Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
[CANCER RESEARCH 42, 4836-4841, 0008-5472/82/0042-OOOOS02.00 November 1982] Purification and Immunological Characterization of Human Pancreatic Ribonuclease Minoru Kurihara,1 Michio Ogawa, Toshiyuki Ohta, Eiji Kurokawa, Takeshi Kitahara, Goro Kosaki, Takehiko Watanabe, and Hiroshi Wada Second Department of Surgery, Osaka University Medical School. Fukushima-ku, Osaka 553 [M. O., T. O., E. K., T. K., G. K.]. and Second Department Pharmacology, Osaka University Medical School, Kita-ku, Osaka 530 ¡T.W., H. W.¡,Japan ABSTRACT Three alkaline RNases were purified from human pancreatic juice to near homogeneity as judged by sodium dodecyl sulfate and native polyacrylamide gel electrophoreses. The molecular weights of these RNases determined by sodium dodecyl sulfate electrophoresis were 27,000, 19,000, and 13,000. The activ ities of these three RNases were increased by addition of Mg2+, Ca2+, Co2*, K+, Na+, spermine, and spermidine and decreased by the addition of heparin, Cu2+, and Zn2+. These RNases showed higher hydrolytic activity toward polycytidylic acid than toward polyguanylic acid, polyuridylic acid, or polyadenylic acid. The three human pancreatic RNases were immunologically identical but differed from human liver RNase, as shown by Ouchterlony double-diffusion test. Radioimmunoassay of hu man pancreatic RNase showed that immunologically similar RNases are present in human saliva, urine, and serum. INTRODUCTION RNase activity has been observed to be elevated in the serum of patients with malignant tumors (4, 12, 32). Recently, Reddi and Holland (21, 23) reported that pancreatic RNase activity in human serum could be measured in a specific way with poly(C)2 as substrate and could serve as a biochemical marker in the diagnosis of carcinoma of the pancreas. More recently, however, Peterson (20) found that patients with pan creatic cancer could not be distinguished in this way from those with pancreatitis or with nonpancreatic disease, although the RNase activity in all cases of pancreatic cancer was differ ent from that in normal individuals. Moreover, he reported that poly(C)-specific RNase activity did not decrease in the serum of patients after total pancreatectomy. These conflicting results could be because serum RNase with preference for poly(C) may originate from other organs beside the pancreas or could be due to variation in the stage of disease and secondary pathology of patients from whom sera were obtained. In the present study, we purified RNase from human pan creatic juice, examined its properties, and developed a RIA for human pancreatic RNase. By this sensitive and specific method, we investigated the immunoreactivity of pancreatic of RNase and compared it with those of RNases in various body fluids. MATERIALS AND METHODS Materials Pancreatic juice was obtained by surgical cannulation of the pan creatic duct of patients undergoing resection of the head of the pan creas and stored at -20° until use. These patients had a periampullar neoplasm or gastric cancer with pancreatic infiltration. Human serum, urine, and saliva used for dilution curves were obtained from a healthy 33-year-old man. The following reagents were used: poly(C) (Yamasa ShöyuCo., Japan); yeast RNA, poly(G), poly(U), poly(A), SDS electro phoresis protein markers, and bovine RNase A (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Mo.); Sephadex G-75 superfine, Sephadex G-25, Sepharose 4B (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden); phosphocellulose and ampholine (Brown Co., England); cellulose dialysis tubing (Nakarai Chemicals, Japan); Freund's complete adjuvant (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd., Japan); Nali5l (New England Nuclear); goat anti-guinea pig IgG serum and normal guinea pig serum (Eiken Chemicals Co., Japan). Human liver RNase was purified in our laboratory (19). Poly(G) agar was prepared by the method of Schmukler ef al. (25). Heparin Sepharose-CL-6B