* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Wonderful eclipses
Chinese astronomy wikipedia , lookup
Definition of planet wikipedia , lookup
Aquarius (constellation) wikipedia , lookup
Astrobiology wikipedia , lookup
Equation of time wikipedia , lookup
History of astronomy wikipedia , lookup
Antikythera mechanism wikipedia , lookup
Rare Earth hypothesis wikipedia , lookup
History of Solar System formation and evolution hypotheses wikipedia , lookup
Geocentric model wikipedia , lookup
Tropical year wikipedia , lookup
Extraterrestrial life wikipedia , lookup
Lunar effect wikipedia , lookup
Formation and evolution of the Solar System wikipedia , lookup
Late Heavy Bombardment wikipedia , lookup
Astronomical unit wikipedia , lookup
Comparative planetary science wikipedia , lookup
Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems wikipedia , lookup
Lunar theory wikipedia , lookup
Eclipses Wonderful eclipses The size, shape and positions of the Earth, Moon and Sun bring us wonderful eclipses. Guillermo Gonzalez considers how this happy state of affairs arose. he circumstances of total eclipses of the Sun by the Moon are discussed. It is shown that total eclipses of the Sun from the Earth are much closer to perfect than eclipses produced by other moons in the solar system. We can expect to enjoy total eclipses of the Sun for about another 250 million years. T T otal eclipses of the Sun have both inspired and frightened people since ancient times. Even today, although no mystery remains about them, total solar eclipses still draw thousands along a long narrow strip of land to witness a mere few minutes of darkness. Have eclipses always appeared as they do today? Will they be any different in the distant future? What are eclipses like on other planets? Are they any more spectacular? In the following discussion I hope to be able to answer these questions. 1a (right): A computer combination of seven of the author’s colour images of the 24 October 1995 eclipse in Nim Ka Thana, India. The image processing procedure employed is the same as that described by Pellett (1998). It results in an image with a very large dynamic range in the radial direction. In order to try to understand why total solar eclipses on the Earth inspire such awe, we will consider a few “what if?” questions. They are motivated by the basic requirements for total eclipses: an alignment of three bodies in a straight line such that the middle body completely obscures the luminous body as seen by an observer on the surface of the third body. Super eclipses and perfect eclipses First, what if the Moon were significantly closer to the Earth? About 2.5 Gyrs ago the Moon’s mean distance from the Earth was about 87% its present value (Walker and Zahnle 1986). At that epoch, total eclipses of the Sun would have been more common and visible over a wider region of the Earth’s surface (we will call these “super-eclipses”). During a super-eclipse, the pink chromosphere and parts of the inner corona will be visible only near the start and end, unlike the present situation, where we can observe the entire corona throughout the eclipse. With more frequent eclipses and greater visibility from the Earth, super-eclipses would inspire no more awe than sunrises and sunsets (which are, after all, just total eclipses of the Sun by the Earth). For eclipses like the one that occurred on 24 October 1995, during which the Moon’s apparent size was only about 45 arc seconds greater than the Sun’s, the full extent of the Sun’s extended atmosphere was visible for just under one minute. I will refer to an eclipse of this type as a “perfect eclipse”, because it is of sufficient duration for an observer to take in the full event, and the Moon is just large enough to fully block the bright photosphere, but it is not so large as to block the chromosphere. A total eclipse of shorter duration would result in a brighter sky, and there would not be sufficient time for significant dark adaptation of the eye. In such a case, the faint outer corona would be more difficult to see. Angular coincidences 1b: Colorized image of the 24 October 1995 total solar eclipse obtained through a small telescope. The original was a high-resolution black and white photo. Also shown as a yellow disk is the properly scaled solar disk (32′ 09″). The maximum (35′ 11″) and minimum (28′ 47″) sizes reached by the Moon in the present epoch are indicated by the red markers. The angular diameter of the Moon during the eclipse was 32′ 54″. Original photo courtesy of Dr Jagdev Singh of the Indian Institute of Astrophysics, Bangalore, India. 3.18 At the present epoch (today plus or minus a few thousand years) the maximum difference between the apparent sizes of the Moon and the Sun (when the Moon is at perigee and the Earth is at aphelion) is about 3.7 arc minutes. According to the lunar orbital elements given by Simon et al. (1994), the full range in the Moon’s apparent angular size is 28′ 47″ to June 1999 Vol 40 Eclipses 35′ 11″; this calculation includes both the mean and the leading periodic terms of the lunar osculating a and e elements. The smaller sizes result in annular eclipses, and the larger ones obscure the chromosphere during mid-totality. Shown in figure 1b is a short exposure image of the 24 October 1995 solar eclipse with the properly scaled disk of the Sun superimposed. 