Download The mating game: pollination and fertilization in flowering plants

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Meristem wikipedia , lookup

Plant breeding wikipedia , lookup

Ecology of Banksia wikipedia , lookup

Arabidopsis thaliana wikipedia , lookup

Flower wikipedia , lookup

Plant evolutionary developmental biology wikipedia , lookup

Fertilisation wikipedia , lookup

Pinophyta wikipedia , lookup

Plant reproduction wikipedia , lookup

Flowering plant wikipedia , lookup

Glossary of plant morphology wikipedia , lookup

Pollen wikipedia , lookup

Pollination wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
18
The mating game: pollination and fertilization in flowering plants
Laura K Wilhelmi and Daphne Preuss*
Recent work has revealed signaling molecules that control
pollination, including small peptides that mediate pollen
recognition and glycoproteins that support pollen tube growth.
The polarized growth of pollen tubes requires a calciummediated signal cascade, and cues derived from the haploid
and diploid ovule cells guide pollen tubes to the eggs.
Addresses
Department of Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology, University of
Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
*e-mail: [email protected]
Current Opinion in Plant Biology 1999, 2:18–22
http://biomednet.com/elecref/1369526600200018
© Elsevier Science Ltd ISSN 1369-5266
Abbreviations
AGP
arabinogalactan protein
PCP
pollen coat protein
SI
self-incompatibility
SLG
S-locus glycoprotein
SRK
S-locus receptor kinase
TTS
transmitting tissue-specific glycoprotein
Introduction
Plants, like other organisms, invest enormous resources to
find the most suitable mate. Although regulation of flowering time and insect pollination help ensure that pollen
arrives at an appropriate flower, recent studies reveal the
importance of communication between male and female
cells in controlling plant mating. Cell signaling regulates
recognition of pollen by the stigma, migration of pollen
tubes through the pistil, delivery of sperm to the ovules,
and finally, co-ordinated development of the zygote,
endosperm, seed, and fruit (Figure 1). In this review, we
summarize recent insights into the mechanisms that control pollination and fertilization.
for SI: SLG encodes an extracellular glycoprotein and SRK
encodes a receptor kinase localized to the plasma membrane [1•,2]. Mutations in either gene result in
self-compatibility, as do transgenic constructs that reduce
their expression levels [1•,3,4].
How do SLG and SRK enable plants to reject incompatible pollen? Current models propose an interaction with a
pollen-specific S locus gene, initiating a phosphorylation
cascade that results in pollen rejection. Although the SI
response is often accompanied by a rapid and localized
production of β-1,3 glucan, or callose, in the stigma, surprising recent studies demonstrate that callose is not
required for SI [5]. In addition, though adhesion of pollen
to the stigma is species specific [6], pollen binding affinity
does not correlate with SI [7•].
One approach used to identify pollen-specific SI components relied on characterizing the structure of the S locus
itself. This resulted in the identification of one promising
gene, SLA (S-locus anther), that is disrupted by a retrotransposon insertion in several self-compatible mutants
[8]. Linkage of this SLA sequence defect with a mutant
phenotype initially led to proposals that SLA mediates SI
in pollen [8]. Subsequent investigations, however, showed
that many wild-type strains have a similar insertion within
SLA, indicating that SLA is not necessary for a functional
SI response [9]. Nonetheless, exploring the S-locus for
other genes active in SI remains a valuable approach.
Stigma cells use a variety of mechanisms to limit the success of inappropriate pollen. On dry stigmas, the transfer of
water and nutrients to pollen grains is also controlled —
foreign pollen often remains dehydrated. The invasion of
pollen tubes into stigma cells is regulated in many species,
including those with wet stigmas. These early checkpoints
serve to block pollination before pollen consumes valuable
resources within the pistil.
Purification of pollen components that bind to SLG and
SRK led to the exciting discovery that peptide signals may
