Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Key Paper Evaluation Resistance to anti-peptide deformylase drugs 1. Introduction 2. Results from the paper by Apfel et al. 3. Significance of the results 4. Expert opinion Bibliography Evaluation of: APFEL CM, LOCHER H, EVERS S et al.: Peptide deformylase as an antibacterial drug target: target validation and resistance development. Antimicrob. Agents. Chemother. (2001) 45(4):1058-1064. Carmela Giglione & Thierry Meinnel Institut des Sciences du Végétal, UPR2355, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Bâtiment 23, 1 Avenue de la Terrasse, F-91198 Gif-sur-Yvette cedex, France Recent work has assessed the potential of peptide deformylase (PDF) as a target for broad spectrum antibacterial agents. By using a number of approaches, including proteomics, researchers at Roche have shown that the molecules they had selected in vitro were able to target PDF in vivo. However, the authors, having observed resistance occurring at a rather high frequency and on the basis of the recent discovery of a deformylase homologue in humans, suggest that PDF ‘may not be an optimal target for broad spectrum antibacterial agents’. We link these data to results published by other laboratories and conclude that PDF deserves to still be considered a valuable target for new antibiotics. Keywords: antibiotics, deformylase, human homologue, resistance, side effects, toxicity Expert Opin. Ther. Targets (2001) 5(3): 1. Ashley Publications www.ashley-pub.com Introduction Infectious diseases caused by bacteria, fungi and other parasitic organisms affect hundreds of millions of people worldwide and cause millions of deaths each year. Renewed interest in the discovery of new antibiotics has been driven by the development by these organisms of resistance to the drugs commonly used against them. Although the number of antibiotics is very large (>160), the diversity of chemical classes that they represent is, however, rather limited and resistance mechanisms are most often connected to each antibiotic class. Up-to-date approaches towards the search for new antibiotics therefore take advantage of new targets involved in novel mechanisms yet to be explored in drug discovery, for which resistance mechanisms have not evolved widely amongst bacterial populations. The search for a broad spectrum drug is clearly preferable for several reasons, including the high cost development of each individual drug and the possibility for physicians to take immediate action in case of obvious infection. Recently, the study of microbial genomics has had a huge impact on the field of drug target discovery and validation. Comparative genomics data, together with systematic transposon mutagenesis, have revealed that a common set of only 250-350 genes is essential in bacteria and therefore useful for target validation experiments. Among this plethora of potential new targets are several that seem better suited to the drug discovery process, in that they closely match defined criteria, such as the ability to assay activity in vitro. Today, pharmaceutical research for new antibiotics involves much preliminary work with the purified target in vitro, the isolation of low affinity inhibitors (‘hits’) and the further improvement of the potency of the first lead compounds to obtain orally bioavailable drugs. A recent paper by Apfel et al. (F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd., Switzerland) [1] attempts to validate one such promising target, PDF (for a complete review on PDF see [2] ). PDF (encoded by the def gene) is the enzyme responsible for the cleavage of the N-formyl group occurring at the N-termini of nascent polypeptides synthesised 2001 © Ashley Publications Ltd ISSN 1472-8222 1 Resistance to anti-peptide deformylase drugs in eubacteria. The presence of this group comes from the activity of the methionyl-t-RNAfMet transformylase (encoded in bacteria by fmt) which adds a formyl group to the free amino group of methionine, which is already bound to the initiator tRNAfMet (for a review see [3]). PDF activity is essential for bacterial survival and is believed to be absent from mammals, although a PDF homologue has been recently described [4]. A number of specific anti-PDF drugs, which all have more or less the same structure (as proposed in [2]) have recently been described and shown to display broad spectrum antibacterial activities [5-8]. The Apfel paper assesses whether the inhibitors of PDF that they previously selected in vitro: • do indeed interfere with PDF activity in vivo • lead to bacterial cell growth arrest or death • cause resistance development. 