Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Working group results from the Târnava Marè focal area First session working group 2 (Târnava Marè) CBA framework and ecosystem services 1. Discussion on the ecosystem services baseline Treat specific question per focal area Târnava Marè qualitative analysis First session working group: CBA framework and ecosystem services General: • It’s difficult to focus one habitat 6210, it should be a wider habitat type (e.g. dry grasslands or dry habitats) • Ecotourism is hard to address because of the multifunctional aspects. • Pollination is important for privately owned small fruit trees. • Biological control of agricultural pests should be taken into account. Questions: • Each cow gains 130kg of weight (meat) every year. This is too high if we only focus on 6210. • Number of cows/ha in Tarnava Mare= 0.5/ha A minimum of 5 data sources are required to assess this issue, e.g. town hall, framers association and veteran resources Life stock unit/ha should be used instead of differentiating between animal species First session working group: CBA framework and ecosystem services 2. Assessing climate change threats Main threat sheet Target: Discussing the impact of climate change on the focal areas. Ecosystem Nr. Threat Is this threat relevant in your area? Grasslands in Tarnave Mare 1. Sheep overgrazing Y Positiv e Y Score: (--) Major threat because the land use manageme nt changed, e.g. year round grazing 2. Score: (--) First session working group: CBA framework and ecosystem services 3. First session working group: CBA framework and ecosystem services 4. Adaptation measures shortlisting Selection of the measures: 1. Support cross-sectoral cooperation to allow for the development of landscapes adapted to climate change 2. Supporting and implementing high nature value farming Questions: 4. Institutional capacity: Pay Agency (intermediate agency) -governmental agency- ministry effective. Bureaucracy is an issue in this system and there is a high institutional/operational cost. First session working group: CBA framework and ecosystem services 4. Adaptation measures shortlisting Selection of the measures: 1. Support cross-sectoral cooperation to allow for the development of landscapes adapted to climate change 2. Supporting and implementing high nature value farming Questions: 6. Costs of measures: Current costs: Institutional costs, e.g. overhead and wages. Costs of proposed measures: Increased institutional costs + infrastructure investment and maintenance costs, e.g. satellite data maps First session working group: CBA framework and ecosystem services 4. Adaptation measures shortlisting Selection of the measures: 1. Support cross-sectoral cooperation to allow for the development of landscapes adapted to climate change 2. Supporting and implementing high nature value farming Questions: 7. Stakeholder influence: Enough, but no capacity for stakeholders to negotiate on financial distribution. Hindrance: Investors are opposing the limitation on sheep numbers. Technical barriers: Inventory should be more detailed, e.g. grazing pressure effects should be established for specific habitats. Knowledge barriers: Lack of stakeholder knowledge, e.g. on financing frameworks. Thank you for your attention