regulate SI [10••]. The extracellular pollen coating contains several proteins, including a large family of
cysteine-rich peptides (pollen coat proteins or PCPs)
released onto the stigma surface upon pollination
[10••,11,12•]. Purified fractions containing these peptides
bind to SLG, although their function remains undefined.
Curiously, the PCP genes neither map to the S locus, nor
do their products bind to SLG in an allele-specific manner.
Because genetic evidence suggests the male determinant
of SI ought to be polymorphic and within the S-locus, a
search for additional SLG-binding components may prove
fruitful. Nonetheless, the strong sequence similarity
between the PCPs and defensins, plant polypeptides with
antifungal activity [12•], presents an intriguing possibility
for peptide signaling during pollination.
In self-incompatible Brassica species, self fertilization is
inhibited at the stigma surface. A genetic and molecular
characterization of self-incompatibility (SI) defined a complex polymorphic locus, which contains both male and
female-specific genes [1•]. Recent studies conclusively
demonstrate that two stigma-specific genes are necessary
Immediately after pollination, compatible pollen grains
absorb water and begin to form a pollen tube that invades
the stigma. Whether stigma surfaces are wet or dry, lipids
have been implicated in mediating pollen hydration
[13,14,15•]. Mutations that eliminate the lipid-rich exudate of wet Nicotiana stigmas result in female sterility, and
Pollen recognition at the stigma surface — the
first line of defense
The mating game Wilhelmi and Preuss
19
Figure 1
Anatomy of fertilization in flowering plants.
(a) Representation of a typical pistil, consisting
of a stigma, style, and ovary. Pollen grains land
on the stigma surface and germinate pollen
tubes which grow into the style through a
central transmitting tract which contains the
ovules. (b) Desiccated pollen grains land on
the stigma cell surface; once compatible
grains are hydrated, they are able to produce a
pollen tube that carry two sperm to each ovule.
sc, stigma cell; dp, desiccated pollen grain;
hp, hydrated pollen grain; pt, pollen tube. (c)
After exiting the style, pollen tubes enter the
ovary, where they approach individual ovules.
Each ovule contains a haploid female
gametophyte, consisting of the egg and
central cell nuclei (cn), that is surrounded by
diploid integument tissue (it). The tubes grow
up the funiculus and enter the micropyle, an
opening in the ovule that allows the tube
access to the female gametophyte. Fertilization
of the egg by one sperm cell forms the zygote,
and fusion of a second sperm cell with the two
central cell nuclei forms the endosperm. fu,
funiculus; pt, pollen tube.
(a)
(b)
Stigma
dp
Pollen
grain
Growing
pollen
tube
sc
hp
pt
Style
Transmitting
tract
(c)
it
cn
Ovary
Ovule
egg
fu
pt
Current Opinion in Plant Biology
addition of lipids to the surface of these stigmas restores
fertility [15•,16]. In plants with dry stigmas, long-chain
lipids in the pollen coating are required for hydration
[13,14]; delivery of those lipids may require oleosins — oil
binding proteins that solubilize lipid droplets [17–19].
Though the application of short-chain lipids can cause
pollen hydration even on dry stigmas [15•], it remains to be
demonstrated if lipids alone can trigger a normal series of
hydration events. Lipids may serve to form a water-tight
seal between pollen and the stigma, facilitating the rapid
transport of water through channels in the stigma and
pollen membranes. The recent identification of an aquaporin-like gene within the Brassica S-locus may provide
clues toward the regulation of this process [20]. Self-compatible mutants show reduced expression of this
aquaporin, though the nature of the mutant defect remains
to be demonstrated. Finally, it is reasonable to expect that
several components contribute to pollen germination,
some such as lipids or water channels that are shared
among all plants and others, like flavonols, that play a
species-specific role [21,22].
Pollen tube growth —organizing cell polarity
Once pollen tubes invade the stigma, they grow through
the style at rates that can approach 1 cm/hr. This polarized
cell growth has been the focus of recent investigations:
revealing parallels with systems as diverse as root hairs,
