Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on June 18, 2017. For personal use only. Ambiguous Phenotypes and Characterized By Wolf-Dieter Ludwig, Claus Jochen Ambiguous phenotypes 16 children with netic, molecular ses as studies well as were used The first mia whose while of the comprised five cells globulin (Ig) netic were t(4;1 of the populations. cell one heavy-chain A Further was morphologic and gene are thought progenitor cell by several separate studies leukemic phoid and cells myeloid blast-cell of a pluripotent stem lymphoid and myelomonocytic tion, gene aberrant mogenic event, progenitor antigens, Various School; the of the and ofUlm, Submitted May Supported in part Address 8, 1987; reprint ©I 988 costs ofthis This article in accordance of Giessen. Hannover Medical findings leukemia 30, /000 article must with Krebshilfe Based We present Ba 770/2-2. Berlin MD, Inc. the or third insuffi- Depart- lineage exists implications in a small number heterogeneity by application of acute of recombinanV heavy-chain immunoglobulin either the than heterogeneity findings, lymphoid of 16 children comprised cell features. understand a multimodal the observed acute leukemia, or genotypic fea- characterized populations by demonstrating Our results approach emphasize in order heterogeneous in a higher biclonal homogeneous or were or myeloid and with phenotypic lineage biclonal and relatively cell for et a12#{176} proposed biphenotypic, of separate necessity previously Andreeff with one is the coex- lines with different differ in their pheno- monophenotypic, subtypes. either than cell monoclonal populations coexistence genotypes 45, FRG. these cells of more mine University mixed nomenclature in acute myeloid leukemia acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Tgene rearrangement in T lineage the data blast to deter- phenotypes proportion of acute and leukemias realized. were defrayed in part by page therefore be hereby marked /8 U.S.C. section 1 734 solely MATERIALS to Patients. & Stratton, on monoclonal leukemia whose and by acute analyzed lineage of genotypic biphenotypic, monophenotypic the Free in and clinical two or more leukemic that may not necessarily between Ulm, 13, /988. and been illustrated discriminating tunes Ludwig, took pluripotent expression accepted demonstrating expression istence of karyotypes morphologic Steglitz. the lymphoma,’5 as well as rearrangement of the gene coding for the /3 chain of the T cell receptor (/3-TCR) in AML and B cell precursor ALL’#{176}”’9 or -y-TCR in pre-B cell ALL.’9 of Klinikum trans- Inc. only (Ig) gene rearrangement (AML)’#{176}’2 and T cell ALL),’#{176}’3”4kappa-chain of Wolf-Dieter content. patients phenotypes the incidence been methods University to of one cytometry DNA malignant to (Ig in flow group leukemia,6’7 have has DNA University project rearrangefeatures cell that gene no generally of such types. Steof January did close aberrant acute Furthermore, Medicine, this fact. 0006-4971/88/7106-0035$3.00/0 1518 leuke- Klinikum the Deutsche gene patients & Stratton, as yet. Medicine, Hindenburgdamm by Grune biphenotypic hybrid of accepted rearin five specifity. Another University Internal Gene rearrangement) ambiguous from by Grune Transfusion by a grantfrom requests “advertisement” leuke- FRG. ofHematology/Oncology, The publication charge payment. the Pediatrics, Forschungsgemeinschaft, of West-Berlin, indicate of Departments M#{252}nster, University the Deutsche of whereas reagent a 1988 myeloid-linked of Hematology/Oncology. Department with the differentia- of the applied markers.2’3 to describe such cases, eg, M#{252}nster, University the malig- hematopoietic and infidelity,4 Departments or leukemic from resulted and leukemia bigenotypic second of patients.8”#{176} Additional lym- (1) cell of rare lymphoid- lineage the Department Berlin; University ment resulting immortalization coexpressing promiscuity,2 From Ulm; expression or (4) lack of specifity terms have been proposed lineage glitz, (3) cells of cell. group myeloid antigens. and ontogenetically leukemia,8”#{176} but pathques- blasts by: stem mia,5 involving findings a stage and be demonstrated suggest and lym- antigens. of leukemic we group phenotype. light-chain 16 last acute for expressing explained at the first cell gene findings. in the place Ig ALL. abnormalities on these cient Ig of differ- myeloid nant transformation potential for both (2) Sur- or lymphoid fidelity was and been Ig from a single leukemias These have of oligoclonal simultaneously features.2 heterogeneity early T could /9-TCR of cell acute of with none formation commitment expression acute Based surface with to arise myeloid lineage of lymphoid populations individual clonal rearrangement in which reporting In disclose patients. showed as monoclonal patient. The or T cell-associated additional and Hell, typical pre-B unequivocal children Cytoge- demonstration in all five patients patients. in two (fi-TCR). early coexpression heavy-chain separate other of B cell by is restricted to either However, more recently, tioned the evidence five of two six Gerhard otherwise of Ig heavy-chain revealed and coexistence provided LEUKEMIAS abnormal entiation ways.’ the children. and ment immuno- patients. these of Molecular receptor with (ALL). with rangement expres- features. T cell of myeloid children (AML) leuke- lymphoid. simultaneous rearrangements of as well CUTE with 1 6 patients. myeloid gene prisingly. children in all one patients heavy-chain two groups. as Hansj#{243}rg Riehm cases leukemia three of the phoblastic into acute of the Leukemia Hiddemann, and of four patients of heavy-chain indicated features. these analy- chain consisted coexpression myeloid three with cytometric the cytochemical rearrangements in in cytoge- Acute Wolfgang V. Teichmann, and evidence available analyses pre-B flow observed With Analysis Raghavachar, Johannes marker. morphologically and showed 1 ). In five marker cell gene data. were disclosed pre-B studies DNA Anand Seibt-Jung, Surface morphologic to divide blast early genetic in and J#{246}rg Ritter, Hannelore genotypes genetic. immunophenotyping sion cell and leukemia. standard group R. Bartram, Harbott, acute Genotypes in 16 Children by Multiparameter AML and immunophenotype From 500 April with 1984 ALL analysis AND METHODS to September were as part 1986, referred of to the AML 80 children our laboratory and Blood, Vol 71, No 6 (June), 1988: ALL with for BFM pp 15 18-1528 From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on June 18, 2017. For personal use only. AMBIGUOUS PHENOTYPES (Berlin-Frankfurt wise GENOTYPES MUnster)-trials- typical antigens, AND AML, mostly ten I cell IN ACUTE LEUKEMIA 1983. Of 80 children showed antigens evidence of CD7, CD4, (ie, 1519 with other- (Tago, lymphoid-associated and CD2), whereas myeloid-related antigens were detected on blasts from 20 patients with ALL. Five children had two distinct cell populations with either myeloid or lymphoid features. However, adequate cell numbers for more extensive studies of surface antigen expression or molecular genetic analyses were available only from the I 6 patients described in this report. In administration 14 patients, samples of induction were investigated chemotherapy. Two before patients were by the ied at relapse. Morphology and cytochemistry. The morphologic diagnosis Schiff reagent acetate (PAS), esterase myeloperoxidase (ANAE), and evaluated by the reference sity Children’s Hospitals diagnoses were Ultrastructural (MPO) were incubated independent Endogenous the method in 20 mg diaminobenzidine 10 mL of 0.05 microscopy panel. mol/L with taming 2% incubated Immunologic bovine (30 serum minutes, albumin 4#{176}C) with The to the cells in the dark in a and below. 