Download active galactic nuclei (AGNs) between two BOSS

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Messier 87 wikipedia , lookup

Atlas of Peculiar Galaxies wikipedia , lookup

Seyfert galaxy wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Comparison of some properties of star forming galaxies and
active galactic nuclei (AGNs) between two BOSS galaxy
samples of SDSS DR9
Xin-Fa Deng
School of Science, Nanchang University, Jiangxi, China, 330031
Abstract Using the LOWZ and CMASS samples of the ninth data release (DR9) from the
SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS), I investigate properties of star
forming galaxies and AGNs. The CMASS sample seriously suffers from the radial selection effect,
even within the redshift 0.44 ≤ z ≤ 0.6, which will lead to statistical conclusions in the CMASS
sample being less likely robust. In the LOWZ sample, the fraction of star-forming galaxies is
nearly constant from the lowest density regime to the densest regime; the AGN fraction is also
insensitive to the local environment. In addition, I note that in the LOWZ sample, stellar mass and
stellar velocity dispersion distributions of star forming galaxies and AGNs are nearly same.
Keywords Galaxies: active-- galaxies: statistics
1. INTRODUCTION
In the past, some issues of active galactic nuclei (AGNs) have been controversial. For
example, the AGN fraction obtained in some works was fairly different, from a few percent to
≈ 40% (Dressler et al. 1985; Huchra & Burg 1992; Ho et al. 1997; Carter et al. 2001; Ivezic′ et al.
2002; Miller et al. 2003; Deng et al. 2012a, 2012c). This can be traced to two facts. First, these
authors used different galaxy samples. Second, they applied different AGN classification
techniques. Many works also focused on the environmental dependence of the AGN fraction,
which can provide tests of models of AGN activity and formation. In this aspect, typical works
included ones of Carter et al. (2001) and Miller et al. (2003), who reported that the AGN fraction
depends very little on the environment. But some authors argued that the AGN fraction should
decrease with increasing density (e.g., Dressler et al. 1985; Kauffmann et al. 2004; Popesso &
Biviano 2006; von der Linden et al. 2010; Deng et al. 2012c). Different environmental
dependence of the AGN fraction actually means different physical mechanisms of AGN activity
and formation.
Galaxy samples often were divided into two opposite families, such as luminous and faint, red
and blue, early-type and late-type. One often performed comparative studies between two opposite
families. For example, Deng et al. (2009a) and Deng (2010) compared some properties of
early-type galaxies with those of late-type galaxies. Deng et al. (2011b) explored the
environmental dependence of star formation rate (SFR), specific star formation rate (SSFR) and
stellar mass for blue and red galaxies. Here, as a comparison, I also investigate some properties of
star forming galaxies.
The SDSS-III (Eisenstein et al. 2011)Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) is a
valuable project, which will carry out a redshift survey of 1.5 million luminous red galaxies
(LRGs) at 0.15 < z < 0.8 over 10, 000 square degrees and 160,000 quasi-stellar objects (QSOs) at
1
2.15 < z < 3.5 over 8,000 square degree. The public data release of BOSS spectra data includes a
number of physical galaxy parameters derived by some authors. Using principal component
analysis (PCA), Chen et al. (2012) estimated stellar masses of ≈ 290, 000 BOSS galaxies with
stellar masses of >1011 M ⊗ and a redshift range of 0.4 < z < 0.7. By fitting model spectral energy
distributions to u, g, r, i, z magnitudes, Maraston et al. (2012) calculated stellar masses for ≈ 400,
000 BOSS galaxies at redshift ≈ 0.2-0.7. Thomas et al. (2013) measured stellar velocity
dispersion and presented the BPT classification (Baldwin et al. 1981) of BOSS galaxies. These
data sets will provide source material for the study of many issues of galaxies.
My paper is organized as follows. In section 2, I describe the data used. The density estimator
and results are presented in section 3 and section 4. In section 5, I compare some results of this
work with previous ones. My main results and conclusions are summarized in section 6.
In calculating the distance I used a cosmological model with a matter density Ω 0 = 0.3 ,
cosmological constant Ω Λ = 0.7 , Hubble’s constant H 0 = 70km ⋅ s -1 ⋅ Mpc -1 .
2. Data
The ninth data release (DR9) (Ahn et al. 2012) of the SDSS is the first public release of
spectroscopic data from the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS), which
includes 535,995 new galaxy spectra (median z ≈ 0.52), 102,100 new quasar spectra (median z
≈ 2.32), and 90,897 new stellar spectra, along with the data presented in previous data releases.
