Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Cardiac contractility modulation wikipedia , lookup
History of invasive and interventional cardiology wikipedia , lookup
Echocardiography wikipedia , lookup
Management of acute coronary syndrome wikipedia , lookup
Coronary artery disease wikipedia , lookup
Quantium Medical Cardiac Output wikipedia , lookup
Heart arrhythmia wikipedia , lookup
Dextro-Transposition of the great arteries wikipedia , lookup
Image Quality R e cove ry i n Ca rd i a c CT A n gi ogra p h y : How to edit an ECG trace to improve image quality Barbara L. Kruger, R.T.(R)(CT), Fremont D. Lee, R.T.(R), Natalie N. Braun, B.S., Michael R. Bruesewitz, R.T.(R), Andrew N. Primak, Ph.D., Eric E. Williamson, M.D., Cynthia H. McCollough, Ph.D. CT Clinical Innovation Center, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN Selecting the “Best” Reconstruction Phase Background • Cardiac CT imaging offers a robust, non-invasive Figure 1: The patient’s ECG is recorded by the scanner for use in retrospectively-gated method of visualizing the coronary arteries, as well image reconstructions. The important information conveyed to the operator is labeled as the morphology and function of the heart. here. • Patient preparation is vital in order to avoid image Bullet Point Showing Heart Rate (bpm) Relative Phase (%) or artifacts. Detected R-wave for each R-R Interval Absolute Phase (ms) Reconstructed - Proper placement and connection of the ECG leads Phase are needed to provide a stable, low-noise ECG signal. On the evaluated system (SOMATOM Definition, Siemens Medical Solutions), several important pieces of information are conveyed to the operator using the ECG data strip, as shown in Figure 1. - Prior to scanning, it is essential to coach the patient regarding correct breathing techniques and the Purple Region: Scanner White Region: Scanner Operating at Prescribed Operating at Reduced Scan Time Pink Line: need to refrain from moving or swallowing during Tube Current Tube Current in Seconds X-ray is On the scan. • Artifacts can be classified into two categories: cardiac artifacts and non-cardiac artifacts. Displacement artifacts occur when contiguous sections of anatomy are displaced with respect to each other, making the tissue appear discontinuous. - Cardiac sources of artifacts include heart rate variability or arrhythmias and errors in the detection of the R-wave due to a poor quality ECG signal. - Non-cardiac sources of artifacts include patient breathing, patient movement (voluntary and involuntary), and implanted metal medical devices. Cardiac Displacement Artifacts Variations in patient heart rate due to arrhythmia or ectopic beats can cause displacement artifacts. Additionally, missed or extraneous R-waves (as detected by the scanner) can result in an incorrect phase being used for image reconstruction. This principle is illustrated in Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) In cardiac CT, different sections of anatomy along the Z axis are imaged during successive cardiac cycles (represented by the colored bars in each of the four R-R intervals shown). Displacement artifacts occur when one R-R interval is shorter or longer than adjacent intervals (cycle with green bar). The reconstructed data is then at a different phase and discontiguous with the adjacent anatomy. (b) Patient exam demonstrating this principle. A B Manual selection of the best phase for reconstruction is a cumbersome process. Retrospective ECG-gated image reconstruction allows the reconstruction of images at any point in the cardiac cycle, providing the opportunity to seek out and use the phase with the least motion. This is referred to as the “best phase”. However, the best phase can vary from patient to patient, even for similar heart rates. Even for low heart rates, occasionally a systolic phase (e.g. 30-40%) yields better image quality than a diastolic phase (e.g. 6080%), although most often end-diastole is better for heart rates < 70 bpm and end-systole is better for heart rates > 70 bpm. Thus, the operator must determine for each patient which is the optimal reconstruction phase. Further, it is not uncommon that the right coronary artery looks better at a different phase (typically earlier) than the left anterior descending and left circumflex coronary arteries, due to the complex motion of the heart. Adding New Syncs Figure 6: Examples of high quality ECG strips where the heart rate was relatively constant and the R-waves easily identified. (a) Mean heart rate of 51 bpm. The reconstruction phase is most appropriate in the quiescent end-diastolic phase. (b) Mean heart rate of 109 bpm. The reconstruction