752; Coulter Electronics, Hialeah, (DAB; Sigma, St Tris-HCL, pH 7.4, F(ab’)2 fragment goat anti-mouse IgG In the case of VIM-2/TdT double cells were first incubated in suspension TRITC-conjugated (Fab’)2 fragment The panel of MoAbs goat selected for this study is shown with rabbit smears ringer were sodium azide, diluted cD of patients Biochemicals, Milwaukee, reactivity was assessed immunoperoxidase staining DNAs no. were extracted I through I 6. Ten from included as normal controls and molecular markers, respectively. Probes and constant region (Cia), Ig Antibodies Cellular Used Specifity in This Study or Antigen Source CD 1 9 Pan-B cell B. D#{246}rken,Heidelberg CD2O Pan-B cell Coulter Immunology J5 CD 10 CALLA Coulter Immunology Leu-9 CD7 Pan-T cell Becton Dickinson Leu-1 CD5 OKT1 1 CD2 Pan-T Pan-T cell cell (E rosette Becton Dickinson Ortho Diagnostic Systems OKT4 CD4 T helper/inducer Ortho Systems VIM-2 NA Granulocytic/monocytic VIM-D5 CD 1 5 Granulocytic My7 CD 1 3 Granulocytic/monocytic My9 CD33 MZ1 7 CD 1 5 NA HLA-DR receptor) Diagnostic markers lineage, lineage W. Knapp, Vienna monoblasts W. Knapp, Vienna lineage Coulter Immunology Granulocytic/monocytic lineage Coulter Immunology Granulocytic/monocytic lineage F. Herrmann, Mainz Other markers NA, not applicable. weight for the Ig heavy-chain joining (iH) x light-chain joining (Jx) and constant region (CK), Ig A light-chain constant regions (CX) as well as T cell receptor 13 chain constant region (CTfl) were described elsewhere,’#{176}and kindly provided by P. Leder and i. Seidman. After hybridization the filters were washed under stringent conditions and exposed to XAR-5 film (Kodak, Rochester, NY) using Dupont Lightning-Plus intensifying screens for 12 hours at - 70#{176}C. Cytogenetic studies. Bone marrow cells were prepared for chromosome analysis after a 24-hour culture with subsequent synchronization by methotrexate. Colcemid was added ten minutes before B1 of di iferentiation; cryo- with appropriate restriction enzymes (Boehelectrophoresed on a 0.7% agarose gel, as described previously.U Human placenta markers CD, cluster tech- micrograms HO 37 Abbreviations: WI). in frozen FRG), and hybridized were indirect analysis. were digested blotted, and Major an samples Mannheim, (P.L. antibody elsewhere.27 genetic cell and ‘y-DNAs MoAb. 1 . Monoclonal by Molecular preserved TdT further as described of DNAs 0.1% anti-calf indicated, nique of 0.003%. Thereafter, the for transmission electron Table OKIal anti- of labeled cells were staining for TdT as were cytospin + Myeloid FL). I . For intranuclear TdT staining, cytospin preparations fixed in absolute methanol (30 minutes, 4#{176}C) and incubated When After two further washing procedures, the binding of MoAbs was assessed by indirect immunofluorescence with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated goat F(ab’)2 anti-mouse IgG 1gM Lymphoid VIM-2 described activity et al.22 Unfixed appropriately Antibody Designation (Epics in Table markers and the cytometry mouse 1gM and cytocentrifuged preparations then subjected to indirect immunofluorescent analyzed either on bone marrow (n = 14) or peripheral blood cells (n = 2). Immunofluorescence assays were performed in fresh or cryopreserved samples. Only samples containing 80% leukemic blasts were assayed. Reactivity with murine monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) was determined as previously described.24 Briefly, leukemic blasts were isolated by standard Ficoll-Hypaque density gradient centrifugation. For surface phenotype determinations, 2 x 106 cells were pelleted, washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) conImmunophenotyping. flow beling with FITC-conjugated (Jackson Immunoresearch). immunofluorescence, target were according peroxidase of Rods H2O2 at a final concentration washed and further processed as described elsewhere.23 were observer for one hour at room temperature dissolved containing cells using containing Louis) an and due to Fc recep- ment naphthyl (AcP) binding goat anti-mouse 1gM (Jackson Immunoresearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA), followed by incubation with HD37 and counterla- of maracid of the trials (at the Univerand Hannover, FRG). All ALL were determined (FAB) classification.2’ studies. was studied medium by and alpha phosphatase laboratories in MUnster confirmed subtypes of AML French-American-British acid (MPO), CA). Nonspecific Background fluorescence, determined by using nonreactive MoAbs of the same isotype as the test MoAbs, was subtracted. In selected cases with adequate numbers of cells, double immunofluorescence analysis was performed as described elsewhere.”’’ Briefly, target cells were first stained with myeloid MoAb (V!M-2) and tetramethyl rhodamine isothiocyanate (TRITC) conjugated F(ab’)2 frag- stud- ALL and AML was determined in Pappenheim-stained bone row and blood smears. Slides were stained routinely for periodic Inc, Burlingame, tor was avoided by adding heat inactivated 10% goat serum (Sigma) in both the first and second incubations. Fluorescence of cells was evaluated with an epi-illuminated fluorescence Zeiss microscope or Ortho Diagnostic Systems From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on June 18, 2017. For personal use only. LUDWIG 1520 harvesting. After treatment with a hypotonic KCL solution (0.075 mol/L) the cells were fixed in methanol/acetic acid (3:1) and dropped on a cold wet slide. G-banding was done after a drying period of three to seven days at room temperature with a short trypsin pretreatment and staining with Giemsa solution at a pH of 6.8. DNA analysis ments blood by flow of the cellular and/or bone bromide cytometry. Flow cytometric DNA content were performed marrow cells after staining and mithramycin in combination.3”32 revealed the leukemic lymphoid positive patients, in three positivity for AcP. the basis of lymphoid approximately present. Two measure- in ethanol-fixed with ethidium blasts morphologically M5a) from seven (FAB-Li one Patient of whom PAS disclosed classified to morphology and was diffuse as ALL Cytochemically, on however, 10% MPO-positive lymphoid-like children were classified as AML according to be or L2). also 1 5 was no. morphology. patients L1/2, , ET AL blasts were (FAB-Ml, cytochemical staining. In four of the 16 patients, bone marrow smears were characterized by two separate blast populations with myeloid and lymphoid-appeaning leukemic cells (no. 2, 4, 12, and 16) (Fig 1). In patient no. 9, bone