Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
OBITUARIES Thomas Vincent McEvilly 1935–2002 Fellow of the RAS, distinguished seismologist and earthquake prediction pioneer. S eismology lost one of its most popular and distinguished members on 22 February 2002 with the death of Thomas McEvilly, Professor Emeritus of Geophysics at the University of California, Berkeley. He was undergoing treatment for cancer at St Anthony’s Medical Center in St Louis, the city of his birth. He was a Fellow of the RAS, the American Geophysical Union and the American Association for the Advancement of Science. McEvilly graduated with a BSc summa cum laude in geophysics from St Louis University in 1956. He worked briefly in oil exploration with the California Company and was associated with the Sprengnether Instrument Company (1961–68), eventually becoming engineering vice-president. In 1960 he returned to St Louis University, where he graduated with a PhD in geophysics in 1964. McEvilly’s contributions to geophysics ranged widely, but particularly in seismology. His many publications investigated, among other topics, seismic crustal profiling, earthquake source properties, test-ban treaty verification methods and seismographic instrumentation. He was for ten years editor of the Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America and was elected an honorary member of the Society. He served on many scientific advisory committees for government, university and professional organizations, including UNESCO, the US National Academy of Science/National Research Council from 1981 to 1983. In the early 1960s considerable Federal money became available for upgrades in seismology to support the surveillance of a nuclear test-ban treaty. At the Seismographic Stations at the University of California, Berkeley, Prof. Perry Byerly had secured substantial funds for the first regional telemetry seismographic network in the world. When Byerly became ill, it was necessary to secure another professor, in short order. As a consequence, I was appointed professor and director in 1963 and, in turn, sought the help of an assistant professor of seismology. In those days, candidates were not found by advertising in journals but by personal contacts. The Department of Geology and Geophysics – now Earth and Planetary Science – at Berkeley had a close relationship with St Louis University, where a strong seismology programme had been developed by J B Macelwane, a PhD from Berkeley and who had taught seismology there. Of special value to the Berkeley situation, Tom was deeply knowledgeable about state-of-the-art 1.36 seismological instrumentation. McEvilly was selected and arrived at Berkeley in August 1964. Everyone was struck by how young he looked. Indeed, he never seemed to age. He flourished at his new academic home, not only in earthquake studies with many students and colleagues, but also with friends through mutual delight in fine wines and in visits to wineries often found in California near active earthquake faults. In due course he became assistant director of the Seismographic Stations (1968–89), was appointed chairman of the Department of Geology and Geophysics (1976–80), and was the first director of the Earth Sciences Division of the National Berkeley Laboratory (1982–83). Berkeley The first major project in which he was involved at Berkeley was the planning and construction of the San Andreas Multi-Purpose Observatory on the San Andreas fault near Hollister. It was expected that instruments on this site would capture the dynamics of a large but still-awaited fault rupture. McEvilly and I, our staff and students derived much pleasure and stimulus from this enterprise, no doubt then technically ahead of its time. More broadly, McEvilly undertook many detailed studies of California earthquakes, research that became a persistent part of his career. The initial pivot, to which he returned many times in his life, was the Parkfield earthquake of 1966. In 1968 McEvilly, Cinna Lomnitz and I wrote a joint paper that summarized the main University of California, Berkeley, seismological contribution to the establishment of plate tectonics. This analysis of plate-margin seismicity in central and northern California was based on the high resolution of focal depths and fault mechanisms, made feasible by the Berkeley Telemetry Network. Research grants from the Advance Research Project Agency (APRA) remained generous through the 1970s. In 1980, Prof. Lane Johnson joined the faculty, and Tom and Lane took over the major research effort supported by APRA. Many lasting publications by them and their students resulted. Over the years, McEvilly’s research became more and more diverse within the context of seismicity, crustal structures, seismic source and fault properties. An extensive list of over 100 publications resulted, featuring an unusual variety of dozens of student and professional co-authors. Two major contributions to seismology should be highlighted. McEvilly played a crucial role in the success, from its inception, of the Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology (IRIS), the dominant observational portal in modern seismology. He was chairman of the IRIS board of directors (1984–86) during its somewhat turbulent birth, and continued to play a vital role on advisory committees up until his illness. During the early strenuous debates, Tom had the necessary warm personality and broad knowledge to weld together the warring factions. The second significant part of McEvilly’s research involved earthquake prediction, which had been boosted as a worthy seismological enterprise in the early 1970s. Close scrutiny of the historical recordings of the Berkeley seismographic network led to a paper published in 1979 with W Bakun in which they described a striking 22-year earthquake pattern along the Parkfield section of the San Andreas fault. The result was the famous “Parkfield Prediction Experiment” which generated high hopes for reliable quantitative prediction. The extent of McEvilly’s disappointment when the early 1990s window closed uneventfully is not clear. He was a member and chairman (1989–96) of the National Earthquake Prediction Evaluation Council for the US Geological Survey where he was consistently critical of over-promising success in prediction. McEvilly excelled in teaching on a one-to-one basis. His graduate course called Advanced Seismometry was unique in the United States and is often mentioned by students of that era as providing a firm foundation in their seismological careers. He was, as his published reviews attest, a master of seismic instrumentation. Among his last papers and proposals are many creative ideas on diverse seismic monitoring and networks, including borehole sensors and fault studies with GPS geodetic equipment. A hallmark of McEvilly’s scientific abilities was his powerful intuition. Along with it went great enthusiasm for his subject and an unconstrained generosity in collaborations with colleagues and students. There is little doubt that his work was a great delight to him. After retirement, it continued to be driven by this singular seismological pattern. McEvilly is survived by his wife Dotty, six children, nine grandchildren, two brothers and a sister. A graduate student fellowship in his honour has been established in the Department of Earth and Planetary Science at the University of California, Berkeley (www .seismo.berkely.edu). Bruce A Bolt. February 2003 Vol 44