phase is most appropriate at end-systole due to the decreased length of diastole. Note that 3 R-waves were detected by the system (blue arrows) and marked (blue bullets) slightly earlier than the actual R-wave (red arrows). If image artifacts are apparent, these bullets should be manually moved to over the respective R-waves. The apparent heart rate variation would be decreased by proper placement of the R-wave “bullet” identifiers. A Best Diastole B Best Systole Premature R-Wave 70% 70% Premature R-Wave To determine the best phase, the operator typically selects one anatomic level of interest (e.g. right coronary and circumflex arteries both seen, at about mid heart) and performs a reconstruction at that level throughout the entire cardiac cycle, typically in 5% increments (e.g. 0, 5, 10% … 95%). This “preview” series is then viewed and the best phase selected. This manual process is time consuming, subjective, and is based on only one anatomic level of the heart. Figure 7: (a) A relative recon- 0.7*TRR,1 R 0.7*TRR,2 R R ECG TRR,1 TRR,2 +300 ms R TRR,3 Time +300 ms +300 ms R R R ECG TRR,2 TRR,1 TRR,3 R Time -300 ms -300 ms -300 ms R R R TRR,1 TRR,2 TRR,3 Time Table 1: Suggested reconstruction phases as a function of heart rate. The Best Diastole™ and Best Systole™ images are automatically selected using a motion assessment algorithm. Heart Rate (bpm) Manufacturer Recommended Reconstruction Phase <75 Only Best Diastole™ 75<HR<85 Both Best Diastole™ and Systole™ Non-cardiac Artifacts • Artifacts caused by non-cardiac motion include those caused by breathing, swallowing, or internal motion (bearing down, Valsalva maneuver). Motion external to the heart may cause displacement artifacts in the cardiac anatomy, which unfortunately, cannot be corrected with reconstructions at alternate phases of the cardiac cycle or by ECG editing. The presence or absence of non-cardiac motion can be determined by: - Looking at the sternum or diaphragm for displacement artifacts outside of the heart region using a sagittal or coronal view (Figure 3). - Examining the lung tissue for motion blurring using a lung window setting (Figure 4). • Other sources of non-cardiac artifacts may include metal from surgical clips, artificial valves, pacemakers, defibrillators, or other medical implants, which can cause streak artifacts (Figure 5). In general, as heart rate increases, the dura>85 Only Best Diastole tion of diastole decreases, such that endsystolic images are superior for heart rates above 75-85 bpm. Figure 6 illustrates an ECG strip where (a) Best Diastole™ and (b) Best Systole™ were most appropriate. Table 1 provides manufacturer recommendations for choosing which “best phase” to reconstruct. ™ Figure 3: Discontinuities of the sternum or skin demonstrate that extra-cardiac motion has occurred. The interpreting physician should review the images to determine whether the extra-cardiac motion sufficiently compromises cardiac image quality, such that repeating the exam is warranted. These discontinuities can be identified most easily using the sagittal plane. Figure 4: Lung motion can be recognized by the blurring in the lung parenchyma, which is best seen using the lung window setting. Some pericardial motion blurring is common. Diaphragmatic motion, however, can cause generalized motion of the lungs and heart that results in blurring of the mid and peripheral lung tissue and displacement artifacts in the heart. Figure 5: Streak artifacts due to the presence of metallic cardiac pacing leads. Similar artifacts are caused by mediastinal clips post cardiac by-pass graft surgery. Figure 8: (a) Displacement artifacts (arrows) due to the system mistaking noise on the ECG signal as an R-wave. The incorrect syncs (R-waves) are disabled, resulting in complete recovery of image quality (b). To remedy this situation, the extraneous sync can be either deleted or disabled, where disabling a sync instructs the reconstruction algorithm to ignore that sync. To disable a sync, the operator must right click on the desired R-wave bullet and select “Disable Sync” (Figure 8a). It is better to disable syncs than to delete them because, once a sync is deleted, it can only be restored by selecting the original ECG box. This restores the edited ECG to the originally recorded ECG and any other modifications made to the syncs are lost. In contrast, disabled syncs can be easily enabled by right clicking on the blue bullet and selecting “Enable Sync”. After the extraneous sync is disabled, the reconstruction window associated with it is turned a darker shade of blue to denote that images were not made there. The new reconstructed images demonstrate that