2. Results from the paper by Apfel et al. In their report, Apfel et al. [1] have shown first that an overexpression of PDF activity in Escherichia coli, Haemophilus influenzae or Streptococcus pneumoniae leads to a decrease of susceptibility to the inhibitor Ro 66-0376. Next, a S. pneumoniae strain with a tetracyline-inducible def gene was constructed. In the absence of tetracycline i.e., upon significant decrease of PDF concentration compared to the wild type, this strain: • did not display any growth rate difference • displayed more than a 20-fold increase in sensitivity to inhibitor Ro 66-0376 Upon treatment of H. influenzae and S. pneumoniae with sub-inhibitory concentrations of actinonin (a potent antiPDF agent), the authors analysed pulse-labelled proteins by 2D gel electrophoresis and compared the protein patterns to that of a control, an untreated culture. A systematic shift of most of the low-molecular-weight proteins was observed towards a more acidic pI. The authors assigned the acidic shift of the actinonin-treated protein sample to the presence of N-formyl groups instead of the free amino-groups of deformylated proteins. Indeed, deformylation removes one positive charge, making the pI of proteins more acidic and it is expected that this effect is stronger on small proteins. The authors also have studied drug resistance in E. coli strains grown in the presence of trimethoprim and thymidine. Under such conditions, mimicking a fmt inactivation (see references quoted in [9]) i.e., a translation initiation with methionine instead of N-formyl-methionine, the anti-PDF drugs were ineffective. Taken together, these data indicate that PDF is indeed the molecular target of the drug used and a bacteriostatic effect was observed. Finally, Apfel et al. have searched for resistance development in an XL2-blue strain (Stratagene) and obtained a frequency of 10-7 at 64 µg/ml of Ro 66-6976. Resistance was caused by inactivation of the fmt gene through Tn10 transposition. 2 3. Significance of the results The paper by Apfel et al. [1] is part of a series of data recently published by various pharmaceutical companies in an effort to validate PDF as a target for novel antibiotics. This paper provides, firstly, a very convincing demonstration that PDF is the molecular target of such drugs. In fact, the use of bacterial strains with reduced expression of PDF and possible induction by an external component has been already described by Versicor. Chen et al. [6] constructed an E. coli strain with PDF expression induced by arabinose. Roche has used a similar strategy and reached the same conclusions with the pathogen S. pneumoniae. The most interesting data of this paper is clearly the analysis of proteins by 2D electrophoresis and the demonstration of the acidic shift of many small proteins upon treatment with PDF inhibitors. To our knowledge, this is the first large-scale analysis showing the general effect caused by PDF inhibition on the proteome of any bacterium. The authors should be commended for bringing these new data to the field. Furthermore, as the authors did not manage to get a fully inactivated strain, they conclude that the def gene is essential in S. pneumonia. Up until now, definitive demonstration of the essential character of the def gene has only been made in E. coli [9,10] and Staphylococcus aureus [11]. Apfel et al. have also investigated the resistance mechanism triggered upon anti-PDF treatment. Unfortunately, the authors have only reported results obtained with E. coli. The fact that they obtain inactivation of the fmt gene is not surprising and could have been predicted from earlier work [9,12] as discussed previously [2]. In contrast to def, fmt is not, in fact, strictly required for cell growth. E. coli fmt knockout mutants grow only at temperatures below 37°C, although their growth rate is impaired more than 10-fold [9,12]. Nevertheless, faster growing mutants were observed and one locus responsible for the phenotype was shown to be metZ, a gene encoding the initiator tRNAfMet, which was overexpressed [13]. The effect of fmt inactivation appeared to be weaker in Pseudomonas aeruginosa than in E. coli and a growth rate difference of only 3-fold was reported [14]. The non-essential character of fmt does not appears to be restricted to Gramnegative bacteria, since the Gram-positive Streptococcus faecalis can grow in the absence of formylation [13]. In addition to the data published by Roche, several recent studies, mainly by Versicor [6,11], have described the mechanism of resistance to anti-PDF drugs in pathogenic bacteria. As expected, fmt was by far the most frequent target leading to resistance to such drugs (Table 1). Two interesting results were recently provided by British-Biotech (Table 1 [7]). First, E. coli fmt mutants had shorter doubling times to those previously reported. In our opinion, this may be due to the fast growing mechanisms already described (see above). Second, mutations at a lower rate were mapped outside of the def-fmt region. It will be very interesting to characterise these loci or further examine the region around def-fmt, since an increased expression of the def product could cause such resistance. The most recent reports Expert Opin. Ther. Targets (2001) 5(3) Giglione & Meinnel Table 1: Resistance mechanisms to anti-PDF drugs. Bacterium Staphylococcus aureus ATCC25923 Staphylococcus aureus ATCC29213 Drug used Frequency of (Effect) drug resistance Actinonin (Bacteriostatic) 10-6.3 BB-3497 (Bacteriostatic) 2x10-7 -7 BB-3497 (Bacteriostatic) 10 BB-3497 (Bacteriostatic) 10-7 Ro 66.6976 (Bacteriostatic) -7 10 