Download Chapter 03 Lecture Outline 3.1 Mendel`s Study of Pea Plants

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance wikipedia , lookup

History of genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup

Ploidy wikipedia , lookup

Microevolution wikipedia , lookup

Dominance (genetics) wikipedia , lookup

Polyploid wikipedia , lookup

Quantitative trait locus wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
9/5/15
3.1 Mendel’s Study of Pea Plants
q 
Chapter 03
q 
Lecture Outline
q 
Why pea plants are suitable for genetic studies
The steps that Mendel followed to make crosses between
different strains of pea plants
The seven characteristics of pea plants that Mendel
chose to study
2
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
1
Early Theories of Inheritance
•  Before Mendel, people knew that parents passed traits
onto offspring – but they didn’t understand how it worked
•  Some early theories of inheritance:
–  Pangenesis
•  Hippocrates
•  “Seeds” produced by all parts of body, collected
and transmitted to offspring at conception
–  Blending hypothesis
•  These theories were refuted by the work of Gregor Mendel
in the mid-1800’s
•  Mendel’s work was novel
–  He used quantitative analysis
–  He developed general laws – rules to predict
•  which phenotypes would appear in offspring
•  ratios of phenotypes in the offspring
•  His work was first ignored, then rediscovered in
the early 1900’s
•  Factors that control hereditary traits are malleable
•  They blend together generation after generation
3
4
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
Mendel’s Choice of the Pea Plant
Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display.
Petals
Pollen lands on the stigma
•  The pea (Pisum sativum) has several advantages:
Keel
Sepal
–  Small, easily grown
Stigma
Anther
–  Each flower has male and female structures
•  A plant can fertilize itself (selfing)
•  OR, A plant can be crossed to another different plant
(cross fertilization)
Ovule
Figure 3.2 a
–  Many different varieties were available with different traits
5
(a) Structure of a pea flower
Ovary
Style
Anthers contain pollen
grains, where the male
gametes are produced
6
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
1
9/5/15
•  Mendel carried out two types of crosses
Mendel Studied 7 Characters
CHARACTER
•  Variable characters of pea plants:
–  Height
–  Flower color
–  Flower position
–  Seed color and shape
–  Pod color and shape
CHARACTER
–  Self-fertilization
•  Pollen and egg are derived from
the same plant
VARIANTS
Height
Anthers
Tall
Dwarf
Purple
White
Axial
Terminal
Flower color
VARIANTS
Seed color
Yellow
Green
Round
Wrinkled
Green
Yellow
Flower position
Seed shape
Pod color
Pod shape
Smooth
White
Remove anthers
from purple flower.
Constricted
–  Cross-fertilization
•  Pollen and egg are derived from
different plants
•  When plants with different traits
are crossed, this is hybridization
– progeny are called hybrids
•  To cross-fertilize, Mendel
transferred pollen into the flower of
another plant
Parental
generation
Purple
Transfer pollen
from anthers of
white flower to
the stigma of a
purple flower.
Cross-pollinated flower
produces seeds.
Plant the seeds.
Firstgeneration
offspring
7
8
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
True-Breeding Lines
3.2 Law of Segregation
•  Mendel started with plants that “bred true” for different
character
•  True-breeding lines – Plants that always produce
progeny with the same traits when self-fertilized
(or bred to the same strain)
q 
q 
•  A note on terminology:
–  Character – The type of characteristic that can vary,
such as “height”
–  Trait, or variant – The version of the character, such
as “tall” or “dwarf”
q 
Mendel’s experiments with single-factor crosses
The law of segregation and how it is related to gamete
formation and fertilization
Predicting outcomes of single-factor crosses using a
Punnett square
9
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
10
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
Mendel’s Crosses
Mendel’s Approach
•  Mendel did not start with a hypothesis to explain the
formation of hybrids
–  But he believed that a quantitative analysis of crosses
may reveal a mathematical relationship
–  This is called an empirical approach
–  General findings from such an approach are called
empirical laws
•  Mendel mated true-breeding plants with one trait to plants
with a different trait to create hybrids
–  Matings looking at one character – single-factor cross
–  Matings looking at two characters – two-factor cross
11
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
12
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
2
9/5/15
Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display.
