Download Affection or Money: What Really Drives Customer Loyalty?

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Product planning wikipedia , lookup

Target audience wikipedia , lookup

Marketing communications wikipedia , lookup

Ambush marketing wikipedia , lookup

Multi-level marketing wikipedia , lookup

Viral marketing wikipedia , lookup

Guerrilla marketing wikipedia , lookup

Digital marketing wikipedia , lookup

Youth marketing wikipedia , lookup

Retail wikipedia , lookup

Target market wikipedia , lookup

Integrated marketing communications wikipedia , lookup

Multicultural marketing wikipedia , lookup

Marketing research wikipedia , lookup

Green marketing wikipedia , lookup

Advertising campaign wikipedia , lookup

Marketing wikipedia , lookup

Marketing plan wikipedia , lookup

Marketing mix modeling wikipedia , lookup

Global marketing wikipedia , lookup

Marketing strategy wikipedia , lookup

Customer experience wikipedia , lookup

Street marketing wikipedia , lookup

Sensory branding wikipedia , lookup

Customer satisfaction wikipedia , lookup

Services marketing wikipedia , lookup

Customer relationship management wikipedia , lookup

Direct marketing wikipedia , lookup

Service blueprint wikipedia , lookup

Customer engagement wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Affection or Money: What Really Drives
Customer Loyalty?
André Marchand, University of Muenster
Michael Paul, University of Augsburg
Thorsten Hennig-Thurau, University of Muenster
Georg Puchner, Marketing C+ Weilheim
Keywords: relationship marketing, customer loyalty
EXTENDED ABSTRACT
This study focuses on relationship marketing instruments,
that is, marketing activities such as rewards and loyalty programs that attempt to increase customer retention. Extant
research focuses on either customer relationship perceptions
or customer behavior, without addressing the effects on perceptions and behavior together in a common study. This
study overcomes this limitation and poses the following
question: What is the effect size that relationship marketing
instruments (e.g., affection or money orientated loyalty programs) have on customer relationship perceptions and actual
consumer behavior, and what are the routes through which
effects occur?
Research Question
The authors use data of 1,950 airline customers, obtained
from combining a longitudinal field experiment with internal customer database information. The experiment manipulates four relationship marketing instruments and measures
customer perceptions with two surveys (before and after the
experimental manipulation) and actual behavior from the
company’s database at different points in time.
Method and Data
The authors find that all tested relationship marketing instrument types positively affect perceived relationship investment, which in turn influences repurchase intentions and
Summary of Findings
thereby spending behavior, indirectly. Moderation analysis
reveals that the appropriate combination of money and affection related dimensions most effectively creates perceived
relationship investment. Money and core product related
relationship marketing instruments also have a direct impact
on behavior; in this study context, it results in the highest
increase in contribution margins.
This investigation represents the first research to study the
effects of a systematically derived set of relationship marketing instruments on both customer relationship perceptions and
customer behavior, accounting for both direct effects on customer relationship behavior and indirect effects on customer
relationship behavior through customer relationship perceptions. Using a longitudinal field experimental design that
combines experimental manipulations with survey data and
actual customer spending information, this study substantially
extends knowledge on the effectiveness of different relationship marketing instruments. Managers should be aware that
there is no such thing as a “generalizable” effect of relationship marketing instruments; instead, the results strongly
depend on the instrument offered. Therefore, understanding
the differential effects of relationship marketing instruments
represents a key task for managers and researchers alike.
Key Contributions
References are available on request.
For further information contact: André Marchand, University of Muenster ([email protected]).
E-28
2016 AMA Winter Educators’ Proceedings