Haemophilus influenzae Actinonin (Bacteriostatic) 10-8 Streptococcus pneumoniae Actinonin (Bacteriostatic) 10-8 Escherichia coli ATCC25922 Escherichia coli ATCC25922 Escherichia coli XL2-blue Resistance yield (µg/ml) (wild type ⇒ resistant) Growth rate (min.) (wild type ⇒ resistant) Resistance mechanism Company 16 ⇒ 128 37 ⇒ 60 fmt (frameshift; stop, missense A108E, G117V) Versicor 32 ⇒ >256 27 ⇒ 37 fmt (frameshift; stop) B-Biotech fmt frameshift; stop; missense A10P) B-Biotech 8 ⇒ >256 30 ⇒ 60 8 ⇒ 32 30 ⇒ 32 8 ⇒ >128 16 ⇒ 128 dealing with anti-PDF drugs (Table 1) suggest that mutations within the def gene itself can lead also to resistance mechanisms, although less efficiently than with fmt inactivation. In this context, we have recently made the hypothesis that some bacteria - such as the actinomycetes, which produce actinonin, the most powerful anti-PDF drug known so far [6] could express drug-resistant PDFs [15]. Finally, it should be noted that Gram-negative bacteria like E. coli or H. influenzae have efficient efflux systems which counteract anti-PDF drugs like actinonin [6]. One cannot exclude therefore that such efflux pumps could also participate in low frequency resistance mechanisms, acquired for instance by horizontal transfer. 4. Expert opinion PDF is now recognised as a promising target for new-generation, broad spectrum antibiotics since it fulfils a list of many decisive advantages for this purpose (see introduction in [2]). However, several major issues including in vivo drug targeting, possible resistance mechanisms and their frequency of occurrence and anticipation of toxicity to humans, have not yet been fully assessed. The work by Apfel and co-workers attempts to answer some of these questions. Although the demonstration of drug targeting is convincing, the conclusion that PDF ‘may not be an optimal target’ because of excessive resistance frequency is, to us, questionable. In the Roche study, anti-PDF drugs were used at bacteriostatic concentrations, which favours the development of drug resistance. As pointed out in the paper, it is also important to stress that anti-PDF drugs with bactericidal activity were previously described and shown to not lead to resistance with a frequency higher than 10 -9 [8]. Moreover, the fact that resistance 24 ⇒120 37 ⇒ 60 [Ref.] [11] [7] [7] ? neither def nor fmt B-Biotech [7] fmt (Tn10 insertion) Roche fmt (frameshift; stop) Versicor def Versicor [1] is observed at a rather high frequency does not necessarily lead to a ‘bad mark’ for the selected target, especially when the resistance mechanism is a new one. This is the case of fmt mutations arising from the use of anti-PDF drugs. Finally, the fact that fmt mutants have a systematically reduced growth rate compared to the wild type (Table 1) suggests to us that PDF is still an extremely attractive target. We agree with the conclusion that the most serious reservation for the use of anti-PDF drugs could come from the recent identification of a PDF orthologue in humans [2,4]. The existance of this human protein raises the idea that treatment with such compounds could result in toxicity. In this context, it should be remembered that a key challenge in the search for new antibiotics is that innovation is necessary, not only due to resistance but also to avoid side effects. Before entering Phase I clinical trials, it is, however, difficult to predict ab initio the side effects associated with the new drugs. However, in the case of PDF, its structural resemblance to the metalloproteases has led to the systematic testing of the effects of anti-PDF drugs on, e.g., matricins (see conclusion in [2]). Recent results showing the high selectivity of actinonin and BB-3497 for PDF over mammalian metalloproteases have been made available [7]. This selectivity suggests strongly that anti-PDF drugs should not be toxic due to inhibition of matricin activity in humans. It now appears that the anticipation of side effect may benefit from genomic studies. Analyses involving the exclusion of genes with homologues in the sequenced genome of eukaryotes, such as yeast, may be helpful to restrict the number of target candidates still further [16]. Similar analyses can be performed now that the human genome is complete. However, the recent identification of the approximately 32,000 Expert Opin. Ther. Targets (2001) 5(3) 3 Resistance to anti-peptide deformylase drugs human genes [17], together with the functional annotation of a collection of more than 13,000 unique mouse cDNAs [18], have revealed that many of them have orthologues in bacteria. These genes may have come either from horizontal gene transfer or from transfer from the mitochondrion, which itself is believed to have a bacterial origin, according to the endosymbiont hypothesis [19,20]. This is likely to be the case in the origin of the human PDF homologue. Clearly, as our knowledge increases, we believe that it will probably become more and more difficult to select attractive bacterial targets that lack any orthologue in the human genome. We think therefore that the discovery of the orthologue of a given target in humans should not lead us to discard the target or slow down the search for Bibliography • Papers of special note have been highlighted as either of interest (•) or of considerable interest (••) to readers. 