (at higher doses). It
has been used in various doses and regimens in patients
undergoing surgery. In general, the recommended dose is
150 mg kg 1 as an i.v. bolus before surgery, followed by
an infusion of 15 mg kg 1 h 1 during the operation.113
EACA is largely eliminated unchanged by renal excretion
and about 35% undergoes hepatic metabolism to the
metabolite adipic acid, which also appears in the urine.
The renal clearance (116 ml min 1) approximates endogenous creatinine clearance, and total body clearance is 169 ml
min 1. The terminal elimination half-life for aminocaproic
acid is 1 to 2 h.113
EACA in cardiac surgery
Several trials have studied the prophylactic administration of
this drug in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. In
most of these studies, aminocaproic acid was compared with
either tranexamic acid or aprotinin. Only a few studies have
compared aminocaproic acid directly with placebo. The
observed efficacy of aminocaproic acid varied somewhat
from study to study, which may be explained by differences
in dosage and time of administration. There are four metaanalyses of EACA in cardiac surgery. Levi and colleagues86
and Fremes and colleagues40 included EACA and tranexamic
acid under the same treatment group (lysine analogues), and
concluded that prophylactic administration of lysine analogues led to a significant reduction in postoperative bleeding
(30–40%), without increasing the incidence of thromboembolic complications. Munoz and colleagues103 compared the
results of five studies in which EACA was used during cardiac
surgery with 52 studies in which aprotinin was used. The
authors concluded that the two antifibrinolytic agents appear
to have similar efficacies, and that the considerably less
expensive EACA may be preferred to aprotinin for reducing
haemorrhage with cardiac surgery. However, we should
interpret the results of the latter study cautiously because
the five EACA studies were in patients undergoing primary
surgery, whereas more than 50% of the aprotinin trials were in
patients undergoing complex or repeat surgery. In one metaanalysis, aminocaproic acid was not found to have a statistically significant effect on the proportion of patients requiring transfusion.78 However, there were only three EACA
trials among the 60 trials included in the analysis. The
poor evaluation of EACA in cardiac surgery and the lack
of an adequate number of large randomized controlled trials
make it difficult to support the use of EACA in this particular
surgical setting.
EACA in non-cardiac surgery
In patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation, Kang
and colleagues66 described a beneficial effect of low-dose
aminocaproic acid (1 g, single infusion). On the other
hand, in a large double-blind trial in which EACA and tranexamic acid were compared with placebo, no significant
difference in transfusion requirements was found between
the EACA and the placebo group.20 However, administration
of the study medication was discontinued at reperfusion of the
new liver, and a possible therapeutic effect could have been
missed because hyperfibrinolytic bleeding is mainly seen
after graft reperfusion. Very low dose EACA (single infusions of 300 mg) is still widely used to treat severe bleeding in
liver transplantation; however, there are no randomized trials
confirming the efficacy of EACA in this setting.
Primary hyperfibrinolysis may occur in patients undergoing prostatic surgery as a result of the release of plasminogen activators from the prostatic tissue. High levels of
plasminogen activators can also be found in urine; this contributes to dissolution of haemostatic clots and haematuria. In
a clinical trial involving patients who had undergone prostatectomy, EACA was effective in controlling postoperative
haematuria compared with placebo, and its use was not
accompanied by significant complications.95 The drug is
not known to reduce the need for transfusion or to decrease
mortality after uncomplicated prostatectomy, and therefore is
not given routinely.
Although EACA has also been used in patients undergoing
other types of surgery, there are not enough data from prospective studies to support the wider application of this agent.
In a recently published Cochrane systematic review of the use
of antifibrinolytics in elective surgery, the results suggested
that EACA might be as effective as other antifibrinolytics.
However, the reviewers could not endorse this finding as they
were able to include only four trials of EACA (208 patients)
compared with 61 trials of aprotinin (7027 patients) and 18
trials of tranexamic acid (1342 patients).57
Adverse effects
The most common acute side-effect with EACA is hypotension that is usually associated with rapid i.v. administration.
Other reported adverse effects are occasionally encountered
Page 6 of 17
Downloaded from http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/ at Pennsylvania State University on February 23, 2013
small blood vessels, further aggravating the condition. This is
at variance with aprotinin, which inhibits circulating plasmin
and spares fibrin-bound plasmin. Additionally, clinical studies indicate that antifibrinolytic amino acids are haemostatically effective even when bleeding is not associated with
overt laboratory signs of hyperfibrinolysis.128 Both drugs
have been widely used to prevent or treat bleeding during
tooth extraction in haemophilia and some other coagulation
disorders. They are used in the management of recurrent
epistaxis, upper gastrointestinal bleeding and primary menorrhagia. Moreover, tranexamic acid appears to reduce the frequency of attacks of hereditary and non-hereditary
angioneurotic oedema. Epsilon-aminocaproic acid and tranexamic acid have been used in the past to reduce the incidence of rebleeding in subarachnoid haemorrhage; however,
this is not currently adopted because both drugs may induce
vasospasm and ischaemic stroke.153
Perioperative systemic haemostatic agents
Tranexamic acid
Tranexamic acid (trans-4-aminomethyl-cyclohexane carboxylic acid) is a competitive inhibitor of plasminogen activation and, at much higher concentrations, a non-competitive
inhibitor of plasmin. Its actions are similar to those of aminocaproic acid, but tranexamic acid is about 10 times more
potent in vitro, with higher and more sustained antifibrinolytic activity.154 Tranexamic acid is usually given as a bolus
dose of 10–15 mg kg 1 i.v. before surgery. In cardiac surgery,
this is followed by 1 mg kg 1 h 1 for 5–8 h. However, a wide
range of dosage regimens has been used in different surgical
procedures.39 113 Only a small fraction of administered tranexamic acid is metabolized; most is excreted unchanged by
the kidney. The dose must be substantially decreased in renal
impairment. Pharmacokinetic studies have revealed that tranexamic acid has a volume of distribution of 9–12 litres and
an elimination half-life of about 2 h.39
There are a number of clinical studies that attest to its
effectiveness in decreasing blood loss and transfusion
requirement after cardiopulmonary bypass. There is also
some evidence that it may be effective in other surgical
procedures.
Tranexamic acid in cardiac surgery
Prophylactic administration of lysine analogues has been
shown to reduce bleeding after cardiopulmonary bypass by
30–40%.40 86 In a recent meta-analysis of 12 trials in patients
undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass, tranexamic acid treatment was associated with a reduction in perioperative blood
loss and allogenic blood transfusion requirements.78 The timing of administration of tranexamic acid in relation to the
onset of cardiopulmonary bypass seems to be crucial for its
beneficial effect. Brown and colleagues10 showed that tranexamic acid was less effective when given after commencement of bypass. Casati and colleagues15 compared
tranexamic acid with high-dose aprotinin in primary elective
cardiac operations. The authors concluded that tranexamic
acid and aprotinin show similar clinical effects on bleeding
and allogeneic transfusion. Because tranexamic acid is about
100 times cheaper than aprotinin, the authors recommend that
its use would be preferable in this setting. Mongan and colleagues99 reported similar results in a similar patient population. However, there seems to be no proof of a reduction in the
operative mortality risk when tranexamic acid is used in
patients undergoing cardiac surgery, an effect that has
been reported with aprotinin.86 The use of tranexamic acid
in adult and paediatric patients undergoing repeat cardiac
surgery was associated with significant reduction in blood
loss and transfusion requirements in two studies.29 120 On the
other hand, Kovesi and Royston thought that the evidence for
the use of tranexamic acid in repeat cardiac surgery is neither
powerful nor consistent.73 Tranexamic acid might also
be effective in reducing blood loss and the need for allogenic
blood products in patients undergoing off-pump coronary
surgery14 and in those undergoing elective thoracic aortic
surgery.16 The use of tranexamic acid in cardiac surgery is
not associated with an increased risk of postoperative myocardial infarction. Wells157 pooled data from 10 randomized
trials that have commented on adverse events, including
thrombosis. The incidence of myocardial infarction in tranexamic acid-treated patients was 0.36% compared with
1.5% in the placebo group. However, the end-points used
for detection of myocardial infarction varied among the different studies and may not always have been adequate. Current evidence suggests that tranexamic acid can safely and
effectively reduce blood loss and allogenic transfusion in
patients undergoing cardiac surgery. It is as effective as aprotinin in the setting of primary cardiac surgery and is far more
cost-effective. The evidence for its use in patients on aspirin
and those undergoing repeat operations is, however, not compelling.