marrow examination at For the identification of DNA aneuploidies all samples were mixed with diploid mononuclear cells from normal blood donors as reference cells at two different concentrations. The appearance of a second G0/G, peak and its change according to the ratio between sample and reference cells was considered to indicate an aneuploid DNA stemline. The DNA index of diploid cells is by definition 1 33 diagnosis showed bling (slO%) tion RESULTS approximately lymphoblasts with and monoblastic of induction monocytoid 84% (FAB-L1) leukemic a small features. chemotherapy Three days for ALL, large (75%) appeared features cells resem- number of cells after initia- blasts with in the peripheral blood. patients ranged in age from 7 months to 16 years; four were under 12 months, and two of them had 1 1q23 translocation- Morphologic, cytogenetic, and clinical data of this patient have been previously reported. Cytochemical staining was inconclusive in one of these patients (no. 9). Two patients (no. 12 and 16) disclosed MPO-positivity at light micro- associated scopic Clinical logic data and hematologic of the 16 patients acute leukemia. eight were girls. 109/L; the WBC 5.2 x 109/L to 60% blast cells Clinical and Eight children were 1 2. The boys, and ultrastructural cytochemical in Table 2. studies. and activity. Study Age (yr)/Sex WBC (Blast %) (x 1O’/L) Rd 8.2/M 8 1 .9 (90) 2. FAB Clinics In patient in Ultrastructural patient patients no. percentage showed strong studies performed of blast cytochemical on leukemic (no. 2 and 4) revealed 4, whereas leukemic cells ANAE cells MPO from cells activity patient no. were negative for MPO (data not shown). In patient no. 6, the morphologic appearance of leukemic blasts was equivocal (FAB-L2 v FAB-M 1 ), and the blast I and He matologi cal Data PAS MPO ANAE AcP ND ND ND ND L2 no. 2 a small features of two of these data of the 16 patients are also Light microscopic examination Time of level. with monocytic Morpho- Table Patient No. hemato- in Table Eight children presented with WBC 100 x in the remaining eight patients ranged from 81.9 x 109/L. Peripheral blood comprised in 15 patients. Light microscopy logic and presented data. are summarized clinicel ces SM rd occurred 48 mo after Dg of ALL. died 1 mo later 2 Dg 1 .4/M 1 23.5 (92) L 1 /M5 65 0 3 0 CR after high-dose to AML- Ara-C. and high-risk consolidation ALL-pr, according CNS rd after 12 mo 3 Dg 1O.7/M 4 Dg 14. 1/M 1 16.4 (88) Ml 18.5 (65) M 1/L 1 0 26 8 0 0 CCR (13+ Ot 0 0 CR after ALL-pr, mo), AML-pr maintenance Th with rd after AML-pr, 5 Dg 4.6/F 560 (94) Li 0 0 0 0 Died before 6 Dg 6.8/M 292 (95) AUL 0 0 0 0 CR after ALL-th, 1 1 mo, died 1 mo later th BM and CNS rel after 10 mo, died 2.5 mo later 7 Rel 4.4/M 8 Dg 16.7/F 9 Dg 0.7/F 42.4 (90) L2 49.5(77) 230 (78) 60 0 0 0 CR afterALL/AML-th, Li/2 0 0 0 0 CCR(2i+mo),ALL-pr Li 0 0 0 0 CR after AML-pr (4+ 10 Dg 0. 1 i/F i i Dg 7.i 149.8 12 Dg 13.8/F 13 Dg 6.3/F i4 Dg 0.9/F 66 (95) M5a i5 Dg 0.7/F i 85 (94) M i i/M (90) 81 (8i) 37 (70) and steroids. 55 0 0 0 CR after ALL-pr, Li 0 0 0 0 CCR(29+ mo), ALL-pr 0 CCR mo), 9 Li 80 50 20 Dg i 2.4/M 275 (90) Li/M 1 (i8+ 0 70 CCR (i7+ mo). ALL-pr 0 0 80 0 CCR (i8+ mo). AML-pr 0 iO 0 0 CR after ALL-pr 6 0 0 and high-dose CR after AML-pr, BM rel after Abbreviations: AUL, acute Percent Rel, relapse; undifferentiated positive tDemonstration BM, bone marrow; leukemia; BMT, Dg, diagnosis; bone marrow blasts. of MPO positive blasts by electron CR, complete transplantation; microscopy. remission; ND, not done. pr, protocol; 2 CNS rel, BMT failure) AML-pr 0 7 mo) died 5 mo later (hepatic ter 5 mo, SM rd after i6 CCR (19+ mo) Li M4/Li 5.2 (38) BMT. Ara-C, CNS rel af- 7 mo maintenance th with ALL-pr. 6 mo, died 3 mo later CCR. continuous complete remission; th, therapy; 2 From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on June 18, 2017. For personal use only. AMBIGUOUS Fig PHENOTYPES 1. Bone diagnosis. Note marrow the myelomonocytoid (FAB-Li) AND aspirate two populations features (Pappenheim magnification GENOTYPES smear of of blast cells. (FAB-M4) stain; IN ACUTE and original LEUKEMIA patient no. larger smaller 12 cells i 521 at Fig 2. Bone marrow aspirate smear of patient no. 6 at diagnosis showing monomorphic proliferation of blasts (FAB-L2 v FAB-Mi ) (Pappenheim stain; original magnification x 950; current magnification x495). with lymphoblasts magnification x950; current x495). gens cells were undifferentiated by cytochemical stains (MPO, ANAE, PAS, AcP negative) (Fig 2). Ultrastructural studies in order to confirm the dual-lineage characteristics of mdividual leukemic blasts could not be performed in this patient due to insufficient cell numbers. Immunophenotyping. The results of immunophenotyping and TdT analysis patients clearly are disclosed 10, and 15). They expressed CDI9 and were negative antigens consistent ingly, however, with all myeloid-related these surface summarized in Table mixed lineage features TdT and the pan-B for CALLA an early (CD1O) pre-B patients phenotype. additionally antigens assays or immunoperoxidase ing techniques were not 3. Five in staining. applied in and some T cell expressed antigens marker 81 J5 Leu-9 i 90 85 40 75 5 2 5 70 3 0 3 3 0 0 4 70 55 5 50 6 45 7 8 9A immunologic essentially myeloid phenotype the same as at analysis in cases with distinct revealed populations that the leukemic not peripheral blood consistent with confirmed patient reactive in the immunologic seven AML. days later Double the existence no. bone marrow phenotyping 2 (CDI9+, at diagnosis; of blast revealed cells in the a marker immunofluorescence profile staining of two separate cell populations VIM-2- 50%; cells, in CDI9-, and Immunophenotypes Myeloid Markers 0KT4 VIM-2 VIM-D5 My7 My9 MZ17 OKlal ND 5 ND ND 40 ND 0 ND 90 4 ND ND ND 41 5 ND 2 20t 0 60 ND 10 ND 82 40t i5 40 10 ND ND 35t ND 0 10 4 ND i2 6 60 ND 55 65 0 0 4 ND ND 0 60 i5 10 ND 77t 55 60 ND 0 6 ND ND ND 5t 3 iO 40 55 75 6 3 6 0 ND ND 3t 30 0 10 75t ND 45 84 90 55 4 85 6 50 4 5 2 2 ND ND ND 90 45 45 5 0 5 0 5 ND ND 10 0 2 ND 55 12 ND 0 9 ND ND ND ND 40 4 45 ND 45 95 85 10 95 60 5 ii 75 60 0 12 50 45 0 13 85 80 35 2 OKT1 1 2 0 7 6 50t 75 6 5 80t 50 5 ND ND 0 0 ND ND 0 0 ND ND ND 25 18 8 45 30 50 80 45 ND ND ND ND 5 0 ND ND 65 5 80 80 83 60 4 62 70 ND 92 14 0 0 4 0 70 2 4 50 8 70 70 0 0 0 ND ND ND 78 68 16 60 50 i 53 2 2 ND ND 16 1 ND, not done. given as percent positive tlmmunperoxidase staining performed 1A. at diagnosis (bone marrow). §B, seven days later (peripheral blood). 22 8 40 15 AII results populations both Leu-1 0 Abbreviation: was examination were however, Although dual stainthese patients due to HD37 The no. 6 at relapse cell possessed blasts with lymphoid features in phase microscopy expressed TdT, HLA-DR, CD19 (no. 2, 9, and 12) as well as CD1O (no. 4 and 16) compatible with early pre-B cell phenotype, whereas the larger blasts in patients no. 2, 4, 12, and 16 reacted with myeloid markers. In patient no. 9, myeloid immunofluorescence TdT blasts characteristics. Lymph oid Markers . Patient B lymphoid Surface Surpnis- 3. homogeneous at least in light-microscopic (no. 5, 6, 7, cell antigen Table morphologically that diagnosis. inadequate numbers of cells, the overlap in the percentages of blasts reactive with lymphoid or myeloid-associated anti- No. the of patient of the and and indicated cells. on cryopreserved cytospin preparations. 