The BOSS galaxy sample is divided into two principal samples at z ≈ 0.4: “LOWZ” and
“CMASS”. The LOWZ sample is a low redshift sample, with a median redshift of z = 0.3,
containing about a quarter of all galaxies in BOSS. This sample is a simple extension of the
SDSS-I and –II Luminous Red Galaxy (LRG) sample (Eisenstein et al. 2001) to lower
luminosities and allows for a comparison with the SDSS I & II samples. The space density of
LOWZ galaxies is about 2.5times that of the SDSS-I/II LRG sample. The CMASS sample,
containing three times more galaxies than LOWZ, is designed to select galaxies above z ≈ 0.4,
and is a nearly complete sample of massive galaxies above the magnitude limit of the survey. The
LOWZ sample mostly contains galaxies at 0.15 < z < 0.43, while the CMASS sample mostly
contains galaxies at 0.43 < z < 0.7.
In this work, the data was downloaded from the Catalog Archive Server of SDSS Data
Release 9 (Ahn et al. 2012) by the SDSS SQL Search (http://www.sdss3.org/dr9/). I extract 85360
LOWZ galaxies with the redshift 0.15 ≤ z ≤ 0.43 (with SDSS flag: BOSS_TARGET1&1>0)
301190 CMASS galaxies with the redshift 0.43 ≤ z ≤ 0.7 (with SDSS flag:
and
BOSS_TARGET1&128>0).
Maraston et al. (2012) employed the two template fittings (passive and star-forming ) and the
two adopted Initial Mass Functions (IMFs) (Salpeter and Kroupa ) , and also considered the mass
lost via stellar evolution. In this work, I use the data of best-fit stellar mass [in log Msun] obtained
with
the
star-forming
template
and
the
Kroupa
IMF
(http://data.sdss3.org/sas/dr9/boss/spectro/redux/galaxy/). Stellar mass of few galaxies is 0 by
2
definition. I remove these galaxies from samples. Finally, the total galaxy number of the LOWZ
sample is reduced to 85295, while the total galaxy number of the CMASS sample is reduced to
296501.
Thomas et al. (2013) performed a spectroscopic analysis of galaxy spectra from the SDSS-III
Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS). This data set is also released in the Web:
http://data.sdss3.org/sas/dr9/boss/spectro/redux/galaxy/. BPT classification first introduced by
Baldwin et al. (1981) was widely used in studies of SDSS galaxies, which has become standard
practice to classify objects according to their position on the so-called BPT diagrams. Thomas et
al. (2013) adopted the empirical separation between star forming galaxies and AGN defined by
Kauffmann et al. (2003). Star forming galaxies are the galaxies that lie below this line in BPT
diagrams. The AGN population consists of the galaxies above the theoretical extreme star burst
line developed by Kewley et al. (2001). Composite galaxies are the objects that are between these
two separating lines. This area is populated by galaxies with a composite of star burst and AGN
spectra. Thomas et al. (2013) further used the dividing line defined by Schawinski et al. (2007) to
distinguish between LINER and Seyfert emission based on SDSS galaxy classifications obtained
through the [NII]/H α ratio. In this data set, all analyses are restricted to those spectra where the
full set of key diagnostic emission lines H β , [OIII], H α , and [NII] can be detected with an AoN
above 1.5 (requiring the amplitude-over-noise ratio of all four lines to be larger than 1.5) to allow
for a proper analysis of the emission line characteristics through emission line ratio diagnostic
diagrams.
3. Density estimator
In this work, following Deng (2010), the three-dimensional local galaxy density LD (Galaxies
Mpc −3 ) is computed in a comoving sphere with a radius of the distance to the 5th nearest galaxy
for each galaxy. To explore environmental dependence of BOSS galaxy properties, like Deng et al.
(2008) did, I arrange galaxies in a density order from the smallest to the largest, select
approximately 5% of the galaxies, construct two subsamples at both extremes of density according
to the density, and compare BOSS galaxy properties in the lowest density regime with those in the
densest regime.
4. Comparison of some properties of star forming galaxies and AGNs between two BOSS
galaxy samples of SDSS DR9
Table 1 shows galaxy number and fraction of different classes in the LOWZ and CMASS
samples and different subsamples. As seen from this table, the fraction of star-forming galaxies in
the LOWZ sample is nearly constant from the lowest density regime to the densest regime.