yeast buds, and neural outgrowths. Small GTP-binding
proteins are required for polarized secretion in many
organisms; similarly, Rho GTPases are localized at the tips
of pollen tubes and are essential for tube growth [23,24].
Rapid pollen tube growth also requires remodeling of pistil cell walls, and expansin and extensin-like activities
required for cell wall loosening have been purified from
maize pollen tubes [25,26].
Although polarized secretion and cell wall loosening are
clearly required for pollen tube growth, additional activities are likely to provide signals that orientate the growing
tubes. Calcium has long been implicated in directing tube
growth, and exciting new evidence reveals the pathways
and mechanisms by which pollen tubes react to calcium
gradients [27,28]. Intriguingly, calcium gradients within
pollen tubes oscillate in phase with pulses of tube
growth [29,30•]. Identifying the source, concentration, and
destination of the calcium ions that pulse across the pollen
tube tip may provide important clues as to how calcium
regulates cell polarity. Pathways known to be regulated by
calcium are also under investigation, and a calcium-dependent protein kinase has been implicated in pollen tube
reorientation [31]. Growing pollen tube tips exhibit high
levels of a calcium-dependent, calmodulin-independent
20
Growth and development
protein kinase (CDPK); localization of kinase activity
changes with pollen tube orientation. Further, release of
caged calcium ions on one side of the pollen tube apex
induces a localized increase in calcium concentration, tube
reorientation, and a corresponding increase in kinase activity adjacent to the site of release [28,31].
Pollen tube guidance — from the style to
the ovules
As pollen tubes travel through the style, many interactions between male and female cells facilitate inhibition
of incompatible pollen tubes. In Nicotiana species, selfincompatible pollen tubes are arrested by S locus RNases
[32,33]. These RNase molecules vary with each S allele,
and current models suggest their import into or activity
within incompatible pollen is regulated by a male-specific S-encoded protein. An intense search for this putative
pollen component is underway. Unfortunately, analysis of
the structure and function of the S-RNase genes themselves reveal few clues. Though active site residues have
been identified [32], construction of chimeric RNases
from different S alleles failed to identify functional
domains [34].
Compatible pollen tubes import nutrients from the style
extracellular matrix and respond to guidance signals as
they travel through the transmitting tract. Arabinogalactan
proteins (AGPs), abundant in stylar secretions, may provide important directional cues. The Yariv reagent, which
binds AGPs, inhibits growth of lily and maize pollen,
although a similar effect was not observed in all plants [35].
In Nicotiana tabacum, a transmitting tissue specific glycoprotein, TTS, exhibits a gradient of glycosylation that may
attract and stimulate growth of pollen tubes to the base of
the pistil [36,37]. Similar results, however, were not
obtained with Nicotiana alata; despite 97% sequence identity and similar sugar modifications, the TTS homolog
GaRSGP fails to exhibit a glycosylation gradient, attract
pollen tubes or stimulate tube growth [38]. These recent
studies warrant careful consideration and substantial work
will be required to identify conserved style components
that regulate the growth of pollen tubes.
After exiting the style, pollen tubes grow toward the
ovules, diploid structures that contain haploid female
gametophytes (Figure 1). Though it was previously
unclear which ovule tissues contribute to pollen tube guidance, recent studies show that both diploid and haploid
female cells are important. Several diploid-specific mutations have been identified that alter ovule structure and
function (see K Schneitz review, this issue pp 13–17, and
[39•]). Some of these dramatically affect ovule morphology; not surprisingly, pollen tube guidance is also aberrant
[40]. Other diploid-specific alterations reveal that morphologically normal ovules can also be defective in guiding
pollen tubes [40,41]. In one case, female tissues from a
self-sterile Arabidopsis mutant exhibit aberrant pollen tube
