Download Ending the Cycle of Homelessness and Incarceration Through

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Ending the Cycle of
Homelessness and Incarceration
Through Supportive Housing
June 7, 2012
Andy McMahon, CSH
Corporation for Supportive Housing
CSH helps
communities create
permanent housing
with services to
prevent and end
homelessness.
Goal of CSH and NACo
Partnership
To foster and strengthen efforts
to end the cycle of homelessness and
incarceration in county jails through
placement in affordable housing with
the necessary supports to stabilize and
thrive in the community
The Problem
Thousands of people with chronic health
conditions cycle in and out of county jail and
other (often county-funded) crisis systems of
care and homelessness - at great public
expense and with limited positive human
outcomes.
The Intersection of Systems and Issues
County Jail
Homelessness
Hospitals/
Emergency
Rooms
High Use of Public Services
with Poor Outcomes
•
Billings’ (2006) analysis of
NYC Medicaid claims data
found that:
– 20% of adult disabled
patients subject to
mandatory managed care
account for 73% of costs
– 3% of patients accounting
for 30% of all costs for adult
disabled patients
6
A Small Number of
Very High Risk
Homeless Persons
At risk for extensive need of health
and justice system services
Average Monthly Costs in All Months by Decile for Homeless GR Recipients
Source: 2,907 homeless GR recipients in LA County with DHS ER or inpatient records
Deciles based on costs in all months whether homeless or housed
$7,000
Probation
Sheriff mental health
jail
$6,000
Sheriff medical jail
Sheriff general jail
$5,000
LAHSA homeless
services
GR Housing
Vouchers
$4,000
General Relief
•The most expensive 10% of
homeless persons have
average monthly costs
$6,529, regardless of whether
they are homeless or housed
Food Stamps
$3,000
Paramedics
Public Health
$2,000
Mental Health
Private hospitals-ER
$1,000
Health Srv - ER
Highest Decile
Ninth Decile
Eighth Decile
Seventh Decile
Sixth Decile
Fifth Decile
Fourth Decile
Third Decile
Second Decile
Source: Economic Roundtable, 2011
Lowest Decile
$0
The greatest cost savings can be achieved by prioritizing high-risk individuals
Health Srv
outpatient clinic
Private hospitalsinpatient
Health Srv hospitalinpatient
7
The Solution & FUSE Premise
Identifying people who cycle between
homelessness and incarceration and placing
these people in supportive housing will improve
life outcomes for the tenants, more efficiently
utilize public resources, and likely create cost
avoidance in crisis systems like jails, hospitals
and shelter.
What is Supportive
Housing?
Supportive housing is a costeffective combination of
permanent, affordable housing with
services that help people live more
stable, productive lives.
Supportive Housing Is…
Permanent affordable housing with combined
supports for independent living
 Housing is permanent, meaning each tenant may stay
as long as he or she pays rent and complies with terms
of lease or rental agreement
 Housing is affordable, meaning each tenant pays no
more than 30% to 50% of household income
 Tenants have access to an array of support services
that are intended to support housing stability, recovery
and resiliency, but participation in support services is
not a requirement for tenancy
Supportive Housing
•
Scattered-site: Use Section 8 Housing
Choice Vouchers (or State rental
assistance programs) + mobile case
management services
•
Congregate: Unit set-asides in new
supportive housing buildings or existing
supportive housing with turnover
•
Providers link tenants to accessible
mental health, substance addiction,
employment, and other support services
•
Providers should be trained in
Motivational Interviewing, navigating
criminal justice system, harm reduction,
recognizing “symptoms” of incarceration,
health care coordination
FUSE Benefits
• By providing frequent systems users with
stable, supportive housing the following
outcomes can occur:
– Decreased county jail usage (and cost offsets)
– Decreased shelter usage (and cost offsets)
– Decreased use of other county funded systems, like
emergency rooms, detox, hospitals
– Increased quality of life
– Leveraging state and federal funds to create a new
pathway – housing – for needier users of county jail
services
See it for yourself!
FUSE Blueprint:
3 Pillars, 9 Steps
Data-Driven ProblemSolving
Policy and Systems
Reform
Targeted Housing and
Services
Cross-system data match
to identify frequent users
Convene interagency and
multi-sector working
group
Create supportive housing
and develop assertive
recruitment process
Track implementation
progress
Troubleshoot barriers to
housing placement and
retention
Recruit and place clients
into housing, and stabilize
with services
Measure outcomes/impact
and cost-effectiveness
Enlist policymakers to
bring FUSE to scale
Expand model and house
additional clients
FUSE is Always a
Collaborative Effort
County Partners
State Partners
Non-Profit
Partners
City Partners
(where applicable)
• Executive leadership (managers, commissioners)
• Corrections department
• Dept of social services/administrator of shelter services
• Housing authority
• Behavioral health agency
• Housing authority
• Homelessness leadership council
• Supportive housing providers
• Service providers
• CSH (where applicable)
• Foundation support
• Executive leadership (Mayor, deputy mayor,
commissioners)
• Police
• Housing authority
Assertive Recruitment Through
Jail, Shelter, Hospital In-Reach
Courts
Psychiatric
Hospital
Jail/Prison
Shelter
Street
Alcohol/Drug
Treatment
Hospital
Detox
16
Measure Outcomes
and Cost-Effectiveness
• Measuring
outcomes is critical
to showing the
effectiveness of the
housing
intervention!
• A 39% reduction in jail
days in Hennepin Co.
MN
• A 50% reduction in jail
days in NYC
• Dramatic reductions in
shelter use in both NYC
and Hennepin Co.
• Lower rates of alcohol
and drug use by tenants
Getting to Policy
Adoption and Scale
• Bringing FUSE from pilot to full policy:
– Early engagement of policymakers, budget
officials around the FUSE “pilot”
– Communication of outcomes and cost-offsets
– Advance redirection of public spending from jails,
shelters, etc. to supportive housing
Focus of Forum
• Demonstrate how FUSE can be
adapted to your community
• Show by example how to overcome
common obstacles (data privacy, limited
housing resources, skeptical
stakeholders)
• Create the beginnings of an action plan
for your county to begin this work