was purchased from Pharmacia. The gel was allowed to swell in distilled water and washed for about 15 min on a sintered glass filter with 0.05 M potassium phosphate buffer, pH 8.0, before being packed into a column for use. Enzyme Assay RNase activity was assayed by the method of Reddi (21). The standard assay system was as follows. The sample was diluted 500fold with 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer, pH 6.8. Then, 0.05 ml of diluted solution, 0.05 ml of poly(C) (4 mg/ml), and 0.15 ml of 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer, pH 6.8, were mixed and incubated at 37° for 15 min. The reaction was stopped by adding 0.25 ml of cold 12% perchloric acid containing 20 mM lanthanum nitrate. The solution stood in an ice bath for 15 min and was centrifuged in the cold at 12,000 x g for 15 min. Then, 200 /il of supernatant was diluted with 1 ml of distilled water, and its absorbance at 260 nm was measured. The RNase activity that caused an increase in absorbance of 1.0 under these assay conditions was defined as 1 unit. Protein Determination Protein concentration was determined by the method of Lowry ef al. (13) or from the absorbance at 280 nm. Purification of Human Pancreatic RNase Received February 4, 1982; accepted July 30. 1982. ' To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at The Second Depart ment of Surgery, Osaka University Medical School, 1-1-50 Fukushima, Fuku shima-ku, Osaka 553, Japan. 2 The abbreviations used are: poly(C), polycytidylic acid; RIA, radioimmunoassay; poly(G), polyguanylic acid; poly(U), polyuridylic acid; poly(A), polyadenylic acid; SDS, sodium dodecyl sulfate. Received February 4, 1982; accepted July 30, 1982. 4836 All procedures were carried out at 4°unless otherwise stated. Step 1. Acid Treatment. Frozen pancreatic juice (2,500 ml) was brought to room temperature before use. The pH was adjusted to 3.5 with 35% HCI, and the solution was kept in an ice bath for about 1 hr. The solution was centrifuged at 10,000 x g for 10 min, and the precipitate was discarded. CANCER RESEARCH Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on June 16, 2017. © 1982 American Association for Cancer Research. VOL. 42 Human Pancreatic RNase Step 2. First Phosphocellulose Column Chromatography. The supernatant (2510 ml) was applied to a phosphocellulose column using a glass filter (10 cm in diameter x 5 cm in height) previously equilibrated with 0.05 M potassium phosphate-HCI buffer, pH 3.5. The column was washed with 1500 ml of 0.05 M potassium phosphate buffer, pH 6.8, and RNase was eluted with the same buffer containing 1.5 M NaCI. The solution was dialyzed twice against 5 liters of the same buffer. Step 3. Second Phosphocellulose Column Chromatography. The sample (670 ml) was applied to a phosphocellulose column (2.5 x 52 cm) previously equilibrated with 0.05 M potassium phosphate buffer, pH 6.8. The column was washed with 300 ml of the buffer, and then protein was eluted with 2 liters of a linear gradient 0 to 0.8 M NaCI in the same buffer (Chart 1,4). The flow rate was 40 ml/hr, and fractions of 20 ml were collected. Fractions with activity were combined (500 ml) and dialyzed twice against 5 liters of the above buffer. Step 4. Third Phosphocellulose Column Chromatography. The sample was applied to a smaller phosphocellulose column (1.5 x 45 cm) under the same conditions as before, and the protein was eluted with 800 ml of a linear gradient of 0.1 to 0.7 M NaCI (Chart M3). The flow rate was 20 ml/hr. Fractions of 10 ml were collected, and those with activity were combined (420 ml) and dialyzed against 4 liters of 0.05 M potassium phosphate buffer, pH 8.O. Step 5. Poly(G) Affinity Chromatography. The sample was applied to a poly(G) affinity column (5.5 x 1.5 cm) equilibrated with 0.05 M potassium phosphate buffer, pH 8.O. The column was washed, and then RNase was eluted with the same buffer containing 1 M NaCI (Chart 1C). The sample (72 ml) was dialyzed against 1 liter of the same