Download Two samples for cross

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Blood sugar level wikipedia , lookup

Blood transfusion wikipedia , lookup

Autotransfusion wikipedia , lookup

Blood donation wikipedia , lookup

Plateletpheresis wikipedia , lookup

Hemorheology wikipedia , lookup

Jehovah's Witnesses and blood transfusions wikipedia , lookup

Blood type wikipedia , lookup

Men who have sex with men blood donor controversy wikipedia , lookup

ABO blood group system wikipedia , lookup

Rh blood group system wikipedia , lookup

Blood bank wikipedia , lookup

Schmerber v. California wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Dr Paul Kerr
Consultant Haematologist
Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Trust
80%
70%
185 Cancer Services
Directorate
60%
185 Critical Care
50%
185 Medical Directorate
185 Surgery I Directorate
40%
30%
185 Specialist Surgery
Directorate
20%
185 W omen & Child Health
Directorate
Total
10%
0%
Sep- Oct10
10
Nov- Dec- Jan10
10
11
Feb- Mar11
11
Apr- May11
11
4
3
2
1
0
Trained
Untrained
No record
50
45
40
35
30
Assessed
25
Not Assessed
Unable to read signature
20
15
10
5
0
Doctors
Nurses
Phlebotomists
Unable to read
signature
No further action accept risk
More training
Lab rejection of all samples from untrained staff
IT solution eg Ordercomms
2 sample policy?
Available
Unavailable
ABO mismatched transfusion frequently fatal
Events are rare but considered unacceptable by the public and the DoH
Wrong blood in tube events occur roughly every two months at RDE
Training does not prevent near misses
95% of patients being transfused have had their blood group checked at
least twice
Request blood by phone or form:
Historical sample
exists
Lab checks to see if historical
group exists:
Group Specific blood issued
Request blood by phone or form:
Lab checks to see if historical
group exists:
No historical
Lab requests second sample be
sent
2nd sample
sent
Group Specific blood issued
Request blood by phone or form:
Lab checks to see if historical
group exists:
No historical
Lab requests second sample be
sent
2nd sample not
available and
blood required
Group O blood issued
Engagement of staff involved in
emergency care
Group O always available
Need for separate samples
Highlighting of need to incident report
issues
If no 2nd sample after 10 units, use original
Pragmatic response if antibodies on first
sample
Number of group and save requests
BT Workload figures
16000
14000
12000
10000
8000
6000
4000
2000
0
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q1
2010-2011
Q2
Q3
2011-12
Date
Q4
Q1
2012-13
Anecdotal evidence of taking one sample
an splitting into two tubes
Lab will reject these; care with labelling
samples
Quick audit suggested practice not rife
Consider a situation where you are unable to take a second cross-match
sample, for example during an urgent case where you are busy resuscitating
an acutely unwell patient; what action should you take if the laboratory
request a second sample prior to providing cross matched blood?
Two sample policy introduced:
No increase in O neg usage
No increase in lab workload
No increase in incidents/delay in blood
Good communication needed
Adherence to RPRB poor when medics
take blood
(Wrong blood in tube events appear to
have fallen)
Consider a situation where you are able to take a second cross-match
sample; what action should you take if the laboratory request a second
sample prior to providing cross matched blood?