* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download MCB421 FALL2005 EXAM#1 ANSWERS MCB421 EXAM1 Page 1
Epigenetics of human development wikipedia , lookup
Polycomb Group Proteins and Cancer wikipedia , lookup
Koinophilia wikipedia , lookup
Gene expression programming wikipedia , lookup
Genome (book) wikipedia , lookup
Genome evolution wikipedia , lookup
No-SCAR (Scarless Cas9 Assisted Recombineering) Genome Editing wikipedia , lookup
Saethre–Chotzen syndrome wikipedia , lookup
Gene nomenclature wikipedia , lookup
Therapeutic gene modulation wikipedia , lookup
Gene expression profiling wikipedia , lookup
Site-specific recombinase technology wikipedia , lookup
Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis wikipedia , lookup
Epigenetics of neurodegenerative diseases wikipedia , lookup
Protein moonlighting wikipedia , lookup
Gene therapy of the human retina wikipedia , lookup
Oncogenomics wikipedia , lookup
Genetic code wikipedia , lookup
Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup
Microevolution wikipedia , lookup
MCB421 FALL2005 Average Std. Dev. Min. Max. (10pts) EXAM#1 ANSWERS 62 14.6 28 84 1. Briefly explain the expected results for the Luria-Delbruck fluctuation test if mutants arise: (a) Spontaneously in a population of cells before exposure to a selective agent: ANSWER: Wide fluctuation in mutants from cells grown in different tubes (i.e., independent samples) relative to cells grown in the same tube. That is, there is great variance relative to the mean number of mutants. (b) Due to adaptation after exposure to the selective agent: ANSWER: Relatively little fluctuation in mutants from cells grown in different tubes (i.e., independent samples) relative to cells grown in the same tube. That is, the number of mutants on each plate approximately equals the mean number of mutants. 2. In the following table, briefly diagram or indicate the common properties of each type of mutation. (1 point for each box; 15 points total) Mutation Missense Nonsense Frameshift Deletion Insertion Effect on DNA Base substitution Base substitution resulting in a stop codon Insertion or deletion of 1 or 2 base pairs Loss of multiple base pairs Addition of multiple base pairs Effect on Protein Substituted amino acid Truncated polypeptide; inactive protein Altered amino acid sequence downstream of mutation; usually truncated polypeptide; inactive protein Usually absent; usually inactive protein May insert extra amino acid (if in frame) or cause premature truncation; usually inactive protein Effect on Phenotype May result in loss of function or conditional phenotype Usually null Null Null Usually null; if insertion is in frame and doesn’t cause premature termination and is in a permissive Page 1 of 9 site, sometimes protein remains functional MCB421 EXAM1 MCB421 FALL2005 phenotype Phenotype EXAM#1 ANSWERS termination and is in a permissive site, sometimes protein remains functional 3. Resistance to the toxic tryptophan analog 5-methyl tryptophan (5-MT) can occur in two ways: (i) specific missense mutations in the trpE gene (the first step in tryptophan biosynthesis) which makes the enzyme insensitive to feedback inhibition; and (ii) mutations that inactivate the trpR gene (the repressor which represses the trp operon when the intracellular concentration of tryptophan is high). The trpR mutants synthesize a large amount of tryptophan so that the 5-methyl tryptophan is not toxic. That is, the concentration of tryptophan is much higher than the concentration of 5-MT. (3pts.) a). Which class of mutants would you expect to be more common and why? ANSWER: The trpR mutations would be most common because a null mutation anywhere within the gene could inactivate the protein. Only a limited number of sites in trpE would be likely to produce a functional protein, which is insensitive to feedback inhibition. (3pts.) b). Indicate whether each of the two types of mutation is dominant or recessive to the wildtype allele of that gene. [Explain your logic.] ANSWER: A tprR null mutation is a simple loss of function mutation, which would be recessive to the wild-type allele. That is, trpR- /trpR+ would be able to repress the trp operon, which would prevent the cell from accumulating high concentrations of tryptophan, thus resulting in sensitivity to the tryptophan analog. A trpE mutant insensitive to feedback inhibition ("trpE*") would be dominant to wild-type. That is, trpE* /trpE+ would have one copy of the gene which is insensitive to feedback inhibition, allowing accumulation of a high intracellular tryptophan concentration and thus resulting in resistance to the tryptophan analog. MCB421 EXAM1 Page 2 of 9 MCB421 FALL2005 EXAM#1 ANSWERS 3. (Cont.) You introduce a copy of several amber suppressors into cells that have one of the trpR mutations and score for sensitivity or resistance to 5-MT and obtain the following results. The suppressors and the tRNA gene encoding them are listed in the Table. (S = sensitive. R = resistant) supE (amber) glutamine supF (amber) tyrosine supL (ochre) lysine trpT- Su9 (opal) tryptophan trpR1 R R R R trpR2 S S R R trpR3 R S R R trpR4 R R S R trpR5 R R R S For each trpR mutant specify: (3pts.) c). The