1 26 29 From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on June 18, 2017. For personal use only. i522 LUDWIG Fig 3. Patient no. 12. Phase contrast ET AL micros- copy and indirect immunofluorescent staining of bone marrow at diagnosis. Note the two distinct populations. larger blasts with myelomonocytoid features and smaller lymphoblasts. (A) Blast cell morphology as seen under phase contrast microscopy. (B) Same field as (A). with the cells stained for myeloid cell surface antigen (TRITC labeled VIM-2 MoAb). Note that intermediate and large blasts are VIM-2-positive. (C) Same field as (A). with the cells stained for nuclear TdT (FITC-conjugated antibody). Note that smaller cells resembling lymphoblasts are TdT-positive. (Original magnification x 1 .000; current magnification x700.) From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on June 18, 2017. For personal use only. AMBIGUOUS PHENOTYPES AND GENOTYPES IN ACUTE LEUKEMIA 1523 VIM-2+ blasts, 25%) as well as in patient no. 12 (TdT+, VIM-2cells, 40%; VIM-2+, TdTblasts, 20%) (Fig 3A-C). In patients no. 1, 8, 1 1, and 13, surface marker studies revealed an early pre-B no. 1 simultaneously other three patients blasts with T cell cell phenotype. Blast cells of patient (CD7 in no. 1 3, and CD2 kemic and with morphologically typical expressing widely lymphoid- overlapped sion on different and in these individual myeloid-associated patients, cells of markers normally leu- investigated, except distinct rearranged indicating explained a restriction Hind!!! digests no. oligoclonality. by either or by patient fragments DNA enzyme likewise The latter overdigestion polymorphism, revealed multiple result or partial since rearranged c, Jit Cs CX $-TcR 1 nm R R G G G R DNA i.0 lndex 2 nm R R G G 3 nm R R GG 4 nm R R G 5 nm R R 6 46,XY,t(4;ii) R 7 46,XY,t(4;ii) 8 G G 1.0 G G 1.0 G G G 1.0 G G G G 1.0 R G G G G 1.0 R R G G G G 1.0 R R R R G G 1.0 47,XXX,t(il;i9) R R G G G G 1.0 nd R R G G G G 1.0 ii nd R R R R G G 1.0 12 nm R* R G G G R 1.0 13 nm R R G G G G 1.0 Four no. 14 nd G G G G G G 1.0 15 46,XX,t(4;ii) R R G G G G 1.0 not 16 nd R R GG G G on analysis patients 14 (Fig 4, Table 4). were observed in patient Ig Light Chain JH nm found blot in all Karyotype 9t 10 coexpres- lineages. Ig and fl-TCR gene analysis. Southern revealed an Ig heavy-chain rearrangement I 2, the and DNA Analyses Chain Patient No. antigens indicating Moleculargenetic. Cytometry Gene Rearrangement cells coexpressed T cell antigens (CD7 in patient no. 3, CD7 as well as CD4 in patient no. 14). The percentage of cells of Cytogenetic. lg Heavy in no. 8 AML, Results Flow and 11). In two children 4. . expressed the CD15 antigen, and the disclosed reactivity of early pre-B ALL antigens Table is digestion EcoR! Abbreviations: or done; bands nm, R, monoclonal ‘DNA or no analysable rearrangement; aneuploidy Materials no mitoses was G, germline quantitated 1.0 mitoses; ND, not configuration. by the DNA index as described in and Methods. tAt diagnosis (bone marrow). $Oligoclonal rearrangement. §At shown). (not the relapse presence CK rearrangement (see results). However, in the absence of multiple copies of chromosome possible alternative explanation. Samples at primary diagnosis from patients no. 6 and 16 could be identified chain initial analysis Fig 4. Southern blot analysis of DNAs obtained from leukemic cells of patients no. 1 through 1 6. BamHl digests were hybridized to a 1 .3 kB EcoRl CM probe that detects a 1 7 kb germline band. Note identical rearranged fragments in cell samples of patient no. 16 obtained from initial diagnosis (A) and in relapse (B). emerged cell sample. configuration (Fig CK and in patient of patients 5, relapse in relapse blots that Jic sequences no. no. 8 and and lane data, I 4 remains on both occasions of leukemic cells in Southern sequences rearrangement and 16, respectively, cally rearranged Ct fragments 16a/b). Yet clonal evolution light of cytogenetic were available showed since was not present remained identi- (Fig 4, lane of patient no. hybridized 16a/b), a to !gic a Cic in the in germline 6 (not shown). Southern 1 1 also showed rearranged blot IgK Fig 5. Southern blot analysis of DNAs obtained from leukemic cell samples of patients no. 8. 1 1 . and 1 6 as well as human placenta (N). BamHI digests were hybridized to CK sequences that detect a 12 kb germline band. Rearranged fragments are indicated by arrows. In patient no. 1 6 a CK recombination is visible in relapse (B) but not in cells from initial diagnosis (A). From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on June 18, 2017. For personal use only. LUDWIG 1524 A complete remission transplant was Only one of the logically distinct lasting was patients than I with year AML/ALL-directed and a bone marrow performed. populations longer occurred relapsed achieved, subsequently ET AL morphologically/immuno- achieved a complete in of spite treatment a remission combination protocols. of CNS relapses in two of these patients (no. 2 and 9), and two others I I months (no. 4) and 6 months (no. 16) after and died of progressive leukemia. diagnosis DISCUSSION Three Fig 6. Configuration of T cell receptor $-chain sequences in patients no. 1 and 12 as well as human placenta DNA (N). EcoRl digests were hybridized to a CT/I probe that detects 1 2 kb CT$1 and 4.2 kb CT$2 germline fragments. Rearranged fragments are indicated by arrows. different attempt to multiple evaluations ous five patient 5), (Fig showed to all other in contrast rearranged IgX chain cases (Table sequences simultaneous patients genes (Table exhibited them. investigations. out 1 5), and 7, tnisomy leukemias. of these equivocal was (no. 9). The was at the arm found t(1 breakpoint long arm was (no. 6, in all of observed whereas of number index try were and successfully leukemic cell t(4;ll) Treatment patients treated AML-BFM-83 has Patients induction was diagnosed, and later, the In patient patient and 1). then I month The CR after patient protocol, and (cytosine arabinoside two with relapse after Lineage was cytotoxic [Ara-C], drugs ALL therapy. (FAB-M5a) a relapse those the chemowith lym- mation acute is of short the B cell with early t(4;1 the 1) have disease B cell may lineage,#{176}or a cell in-depth line with characteriza- lymphoid expression switch partial with to characterize that early of this patients and myeloid capabilities.42 lineage all of lymphoid- three with to lymphoid) for the assumption and patients (myeloid positivity work in the MPO that three also in in patient the target kemias protocols and cell immunologic that acute that should the the consider t(4;l t(4;l data 2 years with important design its mixed-lineage < I 5% of from the here and from t(4;! 