Mendel’s Single-Factor Cross Experiments
Experimental level
1. For each of seven characters, Mendel
cross-fertilized two different
true-breeding strains. Keep in mind
that each cross involved two plants
that differed in regard to only one of
the seven characters studied. The
illustration at the right shows one
cross between a tall and dwarf plant.
This is called a P (parental) cross.
•  Mendel studied seven characters, each with two variants
–  e.g., Plant height variants were tall and dwarf
2. Collect the F1 generation seeds. The following spring, plant the seeds and allow the plants to grow. These are the plants of the F1 generation.
•  His first experiments crossed only two variants of one
character at a time
Conceptual level
P plants
TT x tt
x
Tall
Dwarf
Note: The P
cross produces
seeds that are
part of the F1
generation.
–  Called a single-factor cross or monohybrid cross
F1 seeds
All Tt
F1 plants
Tt
All
tall
Selffertilization
3. Allow the F1 generation plants to
self-fertilize. This produces seeds that
are part of the F2 generation.
•  He followed the characters for two subsequent crosses
–  P generation – Parental generation
–  F1 generation – 1st Filial generation
–  F2 generation – 2nd Filial generation
Selffertilization
F2 seeds
4. Collect the F2 generation seeds and
plant them the following spring to
obtain the F2 generation plants.
5. Analyze the traits found
in each generation.
F2 plants
Tall
13
TT + 2 Tt + tt
Tall
Dwarf
Tall
14
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
DATA FROM MONOHYBRID CROSSES
P Cross
F1 generation
F2 generation
Ratio
Tall X
dwarf stem
All tall
787 tall
277 dwarf
2.84:1
Purple X
white flowers
All purple
705 purple
224 white
3.15:1
Axial X
terminal flowers
All axial
651 axial
207 terminal
3.14:1
Yellow X
Green seeds
All yellow
6,022 yellow
2,001 green
3.01:1
Round X
wrinkled seeds
All round
5,474 round
1,850 wrinkled
2.96:1
Green X
yellow pods
All green
428 green
152 yellow
2.82:1
Smooth X
constricted pods
All smooth
882 smooth
229 constricted
2.95:1
TOTAL
All dominant
14,949 dominant
5010 recessive
2.98:1
Interpreting the Data
•  For all seven characters studied
–  The F1 generation showed only one of the two parental
traits
–  The F2 generation showed an ~ 3:1 ratio of the two
parental traits
•  These results refuted a blending mechanism of heredity
–  The recessive trait “disappeared” entirely in the F1
–  But reappeared unchanged in the F2
•  The data suggested a particulate theory of inheritance
15
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
16
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
Mendel postulated:
•  Dominant and recessive traits:
–  The trait that is exhibited in the F1 is called dominant
–  The trait that is masked in the F1 is called recessive
1. For a given character, a pea plant contains two discrete hereditary
factors, one from each parent
•  In the F1, only the dominant trait appeared
3. When the two factors of a single character are different
–  One is dominant and its effect can be seen
–  The other is recessive and is not expressed
2. The two factors may be identical or different
•  In the F2, the dominant trait plants outnumbered
recessive trait plants with a 3:1 ratio
4. During gamete formation, the paired factors segregate randomly
so that half of the gametes receive one factor and half of the gametes
receive the other
–  This is Mendel’s Law of Segregation
17
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
18
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
3
9/5/15
Terminology
Mendel’s Law of Segregation
–  Genes – the modern term for Mendelian factors
The two copies of a gene segregate (or separate)
from each other during transmission
from parent to offspring
–  Alleles – different versions of the same gene
–  Homozygous – an individual with two identical alleles
–  Heterozygous – an individual with two different alleles
–  Genotype – an individual’s specific allelic composition
–  Phenotype – the outward appearance of an individual
19
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
20
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display.