guidance only in the presence of mutant pollen [41]. This
suggests diploid pistil cells, including those that comprise
the funiculus and integuments (Figure 1), may be required
to attract, bind, and promote the growth of pollen tubes.
Conclusive evidence that the haploid gametophyte is also
required for pollen tube targeting has come from the identification of an Arabidopsis strain that contains a balanced
chromosomal translocation [42••]. Heterozygotes that carry
this translocation have a normal genetic complement; in
these plants, half of the meioses undergo adjacent chromosome segregation, resulting in lethal chromosome
imbalances in the meiotic products. Consequently, although
all of the ovules have genetically normal diploid cells, half
contain aborted gametophytes. In these plants, pollen tubes
fail to approach the abnormal gametophytes, though normal
ovules have associated pollen tubes. Although these studies
reveal that a female gametophyte is important for guidance,
the female gametophyte might induce the surrounding
diploid tissue to emit guidance cues.
The next generation — from gametophytes
to seeds
Gene expression in pollen tubes and female gametophytes
is required for successful reproduction, but few genetic
screens aimed at identifying haploid-specific (gametophytic) mutants have been performed. Diploid-specific
(sporophytic) mutations dramatically reduce fertility and
are relatively easy to isolate; in contrast, male or femalespecific gametophytic defects cause at most a 50%
reduction in seed yield. Recently, progress has been made
toward identifying large numbers of defects in Arabidopsis
gametophytes. One approach has relied on following the
transmission of a heterozygous T-DNA insertion to the
next generation; biased transmission indicates a defect in
the fertility of the male and/or female gametophytes that
carry the insertion [43,44]. Alternatively, genes with interesting haploid-specific roles in development can be
identified by careful characterization of mutants with
defective pollen morphology [45,46].
The genomes contributed by the male and female gametophytes may be fundamentally different, due to
heritable epigenetic modifications (genetic imprinting)
that alter gene expression patterns. In a recent study,
crosses between Arabidopsis diploids, tetraploids, and
hexaploids were performed to cause imbalances in the
maternal and paternal contributions to the embryo and
endosperm [47•]. An excess of maternal genomes (for
example when a tetraploid female is pollinated by a
diploid male) inhibits the development of the endosperm
and results in the formation of small embryos, whereas an
excess of paternal genomes causes embryos and
endosperm to grow larger than normal. More severe
imbalances can result in seedling lethality; for example,
tes (tetraspore) and std (stud) mutants are defective in
pollen cytokinesis and form polyploid sperm that lead to
genetic imbalances and embryo abortion [48,49]. Finally,
maternal effect genes that regulate embryonic
The mating game Wilhelmi and Preuss
development in Arabidopsis have been identified through
gene trapping, a transposon insertion screen that results
in the fusion of a reporter gene carried on the transposon
to chromosomal genes [50]. Mutations in MEDEA, a
homolog of Drosophila Polycomb genes, cause embryo
abortion when transmitted through females. Though the
number of genes that can be imprinted is unknown,
genetic strategies aimed at isolating maternally or paternally imprinted loci will likely prove worthwhile.
The co-ordinated formation of embryos, endosperm,
seeds, and fruit is likely to require the exchange of multiple developmental signals, and mutations that affect
this signaling have been identified. Arabidopsis mutants
known as fie (fertilisation-independent endosperm) or fis (fertilisation-independent seed) [51•,52], inappropriately initiate
development of the endosperm before fertilization takes
place. Mutant fie and fis alleles often fail to be transmitted through female gametophytes. Even when
fertilization of these aberrant gametophytes takes place,
the defect in developmental co-ordination results in
embryo lethality. Regulation of fruit development likely
requires a distinct set of genes; mutation of a MADS-box
gene (AGL8 or FRUITFULL) was recently shown to