Tranexamic acid in non-cardiac surgery
There have been several double-blind trials in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty in which prophylactic administration of tranexamic acid significantly reduced total blood
loss by up to 50% and decreased transfusion requirements
without increasing the risk of thromboembolic manifestations.58 64 152 Benoni and colleagues5 found no benefit
from administering tranexamic acid after the release of the
tourniquet and stated that for optimum efficacy tranexamic
acid should be administered prophylactically at an earlier
stage. Tanaka and colleagues149 found that two injections
of tranexamic acid, one given before surgery and one on
deflation of the tourniquet, was the optimal technique. In
patients undergoing total hip replacement, Ekback and colleagues32 and Benoni and colleagues4 independently
reported a reduction in intraoperative blood loss when tranexamic acid was given prophylactically. However, when
tranexamic acid was given at the end of the operation, it
did not reduce postoperative blood loss in hip arthroplasty.5
In spite of its effectiveness, tranexamic acid cannot be recommended for every patient undergoing joint replacement; it
Page 7 of 17
Downloaded from http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/ at Pennsylvania State University on February 23, 2013
with longer-term administration, and include rash, nausea
and vomiting, weakness, retrograde ejaculation, myopathy
and even rhabdomyolysis.39 Between 1972 and 1995, 31
cases of EACA-induced myonecrosis and myoglobinuria
were reported. All patients received high doses of oral
EACA for more than 28 days. There are no reports of myonecrosis associated with the i.v. use of EACA in the perioperative setting.138 EACA has been implicated in isolated
cases of diffuse thrombosis and fatal pulmonary embolism
after prostatectomy. However, these reports were never
substantiated and the evidence from controlled studies
indicates that the use of EACA is not associated with an
increased incidence of thrombotic events.157 EACA is
contraindicated in patients with bleeding from the upper
urinary tract because of the risk of clot retention in the ureter
and bladder. It is also teratogenic and is therefore contraindicated in pregnancy.128
Mahdy and Webster
Adverse effects
Gastrointestinal side-effects, such as nausea, diarrhoea and
abdominal cramping, have been reported primarily with oral
forms of tranexamic acid but were not reported with i.v.
administration. Rapid i.v. administration of tranexamic
acid may, however, cause hypotension and should therefore
be administered slowly as an infusion. As with aminocaproic
acid, the major concern with tranexamic acid is the potential
for increasing the perioperative risk of thromboembolic complications (arterial thrombosis, myocardial infarction and
pulmonary embolism). However, apart from anecdotes and
case reports, there is no clear-cut evidence that tranexamic
acid is associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic
complications. With respect to renal toxicity from the use of
tranexamic acid, there is little to suggest concern. However,
in one study a group of patients were given tranexamic acid
intraoperatively and for 12 h after surgery, while another
group received tranexamic acid only intraoperatively. The
continued postoperative use of tranexamic acid added no
advantages in terms of blood saving and was associated
with a tendency to renal dysfunction.13
Nafamostat
In 1981, Fujii and Hitomi44 first reported the use of nafamostat mesilate as a synthetic protease inhibitor. It inhibits
thrombin, factors Xa and XIIa, kallikrein, plasmin and complement factors (C1r, C1s). As such, it works as an antifibrinolytic, anticoagulant and anti-inflammatory agent.
Moreover, it has also been shown to preserve platelet function
during cardiopulmonary bypass. Clinically, it has been used
in the treatment of disseminated intravascular coagulation
and acute pancreatitis. It has also been investigated as an
anticoagulant in extracorporeal circuits and as a haemostatic
agent in cardiac surgery. Several studies conducted in Japan
reported a significant reduction in postoperative blood loss
when nafamostat was used in cardiac surgery.104 132 148
Moreover, in a controlled study of 22 patients undergoing
hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma, there was a
significant reduction in fibrinolytic activity together with a
reduced blood transfusion rate in patients who were treated
with nafamostat.143
Aprotinin
Aprotinin is a naturally occurring 58-residue polypeptide
derived from bovine lung with a molecular weight of
6512 Da. It is a powerful inhibitor of plasmin, trypsin, chymotrypsin, kallikrein, thrombin and activated protein C,
through the formation of reversible enzyme–inhibitor complexes.90 157 The enzymatic activity of aprotinin is generally
expressed in kallikrein inactivator units (KIU), with 1 KIU
defined as the amount of aprotinin that decreases the activity
of two biological kallikrein units by 50%.39 The mechanisms
by which aprotinin exert its haemostatic effects are not fully
understood. Studies of perioperative haemostasis have shown
that plasma markers of fibrinolytic activity, such as D-dimers,
are suppressed during the use of aprotinin.109 119 This led to
the conclusion that aprotinin reduces perioperative bleeding
by acting as a powerful antifibrinolytic. It inhibits circulating
plasmin without interfering with fibrin-bound plasmin, and
therefore it does not prevent the dissolution of clots in small
blood vessels, an effect that is not observed with antifibrinolytic lysine analogues.128 At higher doses, aprotinin also
inhibits kallikrein and thus the intrinsic pathway of coagulation with a subsequent reduction in contact-factor-dependent
fibrinolysis and bradykinin production. Plasma concentrations of 125 KIU ml 1 are usually needed to inhibit plasmin,
whereas concentrations of 300–500 KIU ml 1 are needed to
inhibit kallikrein.61
There is controversy in the literature regarding the effects
of aprotinin on platelets. Initial studies in patients undergoing
cardiac surgery suggested that aprotinin protects platelets
against the initial effect of cardiopulmonary bypass.79 151
This has been challenged recently by other studies suggesting
that aprotinin does not influence platelet function.109 156 The
currently held view is that the haemostatic effect of aprotinin
is exerted mainly through inhibition of plasmin. Although
aprotinin does not directly affect platelet adhesion or
aggregation, it may indirectly protect platelets through the
inhibition of various platelet agonists produced during cardiopulmonary bypass, including plasmin.142
In addition to its haemostatic properties, aprotinin has multiple actions that may suppress the inflammatory response,
particularly at higher dosages. By inhibiting kallikrein, aprotinin blocks the conversion of kininogen to the inflammatory
mediator bradykinin.155 It also inhibits the activation of C1 of
the complement system,155 attenuates the release of TNF-a,59
interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-8,50 inhibits endogenous cytokineinduced nitric oxide synthase induction,60 decreases bypassinduced leucocyte activation155 and inhibits monocyte and
granulocyte adhesion molecule up-regulation.45
Page 8 of 17
Downloaded from http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/ at Pennsylvania State University on February 23, 2013
should be considered for patients in whom large blood losses
are predicted or for those who refuse blood transfusion.
Tranexamic acid has also been used in the setting of orthotopic liver transplantation. In a small randomized, placebocontrolled study, it was shown that prophylactic infusion of
low-dose tranexamic acid (2 mg kg 1 h 1) reduced fibrinolysis but not transfusion requirements during orthotopic liver
transplantation.68 On the other hand, Boylan and colleagues9
and Dalmau and colleagues20 independently examined the
effect of high-dose tranexamic acid (10–40 mg kg 1 h 1) in
primary orthotopic liver transplantation; both groups
reported a significant reduction in intraoperative blood loss
and transfusion requirements. The use of tranexamic acid in
prostatic surgery is not very well studied, although it has been
reported that prolonged oral administration of tranexamic
acid (1 g three times daily orally for 3 weeks) may reduce
the incidence of secondary bleeding and the number
of readmissions for haemorrhagic complications after
prostatic surgery.30
Perioperative systemic haemostatic agents
Aprotinin has been used in different dose administration
regimens, the most common being a loading dose of 2 million
KIU followed by continuous infusion of 500 000 KIU h 1.125
In cardiac surgery, an additional 2 million KIU is added to the
bypass pump prime.39 After i.v. injection, rapid redistribution
of aprotinin occurs into the extracellular space, leading to a
rapid initial decrease in plasma concentration. It is metabolized in the proximal renal tubules and eliminated in a
biphasic pattern: a rapid-phase half-life of approximately
40 min and a slower phase half-life of 7 h.113
Aprotinin in cardiac surgery
Aprotinin in non-cardiac surgery
In major thoracic surgery, blood loss can be a serious problem. This is particularly noticed in surgery for inflammatory
pulmonary disease, decortication procedures and re-thoracotomies for recurrent tumours. Kyriss and colleagues77 and
Bedirhan and colleagues3 independently reported a significant reduction in perioperative transfusion requirements and
postoperative bleeding when aprotinin was used during major
thoracic surgery. This was not accompanied by increased
thromboembolic complications. Available data suggest
that aprotinin may be also beneficial in reducing blood
loss in lung transplant recipients.70 High-dose aprotinin
has been used almost routinely in Europe to reduce blood
loss in orthotopic liver transplantation, the first experience
dating back to 1989.108 Recently, two placebo-controlled
trials have shown beyond doubt that aprotinin reduces
blood transfusion requirements during orthotopic liver transplantation by 30–40% compared with placebo.36 114 Moreover, there is emerging evidence that aprotinin might have a
stabilizing effect on haemodynamics after reperfusion of the
new liver.98 This is probably attributable to its antikallikrein
activity, blocking activation of the contact system and
the subsequent release of vasodilating substances, such as
bradykinin.