In the CMASS sample with the redshift 0.43 ≤ z ≤ 0.7, the fraction of star-forming galaxies
dramatically increases with increasing density. This is likely due to the radial selection effect in
the CMASS sample. Dawson et al. (2013) argued that the BOSS galaxies are selected to have
approximately uniform comoving number density of n = 3 × 10 −4 h 3 Mpc −3 out to a redshift z
= 0.6, then monotonically decreasing to zero density at z ≈ 0.8. Fig.2 of Anderson et al. (2012)
showed that the number-density of CMASS galaxies dramatically drops with increasing redshift at
redshift z>0.6. Thus, CMASS galaxies with low density exist preferentially in the redshift range
3
z>0.6, which leads to CMASS subsample at the lowest density regions containing lower fraction
of star-forming galaxies (Thomas et al. 2013).
Thomas et al. (2013) argued that the fraction of star forming galaxies decreases and the
fraction of AGN increases with increasing redshift, mostly owing to selection effects. Fig.1 shows
the fraction of BLANK, Star Forming, Composite and AGN(Seyfert+ LINER+ Seyfert/ LINER)
classes as a function of redshift for the LOWZ and CMASS samples. Fig.2 further demonstrates
the fraction of different AGNs (Seyfert, LINER and Seyfert/ LINER) as a function of redshift for
the LOWZ and CMASS samples. In the LOWZ sample, selection effects are not very serious: the
fraction of star forming galaxies is weakly redshift dependent and the fraction of AGN slightly
increases with increasing redshift. In the CMASS sample, the fraction of AGN decreases with
increasing redshift and the fraction of star forming galaxies slightly increases with redshift. It is
noteworthy that at z ≈ 0.6, the fraction of Star Forming, Composite and AGN classes dramatically
drops to zero, while the fraction of BLANK class reaches to 1. This shows that selection effects in
the CMASS sample are fairly serious. Maraston et al. (2012) also claimed that BOSS is a
mass-uniform sample over the redshift range 0.2 to 0.6. Thus, I construct a CMASS sample with
the redshift 0.44 ≤ z ≤ 0.6, which contains 224435 galaxies. This CMASS sample should be a
relatively uniform sample, in which the radial selection effect is less important. In the following
analyses, I only use this CMASS sample. As seen in table 1, in the CMASS sample with the
redshift 0.44 ≤ z ≤ 0.6, the fraction of star-forming galaxies still increases with increasing density.
Table1 demonstrates that the fraction of each class in two BOSS galaxy samples is fairly
different, which shows that the fraction of each class is seriously influenced by properties of
BOSS galaxy samples.
The study of the environmental dependence of the AGN fraction has long been an important
issue, which can provide tests of models of AGN activity and formation. Miller et al. (2003)
argued that independence on local galaxy density of the AGN fraction may mean that the AGN
population is primarily tracing only the bulge component of galaxies. Miller et al. (2003) also
claimed that if there is a strong relationship between the presence of an AGN and the ability of a
galaxy to form stars, the AGN fraction should decrease with increasing density, analogous to the
SFR(star-formation rate) -density relation (e.g., Balogh et al. 1998; Hashimoto et al. 1998; Lewis
et al. 2002; Go´mez et al. 2003; Tanaka et al. 2004; Patel et al. 2009). If galaxy-galaxy collisions
fuel the AGN activity by driving gas into the cores of galaxies and thus onto the black hole (BH;
Gunn 1979; Shlosman et al. 1990), the fraction of galaxies with an AGN should increase with
increasing local density.
As seen from table 1, the AGN (Seyfert+ LINER+ Seyfert/ LINER) fraction of two
subsamples at both extremes of density in the LOWZ sample is: 59.8% for subsample at low
density and 60.1% for subsample at high density, which shows that the AGN fraction is insensitive
to the local environment. However, in the CMASS sample with the redshift 0.44 ≤ z ≤ 0.6, the
AGN fraction increases considerably with increasing density: 37.4% for subsample at low density
and 49.4% for subsample at high density. This is still due to the radial selection effect. As seen
from Fig.1, at z ≈ 0.6, the AGN fraction dramatically drops to zero. Fig.2 of Anderson et al.
(2012) showed that the number-density of CMASS galaxies reaches to the peak value at z ≈ 0.53,
then decreases substantially with increasing redshift. Thus, most CMASS galaxies with low
density are likely located at z ≈ 0.6, which leads to CMASS subsample at the lowest density
regions containing lower AGN fraction.