interrupt fruit development, without affecting the formation of seeds [53].
Conclusion
Plant reproduction occurs in a competitive environment —
choosing among the available mating partners requires an
amazing array of cell signaling interactions. Recent investigations of pollination in self-compatible and self-incompatible
plants have unearthed a complex set of genetic and molecular controls, active in both diploid and haploid cells. Though
many important molecules have been defined, discerning
those that play general, rather than species-specific, roles
remains a challenge for the future.
References and recommended reading
Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review,
have been highlighted as:
• of special interest
•• of outstanding interest
1. Nasrallah JB: Signal perception and response in the interactions of
•
self-incompatibility in Brassica. Essays Biochem 1997, 32:143-160.
Comprehensive review of the genetic and molecular basis of self-incompatibility in Brassica oleracea and related species.
2.
Stein JC, Dixit R, Nasrallah ME, Nasrallah JB: SRK, the stigmaspecific S locus receptor kinase of Brassica, is targeted to the
plasma membrane in transgenic tobacco. Plant Cell 1996,
8:429-445.
3.
Stahl RJ, Arnoldo MA, Glavin TL, Goring DR, Rothstein SJ:
The self-incompatibility phenotype in Brassica is altered by the
transformation of a mutant S locus receptor kinase. Plant Cell
1998, 10:209-218.
4.
5.
6.
Conner JA, Tantikanjana T, Stein JC, Kandasamy MK, Nasrallah JB,
Nasrallah ME: Transgene-induced silencing of S locus genes and
related genes in Brassica. Plant J 1997, 11:809-823.
Sulaman W, Arnoldo MA, Yu K, Tulsieram L, Rothstein SJ, Goring DR:
Loss of callose in the stigma papillae does not affect the Brassica
self-incompatibility phenotype. Planta 1997, 203:327-331.
Strauss E: How plants pick their mates. Science 1998, 281:503.
21
7.
•
Luu D-T, Heizmann P, Dumas C: Pollen–stigma adhesion in kale is
not dependent on the self-(in)compatibility genotype. Plant
Physiol 1997, 115:1221-1230.
A quantitative measurement of the binding force between pollen and the
stigma in the first hour following pollination. Interestingly, both compatible
and incompatible Brassica pollen was shown to bind with equal efficiencies
to stigmas.
8.
Boyes DC, Nasrallah JB: An anther-specific gene encoded by an S
locus haplotype of Brassica produces complementary and
differentially regulated transcripts. Plant Cell 1995, 7:1283-1294.
9.
Pastuglia M, Ruffio-Chåble V, Delorme V, Gaude T, Dumas C,
Cock JM: A functional S locus anther gene is not required for the
self-incompatibility response in Brassica oleracea. Plant Cell
1997, 9:2065-2076.
10. Stephenson AG, Doughty J, Dixon S, Elleman C, Hiscock S,
•• Dickinson HG: The male determinant of self-incompatibility in
Brassica oleracea is located in the pollen coating. Plant J 1997,
12:1351-1359.
An elegant bioassay was developed, that enabled purification and characterization of the pollen component of self-incompatibility. For this assay, the
pollen coating was extracted from self-compatible and incompatible pollen.
Reconstitution of this coating onto other pollen grains confirmed that male
self-incompatibility can be controlled by factors in the pollen coat.
11. Stanchev BS, Doughty J, Scutt CP, Dickinson H, Croy RRD: Cloning
of PCP1, a member of a family of pollen coat protein (PCP)
genes from Brassica oleracea encoding novel cysteine-rich
proteins involved in pollen–stigma interactions. Plant J 1996,
10:303-313.
12. Doughty J, Dixon S, Hiscock SJ, Willis AC, Parkin IAP, Dickinson HG:
•
PCP-A1, a defensin-like Brassica pollen coat protein that binds
the S locus glycoprotein, is the product of gametophytic gene
expression. Plant Cell 1998, 10:1333-1347.
Extracts of the pollen coating were shown to contain small peptides that
bind to SLG, the stigma-specific component of the Brassica self-incompatibility response. Cloning the corresponding gene revealed sequences with
similarity to peptides involved in anti-fungal defenses. Interestingly, the PCP
gene was expressed after meiosis, suggesting that it is regulated by a haploid-specific promoter.
13. Preuss D, Lemieux B, Yen G, Davis RW: A conditional sterile
mutation eliminates surface components from Arabidopsis pollen
and disrupts cell signaling during fertilization. Genes Dev 1993,