In major orthopaedic surgery, several controlled trials have
shown that aprotinin significantly reduces the transfusion
requirement compared with placebo. This is of particular
benefit in spine surgery, revision or bilateral hip surgery,
total knee arthroplasty, pelvic surgery and surgery for
Page 9 of 17
Downloaded from http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/ at Pennsylvania State University on February 23, 2013
It was the anti-inflammatory properties of aprotinin that first
prompted its use in cardiac surgery but, coincidentally, the
initial studies showed a significant reduction in blood loss
and transfusion requirements.123 Subsequently, multiple
well-designed double-blind trials have demonstrated the
effectiveness of aprotinin in patients undergoing procedures
requiring cardiopulmonary bypass.6 49 81 Aprotinin has been
of particular benefit in operations characterized by
large blood losses, such as those in patients taking aspirin,126
in patients with endocarditis,150 and in patients undergoing
re-operation144 or heart transplantation.115 Moreover, aprotinin significantly reduces blood loss in patients undergoing
off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.33 There are four
recent meta-analyses, each of which confirms the efficacy of
aprotinin in reducing blood loss and the need for blood transfusion without increasing the risk of myocardial infarction.40 78 86 103 The use of aprotinin was also associated
with a two-fold reduction in mortality, an effect that was
not shared by other antifibrinolytics.86 In a multicentre, double-blind placebo-controlled trial, Levy and colleagues87
studied the effect of three different regimens of aprotinin
in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
Patients were randomly assigned to either high-dose aprotinin (2·106 KIU loading dose, 2·106 KIU added to the circuit
prime, and a continuous infusion of 5·105 KIU h 1 during
surgery); low-dose aprotinin (1·106 KIU loading dose,
1·106 KIU added to the circuit prime, and a continuous
infusion of 2.5·105 KIU h 1 during surgery); and a pumpprime only regimen (2·106 KIU aprotinin added to circuit
prime). The percentage of patients requiring donor blood
transfusions in the high- and low-dose aprotinin groups
was reduced, whereas pump-prime-only aprotinin had no
effect. The efficacy of different low-dose aprotinin regimens
has also been reported by other research groups,53 69 but there
has been a lack of consistency in the literature regarding the
efficacy of prime-only aprotinin regimens.87 131
In contrast to low-dose aprotinin, high-dose aprotinin has
an anticoagulant activity and decreases thrombin generation,
which does not seem to interfere with its haemostatic activity.24 Interestingly, a recent meta-analysis reported a lower
incidence of stroke in patients receiving high dose aprotinin,105 and Lemmer and colleagues suggested that pumpprime-only regimens are possibly associated with more
frequent myocardial infarctions.80 In clinical studies,
high-dose aprotinin reduces post-bypass myocardial ischaemia and myocyte damage,159 and hospital length of stay in
high-risk patients.47 In addition to its haemostatic effect,
aprotinin decreases experimental bypass-induced and
cytokine-induced bronchial inflammation,11 and attenuated
lung reperfusion injury following bypass in one small clinical
study.117 It seems, however, that aprotinin in doses currently
used to reduce blood loss has no significant influence on the
systemic inflammatory response during moderate hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass.134
Although not overwhelming, evidence favours the use of
aprotinin over other antifibrinolytics as a haemostatic agent in
cardiac surgery. It is the most extensively studied antifibrinolytic in this setting. It has consistently been reported to
reduce blood loss and transfusion requirements. It is the
only antifibrinolytic that has been associated with reduced
mortality, a reduced incidence of strokes and shorter hospital
stay. Moreover, there are suggestions that its use might be
associated with reduced myocardial reperfusion injury and
post-bypass inflammatory response. It should, however, be
noted that aprotinin is the least cost-effective antifibrinolytic.
Some argue that the routine use of aprotinin in all patients
should be discouraged because many cardiac surgical procedures are not associated with the need for blood transfusion.
This would also avoid the unnecessary risk of sensitization as
well as other adverse effects.
Mahdy and Webster
Adverse effects
Administration of aprotinin introduces a foreign polypeptide
into the systemic circulation; it is therefore not surprising that
hypersensitivity reactions may occur. These reactions range
from mild skin flushing to severe anaphylaxis and circulatory
shock. Most of the published case reports of severe anaphylactic reactions with aprotinin occurred in patients with a
history of being exposed to the drug.22 23 133 Dietrich and
colleagues26 evaluated 121 patients undergoing repeat cardiac surgery who were re-exposed to aprotinin. Preoperative
anti-aprotinin IgG and IgE antibodies were detected in 18 and
nine patients respectively. Three patients out of the 121
(2.5%) experienced an anaphylactic reaction after aprotinin
exposure, followed by full recovery; these patients had reexposure intervals of less than 6 months and the highest
preoperative IgG concentrations of all patients. The authors
concluded that quantitative detection of anti-aprotinin IgE
and IgG lacks specificity for predictive purposes; however,
quantitation of anti-aprotinin IgG may identify patients at risk
of developing an anaphylactic reaction to aprotinin reexposure. It has been estimated that on first-time exposure
the risk of anaphylaxis is less than 0.5%.15 This increases to
4–5% in those re-exposed within 200 days and drops to 1–2%
in those re-exposed after more than 200 days.25 Pretreatment
with corticosteroids and antihistamines seems to have limited
effect in preventing such reactions.157
Isolated case reports of graft occlusion and pulmonary
artery catheter thrombosis after the use of aprotinin in cardiac
surgery have fuelled an ongoing debate concerning its
safety.8 124 In the international study of perioperative transfusion,78 the incidence of perioperative myocardial infarction
was 8% in patients receiving aprotinin vs 5.6% in the placebo
group. Although this difference was not statistically significant, the number of patients was not enough to exclude a small
but clinically important increase in myocardial infarction in
patients treated with aprotinin. However, it is to be noted that
in controlled studies in which coronary angiography was used
to assess graft patency, aprotinin did not lead to an increased
rate of early occlusion of saphenous vein or internal mammary artery grafts.51 81 Moreover, Alderman and colleagues1
demonstrated no difference between 436 patients who used
high-dose aprotinin and 434 treated with a placebo in the
incidence of perioperative acute myocardial infarction and
mortality.
There has been some concern regarding the possibility of
an increased risk of postoperative deep-vein thrombosis in
patients treated with aprotinin. Samama and colleagues129
recently conducted a multicentre, double-blinded study to
compare the risk/benefit ratio of large- and small-dose aprotinin with placebo after major orthopaedic surgery. In their
study, bilateral ascending venography was systematically
performed on the third postoperative day. There was no
increase in deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism
in the aprotinin groups. In another study, by Murkin,106 compression ultrasonography with colour Doppler imaging was
used to evaluate the presence of deep-vein thrombosis in
patients undergoing unilateral hip replacement. There was
no significant increase in the rate of deep-vein thrombosis in
patients treated with low- or high-dose aprotinin compared
with placebo. The possibility that low-dose aprotinin might
lead to more thrombotic events compared with high-dose
aprotinin is still controversial.
Aprotinin has a high affinity for renal tissue, and is potentially nephrotoxic in high concentrations. Feindt and colleagues35 suggested that aprotinin causes a reversible overload
of the tubular reabsorptive mechanisms, resulting in transient
renal dysfunction. Aprotinin may also exert direct toxic
effects on the proximal tubular cells or alter intrarenal
blood flow through inhibition of renin and kallikrein activity.157 Several randomized studies in patients undergoing
cardiac surgery81 137 or orthotopic liver transplantation surgery97 have shown no adverse effects of aprotinin on postoperative renal function. However, other studies reported a
trend towards a mild to moderate increase in postoperative
serum creatinine; this was not associated with clinically
important adverse outcome (e.g. need for dialysis or irreversible renal failure).82 147
Aprotinin, being extracted from bovine lungs, has been
recently withdrawn in Italy because of concerns that it
might transmit the agent responsible for bovine spongiform
encephalopathy and new-variant Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease.
The manufacturers of aprotinin state that the bovine lungs
used to extract aprotinin were collected in geographical areas
in which no cases of transmissible spongiform encephalopathy had been recorded, and there is no evidence that any
patients with the disorder have received aprotinin.90
Conjugated oestrogens
Conjugated oestrogens, like desmopressin, shorten prolonged bleeding times and reduce or stop bleeding in patients
with uraemia. The effect of conjugated oestrogens on the
bleeding time is more prolonged (10–15 days) than that of
Page 10 of 17
Downloaded from http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/ at Pennsylvania State University on February 23, 2013
infectious or neoplastic bone diseases.12 83 107 129 In one of
these studies, the authors suggested that a much higher dose of
aprotinin (4·106 KIU initial dose followed by 1·106 KIU
h 1) might be required to obtain a significant blood-sparing
effect in this group of patients.129 None of these trials has
reported an increased incidence of postoperative deep venous
thrombosis or pulmonary embolism associated with aprotinin. Recently, Palmer and colleagues110 studied the efficacy
of prophylactic high-dose aprotinin in reducing intraoperative blood loss in neurosurgery in 100 patients enrolled in a
randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. There
was a significant reduction in intraoperative blood loss in
the aprotinin group and aprotinin treatment was not associated with an increased risk of thrombotic events, even
though patients did not receive prophylactic anticoagulation
therapy in the postoperative period.
Perioperative systemic haemostatic agents
Recombinant activated factor VII
Recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) was originally developed
for the treatment of bleeding complications in haemophilia
patients with inhibitors against factors VIII or IX.54 In this
group of patients, surgery has always been a challenge as it
may result in life-threatening bleeding that is difficult to
manage by usual measures. Studies have shown that surgery
in patients with high-titre inhibitors against factor VIII or IX
can be performed safely using rFVIIa.52 139 Therapeutic
effects of rFVIIa begin at doses up to 10 times higher
than physiological concentrations of endogenous factor
VII. It is therefore used as a pharmacological intervention
rather than a mere replacement of a deficient coagulation
factor. Recombinant factor VIIa acts by enhancing the natural coagulation pathway through the formation of tissue
factor–factor VIIa complex at the site of endothelial damage.
