Download An evaluation of the availability and affordability of healthy foods in

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics wikipedia , lookup

Hunger in the United States wikipedia , lookup

Food safety wikipedia , lookup

Overeaters Anonymous wikipedia , lookup

Human nutrition wikipedia , lookup

Freeganism wikipedia , lookup

Food coloring wikipedia , lookup

Nutrition wikipedia , lookup

Food studies wikipedia , lookup

Food politics wikipedia , lookup

Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity wikipedia , lookup

Food choice wikipedia , lookup

Obesity and the environment wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Proceedings of the Nutrition Society (2012), 71 (OCE2), E162
doi:10.1017/S0029665112002194
Summer Meeting hosted by the Irish Section, 16–19 July 2012, Translational nutrition: integrating research, practice and policy
An evaluation of the availability and affordability of healthy foods
in discount supermarkets
L. Wearing, M. McAuley and K. M. Mooney
Faculty of Science and Social Sciences, Liverpool Hope University, Liverpool L16 9JD, UK
Limited access to affordable healthy food has been proposed as a contributing factor to poor dietary choices, particularly amongst low
income groups(1). The ability to purchase healthy food has been further challenged in the United Kingdom (UK) by an increase in food
prices, a phenomenon which has resulted in the market growth of discount supermarkets. The aim of this study was to compare the
availability and affordability of healthy food in discount supermarkets to a non-discount supermarket (Tesco) using the Healthy Eating
Indicator Shopping Basket (HEISB)(2). This basket includes items from the five food groups based on health, choice and affordability.
The cost and nutrient composition (using the manufacturer’s nutrition information panel) of the least expensive food item which met the
HEISB criteria were recorded in Lidl (n = 2), Aldi (n = 2) and Tesco supermarket(s) (n = 1) in January 2012. The overall nutrient quality
of a range of items in the HEISB (baked beans; tinned carrots; weetabix; wholemeal loaf; yoghurt; spread) was calculated by assigning a
rank of one to three to each nutrient analysed (energy; fat; saturated fat; sugar; fibre; salt) and taking the sum of the ranks. Higher levels of
nutrients beneficial to health and lower levels of nutrients detrimental to health were assigned the higher rank value. The maximum
possible sum of ranks was 108.
Eighty eight percent, 94 % and 97 % of the food items in the HEISB were available in Lidl, Aldi and Tesco, respectively. Aldi
and Tesco stocked all fruit and vegetable items. Tesco also stocked all carbohydrate rich items, where as Lidl and Aldi stocked seven and
eight items from this food group, respectively. All three supermarkets stocked the same number of items from the milk and dairy group
(n = 3) and the protein rich group (n = 3). The cost of the HEISB was highest in Tesco (Lidl: £41.82; Aldi £44.80; Tesco £55.26) and
remained the highest when food items not available in all three supermarkets were excluded from analysis. The overall nutrient quality of
the selected items in the basket was similar amongst the three supermarkets (figure 1).
Sum of Ranks
80
60
40
20
0
Tesco
Aldi
Lidl
Figure 1. Sum of ranks of the nutrient content of selected foods from the HEISB.
Overall these results suggest that discount supermarkets provide access to a wide range of healthy foods from the five food groups at a
lower price when compared to the dominant supermarket retailer in the UK.
1. Reisig V & Hobbiss A (2000) Health Education Journal 59, 137–149.
2. Dawson et al. (2007) Accessing Healthy Food: A Sentinel Mapping Study of Healthy Food Retailing in Scotland. Food Standards Agency Scotland;
Research Project S04005.
Downloaded from https:/www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 88.99.165.207, on 17 Jun 2017 at 15:36:42, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at
https:/www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0029665112002194