buffer and concentrated by lyophilization. Step 6. Sephadex G-75 Gel Filtration. The concentrated prepara tion (2 ml) was applied to a Sephadex G-75 superfine column (1.8 x 113 cm) equilibrated with 0.05 M potassium phosphate buffer, pH 8.0, containing 0.3 M NaCI. The flow rate was 2 ml/hr, and fractions of 2.5 ml were collected. Three peaks of RNase activity were found (Chart 1D) and Peak 1 (RNase I), Peak 2 (RNase II), and Peak 3 (RNase III) were collected separately. RNase I was purified by an additional step. Step 7. Isoelectric Focusing. The eluate of Peak 1 was dialyzed against 0.05 M potassium phosphate buffer, pH 8.0, and applied to an isoelectric focusing column (pH 9 to 11). Fractions of 1 ml were collected. The RNase activity was located at pH 10.0 (Chart 1£). Heparin affinity Chromatography could be used instead of isoelectric focusing. When heparin affinity Chromatography was used, the sample from Step 6 was dialyzed extensively against 0.05 M potassium phos phate buffer, pH 8.0, and applied to a heparin affinity column (1.5 x 20 cm) equilibrated with the same buffer. The column was washed, and 4.0 I 2.0 50 Fraction 0 No 50 Fraction No. Chart 1. Purification of RNase from human pancreatic juice. A, second phosphocellulose column Chromatography. The eluate from the first phosphocellulose column was applied to a second phosphocellulose column (2.5 x 52 cm) equilibrated with 0.05 M potassium phosphate buffer (pH 6.8). The protein was eluted with a linear gradient of NaCI (0 to 0.8 M). Fractions of 20 ml were collected, and those with activity (Tube Nos. 55 to 80) were pooled. Bars, fractions collected for further purification. B, third phosphocellulose column Chromatography. The sample shown in A was applied to a third phosphocellulose column (1.5 x 45 cm) equilibrated with 0.05 M potassium phosphate buffer (pH 6.8). The protein was eluted with a linear gradient of NaCI (0.1 to 0.7 M). Fractions of 10 ml were collected and active fractions (Tube Nos. 25 to 65) were pooled. C. poly(G) affinity column Chromatography. The sample shown ¡nB was applied to a poly(G) affinity column (1.5 x 5.5 cm) equilibrated with 0.05 M potassium phosphate buffer (pH 8.0). The protein was eluted with the same buffer containing 1 M NaCI. Fractions of 5 ml were collected. D, Sephadex G-75 gel filtration. The eluate from the poly(G) affinity column was concentrated as described in the text and applied to a Sephadex G-75 superfine column (1.8 x 113 cm) previously equilibrated with 0.05 M potassium phosphate buffer (pH 8.0) containing 0.3 M NaCI. RNase was separated into 3 peaks of activity, which are referred to as RNases I, II, and III, in order of elution. E, isoelectric focusing. The RNase I fraction in D was applied to an LKB 8011 column. Electrophoresis was carried out for 48 hr at 0.3 ma and 600 V in 0.5% ampholine (pH 9 to 11) with a sucrose gradient. Fractions of 1 ml were collected. NOVEMBER 1982 4837 Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on June 16, 2017. © 1982 American Association for Cancer Research. M. Kuhhara et al. then material was eluted with a linear gradient of 0 to 0.8 M NaCI. RNase activity was eluted with 0.45 to 0.55 M NaCI. fraction in the absence of the unlabeled measured in duplicate. Electrophoresis RESULTS Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis was performed by the method of Shapiro ef al. (26) using 10% polyacrylamide gel in the presence of 0.1% SDS. Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis at pH 4.5 was per formed by the method of Reisfeld ef al. (24) using 10% polyacrylamide gel. Purification Preparations of Antiserum Antiserum against human pancreatic RNase was produced in guinea pigs. The animals were given injections into multisites in the skin with a mixture of 0.25 ml of human RNase I (0.25 mg/ml) and an equal amount of complete Freund s adjuvant. The injection was repeated after 3 weeks and 6 weeks and, 10 days after the last injection, blood was collected by heart puncture, and the serum was separated and stored at -20°. Ouchterlony Analysis Double diffusion in agar was performed by the procedure terlony (19). of Ouch RIA Procedure All samples were RNase was purified from human pancreatic juice as de scribed in "Materials and Methods." On Sephadex G-75 gel filtration, RNase was separated into 3 peaks (Chart 1D): RNase I, RNase II, and RNase III, in order of elution. RNase II and RNase III were essentially homogeneous at this step. RNase I was purified further by isoelectric focusing. Changes in specific activity and recovery during the purification procedure are summarized in Table 1. With this purification procedure, the yield of enzymic activity was 8.9% with about 1000-fold in crease in specific activity. Purity The purities of the RNase preparations were examined by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Each of the 3 human pan creatic RNases moved as a single, broad band on 10% poly acrylamide gel at pH 4.5, and the activity coincided in the position with the protein band (Fig. 1). On polyacrylamide gel The purified human pancreatic RNase I was labeled with radioiodine following the method of Hunter and Greenwood (10). The procedure used for radioimmunoassay for human pancreatic RNase was a modi fication of the double-antibody technique of Morgan and Lazarow (14). Bovine Serum Albumin iJDvalbumin The reaction mixture consisted of 0.4 ml of 0.9% NaCI solution buffered with 0.01 M phosphate, pH 7.6, containing 0.2% bovine serum albumin and 0.1% sodium azide (NaN3), 0.1 ml of standard solution or samples, 0.1 ml of labeled RNase I (about 3x10" cpm) as tracer •¿Â£ 3 Chymotrypsinogen RNase I t antigen, and 0.1 ml of diluted antiserum (1:10,000). The mixture was mixed well and stood overnight at 4°.After this first incubation, 0.1 ml RNase n of diluted normal guinea pig serum (1:100) and 0.1 ml of diluted antiguinea pig IgG serum (1:20) were added with thorough mixing. The mixture stood overnight at 4°and then was centrifuged at 3,000 rpm at 4°for 30 min. The supernatant was decanted, and the radioactivity of the precipitate was counted in a Packard auto gamma counter. The percentage of binding of the tracer antigen was expressed as the ratio of the radioactivity of the bound fraction to the radioactivity of the same antigen. RNase 0.5 0 Rf. Chart 2. Determination of the molecular weight of RNases I, II, and III. Molec ular weights of RNases I, II, and III were determined by electrophoresis as described in "Materials and Methods." Cyt. C. cytochrome C. Table 1 Summary of enzyme purification Purification was started from 2500 ml of human pancreatic juice. The RNase activity was measured as described in the text. Protein concentration was determined by measuring the absorbance at 280 nm. ProcedurePancreatic protein activ activity (%)0.057 Yield8 ity (units)772.51096.87650.6510394172.844.2 (A280)1357514106.21742406.5157.853.350.8 juiceAcid 1000.078 treatment1st 1420.37 phosphocellulose2nd 841.25 phosphocellulose3rd 662.54 phosphocellulosePoly(G) 513.24 affinitySephade. 220.87 3-75 gel filtration RNase 1 RNase II IIIIsoelectric RNase 5.72 14 0.62 71.68 5.7275'47 44.16 13.26.5Total 14.949.62Total 0.20NO6Specific 8.91%ND focusing RNase 1Volume250025106705004207223.5 184 1.25 The yield was calculated from the enzymatic activity. 1 ND, not determined because the sample contained ampholine. 4838 CANCER RESEARCH VOL. 42 Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on June 16, 2017. © 1982 American Association for Cancer Research. Human Pancreatic RNase Table 2 Effects of ions and chemicals on enzyme activity Assays were carried out in 0.1 Mpotassium phosphate buffer, pH 6.8, containing 5 mw ions or chemicals. Activity in the absence of ions or chemicals was taken as 100%. CUM)RNase Ions and chemicals (5 dine204 1 115 100 137 115 189102Spermine141 126 RNase II 115 7 33 82 141Mg2*172 114Co2*154 115Spermi 265Cu2*40 15Zn2*36 RNase IIINone100 100Na*114 112K*110 30Heparin33 14 50 l"g ">' lOng ml I00ng/ml l