1) represents the subgroup of still a very therapy in is apparent presented leukemia has to cytotoxic exceeds It 1), 1) or is 1) generally response far.43’45 future with characteristics survival clinically t(4;I transfor- cell. for patients with so reported and progenitor leukemia with malignant mixed-lineage course; and patients suggests chemotherapy clinical and ofothers against AML both in duration, patients effective added. of A leukemic antigens with Acute aggressive biologically were of observed leukemia to ALL three and lineage the appropriate according the In addi(CD19), !g gene evidence leukemia of a pluripotent/bipotent The clinical studies these was inconclusive. origin.4’ immunophenotype confirmed by revealed 6-Thioguanine) was and A 4 years induction cell I 5 are consistent no. unknown. leukemia switch no. resemble therapy, relapse. cytogenetic treated ALL occurred AML diagnosis, and by by monoblastic occurred. analysis, CNS treated years blasts immunologic t(4;1 died proto- complete responses to no. 1, a common ALL achieved and no. 7, acute Three phoid-like was marrow was diagnosed therapy. I 3 entered CR of these no. of diagnosis for transformation in t(4; 1 1 ) may be a common progenitor for B cells and myeloid cells. Although patients no. 5 and 10 lacked cytogenetic data, clinical features (ie, young age, poor prognosis) and laboratory findings (ie, hyperleukocytosis) were studies elsewhere.35’37 3, 1 2, and I 4 had for AML. In patient and bone combined The outline in patient indicating of simultaneous 7, and in detail detected in established, dual Our findings I6 were of the characteristics attempting acute markers suggesting observed 8, 1 1 , and no. therapy revealed patient the myeloid pan-B cell antigen in the heavy-chain a very recently t(4; 1 1 ), the of in progenitor was 4), course and patients 6), morphologic Studies results, had DNA indices of I .0 (Table stemline was detected. clinical ambigu- appearance further a myelomonocytic,38’39 cells, mean described in Table 2. All children to protocols of the cooperative reported no. The was origin myeloid-associated The peak cell All or ALL-BFM-83. been patients GO/G, was available I). conflicting multipotent cytome- t(4;1 3.2%. outcome. is briefly according by flow out in all I 6 patients. the for populations DNA no aneuploid and carried of variation coefficient cols blast 7 [i(7q)] analyses lymphoid provided analyses, revealed yielded have DNA ploidy. cell of these staining patients five the from commitment. the 6 at (no. cytochemical in all with pre-B MPO demonstration tion DNA the to were found in two patients: (no. 9) and an isochromosome no. for mixed-lineage In one patient and 16 patients Four on the the in obtained The first group comprised whose blast cells showed I 5). positivety Cytogenetic of all chromoin band I 1q23. in patient but discriminated findings early and based supporting group relapse. and cells, of 5, 6, 7, 10, expression of the of rearrangements in three l;19)(q23;p13) changes X chromosome of the long 16 children was 15), chromosomal analysis of the aberration and appeared only once some I I aberrations Secondary four (4;11)(q21;23) 6, (no. Chromosomal in only a structural A translocation of the I 5, configuration be major in the present as ALL blast tion carried patients classified of T/3 while the 4). Chromosome successfully 7, 9, and a germline the expression (no. shown). (not Two patients (no. 1 and I 2) showed a rearrangement sequences in BamH! or EcoRI digests (Fig 6), other 4). No could summarize phenotypes and genotypes. patients with acute leukemias antigens sequences groups of acute chemotherapeutic features. a leu- From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on June 18, 2017. For personal use only. AMBIGUOUS PHENOTYPES The group second whom analysis revealed tions, one the with features (no. three GENOTYPES of patients morphologic studies AND comprised as well coexistence lymphoid and the patients, myeloid monocytoid features hypothesis of a closer relationship progenitors.6 by recent results and shared surface reports t(9;! differentiating into Molecular genetic leukemia with three myeloid and in this Thus, in group patients analysis revealed a single a monoallelic (patients no. suggest clonally related. kemic cell of two different deletion populations on one clones, allele and a gene emerged phenotypes The that but also blot from analysis different in the detected characterized allele Southern blots analysis multiple during the subpopu- their respective Since rearrangement are the similar cell (Fig of the Ig heavy-chain rearranged fragments. 6, lane rearrangement. may have characterized by distinct heavy-chain and phenotypic or morphologic different ingly, a recent chromosome genes 14, the in childhood a poor observed as study frequent that, presence of more ALL response in patient in suggested B of B lineage that gene than antigens, cells, ALL can AML6”62 expression that only supported anti-CD4 anti-CD7 whose reports but easily of ALL been blast described indicating the exposable form cells antigen from B cell CD2 (CD2) could a subgroup of neoplasias,63 on AML of AML or CD7 and blasts was patients.TM’65 antigens on early cell determinants lineage.2 are entirely This interpretation is by the observed reactivity of AML blast cells and anti-CD7 MoAbs (patient no. 14) or only MoAbs (patient no. 3). Interestingly, recent have demonstrated cells cells All patients the expression of the of monocyte/macrophage from adults with with early pre-B of the antigen as well typical ALL and antigens heavy-chain CD4 lineage66 otherwise or T cell-associated AML.9 coexpression of demonstrated Ig sequences. rear- Two of these also disclosed light-chain Ig gene rearrangement, a originally thought to permit a more definitive assessof B lineage commitment T lineage evidence bigenotypic demonstration functional recently Patient of the $-TCR otherwise Another but cells.’5 gene also no. detected I also without other of Ig heavy-chain AML typical or infidelity interpretation (patient of gene suggests rearrangements gene no. control that such are a component in revealed phenotypic for T lineage ALL. Possible interpretations features have been discussed above. abnormality for such rearrangement 3) may reflect in acute leukemia. partial an and of normal nondiffer- entiation.67 with Taken together, specifity our in this unexpected lineage To on of few antigenic cell neoplasms.’4’5’ AML Expression in patients no. 8, 1 1 and 13, has not and probably further supports the to a particular gene regulation cell with or T cells,59’#{176}it has been questioned be regarded as evidence for acute of the aberrant T view or chronic observed in with X-hapten, in a cryptic to therapy.5#{176} Bigenotypic features as No. 1 2 appear to be approximately twice as the leukemia.2 assumption The 2 z heavy-chain may be correlated clinical drugs, markers. of pan-T antigen CD7 in a substantial proportion blast cells been yet the 1 , has recently no. In pre-B ALL, as observed been previously reported as on in which chemotherapy, patients the in patient rearrangement of two especially on findings such malignant Interestcopies in not cytotoxic T cell with ment extra and studies.25’56’58 expression observed in rear- absent is poor. children multi- gene