This strictly localized effect is what makes rFVIIa different
from other haemostatic agents and almost eliminates all
undesirable side-effects. Moreover, studies have shown
that rFVIIa, when given in supraphysiological dosage, can
bind to the phospholipid membranes of activated platelets
where it activates factor X independent of the tissue factor
pathway, leading to a massive rise in thrombin generation at
the platelet surface.101 High-dose rFVIIa can therefore compensate for a lack of factor VIII or factor IX through what has
been described as a bypass effect,28 which explains its efficacy in treating patients with haemophilia with inhibitors.
This may also explain the effectiveness of rFVIIa in treatment of bleeding episodes in patients with platelet function
disorders.112
Because of its a short half-life (2.7 h), rFVIIa has to be
given as 2-hourly boluses or as a continuous infusion. Which
of these regimens is better is still a matter of debate. Some
studies have shown that continuous infusions result in a satisfactory haemostatic response.130 However, others have
reported that continuous infusions can be ineffective.145
Despite these conflicting results, rFVIIa can be administered
by continuous infusion as long as levels of factor VII:C of
30–40 IU ml 1 are achieved in the immediate postoperative period and levels are maintained above 10 IU ml 1
thereafter.34
Recombinant factor VIIa is a pan-haemostatic agent and as
such can be used in treating bleeding episodes in other disorders of haemostasis, such as factor VII deficiency, quantitative and qualitative platelet disorders, acquired von
Willebrand disease, uraemia and liver disease.18 43 63 74 112 121
The use of rFVIIa in patients without pre-existing haemostatic defect is currently under intense investigation. Preliminary results suggest that it can be used safely and
effectively to control life-threatening bleeding in surgery
and trauma, when all other measures have failed. It can
also be used to reduce blood loss and transfusion requirements in elective surgical procedures associated with excessive bleeding. It should be noted, however, that rFVIIa has not
been approved for use in any of these applications. The
mechanism of action of rFVIIa suggests enhancement of
haemostasis limited to the site of injury without systemic
activation of the coagulation cascade. Therefore, the use of
the drug in trauma patients suffering uncontrolled haemorrhage appears to be rational. Martinowitz and colleagues93
reported the use of rFVIIa in seven massively bleeding, multitransfused, and coagulopathic trauma patients after failure of
conventional measures to achieve haemostasis. Administration of rFVIIa in a dose range of 120–212 mg kg 1 resulted in
cessation of the diffuse bleeding, with significant reduction
in blood transfusion requirements, and shortening of
prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin
time. The results of this report suggest that rFVIIa may
Page 11 of 17
Downloaded from http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/ at Pennsylvania State University on February 23, 2013
desmopressin (6–8 h). However, they must be administered
for a few days before a clinically significant effect can be
noticed.89
Conjugated oestrogens (e.g. Premarin, Wyeth-Ayerst
Laboratories, Philadelphia, PA, USA), given i.v. at a cumulative dose of 3 mg kg 1 (0.6 mg kg 1 daily for 4–5 consecutive days), have been reported to considerably shorten
the bleeding time, by 50%, for at least two weeks in uraemic
patients.89 A daily oral dose of 50 mg shortened the bleeding
time after an average of 7 days of treatment.140
The mechanism of the effect of conjugated oestrogens
on the bleeding time in patients with uraemia is unknown.
However, there is evidence that they increase levels of von
Willebrand factor and factors VII and XII. They may also
increase levels of physiological inhibitors of coagulation,
such as antithrombin.113
In patients with chronic renal insufficiency, recombinant
erythropoietin causes a dose-dependent increase in haematocrit, which is paralleled by a pronounced shortening of the
bleeding time and improvement of platelet adhesion.96 The
routine use of erythropoietin in chronic renal insufficiency
has therefore limited the scope for the use of haemostatic
drugs such as desmopressin and conjugated oestrogens.
Very few trials have been conducted to determine the efficacy of oestrogens in reducing blood loss during surgery. In
one randomized, placebo-controlled trial in patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation, conjugated oestrogens
significantly reduced transfusion and coagulation factor
requirements.41 In another study, the use of conjugated oestrogens was associated with a 37% reduction in postoperative
bleeding after paediatric scoliosis surgery.94
Conjugated oestrogens are well tolerated and side-effects
are negligible or absent. Since no more than five to seven daily
doses are recommended, adverse effects due to oestrogenic
hormonal activity are usually avoided. However, in a case
report by Litwack and Horrow,88 the authors thought that the
use of conjugated oestrogens might have contributed to the
development of fatal occlusion of all saphenous vein grafts
after coronary artery bypass grafting. In general, the role of
conjugated oestrogens in perioperative haemostasis is limited
and at best not well investigated.
Mahdy and Webster
Adverse effects
A major concern when using activated coagulation factors
such as rFVIIa is the possible induction of DIC or thromboembolism. However, in the many studies performed so far,
rFVIIa was not associated with systemic activation of the
coagulation cascade. An analysis of nearly 2000 patients
treated with rFVIIa showed neither venous nor arterial thromboembolic events.122 Between July 1996 and August 2000
more than 140 000 single doses of rFVIIa were administered:
seven myocardial infarctions have been reported, all in
patients with predisposing risk factors; four cases of cerebral
ischaemia; four cases of pulmonary embolism; and three
cases of venous thromboembolism in other parts of the
body.116
The use of rFVIIa in sepsis is potentially hazardous; this is
because tissue factor is inducible in monocytes by toxins
risking intravascular clot formation. However, the application of active site inhibited FVIIa in a sepsis model in
baboons blocked tissue factor and reduced intravascular
fibrin deposition and secondary organ failure.158
Conclusions
Control of intraoperative blood loss requires contribution
from both the surgeon and anaesthetist. Meticulous surgical
haemostasis, proper positioning, control of blood pressure,
judicious fluid replacement, maintenance of normothermia
and correction of clotting factor deficiencies are the basic
components of surgical field haemostasis. Such measures
will suffice in most patients. Systemic pharmacological
haemostatic agents may be of additional benefit in surgical
settings associated with excessive surgical bleeding and/
or hyperfibrinolysis, in patients with borderline or mild
haemostatic defects, or in those who refuse blood transfusion
(Table 1). Anticipating the need for the use of these agents is
important, as they have always been more effective when
used prophylactically.
Desmopressin is useful in patients with mild haemophilia
or type I von Willebrand’s disease who are undergoing surgery. It has also been used successfully to treat or prevent
bleeding in patients with congenital or acquired defects of
platelet function, chronic liver disease and uraemia. There
have been no well-conducted clinical trials demonstrating the
efficacy of prophylactic desmopressin in surgical patients
with no previous haemostatic defects.
Antifibrinolytics are perhaps the most extensively studied
haemostatic agents in the perioperative period. Most of the
studies have focused on their use in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. Aprotinin is the antifibrinolytic agent
that has the best evidence supporting its use. Its efficacy and
safety have been evaluated more extensively. It consistently
reduces blood loss and transfusion requirements, and it is the
only antifibrinolytic agent that has been associated with
reduced mortality, a decreased incidence of stroke, and shortened hospital stay. There are suggestions that its use might be
associated with reduced myocardial reperfusion injury and
post-bypass inflammatory response. The lysine analogues
aminocaproic acid and tranexamic acid are probably as effective as aprotinin in reducing blood loss during cardiac surgery.
However, they are poorly evaluated and data supporting their
use are rather scarce. This is unfortunate because they have a
good safety profile and are significantly cheaper than aprotinin. In non-cardiac surgery, there is some evidence to support the use of antifibrinolytic drugs in patients undergoing
orthotopic liver transplantation, and in major orthopaedic,
vascular and thoracic surgery.
Recombinant FVIIa is a novel and potent haemostatic
agent that has been used for the prevention or treatment
Page 12 of 17
Downloaded from http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/ at Pennsylvania State University on February 23, 2013
prove to be of value as an adjunctive haemostatic agent in
trauma patients. In other case reports of patients without preexistent coagulation disorders, who bled profusely during
various surgical procedures, the use of rFVIIa was reported
to stop bleeding very efficiently.56 102
Recombinant factor VIIa has also been investigated in the
elective settings of cardiac, prostatic and liver transplant
surgery. Al-Douri and colleagues2 evaluated the role of
rFVIIa in five patients (one child aged 2.5 yr and four adults)
undergoing surgical procedures including arterial switch,
closure of atrial septal defect, and mitral valve replacement
with tricuspid valve repair. Haemostasis was achieved with a
single dose (30 mg kg 1) of rFVIIa. The authors concluded
that rFVIIa represents an effective and well-tolerated treatment for serious bleeding episodes both during cardiac surgery and postoperatively.
A recently reported pilot study in six patients undergoing
orthotopic liver transplantation showed a significant reduction of blood loss and red cell transfusions in patients
treated with a single dose of rFVIIa.55 A limitation of
this study was the use a historical control group for comparison. Moreover, a recently performed placebo-controlled
randomized, controlled trial using single-dose rFVIIa (20,
40 or 80 mg kg 1) in liver transplantation did not confirm
the previous findings.111 In both trials, rFVIIa was not
associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic complications, in particular hepatic artery thrombosis. Friederich and colleagues42 reported the use of rFVIIa in patients
undergoing transabdominal prostatectomy. Before surgery,
a single dose of rFVIIa (20 or 40 mg 1 kg) was given and
compared with placebo. A significant reduction of blood
loss, of 45%, was seen in patients treated with rFVIIa, with
no adverse effects noted. This study is of major importance
as it is the first randomized controlled trial to indicate
that surgical blood loss can be reduced in individuals
with normal haemostatic function by the use of a single
dose of rFVIIa.
