Download Obama Lifts a Ban on Entry Into US by HIV Positive

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
3/25/2016
Obama Lifts a Ban on Entry Into U.S. by H.I.V.­Positive People ­ The New York Times
POLITICS
Obama Lifts a Ban on Entry Into U.S. by H.I.V.­Positive
People
By JULIA PRESTON
OCT. 30, 2009
President Obama on Friday announced the end of a 22­year ban on travel to the United States by people who had
tested positive for the virus that causes AIDS, fulfilling a promise he made to gay advocates and acting to eliminate
a restriction he said was “rooted in fear rather than fact.”
At a White House ceremony, Mr. Obama announced that a rule canceling the ban would be published on
Monday and would take effect after a routine 60­day waiting period. The president had promised to end the ban
before the end of the year.
“If we want to be a global leader in combating H.I.V./AIDS, we need to act like it,” Mr. Obama said. “Now, we
talk about reducing the stigma of this disease, yet we’ve treated a visitor living with it as a threat.”
The United States is one of only about a dozen countries that bar people who have H.I.V., the virus that causes
AIDS.
President George W. Bush started the process last year when he signed legislation, passed by Congress in July
2008, that repealed the statute on which the ban was based. But the ban remained in effect.
It was enacted in 1987 at a time of widespread fear that H.I.V. could be transmitted by physical or respiratory
contact. The ban was further strengthened by Congress in 1993 as an amendment offered by Senator Jesse Helms,
Republican of North Carolina.
Because of the restriction, no major international conference on the AIDS epidemic has been held in the
United States since 1990. Public health officials here have long said there was no scientific or medical basis for the
ban.
Under the ban, United States health authorities have been required to list H.I.V. infection as a “communicable
disease of public health significance.” Under immigration law, most foreigners with such a disease cannot travel to
the United States. The ban covered both visiting tourists and foreigners seeking to live in this country.
Once the ban is lifted, foreigners applying to become residents in the United States will no longer be required
to take a test for AIDS.
In practice, the ban particularly affected tourists and gay men. Waivers were available, but the procedure for
tourists and other short­term visitors who were H.I.V. positive was so complicated that many concluded it was not
worth it.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/31/us/politics/31travel.html?_r=0
1/3
3/25/2016
Obama Lifts a Ban on Entry Into U.S. by H.I.V.­Positive People ­ The New York Times
For foreigners hoping to immigrate, waivers were available for people who were in a heterosexual marriage,
but not for gay couples. Gay advocates said the ban had led to painful separations in families with H.I.V.­positive
members that came to live in this country, and had discouraged adoptions of children with the virus.
Gay advocates said the ban also discouraged travelers and some foreigners already living in the United States
from seeking testing and medical care for H.I.V. infection.
“The connection between immigration and H.I.V. has frightened people away from testing and treatment,”
said Rachel B. Tiven, executive director of Immigration Equality, a group that advocates for gay people in
immigration matters. She said lifting the ban would bring “a significant public health improvement.”
“Stigma and exclusion are not a sound basis for immigration policy,” Ms. Tiven said.
Senator John Kerry, Democrat of Massachusetts, who led the effort to repeal the ban, said it had now “gone
the way of the dinosaur.”
But, Mr. Kerry added, “it sure took too long to get here.”
International health officials said lifting the ban would end a much­criticized inconsistency in United States
health policy, with Washington playing a leading role in AIDS prevention in Africa and other countries with severe
epidemics, but preserving restrictions that in practice prevented international AIDS researchers and activists from
gathering at conferences here.
In 1989, a Dutch AIDS educator, Hans Verhoef, was detained for several days in St. Paul when he tried to
attend a conference. Since then, people involved with AIDS issues have not organized meetings here.
“We think this is going to give a very positive image of where the United States is going in terms of eliminating
stigma and discrimination in relation to H.I.V.,” Dr. Socorro Gross, assistant director of the Pan American Health
Organization, said Friday.
Correction: November 3, 2009 A picture caption on Saturday with an article about President Obama’s announcing the end of a ban on travel to the
United States by people who test positive for HIV misidentified the document Mr. Obama was shown signing. It was
the Ryan White H.I.V./AIDS Treatment Extension Act of 2009, which provides medical and support services for those
with H.I.V./AIDS; it was not the order ending the travel ban.
A version of this article appears in print on October 31, 2009, on page A9 of the New York edition with the headline: Obama Lifts a 22­Year Ban
on Entry Into U.S. by H.I.V.­Positive People.
1. 2. 3. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/31/us/politics/31travel.html?_r=0
2/3
3/25/2016
Obama Lifts a Ban on Entry Into U.S. by H.I.V.­Positive People ­ The New York Times
4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. View More Trending Stories »
© 2016 The New York Times Company
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/31/us/politics/31travel.html?_r=0
3/3