reports26’47’48’5355 multiple-agent recently identified rearrangements case the E-rosette-associated be identified on leukemic However, molecularly feathat in this study consisted of four patients whose blast cells coexpressed myeloid- of X-hapten whether However, recent coexpressed by desialylation has and patients as observed several 12). features. without myeloid clearly are simulta- was leukemias ALL-directed antigens cells rangement of Tf3 the /3-TCR of patients. intensive and group ALL leukemic patients finding of differentiation, emerged The last early pre-B no. genes (Fig 4, lane I 2) revealed We tend to interpret these In the course pIe subpopulations of these myeloid- I 2. for acute simultaneously despite prognosis with time and bigenotypic be emphasized neoplasms,52 outcome patients AML- on one conflicting data as an indication for the clonal relationship the leukemic cells, which is suggested by the common gene that, on neoplastic one. first precedes T cell series our including studies these both in patient to Tfl sequences population suggest with patterns fragments obtained 9) Southern of markedly on the other results of in probably coexist in larger course also 4, lane fragments lineages restricted distinctions. above. of Cjs germline hybridized a monoclonal in treatment two However, by a C and EcoR! digests (not shown), existence of two cell populations, a distinct surprising leu- composed no. 9 (Fig intensity. the on the other discussed rearranged by a deletion and Most defined in patient two up in Hind!!! suggest the 4 are clone morphologic patients autoradiographic came results 2 and differ marked pattern that that it appears that, patients, leukemic only show hybridization differs not The Likewise, 4). These results no. 2 and 4 are the no. I 2. patient of that in precursor “mixed-lineage” population rearrangement appears to be less likely. Hence, differentiation process in those lations no. a myeloid 16, for an antigen rangement 4) or biallelic interpretation of patients cell of and reveals CD7, presence are 4, cell 2 and no. 16) Ig gene rearrangement (Fig that the leukemic cells in patients alternative hyperleucapable of 2, case expression of both biphenotypic at the molecular level. It should cell-associated with translocacommon of patients blot or cells.48 no. exhibiting The patients other certain lymphoid Southern (patient t(1 I ;l 9) I 1q23 translo- and have this neous tures studied lymphoma with knowledge, the and supported young age of patients, of a progenitor cell studies interest. with Morphologic, immunono. 9 are consistent with including such as the proliferation pre- lymphoid is further of 11 patients characteristics, kocytosis, and in !g gene rearrangements that both t(4;!!) I 1q23 breakpoint both that, accordance hypothesis leukemia, myeloid evidenced between acute study t(l1;!9), suggested tions involving the with in a lymphoblastic describing cation-associated particular in tumor cell line.46 findings in patient A recent popula- It is noteworthy identical antigens macrophage logic, and clinical and other This disclosing cell one in marker separate involvement dominantly monocyte five children other 16). 1525 LEUKEMIA as immunologic of two 2, 4, 9, 12, and of these IN ACUTE group of of phenotypes patients and probably due to leukemogenesis,4 the probes used (eg, genotypes arise from insufficient multispecific From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on June 18, 2017. For personal use only. 1526 LUDWIG MoAbs68), and abortive sequences inappropriate rarely detectable type.67 Data in the to small acute the AML of these with of the regarding of disclosing evidence cannot patients in this follow-ups associated cell of Conclusions findings long-term prognosis the myeloid-related antigens.4’9’72 number studies prospective cells contradictory expressing surface importance the determine with as to be drawn of the patients series, are this multiple leukemic evolution,73 ,more with malignant not of DNA tiated types aneuploidies of acute is higher leukemias in the (eg, AML more M4 differenor M5 and ALL) than in AML MI and null ALL,24’75 these results further support the origin of ambiguous phenotyps and genotypes from very early precursor cells. In conclusion, the application of expanded diagnostic and needed to subgroup origin disclose for of diagnosis or relapse DNA and will cell differentiation. arising by clonal These phenotypic can and of leukemic contribute genotypic blast to the cells at identification of lead to further insights into normal hematopoietic of two or results ACKNOWLEDGMENT are consis- analyzed features. the biologically and clinically relevant subgroups of acute leukemias. Furthermore, such approaches will be useful in clarifying the pathogenesis of acute “mixed-lineage” leukemias, detect the existence analyzing characteristics to of the cases mixed-lineage approaches possible generally indicating clones.74 clonal their was lines, cases, a common despite it stem or in rare concurrent study did flow cytometry Furthermore, aneuploidies. dence lineage-associated leukemia. In none tent are antigens8”#{176}’56’69’7’ or the prognostic of Ig or TCR hematopoietic common of ALL lymphoid-associated due rearrangements in literature clinical significance surface DNA ET AL Since in this the mci- We are indebted Barbara Komischke to Gudrun for excellent Gassner, technical Annette assistance. Gatzke, and REFERENCES 1 . Fialkow P: Clonal and stem cell origin of blood cell neoplasms, in Lobue J, Gordon AS, Silber R, Muggia FM (eds): Contemporary Hematology/Oncology. New York, Plenum, 1980, p 1 2. Greaves MF, HV: Lineage mia. Blood 3, Stass Chan promiscuity 67:1, Furley AJW, Watt SM, Molgaard differentiation and leuke- 17. 1986 5, Mirro Mixed lineages LC, in hemopoietic J: Unexpected and lineage heterogeneity switch. Hum Pathol in acute 16:864, leukemia: 7. Gale RP, 8. Mirro Ben Bassat 65:261, 1987 J, Zipf TF, I: Annotation. Hybrid non-B-cell 1985 acute leukemia. Br G, Williams D, CH, Kitchingman Melvin 5, Murphy SB, Stass 5: Acute mixed lineage leukemia: Clinicopathologic correlations and prognostic significance. Blood 66:1115, 1985 9. Stass 5, Mirro J: Lineage heterogeneity in acute leukaemia: Acute mixed-lineage leukaemia and lineage switch, in Gale RP, Hoffbrand AV (eds): Clinics in Haematology, vol iS. London, Saunders, 1986, p 81 1 10. Mirro J, Kitchingman GR, Stass SA: Lineage heterogeneity in acute leukemia. Acute mixed lineage leukemia and lineage switch, in Stass SA (ed): The Acute Leukemias. Biologic, Diagnostic, and Therapeutic Determinants. Hematology, vol 6. New York, Marcel Dekker, 1987, p 383 1 1 . Rovigatti U, Mirro J, Kitchingman G, DahI G, Ochs J, Murphy 5, Stass 5: Heavy chain immunoglobulin gene rearrangement in acute nonlymphocytic leukemia. Blood 63:1023, 1984 12. Bartram CR, Raghavachar A, Heimpel H: Biallelic heavy chain immunoglobulin gene rearrangement in acute nonlymphocytic leukemia. Blut 52:203, 1986 13. Ha K, Hozumi N, Hrincu A, Gelfand EW: Lineage specific classification of leukaemia: Results of the analysis of sixty cases of childhood leukaemia. 