It is clear that rFVIIa is a novel haemostatic agent that has
the potential to reduce perioperative blood loss in patients
with or without preoperative haemostatic abnormality.
Results of currently ongoing large trials are awaited before
wider application of rFVIIa is considered.
Perioperative systemic haemostatic agents
Table 1 The advantages and disadvantages of the various haemostatic agents
Advantages
Disadvantages
Desmopressin
Useful in patients with mild haemophilia or type I
von Willebrand’s disease undergoing surgery.
Can be used to treat or prevent bleeding in
patients with congenital or acquired defects of
platelet function, chronic liver disease and uraemia.
Useful in treating patients with aspirin-induced
platelet dysfunction undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass.
Available evidence does not support its use in haemostatically
normal patients undergoing elective cardiac or non-cardiac
surgical procedures.
Reports of increased risk of postoperative myocardial
infarction in patients undergoing coronary
artery bypass grafting.
Epsilon-aminocaproic
acid
Has been poorly evaluated in cardiac and non-cardiac surgery and adequate large randomized controlled trials are lacking.
This makes it difficult to draw conclusions for or against its use in surgical patients.
Tranexamic acid
Effective in reducing the need for blood transfusion in
patients undergoing primary cardiac surgery, off-pump
coronary surgery and thoracic aortic procedures.
Effective in reducing blood loss in joint replacement
operations and orthotopic liver transplantation.
Inexpensive with adequate safety profile.
In cardiac surgery, it has not been effective in reducing
blood loss in patients on aspirin and those undergoing
repeat operations.
Anecdotes suggesting an increased incidence of
thromboembolic manifestations associated with its use.
Concerns regarding renal toxicity if its use is continued
postoperatively.
Nafamostat
Effective in reducing blood loss when used in orthotopic
liver transplantation,
and cardiopulmonary bypass procedures.
No experience with its use in the UK, Europe or the USA.
Aprotinin
Has been consistently reported to reduce transfusion
requirements in cardiac surgery. It is of particular
benefit in patients taking aspirin, in patients with
endocarditis, and in patients undergoing repeat
operations, off-pump surgery or heart transplantation.
Hypersensitivity reactions, particularly on re-exposure.
Case reports of graft occlusion after cardiopulmonary bypass;
other reports suggest an increased incidence of
thromboembolic manifestations.
Trend towards a mild to moderate increase in postoperative
serum creatinine.
The only antifibrinolytic that has been associated with
reduced mortality, reduced incidence of strokes and
shorter hospital stay.
Has been effective in reducing blood loss in major thoracic
surgery, in major orthopaedic surgery, and orthotopic
liver transplantation.
Factor VIIa
Has not been approved for use as a haemostatic agent in
patients without pre-existing bleeding disorders
undergoing elective surgery.
More clinical trials are awaited before definitive conclusions
can be made about the safety and the exact role of this
new drug in surgical patients.
Case reports of myocardial infarction, cerebral ischaemia,
pulmonary embolism and deep-vein thrombosis.
Preliminary results suggest that it can be used safely and
effectively to control life-threatening bleeding in surgery
and trauma, when all other measures have failed.
It can also be used to reduce blood loss in elective surgical
procedures associated with excessive bleeding.
of bleeding in patients with haemophilia and inhibitors.
Preliminary data and one controlled trial indicate that it
may also be effective in surgical patients without pre-existing
coagulation abnormalities. More clinical trials are awaited
before definitive conclusions can be made about the safety
and the exact role of this new drug in surgical patients.
5
References
6
1 Alderman EL, Levy JH, Rich JB, et al. Analyses of coronary graft
patency after aprotinin use: results from the International Multicenter Aprotinin Graft Patency Experience (IMAGE) trial. J Thorac
Cardiovasc Surg 1998; 116: 716–30
2 Al-Douri M, Shafi T, Al-Khudairi D, et al. Effect of the administration of recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa; NovoSeven) in
the management of severe uncontrolled bleeding in patients
undergoing heart valve replacement surgery. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2000; 11: S121–7
3 Bedirhan MA, Turna A, Yagan N, Tasci O. Aprotinin reduces postoperative bleeding and the need for blood products in thoracic
4
7
8
9
surgery: results of a randomized double-blind study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001; 20: 1122–7
Benoni G, Fredin H, Knebel R, Nilsson P. Blood conservation with
tranexamic acid in total hip arthroplasty: a randomized, doubleblind study in 40 primary operations. Acta Orthop Scand 2001; 72:
442–8
Benoni G, Lethagen S, Nilsson P, Fredin H. Tranexamic acid, given
at the end of the operation, does not reduce postoperative blood
loss in hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Scand 2000; 71: 250–4
Bidstrup BP, Royston D, Sapsford RN, Taylor KM. Reduction in
blood loss and blood use after cardiopulmonary bypass with
high dose aprotinin (Trasylol). J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1989;
97: 364–72
Blackwell KE, Ross DA, Kapur P. Propofol for maintenance of
general anesthesia: a technique to limit blood loss during endoscopic sinus surgery. Am J Otolaryngol 1993; 14: 262–6
Bohrer H, Fleischer F, Lang J, Vahl C. Early formation of thrombi on
pulmonary artery catheters in cardiac surgical patients receiving
high-dose aprotinin. J Cardiothorac Anesth 1990; 4: 222–5
Boylan JF, Klinck JR, Sandler AN, et al. Tranexamic acid reduces
blood loss, transfusion requirements, and coagulation factor use in
Page 13 of 17
Downloaded from http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/ at Pennsylvania State University on February 23, 2013
Agent
Mahdy and Webster
10
11
12
13
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26 Dietrich W, Spath P, Zuhlsdorf M, et al. Anaphylactic reactions
to aprotinin reexposure in cardiac surgery: relation to antiaprotinin immunoglobulin G and E antibodies. Anesthesiology
2001; 95: 64–71
27 Dilthey G, Dietrich W, Spannagl M, Richter JA. Influence of desmopressin acetate on homologous blood requirements in cardiac
surgical patients pretreated with aspirin. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth
1993; 7: 425–30
28 Doughty HA, Northeast A, Sklair L, et al. The use of recombinant
factor VIIa in a patient with acquired haemophilia A undergoing
surgery. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 1995; 6: 125–8
29 Dryden PJ, O’Connor JP, Jamieson WR, et al. Tranexamic acid
reduces blood loss and transfusion in reoperative cardiac surgery.
Can J Anaesth 1997; 44: 934–41
30 Dunn CJ, Goa KL. Tranexamic acid: a review of its use in surgery
and other indications. Drugs 1999; 57: 1005–32
31 Egli GA, Zollinger A, Seifert B, Popovic D, Pasch T, Spahn DR. Effect
of progressive haemodilution with hydroxyethyl starch, gelatin and
albumin on blood coagulation. Br J Anaesth 1997; 78: 684–9
32 Ekback G, Axelsson K, Ryttberg L, et al. Tranexamic acid reduces
blood loss in total hip replacement surgery. Anesth Analg 2000; 91:
1124–30
33 Englberger L, Markart P, Eckstein FS, Immer FF, Berdat PA, Carrel
TP. Aprotinin reduces blood loss in off-pump coronary
artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002;
22: 545–51
34 Ewenstein BM. Continuous infusion of recombinant factor VIIa:
continue or not? Thromb Haemost 2001; 86: 942–4
35 Feindt PR, Walcher S, Volkmer I, et al. Effects of high-dose aprotinin
on renal function in aortocoronary bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg
1995; 60: 1076–80
36 Findlay JY, Rettke SR, Ereth MH, Plevak DJ, Krom RA, Kufner RP.
Aprotinin reduces red blood cell transfusion in orthotopic liver
transplantation: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study.