the displacement artifact has been eliminated (Figure 8b). • Using the described principles of ECG sync editing, we developed and evaluated a systematic approach to evaluating and resolving cardiac artifacts. The raw projection and ECG data were saved for 40 retrospectively ECG-gated patient exams where cardiac artifacts were noted by the technologist performing the examination. Thirty-three of these exams were selected from 242 contiguous, outpatient, ECG-gated examinations having one of the following indications: pulmonary Figure 11: Flowchart of systematic approach to image quality recovery. vein stenosis, coronary artery CT angiography, or ECG-gated thorax. Average Heart Rate Heart Rate (bpm) Thus, 14% (33/242) of cardiacgated exams required some evalu<75 >85 75-85 ation for the presence of artifacts. An additional 7 cases were conReconstruct in Reconstruct in tributed from a hospital-based Relative Systolic Relative Diastolic scanner, where cumulative exam Severe counts were unavailable. Sternum No Done Yes Artifact? Yes Done* Discontinuities? • To assist operators in performing the necessary ECG editing, a sysNo tematic approach was developed Severe by two experienced cardiac CT One Recon Box Lung Window Yes Done* No Per R-R Interval? Motion? technologists, with assistance from a medical physicist and cardiovascular radiologist. The proposed No Yes approach is shown in Figure 11. • To evaluate the efficacy of the sugAdd or Disable Move Syncs No Syncs as Needed gested approach, two experienced cardiac CT technologists restored the data to the scanner where the Absolute reverse data were acquired (SOMATOM -400 ms Bullet Points Positioned Recon With Yes Done* Above R-wave Peaks? Absolute Phases Definition, Siemens Medical Absolute forward 400 ms Solutions) and reconstructed the images using the original ECG data in order to document the originally observed artifact. They then followed the approach shown in Figure 11. Multi-planar reformatted images were reconstructed to evaluate the cardiac region in an oblique sagittal projection and to document the effect of each step in the suggested approach. Figure 12: • Clinically, once a satisfactory reconstruction is obtained, the A First Action that Yielded Acceptable Image Quality operator would not perform addi40 Action that Yielded Best Image Quality tional ECG manipulation or image 35 reconstructions. For the purpose of 30 25 this evaluation, each step of the 20 proposed workflow was per15 formed, regardless of the success 10 of the previous steps. The first 5 action in the process that yielded 0 an acceptable image was recorded, 40% 70% Disable Add Sync Move Sync + 400 ms - 400 ms Unedited Unedited Sync as was the action that yielded the best image quality (Figure 12a). B Finally, the preferred reconstruc30 tion phase was recorded for each < 70 bpm 25 exam and evaluated as a function >70 bpm 20 of mean heart rate (Figure 12b). 15 Motion of the sternum and lung 10 parenchyma was noted on 6/40 5 (15%) and 8/40 (20%) of exams, 0 respectively. In 3/40 exams (7.5%), 70% 40% + 400 ms - 400 ms gross patient motion (breathing) Preferred Reconstruction Phase prevented image quality recovery. *If artifact is not resolved, see “When All Else Fails.” ECG An automated technique is available on the evaluated system that reconstructs the entire heart in 2% intervals and computes a figure of merit for each phase that assesses the relative motion at each phase. The algorithm then selects and reconstructs at full resolution the best systolic and/or diastolic phases for the operator (referred to as Best Diastole™ and Best Systole™). When the system detects an R-wave, a blue bullet is placed on the ECG strip to denote the synchronization point (R-wave) for that cardiac cycle. These are referred to on the user interface as “syncs”. Occasionally, noise on the ECG signal is considered by the system to be an R-wave. These “extra syncs” do not represent actual R-waves and an extra image will be reconstructed that is not really at the desired reconstruction phase. This results in cardiac displacement artifacts, as seen in Figure 8a. A 0.7*TRR,3 R a struction phase is expressed as a percentage of the R-R interval. For a 1000 ms (60 bpm) R-R interval, a 70% reconstruction b phase will occur at 700 ms after the detected R-wave, which is approximately end-diastole. If the heart rate increases to 90 c bpm (667 ms R-R interval), the 70% phase will correspond to 467 ms after the R-wave, which will be close to end-systole. To avoid this inconsistency in reconstructed phase when the heart rate varies considerably, the reconstruction phase can be prescribed in absolute terms, as the time (ms) either after (b) a detected R-wave (absolute forward phase) or before (c) the next detected R-wave (absolute reverse phase). Eliminating Undesirable Syncs Displacement Artifact Figure 9: (a) Image quality is severely degraded (arrows) when an insufficient number of R-waves is detected, forcing the system to interpolate data beyond acceptable limits. (b) By inserting syncs at the undetected R-waves, the image quality is completely recovered. B 70% Image Formation A Systematic Approach to Image Quality Recovery Insert Sync The reconstruction phase can be prescribed in either relative terms (percent of the R-R interval) or absolute terms (a specific time interval, in ms, before or after an R-wave), as illustrated in Figure 7. 70% Occasionally there is insufficient data to create acceptable images due to the large distance between the detected R-waves (Figure 9a). Adding new syncs at appropriate locations can alleviate this artifact (Figure 9b). To add new syncs, the operator must right click on the numerical value of the heart rate per R-R interval on the ECG strip and select “Insert Sync” (Fig. 9a). Moving Existing Syncs After inserting new syncs, it is often necessary to move the location of the R-wave bullets to be positioned directly above the R-wave peak. Additionally, image reconstruction at different positions in the cardiac cycle (different phases) is possible by moving the Rwave bullet. For relative (%) reconstructions, moving a sync will affect the reconstruction position both behind and in front of the moved R-wave. For absolute (ms) reconstructions, only the prescribed reconstruction is affected (for forward phase this would be after the moved R-wave, or for reverse phase this would be before the moved R-wave). Figure 10: (a) Image quality is degraded by a momentary loss of a good ECG signal. (b) By first inserting a sync and then moving it to an appropriate location, image quality is completely restored. A Percent of Exams (of 40) • Learn how variations in patient heart rate or errors in R-wave detection can cause displacement artifacts in retrospectively-gated cardiac CT. • Provide specific strategies for editing the patient ECG trace in order to decrease displacement artifacts. • Show examples of the suggested processes and the resultant improvement in image quality. Percent of Exams (of 40) Purpose B A Delete Sync Disable Sync B In Figure 10a, degradation of a portion of the image occurs due to insufficient data in the corresponding R-R interval. This occurred when the ECG signal was briefly degraded, inverting the R-wave, which the autodetection algorithm then missed. Image quality is restored (Figure 10b) by 1) adding one sync and 2) moving it over the position of one of the inverted R-waves. Step 1: Insert sync Step 2: Move sync When All Else Fails • If none of the suggested ECG editing strategies resolve the artifact, or if different phases are required to adequately visualize different arteries, some additional actions can be performed: - Detailed ECG information may be viewed to assist the operator in knowing precisely where to disable, add or move a sync. This feature is enabled using the HeartView configuration menu. - Additional relative or absolute reconstruction phases may be tried. - The physician may use images from different phases for evaluating different coronary arteries. For example, a systolic phase may be needed to adequately visualize the right coronary artery but may not be acceptable for the left coronary arteries, which require a diastolic phase. In this case, reconstruct both phases so that the interpreting physician may use the best phase for each specific coronary artery. • Unfortunately, there are exams that simply cannot be made diagnostic, typically due to substantial thoracic/diaphramatic motion, an extremely poor quality ECG signal, or a very irregular heart rate. Improved temporal resolution and/or heart rate control can reduce the frequency of this situation, as can diligent patient education/coaching before the scan with regard to the importance of holding still and maintaining a non-strained breathold. In the event of a non-recoverable exam, the responsible physician should be consulted for a decision regarding repeating the exam. References • Leschka S, Scheffel H, Desbiolles L, et al. Image Quality and Reconstruction Intervals of Dual-Source CT Coronary Angiography: Recommendations for ECG-Pulsing Windowing. Invest Radiol 2007; 42(8):543-549. • Ohnesorge BM, Becker CR, Flohr TG, Reiser MF. Multi-slice CT in Cardiac Imaging. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2002. © 2007 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research