4
It is noteworthy that the fraction of BLANK class in the CMASS sample is fairly high, which
means that classification of too many galaxies could not be made. Such a drawback will lead to
statistical conclusions in the CMASS sample being less likely robust. CMASS galaxies mostly
are located at z>0.45. Thomas et al. (2013) indicated that the analysis of AGN fractions at high
redshifts requires alternative methods for the identification of AGN, which is a future work.
Fig.3 shows stellar mass distribution of star forming galaxies and AGNs for the LOWZ (a)
and CMASS (b) samples. In the LOWZ sample, stellar mass distribution of star forming galaxies
and AGNs is nearly same. In the CMASS sample, a weak trend can be observed: AGNs are
preferentially more massive. But this is likely due to the radial selection effect.
Fig.4 shows stellar velocity dispersion distribution of star forming galaxies and AGNs for the
LOWZ (a) and CMASS (b) samples. Only in the CMASS sample, an apparent trend exists: AGNs
have preferentially larger stellar velocity dispersion. Thomas et al. (2013) argued that the typical
velocity dispersion of a BOSS galaxy is ≈ 240 km s-1. Indeed, the peak value of stellar velocity
dispersion distribution in two samples is at ≈ 240 km s-1.
Table 1: Galaxy number and fraction of different classes in the LOWZ and CMASS samples and
different subsamples.
5
All
BLANK
Star Forming
Composite
Seyfert
LINER
Seyfert/ LINER
Sample
N
N
LOWZ sample (0.15
≤
z
≤
≤
N
(%)
N
(%)
N
(%)
N
(%)
N
(%)
(%)
≤
0.43)
LOWZ subsample (0.15
(%)
85295 (100.0)
9364(11.0)
10511(12.3)
12019(14.1)
21201(24.9)
26670(31.3)
5530(6.4)
4265 (100.0)
440(10.3)
574(13.5)
700(16.4)
988(23.2)
1324(31.0)
239(5.6)
4265 (100.0)
464(10.9)
580(13.6)
655(15.4)
942(22.1)
1355(31.7)
269(6.3)
296501 (100.0)
130963 (44.2)
42052 (14.2)
19474 (6.6)
42130 (14.2)
44705 (15.1)
17177 (5.7)
14825 (100.0)
12296(82.9)
611(4.1)
334(2.3)
666(4.5)
689(4.6)
229(1.6)
14825 (100.0)
3904(26.3)
2614(17.6)
1199(8.1)
2788(18.8)
3064(20.7)
1256(8.5)
224435 (100.0)
62534(27.9)
41296(18.4)
18991(8.5)
41019(18.3)
43706(19.5)
16889(7.4)
11222 (100.0)
4425(39.4)
1746(15.6)
848(7.6)
1712(15.3)
1834(16.3)
657(5.8)
11222 (100.0)
2686(23.9)
2044(18.2)
951(8.5)
2165(19.3)
2390(21.3)
986(8.8)
z
0.43)
at the lowest density regions
(LD=5.18×10-8--1.71×10-5galaxies
Mpc
−3
)
LOWZ subsample (0.15
≤
≤
z
0.43)
at the densest density regions
(LD=1.11×10-3—3.91×10-2galaxies
Mpc
−3
)
CMASS sample
(0.43
≤ z ≤ 0.70)
CMASS subsample
(0.43
≤ z ≤ 0.70)
at the lowest density regions
(LD=1.44×10-6—2.39×10-5galaxies
Mpc
−3
)
CMASS subsample
(0.43
≤ z ≤ 0.70)
at the densest density regions
(LD=1.75×10-3--1.16×10-1galaxies
Mpc
−3
)
CMASS sample
(0.44
≤ z ≤ 0.60)
CMASS subsample
(0.44
≤ z ≤ 0.60)
at the lowest density regions
(LD=3.52×10-6—3.83×10-5galaxies
Mpc
−3
)
CMASS subsample
(0.44
≤ z ≤ 0.60)
6
at the densest density regions
(LD=2.05×10-3--1.16×10-1galaxies
−3
)
Notes: 1. BPT='BLANK' means no classification could be made, usually because one of the lines
involved has a 'NaN' or 'Inf' value in the catalogue. 2. Seyfert/LINER are those cases where the
line ratios happen to sit exactly on the dividing line.