Tall
Punnett Squares Are Used to
Predict the Outcome of Crosses
Dwarf
x
P generation
TT
tt
Segregation
Gametes
T
t
T
•  A Punnett square is a grid that enables one to predict the
outcome of simple genetic crosses
–  Proposed by the English geneticist, Reginald Punnett
t
Cross-fertilization
Tall
F1 generation
(all tall)
•  Must know the genotype of the parents
Tt
Segregation
Gametes
F2 generation
Genotypes:
(1 : 2 : 1)
Figure 3.6
Phenotypes:
(3 : 1)
T
t
T
t
TT
Tt
Tt
tt
Tall
Tall
Tall
Dwarf
•  We will illustrate the Punnett square approach using
the cross of heterozygous tall plants as an example
Selffertilization
21
22
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
Using a Punnett Square
Punnett square of a cross between two heterozygotes for one character
1. Write down the genotypes of both parents
Male parent = Tt
Female parent = Tt
2. Write down the possible gametes each parent can make
Male gametes: T or t
Female gametes: T or t
3. Create an empty Punnett square
Female gametes
Male gametes
T
t
T
TT
Tt
t
Tt
tt
Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display.
4. Fill in the possible genotypes of the offspring
23
24
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
4
9/5/15
Female gametes
Male gametes
T
t
T
TT
Tt
t
Tt
tt
5. Determine proportions of genotypes and phenotypes
–  Genotypic ratio
• TT : Tt : tt
•  1 : 2 : 1
–  Phenotypic ratio
•  Tall : dwarf
•  3 : 1
3.3 Law of Independent Assortment
q 
Mendel’s experiments involving two-factor crosses
q 
The law of independent assortment
q 
Predicting the outcome of two-factor crosses using a
Punnett square
25
26
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
Mendel’s Two-Factor Cross Experiments
Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display.
•  Mendel also performed two-factor crosses
–  Crossing individual plants that differ in two characters
P generation
RRYY
Haploid gametes
•  Example:
–  Character 1 = Seed shape (round vs. wrinkled)
–  Character 2 = Seed color (yellow vs. green)
rryy
RY
ry
x
rryy
RY
1/
2
Haploid gametes
RY
1/
2
ry
(a) HYPOTHESIS: Linked assortment
ry
x
RrYy
F1 generation
•  There are two possible patterns of inheritance for these
characters – either linked or independent assortment
RRYY
RrYy
Haploid gametes
1/
4
RY
1/
4
Ry
1/
4
rY
1/
4
ry
(b) HYPOTHESIS: Independent assortment
•  Refer to Figure 3.7
27
Figure 3.7
28
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
Figure 3.8
DATA FROM DIHYBRID CROSSES
P Cross
F1 generation
F2 generation
Round,yellow seeds
X wrinkled, green
seeds
All round, yellow
315 round, yellow seeds
101 wrinkled, yellow seeds
108 round, green seeds
32 green, wrinkled seeds
29
30
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
5
9/5/15
Interpreting the Data
•  The F2 generation contains seeds with novel combinations
not found in the parental generation
–  Round and green
–  Wrinkled and yellow
•  These nonparentals are predicted if the genes are
segregating independently of each other
Predicted phenotypic ratio in the F2 generation would be
9:3:3:1 if genes act independently of each other
P Cross
F1 generation
F2 generation
Ratio
Round,
yellow seeds X
wrinkled, green
seeds
All round, yellow
315 round, yellow seeds
101 wrinkled, yellow seeds
108 round, green seeds
32 green, wrinkled seeds
9.8
3.2
3.4
1.0
31
32
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
Methods for
Independent Assortment Problems
Mendel’s Law of
Independent Assortment
•  Like a one-factor cross, a two-factor cross can be displayed
as an array diagram
–  Refer to Figure 3.9
During gamete formation, the segregation of any
pair of hereditary determinants is independent of
the segregation of other pairs
•  Punnett squares can also be used to predict the outcome
of crosses involving two independently assorting genes
–  Refer to Figure 3.10
33
34
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display.
Cross: TtYy x TtYy
Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display.
Four possible male
gametes:
RY
Four possible female
gametes:
RY
Ry
rY
ry
TY
Ty
tY
TTYY
TTYy
TtYY
TtYy
ty
Tall, yellow
Tall, yellow
Tall, yellow
Tall, yellow
TTYy
TTyy
TtYy
Ttyy
Tall, yellow
Tall, green
Tall, yellow
Tall, green
TtYy
ttYY
ttYy
TY
Ty
Ry
rY
ry
TtYY
tY
Tall, yellow
TtYy
RRYY RRYy RrYY RrYy RRYy RRyy RrYy
Rryy RrYY RrYy
rrYY rrYy
RrYy
Rryy
rrYy
rryy
1 RRYY : 2 RRYy : 4 RrYy : 2 RrYY : 1 RRyy : 2 Rryy
Phenotypes:
Figure 3.9
9 round,
yellow seeds
3 round,
green seeds
: 1 rrYY :
Ttyy
ttYy
ttyy
ty
By randomly combining male and female gametes, 16 combinations are possible.