Liver Transpl 2001; 7: 802–7
37 Flordal PA, Ljungstrom KG, Ekman B, Neander G. Effects of
desmopressin on blood loss in hip arthroplasty. Controlled
study in 50 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 1992; 63: 381–5
38 Forestier F, Coiffic A, Mouton C, Ekouevi D, Chene G, Janvier G.
Platelet function point-of-care tests in post-bypass cardiac surgery:
are they relevant? Br J Anaesth 2002; 89: 715–21
39 Franck M, Sladen RN. Drugs to prevent and reverse anticoagulation. Anesthesiol Clin North America 1999; 17: 799–811
40 Fremes SE, Wong BI, Lee E, et al. Metaanalysis of prophylactic drug
treatment in the prevention of postoperative bleeding. Ann Thorac
Surg 1994; 58: 1580–8
41 Frenette L, Cox J, McArdle P, Eckhoff D, Bynon S. Conjugated
estrogen reduces transfusion and coagulation factor requirements
in orthotopic liver transplantation. Anesth Analg 1998; 86: 1183–6
42 Friederich PW, Henny CP, Messelink EJ, et al. Effect of recombinant
activated factor VII on perioperative blood loss in patients undergoing retropubic prostatectomy: a double-blind placebocontrolled randomized trial. Lancet 2003; 361: 201–5
43 Friederich PW, Wever PC, Briet E. Successful treatment with
recombinant factor VIIa of therapy-resistant severe bleeding in a
patient with acquired von Willebrand disease. Am J Hematol 2001;
66: 292–4
44 Fujii S, Hitomi Y. New synthetic inhibitors of C1r, C1 esterase,
thrombin, plasmin, kallikrein and trypsin. Biochim Biophys Acta 1981;
661: 342–5
45 Gilliland HE, Armstrong MA, Uprichard S, Clarke G, McMurray TJ.
The effect of aprotinin on interleukin-8 concentration
and leukocyte adhesion molecule expression in an isolated
Page 14 of 17
Downloaded from http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/ at Pennsylvania State University on February 23, 2013
14
primary orthotopic liver transplantation. Anesthesiology 1996; 85:
1043–8
Brown RS, Thwaites BK, Mongan PD. Tranexamic acid is effective in decreasing postoperative bleeding and transfusions in
primary coronary artery bypass operations: a double-blind,
randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Anesth Analg 1997; 85:
963–70
Bruda NL, Hurlbert BJ, Hill GE. Aprotinin reduces nitric oxide
production in vitro and in vivo in a dose-dependent manner. Clin
Sci (Lond) 1998; 94: 505–9
Capdevila X, Calvet Y, Biboulet P, Biron C, Rubenovitch J, d’Athis F.
Aprotinin decreases blood loss and homologous transfusions in
patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery. Anesthesiology
1998; 88: 50–7
Casati V, Bellotti F, Gerli C, et al. Tranexamic acid administration
after cardiac surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind,
placebo-controlled study. Anesthesiology 2001; 94: 8–14
Casati V, Gerli C, Franco A, et al. Tranexamic acid in off-pump
coronary surgery: a preliminary, randomized, double-blind,
placebo-controlled study. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 72: 470–5
Casati V, Guzzon D, Oppizzi M, et al. Tranexamic acid compared
with high-dose aprotinin in primary elective heart operations:
effects on perioperative bleeding and allogeneic transfusions.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000; 120: 520–7
Casati V, Sandrelli L, Speziali G, Calori G, Grasso MA, Spagnolo S.
Hemostatic effects of tranexamic acid in elective thoracic aortic
surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebocontrolled study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002; 123: 1084–91
Cattaneo M, Harris AS, Stromberg U, Mannucci PM. The effect of
desmopressin on reducing blood loss in cardiac surgery—a metaanalysis of double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. Thromb Haemost
1995; 74: 1064–70
Chuansumrit A, Treepongkaruna S, Phuapradit P. Combined fresh
frozen plasma with recombinant factor VIIa in restoring hemostasis
for invasive procedures in children with liver diseases. Thromb
Haemost 2001; 85: 748–9
Clagett GP, Valentine RJ, Myers SI, Chervu A, Heller J. Does desmopressin improve hemostasis and reduce blood loss from aortic
surgery? A randomized, double-blind study. J Vasc Surg 1995; 22:
223–9
Dalmau A, Sabate A, Acosta F, et al. Tranexamic acid reduces red
cell transfusion better than epsilon-aminocaproic acid or placebo
in liver transplantation. Anesth Analg 2000; 91: 29–34
Despotis GJ, Levine V, Saleem R, Spitznagel E, Joist JH. Use of pointof-care test in identification of patients who can benefit from
desmopressin during cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled
trial. Lancet 1999; 354: 106–10
Dewachter P, Mouton C, Masson C, Gueant JL, Haberer JP. Anaphylactic reaction to aprotinin during cardiac surgery. Anaesthesia
1993; 48: 1110–1
Diefenbach C, Abel M, Limpers B, et al. Fatal anaphylactic shock
after aprotinin reexposure in cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg 1995;
80: 830–1
Dietrich W, Dilthey G, Spannagl M, Jochum M, Braun SL, Richter JA.
Influence of high-dose aprotinin on anticoagulation, heparin
requirement, and celite- and kaolin-activated clotting time in
heparin-pretreated patients undergoing open-heart surgery. A
double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Anesthesiology 1995; 83:
679–89
Dietrich W, Spath P, Ebell A, Richter JA. Prevalence of anaphylactic
reactions to aprotinin: analysis of two hundred and forty-eight
reexposures to aprotinin in heart operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc
Surg 1997; 113: 194–201
Perioperative systemic haemostatic agents
46
47
48
49
50
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65 Jensen LS, Grunnet N, Hanberg-Sorensen F, Jorgensen J. Costeffectiveness of blood transfusion and white cell reduction in
elective colorectal surgery. Transfusion 1995; 35: 719–22
66 Kang Y, Lewis JH, Navalgund A, et al. Epsilon-aminocaproic acid for
treatment of fibrinolysis during liver transplantation. Anesthesiology
1987; 66: 766–73
67 Karnezis TA, Stulberg SD, Wixson RL, Reilly P. The hemostatic
effects of desmopressin on patients who had total joint arthroplasty. A double-blind randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1994;
76: 1545–50
68 Kaspar M, Ramsay MA, Nguyen AT, Cogswell M, Hurst G, Ramsay
KJ. Continuous small-dose tranexamic acid reduces fibrinolysis but
not transfusion requirements during orthotopic liver transplantation. Anesth Analg 1997; 85: 281–5
69 Kawasuji M, Ueyama K, Sakakibara N, et al. Effect of low-dose
aprotinin on coagulation and fibrinolysis in cardiopulmonary
bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 1993; 55: 1205–9
70 Kesten S, de Hoyas A, Chaparro C, Westney G, Winton T, Maurer
JR. Aprotinin reduces blood loss in lung transplant recipients. Ann
Thorac Surg 1995; 59: 877–9
71 Kida H, Nishikawa N, Matsunami K, Katsuyama R, Kawahito M. The
effect of epidural anesthesia on reducing blood loss during upper
abdominal surgery. Masui 1999; 48: 265–70
72 Kobrinsky NL, Letts RM, Patel LR, et al. 1-Desamino-8-D-arginine
vasopressin (desmopressin) decreases operative blood loss in
patients having Harrington rod spinal fusion surgery. A randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 1987;
107: 446–50
73 Kovesi T, Royston D. Pharmacological approaches to reducing
allogeneic blood exposure. Vox Sang 2003; 84: 2–10
74 Kristensen J, Killander A, Hippe E. Clinical experience with recombinant factor VIIa in patients with thrombocytopenia. Haemostasis
1996; 26: 1159–64
75 Kumarasinghe N, Harpin R, Stewart AW. Blood loss during suction
termination of pregnancy with two different anaesthetic techniques. Anaesth Intensive Care 1997; 25: 48–50
76 Kurz A, Sessler DI, Lenhardt R. Perioperative normothermia to
reduce the incidence of surgical-wound infection and shorten hospitalization. Study of Wound Infection and Temperature Group. N
Engl J Med 1996; 334: 1209–15
77 Kyriss T, Wurst H, Friedel G, Jaki R, Toomes H. Reduced blood
loss by aprotinin in thoracic surgical operations associated with
high risk of bleeding. A placebo-controlled, randomized phase IV
study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001; 20: 38–41
78 Laupacis A, Fergusson D. Drugs to minimize perioperative blood
loss in cardiac surgery: meta-analyses using perioperative blood
transfusion as the outcome. The International Study of Perioperative Transfusion (ISPOT) Investigators. Anesth Analg 1997;
85: 1258–67
79 Lavee J, Savion N, Smolinsky A, Goor DA, Mohr R. Platelet protection by aprotinin in cardiopulmonary bypass: electron microscopic
study. Ann Thorac Surg 1992; 53: 477–81
80 Lemmer JH Jr, Dilling EW, Morton JR, et al. Aprotinin for primary
coronary artery bypass grafting: a multicenter trial of three dose
regimens. Ann Thorac Surg 1996; 62: 1659–67
81 Lemmer JH Jr, Stanford W, Bonney SL, et al. Aprotinin for
coronary bypass operations: efficacy, safety, and influence on
early saphenous vein graft patency. A multicenter, randomized,
double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
1994; 107: 543–51
82 Lemmer JH Jr, Stanford W, Bonney SL, et al. Aprotinin for coronary
artery bypass grafting: effect on postoperative renal function. Ann
Thorac Surg 1995; 59: 132–6
Page 15 of 17
Downloaded from http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/ at Pennsylvania State University on February 23, 2013
51
cardiopulmonary bypass system. Anaesthesia 1999; 54:
427–33
Gombotz H, Metzler H, List WF. Methods of reduction of perioperative bleeding. Br J Anaesth 1998; 81 (Suppl. 1): 62–66
Gott JP, Cooper WA, Schmidt FE Jr, et al. Modifying risk for extracorporeal circulation: trial of four antiinflammatory strategies. Ann
Thorac Surg 1998; 66: 747–53
Guay J, Reinberg C, Rivard GE, Poitras B, Mathews S, David M.
DDAVP does not reduce bleeding during spinal fusion for idiopathic scoliosis. Can J Anaesth 1990; 37: S14
Harder MP, Eijsman L, Roozendaal KJ, van Oeveren W,
Wildevuur CR. Aprotinin reduces intraoperative and postoperative blood loss in membrane oxygenator cardiopulmonary bypass.