1
1
0.8
0.8
Fraction
Fraction
Mpc
0.6
0.6
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.2
0
0
0.2
0.3
z
(a)
0.5
0.4
0.6
0.7
z
(b)
Fig.1 Fraction of different classes as a function of redshift for the LOWZ (a) and CMASS (b) samples: black, red,
green and blue lines represent BLANK, Star Forming, Composite and AGN(Seyfert+ LINER+ Seyfert/ LINER),
respectively.
7
1
0.8
0.8
Fraction
Fraction
1
0.6
0.6
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.2
0
0
0.2
0.3
z
(a)
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
z
(b)
Fig.2 Fraction of different AGNs as a function of redshift for the LOWZ (a) and CMASS (b) samples: blue, red,
0.6
0.6
0.4
0.4
Fraction
Fraction
green lines represent Seyfert, LINERand Seyfert/ LINER, respectively.
0.2
0.2
0
0
10.5
11
11.5
log M
*
(a)
12
12.5
10.5
11
11.5
log M
*
(b)
12
12.5
Fig.3 Stellar mass distribution of star forming galaxies and AGNs for the LOWZ (a) and CMASS (b) samples: red
solid line for AGNs, blue dashed line for star forming galaxies. The error bars of blue lines are 1
errors. Error-bars of red lines are omitted for clarity.
8
σ
Poissonian
0.2
0.16
0.16
Fraction
Fraction
0.2
0.12
0.08
0.04
0.12
0.08
0.04
0
0
100
200
300
Stellar velocity dispersion(km s-1)
(a)
400
100
200
300
Stellar velocity dispersion(km s-1)
(b)
400
Fig.4 Stellar velocity dispersion distribution of star forming galaxies and AGNs for the LOWZ (a) and CMASS (b)
samples: red solid line for AGNs, blue dashed line for star forming galaxies. The error bars of blue lines are 1
σ
Poissonian errors. Error-bars of red lines are omitted for clarity.
5. Comparison with previous results
Deng et al. (2012a) reported that in the two volume-limited Main galaxy (Strauss et al. 2002)
samples of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 8 (the SDSS DR8) (Aihara et al. 2011), the
fraction of star-forming galaxies decreases with density, which is in good agreement with previous
results (Carter et al. 2001; Miller et al. 2003; Deng et al. 2009b, 2011a). Such a trend means that
high density environments tend to suppress star formation(e.g., Balogh et al. 1998; Hashimoto et
al. 1998; Lewis et al. 2002; Go´mez et al. 2003; Tanaka et al. 2004; Patel et al. 2009), which is
suggested by many possible mechanisms(Gunn & Gott 1972; Byrd & Valtonen 1990; Zabludoff et
al. 1996; Zabludoff & Mulchaey 1998; Moore et al. 1999; Quilis et al. 2000). However, Deng et al.
(2012b) found that the environmental dependence of star formation rate (SFR) and specific star
formation rate (SSFR) in the LRG sample is fairly weak. LRGs are a group of galaxies that are
likely to be luminous, red and early-types. Deng et al. (2012b) argued that weak environmental
dependence of SFR and SSFR in the LRG sample can be traced to two facts. First, galaxy color
and morphology are a pair of galaxy properties most predictive of local environments. Second,
strong environmental dependence of galaxy properties for red galaxies mainly is due to the one in
the red late-type sample (Deng et al. 2011b). As indicated as the above-mentioned text, the LOWZ
sample only is a simple extension of the SDSS-I and –II Luminous Red Galaxy (LRG) sample.
Thus, it is not surprising that there nearly is no correlation between the fraction of star-forming
galaxies and the local density in the LOWZ sample.
As seen in table 1, the AGN(Seyfert, LINER and Seyfert/ LINER) fraction in the LOWZ
sample is ≈ 62.6% and this fraction in the CMASS sample with the redshift 0.44 ≤ z ≤ 0.6 is
≈ 45.2%, which is much larger than results obtained in previous works. Dressler et al. (1985) and
Huchra & Burg (1992) reported that only a few percent of galaxies possessed an AGN. Ivezic′ et
9
al. (2002) also claimed that only 5% of SDSS galaxies had an AGN. Miller et al. (2003) showed
that the AGN fraction in the early data release of the SDSS (Stoughton et al. 2002) is about 20%,
which is closer to that found in the 15R-North galaxy redshift survey by Carter et al. (2001). In
two volume-limited Main galaxy samples of the SDSS DR6 (Adelman-McCarthy et al. 2008)
∗
above and below the value of M r , Deng et al. (2012c) demonstrated that the AGN fraction in the
luminous volume-limited sample is ≈ 9.8% and the AGN fraction in the faint volume-limited
sample is ≈ 4.3%. Deng et al. (2012a) argued the difference of the AGN fraction obtained by
different authors likely is due to these authors using different AGN classification techniques.
