* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Spin The evidence of intrinsic angular momentum or spin and its
Magnetic monopole wikipedia , lookup
Aharonov–Bohm effect wikipedia , lookup
Electron configuration wikipedia , lookup
Elementary particle wikipedia , lookup
Dirac equation wikipedia , lookup
Ising model wikipedia , lookup
Particle in a box wikipedia , lookup
Matter wave wikipedia , lookup
Quantum entanglement wikipedia , lookup
Canonical quantization wikipedia , lookup
Nitrogen-vacancy center wikipedia , lookup
Atomic orbital wikipedia , lookup
Wave function wikipedia , lookup
EPR paradox wikipedia , lookup
Quantum state wikipedia , lookup
Ferromagnetism wikipedia , lookup
Bell's theorem wikipedia , lookup
Hydrogen atom wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup
Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Spin The evidence of intrinsic angular momentum or spin and its associated magnetic moment came through experiments by Stern and Gerlach and works of Goudsmit and Uhlenbeck. The spin is called intrinsic since, unlike orbital angular momentum which is extrinsic, it is carried by point particle in addition to its orbital angular momentum and has nothing to do with motion in space. The magnetic moment µ ~ of silver atom was measured in 1922 experiment by Stern and Gerlach and its projection µz in the direction of magnetic field ẑ B (through which the silver beam was passed) was found to be just −|~ µ| and +|~ µ| instead of continuously varying between these two as limits. Classically, magnetic moment is proportional to the angular momentum (12) and, assuming this proportionality to survive in quantum mechanics, quantization of magnetic moment leads to quantization of corresponding angular momentum S, which we called spin, q q~ µz = g Sz ⇒ µz = g ms (57) 2m 2m as is the case with orbital angular momentum, where the ratio q/2m is called Bohr magneton, µb and g is known as Lande-g factor or gyromagnetic factor. The g-factor is 1 for orbital angular momentum and hence corresponding magnetic moment is l µb (where l is integer orbital angular momentum quantum number). A surprising feature here is that spin magnetic moment is also µb instead of µb /2 as one would naively expect. So it turns out g = 2 for spin – an effect that can only be understood if linearization of Schrödinger equation is attempted i.e. make it consistent with special theory of relativity. The algebra for spin angular momentum is considered very similar to the orbital angular momentum algebra, S 2 |s, ms i = s(s + 1)~2 |s, ms i Sz |s, ms i = ms ~ |s, ms i, −s ≤ ms ≤ +s p S± |s, ms i = (s ∓ ms )(s ± ms + 1) ~ |s, ms ± 1i, (58) where S± = Sx ± iSy . Any component of spin angular momentum S has 2s + 1 eigenvalues and therefore we expect ms to have 2s + 1 disctinct values between −s ≤ ms ≤ s. However, unlike orbital angular momentum quantum number l, the spin angular momentum quantum number can take both integer and half-integer values, s = 0, 1/2, 1, 3/2, 2, . . .. In fact, the experimental result of Stern and Gerlach showing only 2 distinct µz can explained if s = 1/2 is considered bacause ms = ±1/2. Every elementary particle has specific value of spin s: π has spin 0, electron spin is 1/2, photons have spin 1, deltas’ spins are 3/2 and so on. Matrix representation for spin S can be derived using the equations in (58), the same way as L, and they are, 3 1 1 0 1 0 S 2 = ~2 , Sz = ~ , 0 1 0 −1 4 2 1 1 0 1 0 −i Sx = ~ , Sy = ~ , 1 0 i 0 2 2 0 1 0 0 S+ = ~ , S− = ~ . (59) 0 0 0 1 We may write this representation as S= 1 ~σ 2 1 (60) where, σx = 0 1 1 0 , σy = 0 −i i 0 , σz = 1 0 0 −1 (61) are the Pauli spin matrices. The commutation and anti-commutation relations obeyed by Pauli matrices are, [σi , σj ] = 2i ijk σk {σi , σj } = 2 δij . (62) A few other properties of Pauli spin matrices are, σx2 = σy2 = σz2 = 1, σx σy = i σz etc., σj† = σj Tr (σj ) = 0, det (σj ) = −1. (63) These relations are peculiar to spin 1/2 representations and do not hold for l = 1 matrices. The eigenstates of S for spin 1/2 particles will be represented by a two-component column matrix, called spinor: 1 spin − up : χ+ = 0 a , and |a|2 + |b|2 = 1. (64) χ = a χ+ + b χ− = 0 b spin − dn : χ− = 1 As we have discussed before, there is nothing special about the z-component of angular momentum operator and just because the σz is diagonal the spin-states ±~/2 are easy to see, otherwise any other directions are just fine. To illustrate this, letus try to figure out the eigenvalues and eigenspinors of Sx . To find the eigenvalues, diagonalize the Sx , ⇒ Sx |χ(x) i = λ |χ(x) i → (Sx − λ) |χ(x) i = 0 −λ ~/2 2 2 ~/2 −λ = 0 ⇒ λ = (~/2) → λ = ±~/2 (65) which says the spin eigenvalues are the same as that for Sz as it should be. However, the space in which Sx is diagonal will obviously be different and they are obtained as, ~ 0 1 ~ α α α α β = Sx = ± ⇒ = ± , (66) β β β β α 2 1 0 2 i.e. β = ±α. Hence the eigen spinors of Sx are, 1 ~ α 1 (x) χ+ = =√ e − val : α 2 2 1 1 ~ α 1 (x) χ− = =√ e − val : − . −α 2 2 −1 2 (67)