7. 1. 2. •• 3. 4. •• 5. 6. 4 APFEL CM, LOCHER H, EVERS S et al.: Peptide deformylase as an antibacterial drug target: target validation and resistance development. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. (2001) 45:1058-1064. GIGLIONE C, PIERRE M, MEINNEL T: Peptide deformylase as a target for new generation, broad spectrum antimicrobial agents. Mol. Microbiol. (2000) 36:11971205. A recent review of PDF and of its use as a target for antimicrobial drugs. Toxicity and drug-resistance are discussed. MEINNEL T, MECHULAM Y, BLANQUET S: Methionine as translation start signal: a review of the enzymes of the pathway in Escherichia coli. Biochimie (1993) 75:1061-1075. GIGLIONE C, SERERO A, PIERRE M, BOISSON B, MEINNEL T: Identification of eukaryotic peptide deformylases reveals universality of N-terminal protein processing mechanisms. EMBO J. (2000) 19:5916-5629. Discovery of functional PDFs in humans. The consequence on toxicity of anti-PDF drugs is discussed. APFEL C, BANNER DW, BUR D et al.: Hydroxamic acid derivatives as potent peptide deformylase inhibitors and antibacterial agents. J. Med. Chem. (2000) 43:2324-2331. CHEN DZ, PATEL DV, HACKBARTH CJ et al.: Actinonin, a naturally occurring antibacterial agent, is a potent deformylase inhibitor. Biochemistry (2000) 39:12561262. • 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. efficient, bioavailable drugs against it. Rather, this data should be taken into account in the research strategy in order to minimise the effects of the drugs against the human orthologue. As an illustrative point, the success of the fluoroquinolones shows that high selectivity can be achieved even when a mammalian orthologue of the target exists. Future collaborative efforts between pharmaceutical companies and academic laboratories will be essential in the development of strategies to validate future antimicrobial drug targets such as PDF, and to develop safe, efficacious drugs against them. Reports that actinonin, a natural antibiotic, specifically blocks PDF activity; demonstration of target inhibition in vivo. CLEMENTS JM, BECKETT RP, BROWN A et al.: Antibiotic activity and characterization of BB-3497, a novel peptide deformylase inhibitor. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. (2001) 45:563-570. Reports that the formylhydroxylamine peptide derivative BB-3497 is efficient and bioavailable against bacterial infection. HUNTINGTON KM, YI T, WEI Y, PEI D: Synthesis and antibacterial activity of peptide deformylase inhibitors. Biochemistry (2000) 39:4543-4351. MAZEL D, POCHET S, MARLIERE P: Genetic characterization of polypeptide deformylase, a distinctive enzyme of eubacterial translation. EMBO J. (1994) 13:914-923. MEINNEL T, BLANQUET S: Characterization of the Thermus thermophilus locus encoding peptide deformylase and methionyl-tRNA(fMet) formyltransferase. J. Bacteriol. (1994) 176:7387-7390. MARGOLIS PS, HACKBARTH CJ, YOUNG DC et al.: Peptide deformylase in Staphylococcus aureus: resistance to inhibition is mediated by mutations in the formyltransferase gene. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. (2000) 44:1825-1831. GUILLON JM, MECHULAM Y, SCHMITTER JM, BLANQUET S, FAYAT G: Disruption of the gene for MettRNA(fMet) formyltransferase severely impairs growth of Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. (1992) 174:4294-4301. SAMUEL CE, RABINOWITZ JC: Initiation of protein synthesis by folatesufficient and folate- deficient Streptococcus faecalis R. Biochemical and biophysical properties of methionine transfer Expert Opin. Ther. Targets (2001) 5(3) 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. ribonucleic acid. J. Biol. Chem. (1974) 249:1198-1206. NEWTON DT, CREUZENET C, MANGROO D: Formylation is not essential for initiation of protein synthesis in all eubacteria. J. Biol. Chem. (1999) 274:22143-22146. GIGLIONE C, MEINNEL T: Peptide deformylase as an emerging target for antiparasitic agents. Emerg. Therap. Targ. (2001) 5:41-57. BRUCCOLERI RE, DOUGHERTY TJ, DAVISON DB: Concordance analysis of microbial genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. (1998) 26:4482-4486. LANDER ES, LINTON LM, BIRREN B et al.: Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature (2001) 409:860921. KAWAI J, SHINAGAWA A, SHIBATA K et al.: Functional annotation of a full-length mouse cDNA collection. Nature (2001) 409:685-690. DOOLITTLE WF: You are what you eat: a gene transfer ratchet could account for bacterial genes in eukaryotic nuclear genomes. Trends Genet. (1998) 14:307-311. PONTING CP: Plagiarized bacterial genes in the human book of life. Trends Genet. (2001) 17:235-237. Affiliation Carmela Giglione & Thierry Meinnel† †Author for correspondence Institut des Sciences du Végétal, UPR2355, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Bâtiment 23, 1 avenue de la Terrasse, F-91198 Gif-sur-Yvette cedex, France Tel.: 33 1 69 82 36 12; Fax: 33 1 69 82 36 07; E-mail: [email protected]