However, in works of Deng et al. (2012a) and Deng et al. (2012c), two volume-limited Main
∗
galaxy samples above and below the value of M r contain fairly different AGN fraction, even if
the same AGN classification techniques were used in two samples. Deng et al. (2012a) and Deng
et al. (2012c) argued that the AGN fraction also is seriously influenced by properties of galaxy
samples. Deng et al. (2012a) used galaxy physical parameters derived by the MPA-JHU group
(http://www.mpa-garching.mpg.de/SDSS/DR7/), such as BPT classification, stellar mass, nebular
oxygen abundance, star formation rates (SFRs) and the specific SFR (SSFR). BPT classification in
this Web is based on the methodology of Brinchmann et al. (2004), which is completely the same
as the methodology of Thomas et al. (2013) adopted in this work. But the AGN fraction in two
BOSS galaxy samples is much larger than that found in two volume-limited Main galaxy samples
by Deng et al. (2012a). This further shows that the AGN fraction indeed is correlated with some
properties of galaxy samples.
Kauffmann et al. (2003) argued that AGNs of all luminosities of the [OIII] λ 5007 emission
line reside almost exclusively in massive galaxies. Deng et al. (2012a) concluded that galaxies
hosting AGNs are preferentially more massive. For a long time, the supermassive black holes
were hypothesized as the power source of AGNs (Salpeter 1964; Lynden-Bell 1969). Heckman et
al. (2004) reported that most present-day accretion occurs onto black holes that reside in
moderately massive galaxies ( M * ≈ 10
10
− 1011.5 M Θ ). However, I calculate the fraction of
moderately massive galaxies in different galaxy samples: 88.75% in the LOWZ sample, 90.88% in
the CMASS sample with the redshift 0.44 <z<0.6, 32.86% in the faint volume-limited sample of
Deng et al. (2012a) and 98.49% in the luminous volume-limited sample of Deng et al. (2012a),
which does not support this standpoint. Deng et al. (2012c) also argued that the presence of AGNs
is not correlated with the stellar mass. They demonstrated that about 70.82% of luminous hosts
with an AGN are high mass galaxies, while this fraction in faint hosts with an AGN is only 3.73%.
Carter et al. (2001) and Deng et al. (2012c) demonstrated that the AGN fraction increases
steeply with luminosity. BOSS galaxies are a group of fairly luminous galaxies, compared with
previous galaxy samples. High fraction of AGN in BOSS galaxy samples like is due to the
correlation between the presence of AGNs and luminosity.
Numerous authors showed that the AGN fraction nearly is not correlated with the local
environment of AGN host galaxies (e.g., Monaco et al. 1994; Coziol et al. 1998; Shimada et al.
2000; Carter et al. 2001; Schmitt 2001; Miller et al. 2003; Pasquali et al. 2009). However, there
have been a number of dissenting papers. Dressler et al. (1985) and Popesso & Biviano (2006)
reported a lower fraction of AGNs in clusters than in the field. Kauffmann et al. (2004) argued
10
that galaxies in dense environments are less likely to host a powerful optical AGN (L[OIII] >
7
10 L⊗ ). von der Linden et al.(2010) claimed that the overall fraction of strong AGNs decreases
towards the cluster center. Deng et al. (2012c) showed the fraction of AGNs declines substantially
with increasing local density in the luminous volume-limited sample, but in the faint
volume-limited sample this change is very weak. Deng et al. (2012a) argued that such a
controversial conclusion likely also is due to these authors using different AGN classification
techniques and galaxy samples. For example, in the two volume-limited Main galaxy samples of
the SDSS DR8, Deng et al. (2012a) found that AGN fraction is nearly insensitive to the local
environment, which is not consistent with the conclusion of Deng et al. (2012c). Deng et al.
(2012c) used the empirical demarcation line between star-forming galaxies and AGNs developed
by Kauffmann et al. (2003). Thus, AGN samples of Deng et al. (2012c) actually contain
composite galaxies (C) and AGN populations. Deng et al. (2012a) indicated that if composite
galaxies (C) are classified as AGN like Deng et al. (2012c) did, the fraction of AGNs in the
luminous volume-limited sample declines with increasing local density.