7:974-985.
14. Hülskamp M, Kopczak SD, Horejsi TF, Kihl BK, Pruitt RE:
Identification of genes required for pollen-stigma recognition in
Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 1995, 8:703-714.
15. Wolters-Arts M, Lush WM, Mariani C: Lipids are required for
•
directional pollen-tube growth. Nature 1998, 392:818-821.
A stigma mutant that lacks an oil-rich exudate was used to define lipid molecules required for pollen hydration and germination on Nicotiana stigmas.
Interestingly, only certain lipids were found to have high levels of activity, and
these lipids also rescued pollen hydration in Arabidopsis mutants that lack
lipids in the pollen coating.
16. Goldman MHS, Goldberg RB, Mariani C: Female sterile tobacco
plants are produced by stigma specific cell ablation. EMBO J
1994, 13:2976-2984.
17.
de Oliveira DE, Franco LO, Simoens C, Seurinck J, Coppieters J,
Botterman J, Van Montagu M: Influorescence-specific genes from
Arabidopsis thaliana encoding glycine-rich proteins. Plant J 1993,
3:495-507.
18. Robert LS, Gerster JL, Allard S, Cass L, Simmonds J: Molecular
characterization of two Brassica napus genes related to oleosins
which are highly expressed in the tapetum. Plant J 1994,
6:927-933.
19. Ross JHE, Murphy DJ: Characterization of anther-expressed genes
encoding a major class of extracellular oleosin-like proteins in the
pollen coat of Brassicaceae. Plant J 1996, 9:625-637.
20. Ikeda S, Nasrallah JB, Dixit R, Preiss S, Nasrallah ME: An aquaporinlike gene required for the Brassica Self-incompatibility response.
Science 1997, 276:1564-1566.
21. Mo Y, Nagel C, Taylor LP: Biochemical complementation of
chalcone synthase mutants defines a role for flavonols in
functional pollen. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992, 89:7213-7217.
22. Burbulis IE, Iacobucci M, Shirley BW: A null mutation in the first
enzyme of flavonoid biosynthesis does not affect male fertility in
Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 1997, 8:1013-1025.
22
Growth and development
23. Lin Y, Wang Y, Zhu J, Yang Z: Localization of a Rho GTPase implies
a role in tip growth and movement of the generative cell in pollen
tubes. Plant Cell 1996, 8:293-303.
40. Hülskamp M, Schneitz K, Pruitt RE: Genetic evidence for a
long-range activity that directs pollen tube guidance in
Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 1995, 7:57-64.
24. Lin Y, Yang Z: Inhibition of pollen tube elongation by microinjected
anti-Rop1Ps antibodies suggests a crucial role for Rho-type
GTPases in the control of tip growth. Plant Cell 1997, 9:1647-1659.
41. Wilhelmi LK, Preuss D: Self-sterility in Arabidopsis due to defective
pollen tube guidance. Science 1996, 274:1535-1537.
25. Rubinstein AL, Marquez J, Suarez-Cervera M, Bedinger PA: Extensinlike glycoproteins in the maize pollen tube wall. Plant Cell 1995,
7:2211-2225.
26. Cosgrove DJ, Bedinger P, Durachko DM: Group I allergens of grass
pollen as cell wall-loosening agents. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
1997, 94:6559-6564.
27.
Malhó R, Read ND, Trewevas AJ, Pais MS: Calcium channel activity
during pollen tube growth and reorientation. Plant Cell 1995,
7:1173-1184.
28. Malhó R, Trewevas AJ: Localized apical increases of cytosolic free
calcium control pollen tube orientation. Plant Cell 1996,
8:1935-1949.
29. Messerli M, Robinson KR: Tip localized Ca2+ pulses are coincident
with peak pulsatile growth rates in pollen tubes of Lilium
longiflorum. J Cell Sci 1997, 110:1269-1278.
30. Holdaway-Clarke TL, Feijo JA, Hackett GR, Kunkel JG, Hepler PK:
•
Pollen tube growth and the intracellular cytosolic calcium
gradient oscillate in phase while extracellular calcium influx is
delayed. Plant Cell 1997, 9:1999-2010.
Fluorescent calcium reporter molecules were used to follow fluxes in the calcium gradient in pollen tubes. Importantly, the gradient fluctuations that occurred
at the pollen tube tip were in phase with the pulsating growth of pollen tubes.
31. Moutinho A, Trewevas AJ, Malhó R: Relocation of a Ca2+-dependent
protein kinase activity during pollen tube reorientation. Plant Cell
1998, 10:1499-1509.
32. Dodds PN, Clarke AE, Newbigin E: A molecular perspective on
pollination in flowering plants. Cell 1996, 85:141-144.
33. Lee HS, Huang S, Kao T: S proteins control rejection of