Totals:
Tall, yellow Dwarf, yellowDwarf, yellow
Tall, yellow
Tall, green Dwarf, yellow Dwarf, green
2 rrYy : 1 rryy
3 wrinkled,
yellow seeds
Genotypes:
1 wrinkled,
green seed
Phenotypes:
35
Figure 3.10
1 TTYY : 2 TTYy : 4 TtYy : 2 TtYY :
9 tall
plants with
yellow seeds
1 TTyy : 2 Ttyy
3 tall
plants with
green seeds
1 ttYY : 2 ttYy
1 ttyy
3 dwarf
1 dwarf
plants with
plant with
yellow seeds green seeds
36
6
9/5/15
Three-factor crosses
•  In crosses involving three or more independently assorting
genes, a single Punnett square becomes cumbersome
–  Would need 64 squares for three genes!
–  Can use three Punnett Squares plus
the multiplication method
–  Refer to Figure 3.11a, b
•  A second alternative is the forked-line method
–  Refer to Figure 3.11c
37
Figure 3.11a, b
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
38
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
3.4 Chromosome Theory of
Inheritance
q 
q 
Figure 3.11c
The key tenets of the chromosome theory of inheritance
The relationship between meiosis and Mendel’s laws of
inheritance
39
40
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
•  Chromosome Theory of Inheritance resulted from
three lines of evidence:
Chromosome Theory of Inheritance
1.  Mendel’s breeding experiments
•  A major breakthrough in our understanding of genetics
2.  Nägeli and Weismann
•  Established the framework for understanding how
chromosomes carry and transmit genetic determinants
• 
• 
• 
•  Explains the patterns of inheritance seen by Mendel
A substance in living cells is responsible for inherited traits
Parents contribute equally to determine traits of offspring
Hertwig, Strasburger, and Flemming suggested that
chromosomes are the carriers of the genetic material
3.  Boveri and Sutton
• 
• 
41
Saw similarity between segregation of traits and behavior
of chromosomes during meiosis
Proposed the chromosome theory of inheritance
42
7
9/5/15
Chromosome Theory of Inheritance
Chromosome Theory
of Inheritance
1.  Chromosomes contain the genetic material
2.  Chromosomes are replicated and passed
from parent to offspring
Inheritance patterns of traits can be explained
by transmission patterns of chromosomes
during meiosis and fertilization
• 
Also from cell to cell during development
• 
Chromosomes retain individuality during transmission
3.  Nuclei of most eukaryotic cells contain chromosomes
in homologous pairs (they are diploid)
• 
Gametes, however, are haploid
4.  In the formation of haploid cells, chromosomes
segregate independently
5.  Each parent contributes one set of chromosomes
43
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
44
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
Law of Segregation is Explained
by Separation of Homologs
•  Mendel’s Law of Segregation can be explained by the
separation of homologous chromosomes during meiosis
•  Consider a situation where one homolog carries a
dominant allele (Y, yellow seeds) and the other carries
the recessive allele (y, green seeds)
–  The gametes of the heterozygote may contain the
dominant allele or the recessive allele, but not both
45
46
Law of Independent Assortment is Explained by
Random Alignment of Homologs
•  Mendel’s Law of Independent Assortment can be
explained by the random alignment of homologous
chromosomes during meiosis
•  Consider a situation where a double heterozygote
carries the dominant and recessive alleles for two genes,
each gene on a different chromosome
–  The chromosomes with dominant alleles may end up together
in a gamete, or not
–  All four combinations are possible in the gametes
47
48
8
9/5/15
I -1
Pedigree Analysis
3.5 Studying Inheritance Patterns
in Humans
q 
q 
II -1
III -1
The features of a pedigree
Analysis of a pedigree to determine if a trait or disease is
dominant or recessive
•  When studying human traits,
it is not ethical to control
parental crosses (as Mendel
did with peas)
–  So we must infer gene
properties from analysis of
family trees or pedigrees
I-2
II -2
III -2
II -3
III -3
III -4
III -4
III -5
II -5
III -6
III -7
(a) Human pedigree showing cystic fibrosis
Female
Male
Sex unknown or not
specified
Miscarriage
Deceased individual
Unaffected individual
Affected individual
Presumed heterozygote
(the dot notation indicates
sex-linked traits)
Consanguineous mating
(between related individuals)
Fraternal (dizygotic) twins
Identical (monozygotic) twins