ug ml lOngml SOngml Chart 3. Cross-reactivities of bovine RNase A with antiserum with human pancreatic RNase and human liver RNase. The conditions for incubation and separation of bound antigens are described in "Materials and Methods." Data are shown on a semilog plot. Table 3 Substrate specificity Assays were carried out as described in the text. The concentration of substrate was 4 mg/ml. The activity with poly(C) as substrate was taken as 100%. SubstrateRNase I RNase II 100 RNase III 100 RNase APoly(C)100100Poly(A)6 4.3 5 0.5 14.7Poly(G)2.2 0 0 0.6Poly(U)8.6 17.8 containing 0.1% SDS, RNase I, RNase II, and RNase III mi grated as single bands, and their molecular weights were estimated as 27,000, 19,000, and 13,000, respectively (Chart 2). Enzymological Properties Effects of Ions and Chemicals on Enzymatic Activity. The enzymatic activities of the 3 RNases were increased in the presence of 5 rriM of Na+, K+, Mg2+, Co2+, spermine, and spermidine and decreased by 5 mw of Cu2+, Zn2+, and heparin (Table 2). There were no remarkable differences in the effects of these ions and chemicals on the 3 RNases, although RNase II gave slightly different results from RNase I and RNase III with spermidine, Cu2+, and heparin. Substrate Specificity. These RNases cleaved poly(C) better than poly(A), poly(G), or poly(U). Their substrate specificity was similar to that of bovine RNase A (Table 3). Immunological Properties Ouchterlony Test. Single precipitation lines were formed between anti-human pancreatic RNase serum and the 3 pan NOVEMBER 1982 creatic RNases, and all the lines fused. No precipitation line was formed between antihuman pancreatic RNase I serum and liver RNase (Fig. 2). Radioimmunoassay. The standard curve is shown in Chart 3. Using this standard curve, the concentration of human pancreatic RNase could be measured in the range 10 to 500 ng. As shown in Chart 3, slight cross-reactivity was detected between human pancreatic RNase and human liver RNase (about 10% at the point of 50% 8/S0), but there was no crossreactivity between human pancreatic RNase and bovine RNase A. The dilution curves of human serum, urine, saliva, and pancreatic juice were parallel with the standard curve for human pancreatic RNase (Chart 4). The samples used for dilution curves were not from the patients whose pancreatic juice was used for purification of RNase. The amounts of RNase, calculated from the dilution curves, were 480 ng/ml in serum, 200 ng/ml in saliva, 240 ng/ml in urine, and 6400 ng/ ml in pancreatic juice. DISCUSSION RNases are widely distributed in various human tissues, and their purifications have been reported by several groups (6,11, 16, 18, 22, 28, 29). Since the report of Reddi (21), pancreatic RNase has been of interest because of its possible diagnostic value as a marker of pancreatic cancer. At present, however, little is actually known about human pancreatic RNase in rela tion to the origin of human serum RNase. In the present study, we purified RNase from human pancreatic juice and examined its properties. Using this purified enzyme, we developed a RIA for determination of the immunoreactivities of various RNases in human biological fluids. The pancreatic RNase that we have purified has 3 isozymes 4839 Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on June 16, 2017. © 1982 American Association for Cancer Research. M. Kurihara et al. sample dilution I 256 I 128 I 64 I 32 I 16 18 100 human pancreatic RNase standard pancreatic juice m m I U 50 I IO 100 Pancreatic RNase (ng/ml) 1000 Chart 4. Standard curve for human pancreatic RNase and dilution curves for serum, urine, saliva, and pancreatic juice. These human body fluids were diluted with 0.01 M phosphate:0.9% NaCI solution containing 0.2% bovine serum albu min and 0.1 % sodium azide. with different molecular weights. Weickmann ef al. (31 ) purified an RNase from human pancreas. Their RNase gave a single band of protein on polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis in the