Kauffmann et al. (2004) argued that the fraction of strong AGNs in massive galaxies
decreases as a function of density, while the fraction of low-luminosity AGNs depends very little
on local density. Miller et al. (2003) reported that the AGN fraction shows little dependence on
local density. Kauffmann et al. (2004) claimed that it is likely due to their sample containing a
substantial number of weak AGNs. Kauffmann et al. (2004) indicated that AGNs with L[OIII] >
7
10 L⊗ are almost all type 2 Seyfert galaxies, while low-luminosity AGNs are LINERs. However,
table 1 demonstrates that in the LOWZ sample, both the fraction of Seyfert and LINER classes are
nearly independent of the local environment. As indicated as Deng et al. (2012c), this shows that
the classification of AGNs does not essentially decide whether the AGN fraction depends on the
environment.
6. Summary
Using the LOWZ and CMASS samples of the ninth data release (DR9) from the SDSS-III
Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS), I investigate properties of star forming galaxies
and AGNs. The main results can be summarized as follows:
1) The CMASS sample seriously suffers from the radial selection effect, even within the redshift
0.44 ≤ z ≤ 0.6, which will lead to statistical conclusions in the CMASS sample being less likely
robust. Thomas et al. (2013) indicated that the analysis of AGN fractions at high redshifts requires
alternative methods for the identification of AGN. Improvement of all these drawbacks in CMASS
sample should be a focus of future works.
2) The fraction of each class in two BOSS galaxy samples is fairly different, which shows that the
fraction of each class is seriously influenced by properties of BOSS galaxy samples.
3) In the LOWZ sample, the fraction of star-forming galaxies is nearly constant from the lowest
density regime to the densest regime, which is consistent with results of LRGs.
4) The AGN(Seyfert, LINER and Seyfert/ LINER) fraction in the LOWZ sample is ≈ 62.6% and
this fraction in the CMASS sample with the redshift 0.44 ≤ z ≤ 0.6 is ≈ 45.2%, which is much
larger than results obtained in previous works.
11
5) In the LOWZ sample, the AGN fraction is insensitive to the local environment.
6) In the LOWZ sample, stellar mass and stellar velocity dispersion distributions of star forming
galaxies and AGNs are nearly same.
Acknowledgements
I thank the anonymous referee for many useful comments and suggestions. This study was
supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC, Grant 11263005).
Funding for SDSS-III has been provided by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, the Participating
Institutions, the National Science Foundation, and the U.S. Department of Energy. The SDSS-III
web site is http://www.sdss3.org/.
SDSS-III is managed by the Astrophysical Research Consortium for the Participating
Institutions of the SDSS-III Collaboration including the University of Arizona, the Brazilian
Participation Group, Brookhaven National Laboratory, University of Cambridge, University of
Florida, the French Participation Group, the German Participation Group, the Instituto de
Astrofisica de Canarias, the Michigan State/Notre Dame/JINA Participation Group, Johns
Hopkins University, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Max Planck Institute for
Astrophysics, New Mexico State University, New York University, Ohio State University,
Pennsylvania State University, University of Portsmouth, Princeton University, the Spanish
Participation Group, University of Tokyo, University of Utah, Vanderbilt University, University
of Virginia, University of Washington, and Yale University.
