Download Performance Task (continued)

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Tsunami wikipedia , lookup

Seismic retrofit wikipedia , lookup

2010 Haiti earthquake wikipedia , lookup

1908 Messina earthquake wikipedia , lookup

Earthquake engineering wikipedia , lookup

2013 Bohol earthquake wikipedia , lookup

Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Nuclear Power Plant wikipedia , lookup

2011 Christchurch earthquake wikipedia , lookup

1992 Cape Mendocino earthquakes wikipedia , lookup

2008 Sichuan earthquake wikipedia , lookup

1880 Luzon earthquakes wikipedia , lookup

1570 Ferrara earthquake wikipedia , lookup

2010 Pichilemu earthquake wikipedia , lookup

Casualties of the 2010 Haiti earthquake wikipedia , lookup

2010 Canterbury earthquake wikipedia , lookup

2009–18 Oklahoma earthquake swarms wikipedia , lookup

1960 Valdivia earthquake wikipedia , lookup

1906 San Francisco earthquake wikipedia , lookup

Earthquake casualty estimation wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Name_________________________________________________________
Chapter
6
Date __________
Performance Task (continued)
Measuring Natural Disasters
In 2005, an earthquake measuring 4.1 on the Richter scale barely shook the city of
Ocotillo, California, leaving virtually no damage. But in 1906, an earthquake with an
estimated 8.2 on the same scale devastated the city of San Francisco. Does twice the
measurement on the Richter scale mean twice the intensity of the earthquake?
In 1935, Charles Richter developed a method to compare the strength of earthquakes.
Seismographs could already detect and record seismic waves. Richter’s scale was a way
to make sense of these measurements. A major challenge of such a scale was how to
represent signals with such an enormous difference in intensity—the largest signals
could be over one billion times greater than the smallest ones. The solution was to use a
logarithmic scale. In a linear scale, units along the x-axis increase by a constant, usually
1. But in a log scale, units along the x-axis increase by powers of 10. An increase of 1
point means the strength of the earthquake is 101 times greater than the level before. An
increase of 2 points means the strength of the earthquake is 102 , or 100 times greater.
Earthquakes In Chronological Order1
Date
Location
Magnitude
April 18, 1906
San Francisco, California
8.2
March 28, 1964
Prince William Sound, Alaska
9.2
September 7, 1999
Athens, Greece
5.9
April 29, 2003
Fort Payne, Alabama
4.6
March 30, 2005
Fukuoka, Japan
6.6
May 20, 2005
Ocotillo Wells, California
4.1
December 16, 2005
Hercules, California
3.4
February 3, 2009
Morristown, New Jersey
3.0
January 12, 2010
Port-au-Prince, Haiti
7.0
August 23, 2011
Mineral, Virginia
5.8
August 29, 2011
West Plains, Missouri
2.4
October 16, 2012
Midlothian, Texas
2.7
June 11, 2013
Conway, Arkansas
1.8
October 25, 2013
Fukushima, Japan
7.3
December 24, 2013
Tustin, California
1.3
January 17, 2014
Jacό, Costa Rica
5.2
Copyright © Big Ideas Learning, LLC
All rights reserved.
Algebra 2
Assessment Book
89
Name _________________________________________________________ Date _________
Chapter
6
Performance Task (continued)
1. Using the chart, plot and label the earthquake data according to magnitude.
The x-axis represents the whole-number portion of the magnitude and the y-axis
represents the decimal portion of the magnitude. For example, a quake of
magnitude 5.3 occurring in Trinidad, Colorado, would be plotted and labeled as
(5, 0.3) because its whole number is 5 and its decimal is 0.3.
Earthquakes by Magnitude
y
0.8
0.6
0.4
(5, 0.3)
0.2
2
4
6
8
x
−0.2
2. What earthquake was about 10 times stronger than the quake in Tustin, California?
3. What earthquake was about 100 times stronger than the quake in Fukushima,
Japan?
4. What earthquake was about 1000 times stronger than the quake in Jacό, Costa Rica?
5. What is the smallest earthquake in the data? What is the largest? Compare their
magnitudes.
6. How much larger was the devastating San Francisco quake than the quake that
barely shook Ocotillo Wells, California? Explain.
7. Find two earthquakes, other than the ones in Exercise 2, in which one was about
10 times stronger than the other. Explain how you chose these quakes.
8. Find two earthquakes, other than the ones in Exercise 3, in which one was about
100 times stronger than the other. Explain how you chose these quakes.
9. Find two earthquakes, other than the ones in Exercise 4, in which one was about
1000 times stronger than the other. Explain how you chose these quakes.
10. Find two earthquakes in which one was 10,000 times stronger than the other.
Explain how you chose these quakes.
11. Find two earthquakes in which one was a million times stronger than the other.
Explain how you chose these quakes.
90
Algebra 2
Assessment Book
Copyright © Big Ideas Learning, LLC
All rights reserved.