presence of SDS, but on electrophoresis in 10% polyacryl amide at pH 4.5 it gave at least 3 protein bands. They purified their enzyme to the step of affinity chromatography, but we have purified RNase further by Sephadex G-75 gel filtration and isoelectric focusing. In the present study, pancreatic RNase activity was separated into 3 fractions by gel filtration. We also purified pancreatic RNase from human pancreas in a separate investigation, to be published,3 and found that it was also separated into at least 2 distinct fractions of activity with different molecular weights on gel filtration. Although we could not analyze the amino acid compositions or sugar compositions of these fractions because of the limited quantity of purified enzyme available, we tentatively conclude from the present results that human pancreatic RNase has at least 3 isozymes, consisting of the same polypeptide chain and differing only in their degree of glycosylation, as shown for bovine pancreatic RNase (2). However, it is still possible that some of these 3 RNases might be artifacts formed on acid treatment (29), that they are allotypes, not isozymes, because pancreatic juice was collected from several individuals, or that their difference might result from disease, although the pancreatic juice was collected from patients with periampullary neoplasm and gastric cancer. Previous papers described slight cross-reactivity between human pancreatic RNase and bovine RNase A (31) and no cross-reactivity between pancreatic RNase and human liver RNase (1 7). However, our results were different; we found no cross-reactivity between human pancreatic RNase and bovine RNase A by RIA. However, the variation in results may simply be due to differences in the methods used. Moreover, slight cross-reactivity was demonstrated between human liver RNase and human pancreatic RNase by RIA, although no precipitation 3 M. Kurihara. N. Ogawa. T. Ohta. E. Kurokawa. Watanabe, and H. Wada, manuscript in preparation. 4840 T. Kitahara. G. Kosaki. T. line was formed in an Ouchterlony double-diffusion test be tween human liver RNase and antiserum to human pancreatic RNase. Human serum contains many types of acidic RNases and alkaline RNases originating from various tissues (1, 3, 15). Alkaline RNase has been of interest because its activity is thought to be elevated in the serum of patients with malignant tumors. Houck and Berman (9) first reported the serum RNase levels in patients with various diseases, indicating that conges tive heart failure, myocardial infarction, and primary kidney disease with uremia were associated with an elevated serum RNase level. Zykto and Cantero (32) and Chretien ef al. (4) reported that the serum RNase level was increased in patients with carcinoma. Serum RNase was also reported to increase in malnourished children (27). Akagi et al. (1) reported that there are at least 5 alkaline RNases in human serum and that 4 of them have properties similar to those of the bovine pancreatic enzyme. Recently, Reddi (21) reported that human serum RNase was a good biochemical marker in diagnosis of carcinoma of the pancreas because of its unique specificity for poly(C). Warshaw ef at. (30) also reported that increased poly(C)-specific serum RNase was of adjunctive value in the diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma. On the contrary, Peterson (20) reported that the level of serum RNase activity toward poly(C) of patients with pancreatic cancer was not different from that of patients with nonpancreatic diseases. Doran ef al. (5) and Hölbling ef al. (8) also reported that serum RNase with preference for poly(C) was not a specific marker of carcinoma of the pancreas. Furthermore, Peterson (20) reported that after total pancreatectomy, serum RNase activity remained in the normal range. Recently, we also experienced a case in which serum RNase activity with poly(C) as substrate was normal after total pancreatectomy. In the present study, dilution curves of saliva were parallel with the standard curve of human pancreatic RNase in RIA, suggesting that salivary RNase is immunologically very similar to pancreatic RNase. Bovine RNase from the salivary gland has also been reported to be very similar to bovine pancreatic RNase (7). Thus, human salivary gland may be a source of serum RNase in some patients. The previous reports and present results suggested that further study is needed to clarify the reasons for elevation of RNase in the serum of patients with malignant tumors. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank Prof. Charles A. Dekker, University of California, and Prof. Masachika Irie, Hoshi College of Pharmacy, for valuable advice during preparation of the manuscript. REFERENCES 1. Akagi, K., Murai, K., Mirano, N., and Yamanaka, M. Purification and prop erties of alkaline ribonuclease from human serum. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 442. 368-378, 1976. 2. Baynes, J. W., and Wold, F. Effect of glycosylation on the in vivo circulating half-life of ribonuclease. J. Biol. Chem., 251: 6016-6024, 1976. 3. Blank. A., and Dekker, C. A. Ribonucleases of human serum, urine, cerebrospinal fluid, and leukocytes. Activity staining following electrophoresis in sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels. Biochemistry, 20. 2261-2267, 1981. 4. Chretien, P. B., Mathews, W.. and Twomey, P. L. Serum ribonucleases in cancer: relation to tumor histology. Cancer (Phila.), 37. 175-179, 1973. 5. Doran, G.. Allen-Mersh. T. G., and Reynolds, K. W. Ribonuclease as a tumor marker for pancreatic carcinoma. J. Clin. Pathol., 33. 1212-1213, 1980. CANCER RESEARCH Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on June 16, 2017. © 1982 American Association for Cancer Research. VOL. 42 Human Pancreatic RNase 6. Frank. J. J.. and Levy, C. C. Properties of a human liver ribonuclease. J. Biol. Chem., 251: 5745-5751, 1976. 7. Hirose, S., Kumagai, H., Yoshikawa, M., Mikami, T., and Igarashi, K. Studies on salivary gland ribonucleases. II. Purification of ribonucleases from bovine submaxillary gland and the effects of polyamines on their activities. J. Biochem., 82. 1605-1612. 1977. 8. Hölbling, N., Funovics. J., Euler, J., Karner. J., Zöch. G., und Sauermann, G. Zur Anwendbarkeit der polyC-spezifichen Serum Ribonuklease und des CEA in der Diagnose des Pankreasharzinomas. Klin. Wochenschr, 59: 1201-1207, 1981. 9. Houck, J. C., and Berman, L. B. Serum ribonuclease activity. J. Appi. Physiol.. 72:473-476. 1958. 10. Hunter, W. M., and Greenwood, F. C. Preparation of ¡odine-131 labeled human growth hormone of high specific activity. Nature (Lond.), 794: 495496. 1962. 11. Iwama, M., Kunihiro, M., Ohgi. K., and Irie, M. Purification and properties of human urine ribonucleases. J. Biochem., 89: 1005-1016, 1981. 12. Kottel, R. H„ Hoch, S. O., Parsons, R. G., and Hoch, J. A. Serum ribonucle ase activity in cancer patients. Br. J. Cancer, 38: 280-286, 1978. 13. Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L., and Randall, R. J. Protein measurement with the Polin phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem., 793. 265-275, 1951. 14. Morgan. C. R., and Lazarow, A. Immunoassay of insulin using a two-antibody system. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med.. 7 70: 29-32, 1962. 15. Neuwelt, E. A., Boguski, M. S., Frank, J. J., Kim, P. A., and Levy, C. C. Possible site of origin of human plasma ribonucleases as evidenced by isolation and partial characterization of ribonucleases from several human tissues. Cancer Res., 38: 88-93. 1978. 16. Neuwelt, E. A., Frank, J. J., and Levy, C. C. Purification of human spleen ribonuclease by immunoabsorption. J. Biol. Chem., 257. 5752-5758, 1976. 17. Neuwelt, E. A., Schmukler, M., Niziak, M. S., Jewett, P. B., and Levy, C. C. The immunological characterization of several human ribonucleases by using primary binding tests. Biochem. J., 763: 419-426, 1977. 