14. Pelicci Br J Haematol 6 1 :237, 1985 PG. Knowles DM, Dalla Favera R: Lymphoid tumors rearrangements of both immunoglobulin and T cell receptor genes. J Exp Med 162:1015, 1985 I 5. Ha-Kawa K, Hara J, Keiko Y, Muraguchi A, Kawamura N, displaying Med A, Hozumi N, Minden of the T-cell acute lymphoblastic 313:1033, M, Mak TW, Gelfand EW: receptor fl-chain gene in non-T-cell, leukemia of childhood. N Engl J 1985 18. Felix CA, Reaman GH, Korsmeyer Si, Hollis GF, Dinndorf PA, Wright JJ, Kirsch IR: Immunoglobulin and T cell receptor gene configuration in acute lymphoblastic leukemia of infancy. Blood 70:536, 1987 19. Felix CA, Wright JJ, Poplack DG, Reaman GH, Cole D, Goldman P, Korsmeyer Si: T cell receptor a-, -, and -y-genes in T cell Pui Tawa Rearrangement 4. Smith U, Curtis JE, Messner HA, Senn JS, Furthmayr H, McCulloch EA: Lineage infidelity in acute leukemia. Blood 61:1138, 1983 5. Editorial: Biphenotypic leukaemia. Lancet 2:1 178, 1983 6. Ben-Bassat I, Gale RP: Hybrid acute leukemia. Leuk Res 8:929, 1984 J Haematol 5, Doi 5, Yabuuchi H: Kappa-chain gene rearrangement in apparent T-lineage lymphoma. J Clin Invest 78:1439, 1986 16. Cheng GY, Minden MD, Toyonaga B, Mak TW, McCulloch EA: T cell receptor and immunoglobulin gene rearrangements in acute myeloblastic leukemia. J Exp Med 163:414, 1986 Ishihara an and pre-B 80:545, 20. cell acute M, Redner lymphoblastic leukemia. i Clin Invest 1987 Andreeff P, Miller D, Melamed determination A, Thongprasert MR: of ploidy, 5, Eagle Multiparameter proliferation B, Steinherz flow cytometry and differentiation for in acute treatment effects and prognostic value, in BUchner T, Bloomfield CD, Hiddemann W, Hossfeld DK, Schumann J (eds): Tumor Aneuploidy. Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 1985, p81 21. Bennett JM, Catovsky D, Daniel MT. Flandrin G, Galton DAG, Gralnick HR. Sultan C: Proposals for the classification of the leukemia: acute 22. leukaemias. Roels Br J Haematol F, Wisse E, Brest discrimination between zidine. Histochemistry 23. Hoelzer acute 24. Heil G, unclassified Hiddemann 1976 der Meulen catalases and peroxidases 41:281, 1975 Ganser D, Heimpel 33:451, B, van A, Raghavachar H: Induction leukaemias. W, Ludwig A, i: Cytochemical using diaminobenKurrle ofmyeloperoxidase Br J Haematol WD, E, Heit W, in five cases 68:23, Herrmann of 1988 F, Harbott i, Beck JD, Lampert F, Odenwald E, Riehm H: New techniques in the diagnosis and pretherapeutic characterization of acute leukemias in children: Analyses by flow cytometry, immunology and cytogenetics in the BFM studies, in Riehm H (ed): Malignant Neoplasms Childhood and Adolescence. Basel, Karger, 1986, p 106 25. Bettelheim P, Paietta E, Majdic 0, Gadner H, Schwarzmeier J, Knapp W: Expression of a myeloid marker on TdT-positive acute lymphocytic leukemic cells: Evidence by double-fluorescence staining. Blood 60:1392, 1982 in From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on June 18, 2017. For personal use only. AMBIGUOUS 26. PHENOTYPES Neame PB, AND GENOTYPES Soamboonsrup IN ACUTE P. Browman G, Barr RD. N, Chan B, Pai M, Benger A, Wilson WEC, Walker JA: Simultaneous or sequential expression of lymphoid phenotypes in acute leukemia. Blood 65:142, 1985 27. K#{246}llerU, Stockinger A rapid and and simple bone 28. samples. Raghavachar cellular and clonality and immunoglobulin 29. Bakhshi Whang-Peng of chronic ment A, cells. J, Arnold Nature N EngI KA, and ofsurface 68:658, Lossman for 309:826, the JP, 1983 A B B, G#{246}hde W, Bflchner procedures for specific and 1: rapid 32. Barlogie B, Spitzer i: cells. 48:245, Blood 33. analysis W, Fengler Hart iS, Johnston analysis of DA, human Bflchner Schumann J, Andreeff BH, Murphy for DNA R, cytometry. Baumgarten M, Barlogie T, Har- bott J, Ludwig WD, Henze G: Biklonale Leuk#{228}mie(O-ALL/ AMoL) mit l1;l9 Translokation und Trisomie X bei einem Monatealten M#{228}dchen.KIm P#{228}diat 198:178, 1986 35. Creutzig U, Ritter i, Riehm H, Langermann Hi, Henze 8 Ritter akuten, i, Creutzig U, der 83. Onkologie 37. kooperativen 9:78, Riehm H, leukemia, in Voute hardt (eds): MK G: Risikogruppen Therapiestudien der Analyse der 78 und AML-BFM 1986 Feickert Hi, PA, Barrett Cancer Lampert F: Acute lymphoblastic A, Bloom HJG, Lemerle J, Neid- in Children. Berlin, Springer-Verlag, DL, nonlymphoid 5, Maeda 52. Pittaluga precedes phoblastic) neoplasms. 53. Prentice 54. vich Perentesis AH: 1986 1) chromosomal characteristics. JH: Y, Y: acute leukemia RC, with SB: Kalwinsky of leukemic 69:1289, 1987 5, Rovigatti evidence for Pediatr 102:63, 55, Ueda 56. with M, Lipford U, Melvin Biologic and the T cell 68:134, AG, i, Ramsay SL, prognostic receptor Cossman /3-chain i: 3Al in precursor (CD7) T (lym- 1986 Bradstock KF: in treated NKC, Mixed lymphoblas- Hodgkin’s Brunning leukemia: a common EH, rearrangements Blood Smith Biphenotypic disease. R, Kersey Immunologic lymphoid-myeloid Blood iH, and Filipo- morphologic progenitor in humans. i 1983 1, Kita K, Kagawa Y, Uchino M, McKolnis i, Crist of myeloid antigen blastic leukemia D, Tamori 5, Ando T: Acute leukemia H, Nakamura of lymphoblasts Weiner and Borowitz monoblasts. M, Boyett i, 5, Sassada with Leuk Res Civin K, two 8:63, M, cell 1984 Metzger R, W, Dowell B, Pullen i: Clinical pathologic aspects positivity in pediatric patients with acute lympho(ALL). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 4:172, 1985 (abstr) Res DC, Kersey 9:1467, T, Hiyoshi Ribeiro Blood Murphy leukemia 2. Leuk 67:689, SB, i, Stass 1/3 gene tic-myelomonoblastic 56:129, 1980 of ‘myeloid 42. Stung RC, Korsmeyer Si, Parkin JL, Arthur Human acute leukemia cell line with the t(4;1 rearrangement exhibits B lineage and monocytic Blood6S:21, 1985 HL, cases rela- M, Hayashi DL: An analysis Comparison AG, 57. Blood Chen T: Four Res T, Shikano Murphy SC, 5, Raffeld expression pattern 4;l I translocation. H, i, 137:2043, 1986 acute leukemia and its myelomonocytic nature in infants. Blood 61:1174, 1983 40. Stark B, Umiel T, Mammon Z, Galili N, Dzaledetti M, Cohen lJ, Steinberg M, Vogel R, Zaizov R: Leukemia of early infancy. Early B-cell lineage associated with t(4;ll). Cancer 58:1265, 1986 41. Mirro i, Kitchingman G, Williams D, Lauzon GJ, Lin CC, Callihan T, Zipf TF: Clinical and laboratory characteristics of acute T, Sugiyama Clonal Leuk in in infants. leukemia: I) the Maeda H, Matsuo Ritter 1986 Williams Mirro Raimondi K, with M, Misu SC, WM, GR, Kita 0, acute 1986 M: N, Sakurai M, Takeda characteristics features of t(4;l leukemia Nagasaka Crist Kitchingman populations 38. Parkin iL, Arthur DC, Abramson CS, McKenna RW, Kersey JH, Heideman RL, Brunning RD: Acute leukemia associated with the t(4;1 I ) chromosome rearrangement: Ultrastructural and immunologic characteristics. Blood 60:1321, 1982 Mabuchi 4;l I literature. CR, Potter monoblasts. Blood 67:484, chromosomal Yoshida 1986, p 101 39. cell G, bei Leuk#{228}mieim Kindesalter. nicht-lymphatischen Ergebnisse Schellong the Bartram HC, N, Takasaki 1, Sakurai Raimondi GV, gene. i Immunol Kabisch H, Niethammer D, JUrgens H, Stollmann B, Lasson U, Kaufmann U, L#{246}ffier H, Schellong G: Improved treatment results in childhood acute myelogenous leukemia: A report of the German cooperative study AML-BFM-78. Blood 65:298, 1985 36. of significance of the presence of more than two z heavy-chain genes in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia of B precursor cell origin. Blood 67:698, 1986 51. Greenberg iM, Quertermous T, Seidman JG, Kersey JH: Human T cell -y-chain gene rearrangements in acute lymphoid and 1984 U, review WD, Morse and hematologic Pui C-H, DahI 50. B, Her- 5:445, 5, Creutzig Ludwig KL, Y, Maseki translocations. 