Download Dynamics of a linked Higher and Lower Trophic Level

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Dynamics of a linked Higher and Lower Trophic Level System in the North Sea
Jonathan Beecham
Steven Mackinson
John Aldridge
Jorn Bruggeman
Ecopath with Ecosim handles higher trophic level feeding and fishery interactions
Mammals
Fish
Birds
Benthos
Bacteria
Consumption rate of fish on zooplankton (Total consumed or rate) Zoops (Z3, Z4)
Phytes
Benthos
Zoops
Phytes
Flows to detritus (deaths)
PATTERN VALIDATION
Zoop prey availability (biomass per month or production rate)
Detritus
Nutrient, organic matter fate and recycling
Bacteria
Detritus Nutrients
Biogeochemical process model (GOTM‐BFM), handles lower trophic level feeding interactions & nutrient dynamics
Xml Specification Approach (TCP)
Repository of Canonical Descriptions
EwE Model
.xsd
.xsd
.xsd
.xsd
Template
Template
(BFM)
(BFM)
Template
Template
(EwE)
(EwE)
EwE.xml
EwE.xml
GOTM‐BFM model
Interface
Interface
spec
spec
Dictionary
BFM.xml
BFM.xml
Optional TCP Link
Interface
(plugin)
Couplerlib
Interface
(Python)
Couplerlib
Ersem Phytoplankton Groups
Flagellates
Diatoms
Dinoflagellates
Mesozooplankton groups in ERSEM
Ominivorous Mesozooplankton
Carnivorous Mesozooplankton
Nutrients in ERSEM model
Pelagic N
Benthic N
Pelagic Si
Pelagic P
Mesozooplankton in Ecosim
Pelagic Species in Ecosim
Benthic Species in Ecosim
Areas for Component Model Development
• Seasonality in Ecosim / Ecospace.
• Nutrient reserves model in Ecosim.
• Understanding Silicon / Diatom dynamics in LTL models.
• Modelling of over‐winter survival of Zooplankton.
• Seasonal Modelling of Marine Homeotherms.
Conclusions
• Couplerlib with metadata enables us to link models with different data representation.
• Pelagic Linking is easier then Benthic
• Need to consider whether models are compatible in terms of variation
• Fixed versus plastic seasonality may be an issue.
• Need for linked model calibration. Acknowledgments
• This work was funded by the EU FP7 MEECE program, with additional financial support from the Cefas seedcorn fund. • Mark Platts (plots). Piet Ruadij.
Thanks to Carl Walters, Villy Christensen, Sherman Lai and Joe
Buszowski.