class of mutation (substitution, frameshift, deletion, or insertion) that could be present. ANSWER: trpR1 – any of the 4 mutations listed above trpR2 – amber trpR3 – amber trpR4 – ochre trpR5 – opal (3pts.) d). Whether the trpR mutation is likely to be a nonsense mutation and why. ANSWER: trpR2, trpR3, trpR4, and trpR5 are nonsense because they are suppressed by amber, ochre, and opal suppressors. (3pts.) e). In cases where suppression occurs, state what structure/function you can predict for the TrpR repressor? ANSWER: trpR2 – Gln and Tyr can make an active protein trpR3 – Tyr can make an active protein trpR4 – Lys can make an active protein trpR5 – Trp can make an active protein (2pts.) f). Which mutant would most likely be reverted by ICR191? Why? ANSWER: trpR1 because it could be a frameshift mutation. MCB421 EXAM1 Page 3 of 9 MCB421 FALL2005 EXAM#1 ANSWERS 4. Salmonella Enteritidis expresses a specific fimbriae called Sef which facilitate attachment of the bacteria to macrophages during infections. A large number of mutations were isolated that prevent expression of sef genes, and complementation analysis was done to determine the number of genes disrupted by the mutations. For each mutation, one copy of the genes was present on the chromosome and a second copy of the genes was present on a plasmid integrated into the chromosome at a different site. The results are shown in the table below. (− indicates no Sef fimbriae produced and + indicates that Sef fimbriae are produced.) Copy #1 + sef sef-51 sef-52 sef-53 sef-54 sef-55 sef-56 sef-57 sef-58 sef-59 sef-60 (3pts.) Copy #2 sef-51 sef-52 sef-53 sef-54 sef-55 sef-56 sef-57 sef-58 sef-59 sef-60 + + + + + − + + + + − − − − + − − + + − − − + + − − − − − − − − − + + − − − − + + + + − + − − + − + + − + + − − + + + + − + − + − a). Based upon these results, how many complementation groups were detected? ANSWER: 4 complementation groups. (3pts.) b). Indicate which mutations fall into each complementation group: ANSWER: Group #1 = sef-52, sef-55, sef-57; group #2 = sef-53 and sef-59; group #3 = sef-54; group #4 = sef-58, sef-60; Note that sef-51 and sef-56 cannot be placed into a complementation group. c). Suggest a likely explanation for the complementation behavior of the sef-51 mutation. Would you expect this mutant to produce CRM? [Briefly explain your answer.] (3pts.) ANSWER: sef-51 is recessive to the wild-type in trans, indicating that this phenotype is NOT likely to be due to a trans-dominant negative (negativedominant) mutant. Thus, this phenotype is likely to be due to a cis-acting mutation that prevents expression of all of the sef genes. Not likely to produce CRM because mutations in a gene resulting in cis-dominance are usually not made or truncated and thus rapidly degraded. MCB421 EXAM1 Page 4 of 9 MCB421 FALL2005 EXAM#1 ANSWERS d). Suggest a likely explanation for the complementation behavior of the sef-56 mutation. Would you expect this mutant to produce CRM? [Briefly explain your answer.] (3pts.) ANSWER: sef-561 is dominant to the wild-type in trans, indicating that this phenotype is likely to be due to a trans-dominant negative (negativedominant) mutant gene product. Likley to produce CRM because such mutations are typically due to missense mutations. 5. You have isolated 4 independent tryptophan auxotrophs of E. coli. To characterize the types of mutations that cause the auxotrophies, you perform reversion analyses. You select revertants without any mutagen (spontaneous) and in the presence of mutagens. You use common mutagens we discussed in class and newly discovered chemicals called “X” and “Y”. The data are shown in the table below. Number of Revertants / 108 cells Mutant trp1 trp2 trp3 trp4 5-BrU 300 643 9 3 Spontaneous 20 23 16 6 ICR191 7 3 603 5 X 500 26 6 5 Y 30 603 7 3 a. How would you have designed the experiment to ensure that all 4 auxotrophs are independent? What type of medium would you use to select the revertants? (3pts.) ANSWER: Isolate mutants from several independent cultures and save only one from each. Use minimal media + glucose. (3pts.) b. Based on the reversion data, what type of mutation is present in each auxotroph? How do you know? ANSWER: trp1 – base substitution (transition) because 5-BrU causes GC ⇔ AT trp2 - base substitution (transition) because 5-BrU causes GC ⇔ AT trp3 – frameshift because ICR191 is specific for frameshift mutations trp4 – insertion because you get revertants, but the reversion frequency is not increased in the presence of mutagens (3pts.) c. Are compounds X and Y mutagens? How do you know? Can you determine if they have any specificities for mutations they cause? ANSWER: Yes, because you get an increased reversion rate, over the rate for spontaneous revertants. One causes GC → AT and the other causes AT → GC. However, you cannot tell which one causes which direction (if you compare to 5-BrU). MCB421 EXAM1 Page 5 of 9 MCB421 (3pts.) FALL2005 EXAM#1 ANSWERS d. Which auxotrophs would most likely be capable of suppression by intragenic suppressors? Intergenic suppressors? ANSWER: All four could be suppressed by intragenic suppressors. Only trp3 would not be able to be suppressed by intergenic suppressors. (14 