2 Range of angular size ratio of a satellite (the minimum dimension) to that of the Sun for all the known natural satellites in the solar system. Most of the data are from the 1999 Astronomical Almanac; the satellites are arranged from top to bottom in the same order as in the almanac, except for two new additions to Uranus. The data for the Galilean satellites are from Davies et al. (1998), and the data for Metis, Adrastea, Amalthea, and Thebe (all belonging to Jupiter) are from Thomas et al. (1998). Earth Mars Jupiter Moon shape Secondly, what if the Moon were “less round”? Clearly, this would result in fewer eclipses with the present configuration of the Earth–Moon– Sun system. Eclipses would still occur if the apparent size of the minor axis of a squashed Moon were larger than the Sun’s apparent size. But such eclipses would be “less perfect”; the chromosphere would be obscured along the major axis during mid-totality. The Moon and the Sun, as it happens, are two of the roundest measured bodies in the solar system. The oblateness of the lunar profile on the sky is about 0.06% (Runcorn and Hofmann 1972). However, the lunar axis pointing towards the Earth is larger than the other two axes by about 5 km; had the Moon not yet achieved a tidally locked orbit, the longer axis would lead to a less round lunar profile. For a rocky body, it is generally the case that the smaller its size, the more irregular its shape. This is true for the small satellites and for the few asteroids that have been directly imaged. Even among the four Galilean moons, the degree of roundness varies. It increases with increasing distance from Jupiter; Io is the most irregular, with its major axis greater by 14 km than its minor axis, and Callisto is the roundest, with no measurable deviation from a perfect sphere (Davies et al. 1998). This trend probably results from the increasing fraction of water with increasing distance from Jupiter, since ice is more easily deformed than rock. Some of the water may even be in a liquid state for a couple of the Galilean moons. The oblateness of the Sun is 0.0009% (Lydon and Sofia 1996). Rotation is the primary cause of flattening in a star (Paternò et al. 1996). However, the Sun’s oblateness was significant probably only for the first few million years of its life. Eclipses on other planets Thirdly, what if we were living on another planet in the solar system? Shown in figure 2 is the range in the ratio of apparent sizes of a satellite to that of the Sun for each of the known natural satellites in the solar system. If a satellite is non-spherical, then its minimum dimension is used for calculating its apparent size. The apparent size of a satellite corresponds to what an observer at the equator of the parent planet would observe; for the gas June 1999 Vol 40 Saturn Uranus Neptune Pluto 0.01 0.1 1 angular size ratio (satellite/Sun) giants, we might imagine an observer floating in a large research balloon! The calculations include the eccentricities of the orbits of the satellites and their parent planets (the periodic terms of the lunar osculating elements a and e were not included for consistency). The Galilean moons produce large shadows on the cloud tops of Jupiter, which are familiar to amateurs who have spent any time observing it. Had the Galilean moons come closer to matching the apparent disk of the Sun, their shadows would probably not be visible in amateur telescopes. Evident in figure 2 is a trend of increasing size ratio with increasing distance from the Sun, as expected. Of the 63 satellites plotted, only two span a ratio of unity: the Moon and Prometheus. The latter is an irregular satellite of Saturn. From Saturn the eclipsed Sun would appear much smaller than it does from the Earth, and the duration of eclipses produced by Prometheus would be very brief, given its short orbital period (0.61 days). Therefore, compared with the other satellites in the solar system, total eclipses produced by the Moon are atypical. What does the future hold? Lunar laser ranging is arguably the most important enduring legacy of NASA’s Apollo programme. The positioning of several retro- 10 reflectors on the lunar surface by the astronauts has made it possible to measure the distance of the Moon to within a few centimetres. Twenty-five years of laser ranging have yielded a lunar recession rate of 3.82 ± 0.07 cm/year (Dickey et al. 1994), which is due to the Mooninduced tides on the Earth. Employing sedimentary rock records, specifically “tidalites”, going back 900 Myrs, Sonett and Chan (1998 and references therein) find that the lunar recession rate has been approximately constant during that time interval. Assuming that this rate remains constant, it will result in a significant decrease in the apparent size of the Moon on a timescale of 107 to 108 years. But the Moon’s distance from the Earth is not the only changing parameter relevant to our present discussion. Also important is the gradual expansion of the Sun due to ordinary stellar evolution. According to the calculations of Sackmann et al. (1993), the Sun’s diameter is increasing by 6 cm/year. Add to this the slow decrease in the mean e of the lunar orbit at a rate of 1.6 ×10–8 per century (Simon et al.). Superimposed on these slow secular changes are the short-term variations in the lunar orbital elements noted above, plus the intermediate timescale variations in the mean e of the Earth’s orbit (figure 3); the mean a of the Earth’s orbit changes very little. 