Download women reservation bill and politics of obcs and minorities

1
WOMEN RESERVATION BILL AND POLITICS OF OBCS AND MINORITIES
Asghar Ali Engineer
(Secular Perspective, March 16-31, 2010)
After fourteen years of women’s struggle, Rajya Sabha passed a women’s Reservation
Bill last week with two-third majority for constitutional amendment. The OBC satraps
did their best to forestall the Bill but did not succeed. Their argument that the bill will
benefit only upper caste Hindu women at the cost of OBCs and minority women is only
superficial and would hardly bears scrutiny. Truth is more complex and has to be
examined with all its complexity.
In fact Dalits and OBCs have already been given reservation and that reservation is fully
justified. But by giving them reservation within reservation can make them even more
dependants on reservation. Also, when OBC men can fight elections and all of them are
not highly educated, in fact many men are not literate beyond reading or writing their
names why can’t women, even if not highly literate, can go to state assembly or
parliament. And this is also not true that all OBC women are illiterate and all upper caste
women are highly literate. Many upper caste women are also not highly literate.
Today female education is spreading fast and let alone OBC women even dalit women
are also getting better educated than their mothers. Truth is much more complex. OBC
men are not willing to allow their women folk to go to state assemblies or parliament.
They do not want to part with their share of power. If women start representing in
assemblies and parliament they will become dominant and assertive of their power. It
hurts their male ego.
Also, if they are really concerned about their women getting reservation why can’t they
give 33% reservation to their women in party nomination. Why do they want quota
within quota? They want extra reservation so that they do not want to cut down their own
representation in parliament or assembly. And again who can say that the benefit will not
go only to creamy layer among OBC. So far all the benefits of reservation have gone to
creamy layers among OBCs and dalits. There is no reason to believe that political
reservation will benefit all. The dalits and OBCs as a whole have remained extremely
poor and illiterate.
But the OBC satraps due to their numbers in Parliament are able to dictate terms and
specially for passing the Finance Bill and without their cooperation Finance Bill can be
stalled. That is the Government changed its strategy and postponed presenting Women’s
Reservation Bill in Lok Sabha until May so that it can seek cooperation of OBC satraps
in passing the Finance Bill.
But even in May these OBC leaders in Lok Sabha can succeed in stalling the Women’s
Reservation Bill and Mulayam Singh Yadav is talking of compromising by conceding
twenty per cent seats for women in parliament and state assemblies. And government also
2
may compromise to ensure smooth passage of Bill. This would certainly be at the cost of
justice to women. But in politics of vote bank who cares for justice. And it seems
Government may accept 20% reservation for women. The Bill could have been passed 14
years ago with these amendments. Why then Government waited for 14 long years if it
had to accept such a compromise. I wish the government does not give in to such
pressures. It will be gross injustice to cause of women. And that too those OBC leaders
who are crying foul for non representation of OBC women did not hesitate to make their
wives even chief minister of the state. Laloo Prasad’s wife Rabri Devi was made Chief
Minister of Bihar who did not have any experience in politics, much less administering a
huge state like Bihar. Similarly, BJP Uma Bharti, another OBC woman, Chief Minister of
another big state like Madhya Pradesh. She too had hardly any experience except being
mass agitator and a demagogue.
Reservation for Muslim Women
Mulayam Singh Yadav and Laloo Prasad Yadav also are saying, to strengthen their
position that a sub-quota be given to Muslim women. This has no iota of sincerity. Had
they been sincere, they would have given tickets to Muslim women of their respective
parties either for parliamentary elections or to say the least, assembly elections. As far as
we know, these leaders did not give tickets even to Muslim men, in proportion to their
population, let alone to Muslim women. Now to demand sub-quota for Muslim women is
nothing more than politicking for winning support of Muslims. It is nothing more than
mere politicking. It is this kind of politicking which denies justice to minorities and
others. And as pointed out above, this is not even doing justice to OBC but only to
creamy layer.
Much greater irony is Muslim community does not speak in one voice even for its own
benefit. While political minded Muslims are demanding sub-quota for Muslims the
conservative Ulema are banning Muslim women from the arena of representational
politics. Few years ago when women were given 33% and in some states even 50%
representation in panchayats, zilla parishad and municipal elections, a Muslim woman
from Deoband filed her nomination for Municipal board election. A fatwa was issued by
muftis of Deoband that it is haram for Muslim women to fight elections and campaign
among men. However, the Muslim woman showed determination and refused to
withdraw her nomination. The muftis then relaxed and asked her to wear hijab for
campaigning among men. The woman again refused to bow down to wishes of muftis and
campaigned and even won the election. Now we have news from Nadwatul Ulema,
Lucknow that women should sit at home and perform her domestic chores than enter into
public arena.
Our Ulema from India do not even know that Pakistan, the so called Islamic State has
already given 22% reservation to women in National Assembly. Either this news has not
reached Indian Ulema or they consider reservation for women in Pakistan “un Islamic”.
The Indian Ulema unfortunately are totally cut off from the modern world. They are still
living the medieval Islam which they study in the books written by Islamic jurists and
scholars of medieval era. It appears they consider medieval Islam as the only Islam they
know. For them women have been created to serve their husbands and any other role for
3
women as “un-Islamic”. They even refuse to take cognizance of what is going on in other
Islamic countries like Iran, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Indonesia and Malaysia. In Saudi
Arabia, which is considered strictest regime for women, King Abdullah has nominated a
woman as a cabinet minister. In Iran women freely contest parliamentary elections and
have become achievers in various fields of life. In Kuwait women fought their case up to
Supreme Court to go to parliament without wearing hijab. In Malaysia, women have been
appointed to naval ships and in Indonesia a Muslim woman Megawati Sukarnoputri
became president of the country. And of course in Pakistan Benazir Bhutto was elected as
Prime Minister. In Bangladesh power rotates between Khaleda Zia and Haseena Wajed.
In our opinion it is government’s duty to ensure justice to women of all castes and
communities and to refuse to slash 33% quota under pressure and there should not be
sub-quotas for castes and communities. The democratic ideal requires that justice be done
to women as a whole and all women to whatever castes and communities they belong to
should have fair representation without taking resort to quota and suppose quota is agreed
to how long will it last? Will it not become a permanent feature of Indian politics? Justice
requires that only creamy layers and close relatives of regional satraps like Mulayam
Singh Yadav and Laloo Prasad Yadav and other OBC leaders could not be the only
beneficiaries of reservations.