Ann Thorac Surg 1991; 51: 936–41
Harig F, Feyrer R, Mahmoud FO, Blum U, von der Emde J.
Reducing the post-pump syndrome by using heparin-coated circuits, steroids, or aprotinin. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999; 47:
111–8
Havel M, Grabenwoger F, Schneider J, et al. Aprotinin does not
decrease early graft patency after coronary artery bypass grafting
despite reducing postoperative bleeding and use of donated blood.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994; 107: 807–10
Hay CR, Negrier C, Ludlam CA. The treatment of bleeding in
acquired haemophilia with recombinant factor VIIa: a multicentre
study. Thromb Haemost 1997; 78: 1463–7
Hayashida N, Isomura T, Sato T, Maruyama H, Kosuga K, Aoyagi S.
Effects of minimal-dose aprotinin on coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997; 114: 261–9
Hedner U, Glazer S, Pingel K, et al. Successful use of recombinant
factor VIIa in patient with severe haemophilia A during synovectomy. Lancet 1988; 2: 1193
Hendriks HG, Meijer K, deWolf JT. Reduced transfusion requirements by recombinant factor VIIa in orthotopic liver transplantation. Transplantation 2001; 71: 402–5
Hendriks HG, van der Maaten JM, de Wolf J, Waterbolk TW,
Slooff MJ, van der Meer J. An effective treatment of severe intractable bleeding after valve repair by one single dose of activated
recombinant factor VII. Anesth Analg 2001; 93: 287–9
Henry DA, Moxey AJ, Carless PA, et al. Anti-fibrinolytic use for
minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion. Cochrane
Database Syst Rev 2001: CD001886
Hiippala ST, Strid LJ, Wennerstrand MI, et al. Tranexamic acid
radically decreases blood loss and transfusions associated with
total knee arthroplasty. Anesth Analg 1997; 84: 839–44
Hill GE, Alonso A, Spurzem JR, Stammers AH, Robbins RA. Aprotinin and methylprednisolone equally blunt cardiopulmonary
bypass-induced inflammation in humans. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
1995; 110: 1658–62
Hill GE, Robbins RA. Aprotinin but not tranexamic acid inhibits
cytokine-induced inducible nitric oxide synthase expression.
Anesth Analg 1997; 84: 1198–202
Hoffmann H, Siebeck M, Thetter O, Jochum M, Fritz H. Aprotinin
concentrations effective for the inhibition of tissue kallikrein and
plasma kallikrein in vitro and in vivo. Adv Exp Med Biol 1989; 247B:
35–42
Horrow JC. Desmopressin and antifibrinolytics. Int Anesthesiol Clin
1990; 28: 230–6
Ingerslev J, Kristensen HL. Clinical picture and treatment strategies
in factor VII deficiency. Haemophilia 1998; 4: 689–96
Jansen AJ, Andreica S, Claeys M, D’Haese J, Camu F, Jochmans K.
Use of tranexamic acid for an effective blood conservation
strategy after total knee arthroplasty. Br J Anaesth 1999; 83:
596–601
Mahdy and Webster
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
intravascular coagulation using recombinant activated factor VII.
Br J Haematol 2001; 114: 174–6
Munoz JJ, Birkmeyer NJ, Birkmeyer JD, O’Connor GT, Dacey LJ. Is
epsilon-aminocaproic acid as effective as aprotinin in reducing
bleeding with cardiac surgery?: a meta-analysis. Circulation 1999;
99: 81–9
Murase M, Usui A, Tomita Y, Maeda M, Koyama T, Abe T. Nafamostat mesilate reduces blood loss during open heart surgery. Circulation 1993; 88: II432–6
Murkin JM. Attenuation of neurologic injury during cardiac surgery.
Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 72: S1838–44
Murkin JM, Haig GM, Beer KJ, et al. Aprotinin decreases exposure
to allogeneic blood during primary unilateral total hip replacement.
J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000; 82: 675–84
Murkin JM, Shannon NA, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Cruickshank
M, Wyile G. Aprotinin decreases blood loss in patients undergoing
revision or bilateral total hip arthroplasty. Anesth Analg 1995; 80:
343–8
Neuhaus P, Bechstein WO, Lefebre B, Blumhardt G, Slama K. Effect
of aprotinin on intraoperative bleeding and fibrinolysis in liver
transplantation. Lancet 1989; 2: 924–5
Orchard MA, Goodchild CS, Prentice CR, et al. Aprotinin reduces
cardiopulmonary bypass-induced blood loss and inhibits fibrinolysis without influencing platelets. Br J Haematol 1993; 85: 533–41
Palmer JD, Francis JL, Pickard JD, Iannotti F. The efficacy and safety
of aprotinin for hemostasis during intracranial surgery. J Neurosurg
2003; 98: 1208–16
Use of NovoSeven in patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation. In: Proceedings of the 6th NovoNordisk Symposium on
the Treatment of Bleeding and Thrombotic Disorders, 2001;
Copenhagen, 2001
Poon MC, Demers C, Jobin F, Wu JW. Recombinant factor VIIa is
effective for bleeding and surgery in patients with Glanzmann
thrombasthenia. Blood 1999; 94: 3951–3
Porte RJ, Leebeek FW. Pharmacological strategies to decrease
transfusion requirements in patients undergoing surgery. Drugs
2002; 62: 2193–211
Porte RJ, Molenaar IQ, Begliomini B, et al. Aprotinin and transfusion
requirements in orthotopic liver transplantation: a multicentre
randomized double-blind study. EMSALT Study Group. Lancet
2000; 355: 1303–9
Prendergast TW, Furukawa S, Beyer AJ 3rd, Eisen HJ, McClurken
JB, Jeevanandam V. Defining the role of aprotinin in heart transplantation. Ann Thorac Surg 1996; 62: 670–4
Product monograph. Novo Seven, NovoNovdisk, Copenhagen,
2001
Rahman A, Ustunda B, Burma O, Ozercan IH, Cekirdekci A,
Bayar MK. Does aprotinin reduce lung reperfusion damage
after cardiopulmonary bypass? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2000; 18:
583–8
Rao AK, Ghosh S, Sun L. Mechanisms of platelet dysfunction and
response to DDAVP in patients with congenital platelet function
defects: a double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Thromb Haemost
1995; 74: 1071–8
Ray MJ, Marsh NA. Aprotinin reduces blood loss after cardiopulmonary bypass by direct inhibition of plasmin. Thromb Haemost
1997; 78: 1021–6
Reid RW, Zimmerman AA, Laussen PC, Mayer JE, Gorlin JB,
Burrows FA. The efficacy of tranexamic acid versus placebo in
decreasing blood loss in pediatric patients undergoing repeat
cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg 1997; 84: 990–6
Revesz T, Arets B, Bierings M. Recombinant factor VIIa in severe
uremic bleeding [letter]. Thromb Haemost 1998; 80: 353
Page 16 of 17
Downloaded from http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/ at Pennsylvania State University on February 23, 2013
83 Lentschener C, Cottin P, Bouaziz H, et al. Reduction of blood loss
and transfusion requirement by aprotinin in posterior lumbar spine
fusion. Anesth Analg 1999; 89: 590–7
84 Lethagen S, Harris AS, Sjorin E, Nilsson IM. Intranasal and intravenous administration of desmopressin: effect on F VIII/vWF, pharmacokinetics and reproducibility. Thromb Haemost 1987; 58:
1033–6
85 Lethagen S, Rugarn P, Bergqvist D. Blood loss and safety with
desmopressin or placebo during aorto-iliac graft surgery. Eur
J Vasc Surg 1991; 5: 173–8
86 Levi M, Cromheecke ME, de Jonge E, et al. Pharmacological strategies to decrease excessive blood loss in cardiac surgery: a metaanalysis of clinically relevant endpoints. Lancet 1999; 354: 1940–7
87 Levy JH, Pifarre R, Schaff HV, et al. A multicenter, double-blind,
placebo-controlled trial of aprotinin for reducing blood loss and
the requirement for donor-blood transfusion in patients undergoing repeat coronary artery bypass grafting. Circulation 1995; 92:
2236–44
88 Litwack RS, Horrow JC. Lethal thrombosis during coronary artery
bypass graft surgery. Anesthesiology 1987; 67: 134–6
89 Livio M, Mannucci PM, Vigano G, et al. Conjugated estrogens for the
management of bleeding associated with renal failure. N Engl J Med
1986; 315: 731–5
90 Mannucci PM. Hemostatic drugs. N Engl J Med 1998; 339: 245–53
91 Mannucci PM. Desmopressin: a nontransfusional form of treatment for congenital and acquired bleeding disorders. Blood
1988; 72: 1449–55
92 Mannucci PM, Bettega D, Cattaneo M. Patterns of development of
tachyphylaxis in patients with haemophilia and von Willebrand
disease after repeated doses of desmopressin (DDAVP). Br J
Haematol 1992; 82: 87–93
93 Martinowitz U, Kenet G, Segal E, et al. Recombinant activated
factor VII for adjunctive hemorrhage control in trauma. J Trauma
2001; 51: 431–8
94 McCall RE, Bilderback KK. Use of intravenous Premarin to
decrease postoperative blood loss after pediatric scoliosis surgery.