49
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
(b) Symbols used in a human pedigree
Pedigree Analysis
•  Recessive pattern of inheritance
–  Two unaffected heterozygous individuals will
on average have 25% affected offspring
–  Two affected individuals will have 100% affected offspring
–  Can “skip generations”
•  Pedigree analysis is commonly used to determine the
inheritance pattern of human genetic diseases
•  Genes that play a role in disease may exist as
–  A normal allele
–  A mutant allele that causes disease symptoms
•  Dominant pattern of inheritance
–  Does not skip generations
–  Affected individual will have at least one affected parent
•  However, disease may also result from a new mutation
•  Diseases can follow a simple Mendelian pattern of
inheritance that is either dominant or recessive
51
52
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
Example: Cystic fibrosis (CF)
3.6 Probability and Statistics
–  A recessive disorder of humans
–  Affected gene is the cystic fibrosis
transmembrane conductance regulator
(CFTR)
q 
q 
–  The mutant CFTR protein causes ion
imbalance
•  Leads to abnormalities in many tissues
and organs– pancreas, skin, intestine,
sweat glands and lungs
•  Buildup of sticky mucus in the lungs
makes breathing difficult
q 
Definition of probability
Predicting the outcome of crosses using the product rule
and binomial expansion equation
Evaluating the validity of a hypothesis using a chi square
test
53
54
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
9
9/5/15
Probability
Probability and Statistics
•  The probability of an outcome is the chance, or likelihood,
that the outcome will occur
•  The laws of inheritance can be used to predict the
outcomes of genetic crosses
•  Probability =
•  For example:
–  Animal and plant breeders are concerned with the
types of offspring produced from their crosses
–  Parents are interested in predicting the traits that their
children may have
•  This is particularly important in the case of families
with genetic diseases
Number of times an outcome will occur
Total number of possible outcomes
•  For example, in a coin flip
Pheads = 1 heads (1 heads + 1 tails) = 1/2 = 50%
55
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
•  The larger the size of the sample, or number of times the
experiment is performed, the more closely the observed
results will match the expected outcomes
•  In our pea genetics example:
•  Probability =
56
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
•  This is due to random sampling error
–  Random sampling error is large for small samples,
and small for large samples
Expected number of individuals
with a given phenotype
Total number of individuals
•  For example
–  If a coin is flipped only 10 times, it is not unusual to get
70% heads and 30% tails
–  If the coin is flipped 1,000 times the percentage of heads
will be fairly close to the predicted 50% value
Ptall = 3 tall (3 tall + 1 dwarf) = 3/4 = 75%
Pdwarf = 1 dwarf (3 tall + 1 dwarf) = 1/4 = 25%
57
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
58
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
Product rule
The probability that two or more independent events will
occur is equal to the product of their respective probabilities
•  “Independent events” are those in which the occurrence of
one does not affect the probability of another
•  Consider the disease congenital analgesia
–  Recessive trait in humans
–  Affected individuals can distinguish between sensations
•  However, extreme sensations are not perceived as
painful – they do not perceive pain
–  Two alleles
•  P = Normal allele
•  p = Congenital analgesia
•  Question:
–  Two heterozygous individuals plan to start a family
–  What is the probability that the couple’s first three children
will all have congenital analgesia?
59
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
60
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
10
9/5/15
•  Applying the product rule
–  Step 1: Calculate the individual probabilities
•  This can be obtained via a Punnett square
P(congenital analgesia) = 1/4 (25%)
–  Step 2: Multiply the individual probabilities
1/4 X 1/4 X 1/4 = 1/64 = 0.016 = 1.6%
•  This is the probability that the first three offspring
will all exhibit the disease
61
Copyright ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display
11