* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Abstract
Cosmopolitanism wikipedia , lookup
Accountability wikipedia , lookup
Moral relativism wikipedia , lookup
Alasdair MacIntyre wikipedia , lookup
Stephen Toulmin wikipedia , lookup
Virtue ethics wikipedia , lookup
Kantian ethics wikipedia , lookup
Individualism wikipedia , lookup
Bernard Williams wikipedia , lookup
J. Baird Callicott wikipedia , lookup
Consequentialism wikipedia , lookup
Thomas Hill Green wikipedia , lookup
Secular morality wikipedia , lookup
Clare Palmer wikipedia , lookup
Compliance and ethics program wikipedia , lookup
Nel Noddings wikipedia , lookup
Aristotelian ethics wikipedia , lookup
Morality and religion wikipedia , lookup
Primary care ethics wikipedia , lookup
Medical ethics wikipedia , lookup
Sexual ethics wikipedia , lookup
APA Ethics Code wikipedia , lookup
Neuroethics wikipedia , lookup
Ethics of eating meat wikipedia , lookup
Arthur Schafer wikipedia , lookup
Accounting ethics wikipedia , lookup
Ethics of artificial intelligence wikipedia , lookup
Marketing ethics wikipedia , lookup
Jewish ethics wikipedia , lookup
Ethical intuitionism wikipedia , lookup
Business ethics wikipedia , lookup
Toward the Development of a Polyphonic Ethics Scale: Assessing the Plurality of Ethical Perspectives in Organizations Yoséline Leunens Abstract Through this thesis, we aim to help managers and members of organizations identify and make explicit the diversity of ethical conceptions that guide them in their decisions. The objective of this thesis is to develop a scale which incorporates a variety of ethical perspectives, reflecting not only ideas of classical Western moral philosophies, but also contemporary business ethics theories, as well as feminine and non-Western ethical traditions. Such a scale is needed, since current ethics scale used in business ethics research are almost exclusively based on classical moral philosophy, which implies a strong masculine and Western bias. Since they ignore feminine and non Western ethical perspectives, we suggest these scales are silencing the voices of people guided by other ethical traditions. Our conceptual framework builds upon the theoretical constructs from two prominent paradigms, represented among others, by Edgar Schein’s work relating to organizational basic assumptions, and Stephen Toulmin’s work on the justification structure of any logical argument, including ethical arguments. To construct a polyphonic ethics scale, we applied the Toulmin method to generate statements reflecting 30 ethical theories. In this manner, we offer a pool of 90 items, describing one basic assumption about reality (data), one ethical prescription (claim) and one ethical ideal (warrant) that is distinct and representative of each ethical theory. We guided our selection of the 30 ethical theories based on the most cited ethical theories in the business ethics literature, and the objective of including 40% ethical theories developed or promoted by women, or by non-Western thinkers. We measured the level of agreement or disagreement with these statements through a questionnaire that was completed by 441 respondents working in various organizations, and living in Quebec, Canada. We performed exploratory factor analysis and multidimensional scaling analysis and retained a five factors solution, which reflect the following ethical perspectives : Ecosocial harmony, cooperative egalitarianism, neoliberal conservatism, rational objectivity and Machiavellian cynicism. A major contribution of the Polyphonic Ethics Scale, compared to other scales such as the Multidimensional Ethics Scale or the Defining Issue Test, is its capacity to identify ethical perspectives from non Western traditions, such as the African “Ubuntu” tradition, as well as business related traditions, for instance the beliefs of the cooperative movement or the neoliberal tradition, as well as feminine traditions, including the ideas of Simone de Beauvoir, among others. At the practical level, the Polyphonic Ethics Scale is an additional tool for apersonnel selection process, enabling to evaluate the fit between the dominant ethical perspectives of a candidate and the those that employer wishes to encourage within the organisation. Moreover, it can be used at the individual level as a tool to facilitate ethical introspection by managers, or even collectively to promote collaborative action on common ethical issues though effective dialogue between stakeholders. Keywords: ethical decision-making, ethical evaluation, ethical perspectives, ethical pluralism, ethical polyphony, scale development, factor analysis, Multidimensional Ethics Scale, Polyphonic Ethics Scale.