Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Increased Role of Nearshore Zone for Lake Michigan Fish and Fisheries Bo Bunnell1, Tomas Höök2, and Sergiusz Czesny3 1USGS Great Lakes Science Center 2Purdue University, Dept. Forestry and Natural Resources 3Illinois Natural History Survey, Lake Michigan Filed Station Hook, Bunnell and Czesny GLRRIN Lake Michigan Meeting April 2014 High Low total phosphorus 1970 Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement Hook, Bunnell and Czesny GLRRIN Lake Michigan Meeting April 2014 1980 1990 Year 2000 2010 High piscivore biomass Sea lamprey control; piscivore stocking Low total phosphorus 1970 Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement Hook, Bunnell and Czesny GLRRIN Lake Michigan Meeting April 2014 1980 1990 Year 2000 2010 High piscivore biomass Low Sea lamprey control; piscivore stocking total phosphorus spiny water flea 1970 1980 Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement 2000 2010 Year zebra mussel Hook, Bunnell and Czesny GLRRIN Lake Michigan Meeting April 2014 1990 quagga mussel round goby Bunnell et al. 2014 Nearshore to offshore timeline 1970s- higher nutrient loading. Relatively productive nearshore, but without mussels nutrients were more readily transported offshore. 1980s- reduced nutrient loading, piscivore build-up complete. Differences between nearshore productivity (high) and offshore productivity may be lower. 2000s- “nearshore shunt”, “intermediate sink” hypothesized to return nearshore to higher productivity. • Distribution and abundance of Cladophora and dreissenid mussels from previous talks Hook, Bunnell and Czesny GLRRIN Lake Michigan Meeting April 2014 Outline 1. Long-term perspective with USGS trawl data 2. Increasing role of nearshore contributions Hook, Bunnell and Czesny GLRRIN Lake Michigan Meeting April 2014 Prey fish trends (5 – 114 m depth) 400 Ninespine stickleback Deepwater sculpin 360 Rainbow smelt Slimy sculpin 320 Lake-wide biomass (kt) Round goby Bloater Alewife 280 240 200 160 120 80 40 0 1973 1978 1983 Hook, Bunnell and Czesny GLRRIN Lake Michigan Meeting April 2014 1988 1993 Year 1998 2003 2008 2013 Mechanisms driving the prey fish trends? Top-down: Predation by salmonines prevents prey fish from surviving to the ages they once enjoyed. Bottom-up: Reduced prey densities (zooplankton, Diporeia) lead to lower survival of age-0 fish or slower growth and/or condition of juveniles and spawning adults. Today’s goal seeks to understand fish patterns from a spatial perspective: how might differences in nearshore vs. offshore habitat influence fish production? Hook, Bunnell and Czesny GLRRIN Lake Michigan Meeting April 2014 250 Nearshore 200 9, 18, 27 m Mean = 27 kg/ha 150 50 0 Intermediate 200 150 100 37, 46, 55, 64, 73 m Mean = 60 kg/ha 50 0 200 Offshore 82, 91, 110 m Mean = 41 kg/ha 150 100 50 0 19 75 19 80 19 85 19 90 19 95 20 00 20 05 20 10 20 15 Total biomass (kg/ha + SE) 100 Hook, Bunnell and Czesny GLRRIN Lake Michigan Meeting April 2014 Nearshore community composition 100 90 Whitefish 80 Alewife & Bloater 70 60 Kg/ha Sucker Stickleback Smelt Shad Sculpin Piscivore 50 Perch Minnow 40 Goby Drum 30 Catfish Carp 20 Bloater Alewife 10 0 1973 1978 1983 Hook, Bunnell and Czesny GLRRIN Lake Michigan Meeting April 2014 1988 1993 1998 2003 2008 2013 Intermediate community composition 180 160 Bloater & Alewife 140 120 Kg/ha Whitefish Sucker Stickleback Smelt Shad Sculpin 100 Piscivore Perch 80 Minnow Goby 60 Drum Catfish 40 Carp Bloater 20 0 Alewife 1973 1978 1983 Hook, Bunnell and Czesny GLRRIN Lake Michigan Meeting April 2014 1988 1993 1998 2003 2008 2013 Offshore community composition 90 Sculpin, Alewife & Bloater 80 70 Kg/ha 60 Whitefish Sucker Stickleback Smelt Shad Sculpin 50 Piscivore Perch 40 Minnow Goby 30 Drum Catfish 20 Carp Bloater 10 0 Alewife 1973 1978 Hook, Bunnell and Czesny 1983 GLRRIN Lake Michigan Meeting April 2014 1988 1993 1998 2003 2008 2013 25 Nearshore 20 Species richness is highest in nearshore. 