pts.) 6. The malK operon of E. coli contains three structural genes- malK, lamB, and malM. The genes are transcribed from a promoter site (P), located to the left of the malK gene as shown below. The malT gene, which is unlinked to the malK operon, encodes a protein that activates expression of the malK operon. The MalK protein is required for utilization of maltose as a carbon source. The LamB protein is the receptor for phage lambda. The function of MalM is not known. malT P malK lamB malM a. How would you isolate a mutant resistant to infection by phage lambda? Is it a selection, enrichment, or a screen? ANSWER: Plate a lawn of bacteria on rich media and then overlay with an excess of phage lambda (high MOI to ensure there are enough phage to infect all the bacteria plated). Look for colonies that grow and do not lyse. These bacteria will be resistant to infection by phage lambda. b. Describe 4 types of base-pair substitution mutations would you expect to find in the malK operon that cause resistance to infection by phage lambda. ANSWER: (i) P down (ii) malK nonsense that are polar on lamB (iii, iv) lamB missense and non-sense that produce inactive proteins (deletions, insertions and frameshifts are not base-pair susbstitutions) (Mutations in malM have no effect) c. Would any of the mutants be cis- or trans-dominant? Why? ANSWER: malK nonsense mutants would be polar and cis-dominant. Promoter defective mutants would be cis-dominant. MCB421 EXAM1 Page 6 of 9 MCB421 FALL2005 EXAM#1 ANSWERS d. Would any of the mutants be suppressed by informational suppressors? Why? ANSWER: malK nonsense and lamB nonsense could be suppressed by informational suppressors. e. Describe 2 types of base-pair substitution mutations that you would expect to find in or near the malT gene that would cause resistance to infection by phage lambda. Describe the mechanism behind each mutant. ANSWER: P down so MalT is not made at a high enough concentration to activate the malK operon. So the concentration of LamB is low. MalT- Missense or nonsense mutation that makes protein that can’t activate. f. Would any of these mutants be suppressed by informational suppressors? Why? ANSWER: MalT nonsense could be suppressed. g. Would any of these mutations be dominant or recessive in an experiment where the wild-type malT gene is introduced in trans into the cell? ANSWER: malT+ would be dominant to malT down promoter mutant because the wild-type MalT protein expressed by the new malT+ copy could activate the operon. A malT mutant could be recessive if it is a loss of function mutant. Some could be trans-dominant by making a protein that forms inactive multimers with the wild type protein so that the complex can’t activate transcription. (10 pts.) 7. The trpEDCBA operon contains 5 structural genes transcribed in the direction trpE to trpA (see diagram below). You have isolated a tryptophan auxotroph that affects the trpE gene. You find that the mutant shows polarity on the expression of the downstream trpDCBA genes. P trpE trpD trpC trpB trpA Your next step is to isolate mutants that are able to grow in the presence of indole. The last reaction of the tryptophan biosynthesis is the conversion of indole to tryptophan, catalyzed by the TrpB and TrpA proteins. Describe 5 types of intragenic and intergenic mutations could potentially be isolated as revertants: MCB421 EXAM1 Page 7 of 9 MCB421 FALL2005 EXAM#1 ANSWERS ANSWER: Intragenic -True revertants -Same base to different base -Different base in same codon (Other intragenic events will not compensate for the nonsense mutation in trpE) Intergenic -Mutation that creates a mutant tRNA that can read thru the nonsense codon -Mutation in Rho (that could be defective in transcription termination thus relieving polarity) -Mutation in a subunit of RNA polymerase (that doesn’t interact well with Rho thus relieving polarity) (10 pts.) 8. Fred Sanger and his collaborators [Nature. (1977) 265: 687-95] determined the DNA sequence of the bacteriophage Phi X 184. At the time it was the first genome that was sequenced. One of the interesting observations was that two of the genes (A and B) overlapped as shown below. B H a). A E C D F G The protein products of the A and B genes have completely different amino acid sequences. How could this be explained? ANSWER: The DNA of the coding sequences of A and B overlap in the C terminus of A and the N terminus of B. The proteins are translated in different reading frames so that the amino acid sequences of both proteins have no common amino acid sequences. b). They isolated a mutation that made the A gene product temperature sensitive. Interestingly, the B protein was absent in a suppressor-free strain but active in a strain containing supE (coding for a mutant form of a gene encoding a tyrosine tRNA). How could this be explained? ANSWER: The mutation that makes the A protein TS apparently made a mutation in the overlapping codon of the B protein that created a nonsense mutation in the coding sequence of the B protein. When supE is introduced, it suppresses the nonsense mutation so it becomes phenotypically B+. MCB421 EXAM1 Page 8 of 9 MCB421 MCB421 EXAM1 FALL2005 EXAM#1 ANSWERS Page 9 of 9