3.19 Eclipses 35 60 angular size (arc minutes) 34 e × 1000 40 20 33 32 31 30 0 0 200 400 600 time (kiloyears) 800 1000 3 Evolution of the eccentricity of the Earth’s orbit for the next million years. The data were provided by Thomas Quinn and are based on Laskar et al. (1992). The combined effect of these long-term trends is shown in figure 4. The mean apparent sizes of the Sun and Moon will be equivalent in about 150 Myrs. However, we cannot say precisely when total eclipses will cease, because of the short-term variations. If in the future shortterm variations of the lunar orbit are as today, then total eclipses will remain visible up to 300 Myrs in the future. Beyond that, total eclipses will be visible intermittently, when the eccentricity of the Earth’s orbit is large. However, as we noted above, the Moon’s apparent size should be at least 30 arc seconds larger than that of the Sun to produce a “perfect eclipse.” This criterion reduces the visibility time by about 50 Myrs. Eclipses and life on Earth Is there any connection between life on Earth and the occurrence of nearly perfect total solar eclipses? Recent work on habitability leads us to answer this question in the affirmative. This topic is usually discussed with the framework of the anthropic principle in one of its several forms (see Gonzalez 1999 for application of the weak anthropic principle to the Sun’s characteristics). However, here we reverse the usual association – it is not that nearly perfect eclipses are a requirement for habitability but, rather, that they are an indication of the likelihood of habitability. There are many characteristics of the Earth’s environment that, were they slightly different 3.20 0 100 200 300 time (Myrs) 400 500 4 Evolution of the angular sizes of the Sun and Moon for the next several hundred million years. The solid curves show the evolution of the apparent sizes of: 1) the Sun neglecting the eccentricity of the Earth’s orbit, and 2) the Moon neglecting short-term variations in the eccentricity and semi-major axis of its orbit. The dashed curve indicates the evolution of the maximum apparent size of the Moon taking into account the shortterm variations. The short-dashed curve just below the solid solar curve shows the evolution of the minimum apparent size of the Sun for a minimum orbital eccentricity value; the lower one shows the minimum apparent size for the maximum orbital eccentricity. from their present state, might not permit the existence of complex life. We narrow our consideration only to those three bodies involved in producing total solar eclipses on the Earth. First, strong arguments can be given for the necessity of a star similar to the Sun (see Gonzalez 1999). This establishes the physical size of the eclipsed body, and, with the addition of the concept of the circumstellar habitable zone, the distance between the eclipsed body and the other two is also set. Secondly, Laskar et al. (1993) have shown that the Moon keeps the Earth’s obliquity from varying over a large range, which would cause large climate fluctuations. For this mechanism to be effective, the Moon’s mass must be a significant fraction of the Earth’s mass. A glancing blow to the early Earth is the preferred mechanism to form such a large Moon (Lissauer 1997 and references therein). Following the impact, the ejecta coalesce near the terrestrial planet, so a large amount of orbital expansion over several Gyrs is necessary before perfect eclipses are visible from its surface. This timescale is similar to that for the appearance of advanced life capable of understanding eclipses. Thirdly, a terrestrial planet will need to be similar in size to the Earth in order to maintain plate tectonics, and to retain an atmosphere. Therefore, while they do not offer a guarantee, the requirements for habitability (of advanced life) on a terrestrial planet strongly constrain the configuration of the three bodies involved in producing total solar eclipses. In other words, it seems that nearly perfect solar eclipses are thrown in as a free prize for intelligent beings on a habitable world! Concluding remarks We are indeed living in a special time and place as far as the observability of nearly perfect total solar eclipses is concerned. We will continue to experience such eclipses without interruption for roughly another 250 Myrs. ● Guillermo Gonzalez is a postdoctoral research astronomer at the University of Washington. He studies the chemical abundance patterns of stars. References Davies M E et al. 1998 Icarus 135 372. Dickey J O et al. 1994 Science 265 482. Gonzalez G 1999 A&G submitted. Laskar J et al. 1992 Icarus 95 148. Laskar J et al. 1993 Nature 361 615. Lissauer J L 1997 Nature 389 327. Lydon T J and Sofia S 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 76 177. Paternò L et al. 1996 A&A 314 940. Pellett G L 1998 Sky & Tel. 95 No. 1 117. Runcorn S K and Hofmann S 1972 The Shape of the Moon in The Moon ed. Runcorn S K, Urey H C, IAU Symp No. 47, D. Reidel, Dordrecht-Holland, p22. Sackmann I -J et al. 1993 ApJ 418 457. Simon J L et al. 1994 A&A 282 663. Sonett C P and Chan M A 1998 Geophysical Res. Lett. 25 No. 4 539. Thomas P C et al. 1998 Icarus 135 360. Walker J C G and Zahnle K J 1986 Nature 320 600. June 1999 Vol 40