15 10 5 Intermediate 20 15 10 5 0 20 Offshore 15 10 5 0 19 75 19 80 19 85 19 90 19 95 20 00 20 05 20 10 20 15 Species richness 0 Hook, Bunnell and Czesny GLRRIN Lake Michigan Meeting April 2014 100 2004-2013 average *100% 1973-2013 average Nearshore 80 60 42% 20 0 100 Intermediate 80 60 40 12% 20 0 200 Offshore 150 100 36% 50 Hook, Bunnell and Czesny GLRRIN Lake Michigan Meeting April 2014 20 15 20 10 0 20 05 Total biomass (kg/ha + SE) 40 Since 2004, nearshore fish biomass is: 1) closer to longterm average 2) stable, if not increasing. Insights from long-term data • Fish vulnerable to daytime bottom trawl has declined at all depths. Effect of increasing water clarity? Effect of offshore fish moving deeper than our survey samples? • Since 2004, total biomass has declined the least in the nearshore. • Nearshore: highest species richness, but richness has declined in 2000s. Hook, Bunnell and Czesny GLRRIN Lake Michigan Meeting April 2014 Outline 1. Long-term perspective with USGS trawl data 2. Increasing role of nearshore contributions 1. Small-bodied fishes 2. Salmonines 3. Tributary and Wetland influences Hook, Bunnell and Czesny GLRRIN Lake Michigan Meeting April 2014 Increasing Trophic Position Turschak, Bootsma et al. Ecology 2014 Food Web Shift Offshore Energy Sources Hook, Bunnell and Czesny GLRRIN Lake Michigan Meeting April 2014 Nearshore Energy Sources 2010-2011 Field collections 2-hr bottom set, micromesh gillnets 3m, 7-9m, 14-16m Diets, fatty acids, isotopes Round goby, yellow perch, spottail shiners and others Hook, Bunnell and Czesny GLRRIN Lake Michigan Meeting April 2014 Round Goby Diets n=58 n=36 n=110 n=132 n=26 n=17 n=34 Dreissenids Rocky sites Larger fish Chironomids Always important Exception: September >100mm Hook, Bunnell and Czesny GLRRIN Lake Michigan Meeting April 2014 n=114 n=30 Round goby diet ordination nMDS of site means Color = site White = 6R Red = 1R Orange = 1S Yellow = 2R Green = 2S Dark Green = 3R Turquois = 3S Blue = 4R Dark Blue = 4S Purple = 5R Symbol = season Circle = May Triangle = July X = September Symbol Size = fish length class Small (<60mm) Medium (60-100mm) Large (>100mm) Hook, Bunnell and Czesny GLRRIN Lake Michigan Meeting April 2014 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 MDS2 -0.5 -1.0 -1.5 -2.0 -2.5 -1.5 2D Stress: 0.09 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 MDS1 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 Round goby diet ANOSIM: Seasons & Site Differences 2010 60-100mm fish Sites 1R, 2R, 3R, and 4R 2 factors Season Global test significant (sample statistic = 0.1%) All season pairwise comparisons significant Site Global test significant (sample statistic = 0.1%) All site pairwise comparisons with 4R significant 1R & 4R (R = 0.250), 2R & 4R (R = 0.395), 3R & 4R (R = 0.234) Hook, Bunnell and Czesny GLRRIN Lake Michigan Meeting April 2014 2D Stress: 0.04 Round Goby Fatty Acid ANOSIM: Seasons & Sites Different 2010 60-100mm fish 1R, 2R, 3R, 4R 2 factors Season Global test significant (sample statistic = 0.1%) All season pairwise comparisons significant Site Global test