49. DK, AA: Conven- Cytometry E, Buchmann Holmes 5, Mon and 1 1q23 hematopoietic RF, Sandberg i, lymphoblasts Kaneko Williams Leif RC, Mayall on nomenclature 34. G, histogram of Clinical 1976 Hiddemann man Ci, tion DNA SR, Nakazawa New of DNA distributions, in G#{246}hde W, Schumann J, B#{252}chnerT (eds): Second International Symposium on Pulscytophotometry. Ghent, European Press Medikon, 1976, p 97 Schumann AA: Translocation and I985 48. i, Barlogie reports F, Harbott Bauer populations 1985 staining Lampert 46. P. Korsmeyer Si: loss of K genes in human JR. Sandberg case tionship of the lymphoblastic cell line P388 to the macrophage cell line P388D1 as evidenced by immunoglobulin gene rearrangements and expression of cell surface antigens. i Immunol I 36:4695, 1986 47. Hayashi Y, Sakurai M, Kaneko Y, Abe T, Mon T, Nakazawa 5: 1 1 ; 19 translocation in a congenital leukemia with two cell 1986 J, Jensen Three Gerein V, Neidhardt M, Mertens R, Graf N, Riehm H: Acute leukemia with chromosome translocation (4:1 1 ): 7 new patients and analysis of 71 cases. Blut 54:325, 1987 markers A, Goldman mediates J, Schumann preparating J Med Bakhshi element 316:260, 3 1 . Zante A, 45. G, Kleihauer M, Kowalzyk leukemia: Cancer Genet Cytogenet 16:21, 1985 44. Dc Braekeleer M: t (4;l 1) translocation-associated leukemia: An update. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 23:333, for blood Implications by analysis Blood W: 1986 A, Heil leukemia: Kocova acute TA, Korsmeyer Si: Lymphoid blast crisis leukemia represent stages in the develop- precursors. deleting 86:75, Ganser suggested Minowada Siminovitch uniform CR, gene rearrangement. i, Waldman myelogenous of B-cell 30. Bartram undifferentiated 43. Saeed P. Knapp procedure Methods i 527 IR, McBride and myeloid Bettelheim staining i Immunol A, B: Acute origin 0, immunoperoxidase marrow E, Kubanek H, Majdic LEUKEMIA 58. Drexler HG, Sagawa K, Menon monoclonal M, antibodies’ Minowada with i: Reactivity emphasis on MCS- 10:17, 1986 Bettelheim P. K#{246}llerU, Majdic 0, Stockinger H, Hinter- W, Lutz D, Knapp W: Lineage infidelity von Leuk#{228}miezellen. Onkologie 9:72, 1986 59, Stockinger H, Majdic 0, Liszka K, Aberer W, Bettelheim P. Lutz D, Knapp W: Exposure by desialylation of myeloid antigens on acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells. i NatI Cancer Inst 73:7, 1984 60. Tetteroo PAT, van’t Veer MB, Tromp iF, von dem Borne AEG: Detection of the granulocyte-specific antigen 3-fucosyl-Nacetyl-lactosamine on leukemic cells after neuraminidase treatment. berger Int J Cancer 61. Mirro 33:355, 1984 i, Antoun GR, Zipf TF, Melvin 5, Stass 5: The E From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on June 18, 2017. For personal use only. 1528 LUDWIG rosette-associated patients 62. antigen with acute Pui C-H, DahI GV, Mirro dase positivity of T cells can be identified myeloblastic leukemia. Blood on blasts 65:363, from phoid Behm FG, Kalwinsky DK, Murphy SB, Butler DL, J: Clinical significance of low levels of myeloperoxiin childhood acute nonlymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 70. 63. Mills KHG, Cawley iC: Stimulated lymphoid cells of B lineage, but not plasma or myeloid cells, can express E receptor. Leuk Res 9:375, 1985 64. Vodinelich L, Tax W, Bai Y, Pegram 5, Capel P. Greaves MF: A monoclonal antibody (WT1 ) for detecting leukemias ofT cell precursors. Blood 63:1 108, 1983 65. Reuben i, Dalton W, Ahearn M: Mixed lineage leukemia adult acute and chronic leukemia. GS, Warner NL, Warnke RA: Blood 66:182A, 1985 (abstr) by acute 67. cations i with cells Immunol Greaves of monocyte/macrophage 131:212, MF, Chan for hematopoietic Anti-Leu-3/T4 and anti- LC: Mixed lmmunol DahI lineage differentiation. leukemia: Blood 68:598, The impli- 1986 (let- 5, Campbell Today AM: Multispecific monoclonal antibodies. 7:217, 1986 69. Sobol RE, Royston F, Nelson D, Bboomfield I, Mick R, Cuttner i, Ellison RR, Davey CD: Clinical significance of mixed lym- Blood R, J, Griffin importance adult 5: 1 59, Kalwinsky therapeutic 67:1048, I, iD, Look AT, DK, 74, DK: SL, Williams SB, Mauer cells determined Andreeff acute M, Gee R, Koziner myeloblastic 75. Melvin Murphy acute FR, H, Ellison Nelson antigen Leukemic RR, DA, Bloom- expression cell in adult DL, Brodeur leukemia, GM, Aneuploidy by flow cytometry Proc acute Biologic, Diagnostic, and vol 6. New York, Marcel AM: leukemia. B, Clarkson characterization. in childhood Blood T, Mertelsmann leukemia. D, Wolff antigens N EngI J Med 316:1 1 1 1, 1987 implications in childhood i, Chaganti lymphoblastic (abstr) Davey Collins Stass SA (ed): The Acute Leukemias. Therapeutic Determinants. Hematology, Dekker, l987,p4O3 Kalwinski acute 1 986 1986 Royston of myeloid leukemia. GV, and in Oncol in 1980 Gosh Clinical phenotype ter) 68. 72. Clinical Clin Mick lymphoblastic age of S-phase Langerhans 1983 cells. RE, R, Cuttner CD: acute Soc PA, Andrews RG, Benjamin D, Ridgway ID: Expression of normal myeloid-associated leukemia Newman field characteristics Am Sobol 73. 66. Wood bodies react lineage. Dinndorf 71. in myeloid Proc L, Bernstein 70:51, 1987 experience and leukemia. 1985 ET AL correlate 60:959, R, McKenzie R: Biclonal Am Dahl and Assoc with cell 1982 5, Steinmetz lymphoblastic Cancer GV, percent- Res and 21:54, (abstr) Hiddemann aneuploidies dence and W, W#{246}rmann B, G#{246}hdeW, in adult patients relation to patient types. Cancer 57:2146, 1986 with acute characteristics B#{252}chner T: myeloid leukemia. and morphologic DNA Incisub- From www.bloodjournal.org by guest on June 18, 2017. For personal use only. 1988 71: 1518-1528 Ambiguous phenotypes and genotypes in 16 children with acute leukemia as characterized by multiparameter analysis WD Ludwig, CR Bartram, J Ritter, A Raghavachar, W Hiddemann, G Heil, J Harbott, H Seibt-Jung, JV Teichmann and H Riehm Updated information and services can be found at: http://www.bloodjournal.org/content/71/6/1518.full.html Articles on similar topics can be found in the following Blood collections Information about reproducing this article in parts or in its entirety may be found online at: http://www.bloodjournal.org/site/misc/rights.xhtml#repub_requests Information about ordering reprints may be found online at: http://www.bloodjournal.org/site/misc/rights.xhtml#reprints Information about subscriptions and ASH membership may be found online at: http://www.bloodjournal.org/site/subscriptions/index.xhtml Blood (print ISSN 0006-4971, online ISSN 1528-0020), is published weekly by the American Society of Hematology, 2021 L St, NW, Suite 900, Washington DC 20036. Copyright 2011 by The American Society of Hematology; all rights reserved.