Spine 1997; 22: 1394–7
95 Miller RA, May MW, Hendry WF, Whitfield HN, Wickham JE. The
prevention of secondary haemorrhage after prostatectomy: the
value of antifibrinolytic therapy. Br J Urol 1980; 52: 26–8
96 Moia M, Mannucci PM, Vizzotto L, Casati S, Cattaneo M, Ponticelli
C. Improvement in the haemostatic defect of uraemia after treatment with recombinant human erythropoietin. Lancet 1987; 2:
1227–9
97 Molenaar IQ, Begliomini B, Grazi GL, Ringers J, Terpstra OT, Porte
RJ. The effect of aprotinin on renal function in orthotopic liver
transplantation. Transplantation 2001; 71: 247–52
98 Molenaar IQ, Begliomini B, Martinelli G, Putter H, Terpstra OT,
Porte RJ. Reduced need for vasopressors in patients receiving
aprotinin during orthotopic liver transplantation. Anesthesiology
2001; 94: 433–8
99 Mongan PD, Brown RS, Thwaites BK. Tranexamic acid and aprotinin reduce postoperative bleeding and transfusions during primary coronary revascularization. Anesth Analg 1998; 87: 258–65
100 Mongan PD, Hosking MP. The role of desmopressin acetate in
patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. A controlled
clinical trial with thromboelastographic risk stratification. Anesthesiology 1992; 77: 38–46
101 Monroe DM, Hoffman M, Oliver JA, Roberts HR. Platelet activity of
high-dose factor VIIa is independent of tissue factor. Br J Haematol
1997; 99: 542–7
102 Moscardo F, Perez F, de la Rubia J, et al. Successful treatment of
severe intra-abdominal bleeding associated with disseminated
Perioperative systemic haemostatic agents
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
in patients with acetylsalicylic-acid-induced platelet dysfunction.
Can J Surg 1994; 37: 33–6
Shigeta O, Kojima H, Jikuya T, et al. Aprotinin inhibits plasmininduced platelet activation during cardiopulmonary bypass. Circulation 1997; 96: 569–74
Shimada M, Matsumata T, Shirabe K, Kamakura T, Taketomi A,
Sugimachi K. Effect of nafamostat mesilate on coagulation and
fibrinolysis in hepatic resection. J Am Coll Surg 1994; 178: 498–502
Smith CR. Management of bleeding complications in redo cardiac
operations. Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 65: S2–8
Smith MP, Ludlam CA, Collins PW, et al. Elective surgery on factor
VIII inhibitor patients using continuous infusion of recombinant
activated factor VII: plasma factor VII activity of 10 IU/ml is associated with an increased incidence of bleeding. Thromb Haemost
2001; 86: 949–53
Spahn DR, Casutt M. Eliminating blood transfusions: new aspects
and perspectives. Anesthesiology 2000; 93: 242–55
Swart MJ, Gordon PC, Hayse-Gregson PB, et al. High-dose aprotinin in cardiac surgery–a prospective, randomized study. Anaesth
Intensive Care 1994; 22: 529–33
Tanaka K, Kondo C, Takagi K, et al. Effects of nafamostat mesilate
on platelets and coagulofibrinolysis during cardiopulmonary
bypass surgery. Asaio J 1993; 39: M545–9
Tanaka N, Sakahashi H, Sato E, Hirose K, Ishima T, Ishii S. Timing
of the administration of tranexamic acid for maximum reduction
in blood loss in arthroplasty of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001;
83: 702–5
Taylor KM. Improved outcome for seriously ill open heart surgery
patients: focus on reoperation and endocarditis. J Heart Lung Transplant 1993; 12: S14–8
van Oeveren W, Harder MP, Roozendaal KJ, Eijsman L,
Wildevuur CR. Aprotinin protects platelets against the initial
effect of cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1990;
99: 788–96
Veien M, Sorensen JV, Madsen F, Juelsgaard P. Tranexamic acid
given intraoperatively reduces blood loss after total knee replacement: a randomized, controlled study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand
2002; 46: 1206–11
Vermeulen M, Lindsay KW, Murray GD. Antifibrinolytic
treatment in subarachnoid hemorrhage. N Engl J Med 1984;
311: 432–7
Verstraete M. Clinical application of inhibitors of fibrinolysis. Drugs
1985; 29: 236–61
Wachtfogel YT, Kucich U, Hack CE, et al. Aprotinin inhibits
the contact, neutrophil, and platelet activation systems during
simulated extracorporeal perfusion. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
1993; 106: 1–9
Wahba A, Black G, Koksch M, et al. Aprotinin has no effect on
platelet activation and adhesion during cardiopulmonary bypass.
Thromb Haemost 1996; 75: 844–8
Wells PS. Safety and efficacy of methods for reducing perioperative
allogeneic transfusion: a critical review of the literature. Am J Ther
2002; 9: 377–88
Welty-Wolf KE, Carraway MS, Miller DS. Tissue factor blockade
in experimental acute lung injury. In: Programme and abstracts
from the 6th Novo Nordisk Symposium on the Treatment of
Bleeding and Thrombotic Disorders, 2001. Copenhagen, 2001
Wendel HP, Heller W, Michel J, et al. Lower cardiac troponin T
levels in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass and receiving
high-dose aprotinin therapy indicate reduction of perioperative
myocardial damage. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995; 109: 1164–72
Page 17 of 17
Downloaded from http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/ at Pennsylvania State University on February 23, 2013
122 Roberts HR. Clinical experience with activated factor VII: focus on
safety aspects. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 1998; 9 (Suppl. 1): S115–8
123 Royston D. High-dose aprotinin therapy: a review of the first five
years’ experience. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1992; 6: 76–100
124 Royston D. Intraoperative coronary thrombosis: can aprotinin be
incriminated? J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1994; 8: 137–41
125 Royston D, Bidstrup BP, Taylor KM, Sapsford RN. Effect of aprotinin on need for blood transfusion after repeat open-heart surgery. Lancet 1987; 2: 1289–91
126 Royston D, Bidstrup BP, Taylor KM, Sapsford RN. Aprotinin
(Trasylol) reduces bleeding after open heart surgery in patients
taking aspirin and those with renal failure. Anesthesiology 1989; 71
(Suppl.): A6
127 Ruttmann TG, James MF, Aronson I. In vivo investigation into the
effects of haemodilution with hydroxyethyl starch (200/0.5) and
normal saline on coagulation. Br J Anaesth 1998; 80: 612–6
128 Sagripanti A, Sarteschi LM, Camici M, Puccetti S, Capri A. Nontransfusional haemostatic agents in the management of bleeding
disorders. Intern Med 2001; 9: 10–18
129 Samama CM, Langeron O, Rosencher N, et al. Aprotinin versus
placebo in major orthopedic surgery: a randomized, doubleblinded, dose-ranging study. Anesth Analg 2002; 95: 287–93
130 Santagostino E, Morfini M, Rocino A, Baudo F, Scaraggi FA,
Gringeri A. Relationship between factor VII activity and clinical
efficacy of recombinant factor VIIa given by continuous infusion to
patients with factor VIIIinhibitors. Thromb Haemost 2001; 86: 954–8
131 Santamaria A, Mateo J, Oliver A, et al. The effect of two different
doses of aprotinin on hemostasis in cardiopulmonary bypass
surgery: similar transfusion requirements and blood loss. Haematologica 2000; 85: 1277–84
132 Sato T, Tanaka K, Kondo C, et al. Nafamostat mesilate administration during cardiopulmonary bypass decreases postoperative
bleeding after cardiac surgery. ASAIO Trans 1991; 37: M194–5
133 Scheule AM, Jurmann MJ, Wendel HP, Haberle L, Eckstein FS, Ziemer G. Anaphylactic shock after aprotinin reexposure: time course
of aprotinin-specific antibodies. Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 63: 242–4
134 Schmartz D, Tabardel Y, Preiser JC, et al. Does aprotinin influence
the inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass in patients?
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003; 125: 184–90
135 Schneeberger AG, Schulz RF, Ganz R. Blood loss in total hip arthroplasty. Lateral position combined with preservation of the capsule
versus supine position combined with capsulectomy. Arch Orthop
Trauma Surg 1998; 117: 47–9
136 Schott U, Sollen C, Axelsson K, Rugarn P, Allvin I. Desmopressin
acetate does not reduce blood loss during total hip replacement
in patients receiving dextran. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1995; 39:
592–8
137 Schweizer A, Hohn L, Morel DR, Kalangos A, Licker M. Aprotinin
does not impair renal haemodynamics and function after cardiac
surgery. Br J Anaesth 2000; 84: 16–22
138 Seymour BD, Rubinger M. Rhabdomyolysis induced by epsilonaminocaproic acid. Ann Pharmacother 1997; 31: 56–58
139 Shapiro AD, Gilchrist GS, Hoots WK, Cooper HA, Gastineau DA.
Prospective, randomised trial of two doses of rFVIIa (NovoSeven)
in haemophilia patients with inhibitors undergoing surgery. Thromb
Haemost 1998; 80: 773–8
140 Shemin D, Elnour M, Amarantes B, Abuelo JG, Chazan JA. Oral
estrogens decrease bleeding time and improve clinical bleeding in
patients with renal failure. Am J Med 1990; 89: 436–40
141 Sheridan DP, Card RT, Pinilla JC, et al. Use of desmopressin acetate
to reduce blood transfusion requirements during cardiac surgery