significant (sample statistic = 0.1%) All pairwise comparisons significant 2R & 3R show the strongest contrast for adjacent sites (R = 0.682) Low site variation between 1R & 2R, 3R & 4R Hook, Bunnell and Czesny GLRRIN Lake Michigan Meeting April 2014 2D Stress: 0.09 Round Goby Stable Isotopes: 60-100mm Round Goby 4R, 4S 3R, 3S, 5R 6R, 1R, 1S, 2R, 2S Pelagic Hook, Bunnell and Czesny GLRRIN Lake Michigan Meeting April 2014 Benthic Spatial Variation in YOY YEP Fatty Acid Signatures - Fall Hook, Bunnell and Czesny GLRRIN Lake Michigan Meeting April 2014 Happel et al. Outline 1. Long-term perspective with USGS trawl data 2. Increasing role of nearshore contributions 1. Small-bodied fishes 2. Salmonines 3. Tributary and Wetland influences Hook, Bunnell and Czesny GLRRIN Lake Michigan Meeting April 2014 Lake trout diets Stomach Contents Fatty acid analysis: -Spatial patterns less evident -Lake trout rely on both alewife and goby Hook, Bunnell and Czesny GLRRIN Michigan Meeting April 2014 (McKenna etLakeal. in prep) Chinook salmon increased their reliance on alewife in 2009-2010 compared to 1994-1996 Hook, Bunnell and Czesny GLRRIN Lake Michigan Meeting April 2014 Jacobs et al. 2013 Alewife in 2009-2010 diets are smaller than those in 1994-1996 1994-1996 2009-2010 Hook, Bunnell and Czesny GLRRIN Lake Michigan Meeting April 2014 Jacobs et al. 2013 Lake trout and rainbow trout harvest trends in charter boat fishery: IL, MI and WI waters (Lake Michigan, 1992-2012; N=~500K fishing trips) Mean bathymetric depth (m) 75 65 Brown trout 55 Rainbow trout r = -0.72 45 Lake trout r = -0.68 35 25 1992 Chinook salmon 1997 Hook, Bunnell and Czesny GLRRIN Lake Michigan Meeting April 2014 2002 Year 2007 2012 Coho salmon Simpson, Honsey, Rutherford, Höök unpubl. Outline 1. Long-term perspective with USGS trawl data 2. Increasing role of nearshore contributions 1. Small-bodied fishes 2. Salmonines 3. Tributary and wetland influences Hook, Bunnell and Czesny GLRRIN Lake Michigan Meeting April 2014 Comparison between drowned-rivermouth-lakes and nearshore Lake Michigan as alewife nursery habitats (2001-2003). Höök et al. 2007, 2008 Dufour et al. 2005, 2008 Höök and Pothoven 2009 Hook, Bunnell and Czesny GLRRIN Lake Michigan Meeting April 2014 Contributions from other nearshore habitats • As overall productivity of Lake Michigan has decreased, we might expect that relative contributions of fish (biomass, numbers, diversity) from distinct, productive nearshore habitats to have increased. • Several recent/on-going studies in Lake Michigan: river mouths (e.g., Larson et al. 2012, 2013); drowned river mouth lakes (e.g., Janetski et al. 2013; Bhagat and Ruetz 2011) coastal wetlands (e.g., Cooper et al. 2012); large bays (e.g., Madenjian et al. 2011); river plumes (Höök, Troy et al.) • Compared to Lake Michigan proper, these habitats provide differential prey sources, growth rates, reproductive opportunities, etc. • What is the overall role of these habitats at a system-wide scale? Hook, Bunnell and Czesny GLRRIN Lake Michigan Meeting April 2014 Increasing role of nearshore contributions • Increased reliance on nearshore carbon (2002 vs 2010-12) • Nearshore fishes • Spatial trophic patterns • east=pelagic west=benthic • Salmonines • Species differences • Chinook increased reliance on alewife • Lake trout diverse diets; spatial differences • Harvest shifted to shallower depths • Other nearshore habitats • Expectation of increased contribution from productive habitats Hook, Bunnell and Czesny GLRRIN Lake Michigan Meeting April 2014