References
Ahn C.P., Alexandroff R., Allende Prieto C. et al, 2012, ApJS, 203, 21
Adelman-McCarthy J.K., Ag &u& eros M. A., Allam S.S. et al., 2008, ApJS, 175, 297
Aihara H., Prieto C. A., An D. et al., 2011, ApJS, 193, 29
Anderson L., Aubourg E., Bailey S. et al, 2012, MNRAS, 427, 3435
Baldwin J. A., Phillips M. M., Terlevich R., 1981, PASP, 93, 5 (BPT)
Balogh M.L., Schade D., Morris S.L. et al., 1998, ApJ, 504, L75
Brinchmann J., Charlot S., White S. D. M. et al., 2004, MNRAS, 351, 1151
Byrd G., & Valtonen M., 1990, ApJ, 350, 89
Carter B.J., Fabricant D.G., Geller M.J. et al., 2001, ApJ, 559, 606
Chen Y.M., Kauffmann G., Tremonti C. A. et al., 2012, MNRAS, 421, 314
Coziol R., de Carvalho R. R., Capelato H. V., & Ribeiro A. L. B., 1998, ApJ, 506, 545
Dawson K.S., Schlegel D.J., Ahn C.P. et al, 2013, AJ, 145, 10
Deng X.F., He J.Z., Song J. et al., 2008, PASP, 120, 487
Deng X.F., He J.Z., Wen X.Q., 2009a, ApJ, 693, L71
Deng X.F., He J.Z., Chen Y.Q. et al., 2009b, ApJ, 706, 436
Deng X.F., 2010, ApJ, 721, 809
Deng X.F., Chen Y.Q., Jiang P. et al., 2011a, AN, 332, 706
Deng X.F., Chen Y.Q., Jiang P., 2011b, MNRAS, 417, 453
Deng X.F., Xin Y., Wu P. et al., 2012a, ApJ, 754, 82
Deng X.F., Yang B., Ding Y.P. et al., 2012b, AN, 333, 644
Deng X.F., Xin Y., Wu P. et al., 2012c, AN, 333, 767
Dressler A., Thompson I. B., & Shectman S. A., 1985, ApJ, 288, 481
12
Eisenstein D.J., Annis J., Gunn J. E. et al., 2001, AJ, 122, 2267
Eisenstein D. J., Weinberg D. H., Agol E. et al., 2011, AJ, 142, 72
G´omez P.L., Nichol R.C., Miller C.J. et al., 2003, ApJ, 584, 210
Gunn J. E., & Gott J. R. I., 1972, ApJ, 176, 1
Gunn J. E., 1979, in Active Galactic Nuclei, ed. C. Hazard & S. Mitton (Cambridge: Cambridge
Univ. Press), 213
Hashimoto Y., Oemler A., Lin J.H. et al., 1998, ApJ, 499, 589
Heckman T. M., Kauffmann G., Brinchmann J. et al., 2004, ApJ, 613, 109
Ho L. C., Filippenko A. V., & Sargent W. L. W., 1997, ApJ, 487, 568
Huchra J., & Burg R., 1992, ApJ, 393, 90
Ivezic′ Z. et al., 2002, AJ, 124, 2364
Kauffmann G., Heckman T. M., Tremonti C. et al., 2003, MNRAS, 346, 1055
Kauffmann G., White S. D. M., Heckman T. M. et al., 2004, MNRAS, 353, 713
Kewley L. J., Dopita M. A., Sutherland R. S. et al., 2001, ApJ, 556, 121
Lewis I., Balogh M., Propris R.D. et al., 2002, MNRAS, 334, 673
Lynden-Bell D., 1969, MNRAS, 143, 167
Maraston C., Pforr J., Henriques B.M. et al., 2012, arXiv:1207.6114
Monaco P., Giuricin G., Mardirossian F., & Mezzetti M., 1994, ApJ, 436, 576
Miller C.J., Nichol R.C., Go′mez P. L. et al., 2003, ApJ, 597,142
Moore B., Lake G., Quinn T., & Stadel J., 1999, MNRAS, 304, 465
Pasquali A., van den Bosch F. C., Mo H. J. et al., 2009, MNRAS, 394, 38
Patel S.G., Holden B.P., Kelson D.D. et al., 2009, ApJ, 705, L67
Popesso P. & Biviano A. 2006, A&A, 460, L23
Quilis V., Moore B., & Bower R., 2000, Science, 288, 1617
Salpeter E., 1964, ApJ, 140, 796
Schawinski K., Thomas D., Sarzi M. et al., 2007, MNRAS, 382, 1415
Schmitt H. R., 2001, AJ, 122, 2243
Shimada M., Ohyama Y., Nishiura S. et al., 2000, AJ, 119, 2664
Shlosman I., Begelman M. C., & Frank J., 1990, Nature, 345, 679
Stoughton C., Lupton R. H., Bernardi M. et al., 2002, AJ, 123, 485
Strauss M. A., Weinberg D. H., Lupton R. H. et al., 2002, AJ, 124, 1810
Tanaka M., Goto T., Okamura S. et al.,2004, AJ, 128, 2677
Thomas D., Steele O., Maraston C. et al., 2013, MNRAS, 431, 1383
von der Linden A., Wild V., Kauffmann G. et al., 2010, MNRAS, 404, 1231
Zabludoff A. I., &Mulchaey J. S., 1998, ApJ, 496, 39
Zabludoff A. I., Zaritsky D., Lin H. et al., 1996, ApJ, 466, 104
13