18. Ohta. T., Ogawa, M., Kurihara, M.. Kitahara, T., and Kosaki, G. Purification, characterization and development of radioimmunoassay of human liver ribonuclease. Clin. Chim. Acta., in press, 1982. 19. Ouchterlony, O. Diffusion-in-gel metnods for immunological analysis. Prog. Allergy, 5: 1-78, 1958. 20. Peterson, L. M. Serum RNase in the diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma. Proc. Nati. Acad. Sei. U. S. A., 76: 2630-2634, 1979. 21. Reddi, K. K., Nature and possible origin of human serum ribonuclease. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.. 67. 110-118, 1975. 22. Reddi, K. K. Human platelet ribonuclease. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Com mun., 79: 532-538. 1977. 23. Reddi, K. K., and Holland, J. F. Elevated serum ribonuclease in patients with pancreatic cancer. Proc. Nati. Acad. Sei. U. S. A., 73: 2308-2310, 1976. 24. Reisfeld. R. A., Lewis, U. J., and Williams, D. E. Disc electrophoresis of basic proteins and peptides on polyacrylamide gels. Nature (Lond.), 795: 281-285, 1962. 25. Schmukler. M.. Jewett, P. B., and Levy, C. C. The effects of polyamines on a residue specific human plasma ribonuclease. J. Biol. Chem.. 250: 22062212, 1975. 26. Shapiro, A. L.. Vinuela, E.. and Maizel, J. V. Molecular weight estimation of polypeptide chains by electrophoresis in SDS-polyacrylamide gels. Bio chem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 28: 815-820, 1967. 27. Sigulem, D. M., Brasel, J. A., Velasco, E. G., Rosso. P.. and Winick. M. Plasma and urine ribonuclease as a measure of nutritional status in children. Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 26. 793-797, 1973. 28. Sznajd, J., and Naskalski, J. W. Ribonuclease from human granulocytes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 302: 282-292, 1973. 29. Ukita, T., Takahashi, T., Waku, K., and Hoshino. O. Research on pancreatic ribonuclease. J. Biochem., 55 293-302, 1964 30. Warshaw, A. L., Lee, K. H., Wood, W. C., and Cohen. A. M Sensitivity and specificity of serum ribonuclease in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Am. J. Surg.. 739: 27-32, 1980. 31. Weickmann, J. L., Elson. M.. and Glitz, D. G. Purification and characteriza tion of human pancreatic ribonuclease. Biochemistry, 20: 1272-1278, 1981. 32. Zytko, J., and Cantero, A. Serum ribonuclease in patients with malignant disease. Cañad.Med. Assoc. J., 86: 482-485. 1962. RNaseI RNaseII Fig. 2. Immunodiffusion of RNases. The center well contained anti-RNase I serum. Peripheral wells contained RNases I, II. III. and human liver RNase. Well I. RNase I; Well II, RNase II; Well III. RNase III; Well IV, human liver RNase. «Naselli Fig. 1. Gel electrophoresis of RNases I, II, and III on 10% acrylamide gels at pH 4.5. Approximately 3 to 5 fig of enzyme was applied per tube, and electro phoresis was carried out for 8 hr at 2 ma per tube. Electrophoresis was done in duplicate. One was stained with Coomassie brilliant blue. The other was cut into 2-mm sections with a gel slicer, and RNase activity was assayed. Migration was from left (anode) to right (cathode). Arrow, direction of electrophoretic migration. NOVEMBER 1982 4841 Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on June 16, 2017. © 1982 American Association for Cancer Research. Purification and Immunological Characterization of Human Pancreatic Ribonuclease Minoru Kurihara, Michio Ogawa, Toshiyuki Ohta, et al. Cancer Res 1982;42:4836-4841. Updated version E-mail alerts Reprints and Subscriptions Permissions Access the most recent version of this article at: http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/42/11/4836 Sign up to receive free email-alerts related to this article or journal. To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal, contact the AACR Publications Department at [email protected]. To request permission to re-use all or part of this article, contact the AACR Publications Department at [email protected]. Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on June 16, 2017. © 1982 American Association for Cancer Research.