incompatible pollen in Petunia inflata. Nature 1994, 367:560-563.
34. Zurek DM, Mou B, Beecher B, McClure B: Exchanging sequence
domains between S-RNases from Nicotiana alata disrupts pollen
recognition. Plant J 1997, 11:797-808.
35. Roy S, Juah GY, Hepler PK, Lord EM: Effects of Yariv
phenyglycoside on cell wall assembly in the lily pollen tube. Planta
1998, 204:450-458.
36. Cheung AY, Wang H, Wu HM: A floral transmitting tissue-specific
glycoprotein attracts pollen tubes and stimulates their growth.
Cell 1995, 11:383-393.
37.
Wu HM, Wang H, Cheung AY: A pollen tube growth stimulatory
glycoprotein is deglycosylated by pollen tubes and displays a
glycosylation gradient in the flower. Cell 1995, 11:395-403.
38. Sommer-Knudsen J, Lush WM, Bacic A, Clarke AE: Re-evaluation of
the role of a transmitting tract-specific glycoprotein on pollen
tube growth. Plant J 1998, 13:529-535.
39. Baker SC, Robinson-Beers K, Villanueva JM, Gaiser C, Gasser CS:
•
Interactions among genes regulating ovule development in
Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 1997, 145:1109-1124.
A thorough examination of the genetic control of ovule development in
Arabidopsis. Epistasis tests are performed with several developmental
mutants, and a comprehensive model for ovule formation is presented.
42. Ray S, Park S-S, Ray A: Pollen tube guidance by the female
•• gametophyte. Development 1997, 124:2489-2498.
A creative investigation of the contribution of the female gametophyte to
pollen tube guidance in Arabidopsis. A translocation heterozygote was
used to show that pollen tubes target only ovules that contain a viable
female gametophyte.
43. Feldmann KA, Coury DA, Christianson ML: Exceptional segregation
of a selectable marker (KanR) in Arabidopsis identifies genes
important for gametophytic growth and development. Genetics
1997, 147:1411-1422.
44. Howden R, Park SK, Moore JM, Orme J, Grossniklaus U, Twell D:
Selection of T-DNA-tagged male and female gametophytic
mutants by segregation distortion in Arabidopsis. Genetics 1998,
149:621-631.
45. Chen Y-CS, McCormick S: sidecar pollen, an Arabidopsis thaliana
male gametophytic mutant with aberrant cell divisions during
pollen development. Development 1996, 122:3243-3253.
46
Park SK, Howden R, Twell D: The Arabidopsis thaliana
gametophytic mutation gemini pollen 1 disrupts microspore
polarity, division asymmetry and pollen cell fate. Development
1998, 125:3789-3799.
47.
•
Scott RJ, Spielman M, Bailey J, Dickinson HG: Parent-of-origin
effects on seed development in Arabidopsis thaliana.
Development 1998, 125:3329-3341.
Crosses between Arabidopsis strains of different ploidy illustrate the
requirement for a balanced male and female contribution to seed development. Imbalances resulted in dramatic alterations in the size and developmental program of the embryo and endosperm.
48. Spielman M, Preuss D, Li F-L, Browne WE, Scott RJ, Dickinson HG:
TETRASPORE is required for male meiotic cytokinesis in
Arabidopsis thaliana. Development 1997, 124:2645-2657.
49. Hülskamp M, Parekh NS, Grini P, Schneitz K, Zimmermann I, Lolle SJ,
Pruitt RE: The STUD gene is required for male-specific cytokinesis
after telophase II of meiosis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Dev Bio
1997, 187:114-124.
50. Grossniklaus U, Vielle-Calzada J-P, Hoeppner MA, Gagliano WB:
Maternal control of embryogenesis by MEDEA, a Polycomb group
gene in Arabidopsis. Science 1998, 280:446-450.
51. Chaudhury AM, Ming L, Miller C, Craig S, Dennis ES, Peacock WJ:
•
Fertilization-independent seed development in Arabidopsis
thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997, 94:4223-4228.
These studies [51•,52] describe the identification of mutations that cause
endosperm development and seed coat ripening in the absence of fertilization.
Although the resulting seeds do not contain a viable embryo, this approach is
an important step toward understanding parthenogenic development.
52. Ohad N, Margossian L, Hsu Y, Williams C, Repetti P, Fischer RL: A
mutation that allows endosperm development without
fertilization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996, 93:5319-5324.
53. Gu G, Ferrandiz C, Yanofsky MF, Martienssen R: The FRUITFULL
MADS-box gene mediates cell differentiation during Arabidopsis
fruit development. Development 1998, 125:1509-1517.