Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
SCA Sampling Protocol Results: 2016 Tom A. Royer Oklahoma State University Sorghum – Sugarcane Aphid Research Exchange Meeting Dallas, TX January 3 – 4, 2017 Introduction • Goals: – Develop, validate and demonstrate a user-friendly, dynamic sampling tool based on seasonal and spatial distribution patterns and linked to researchbased economic thresholds for sugarcane aphid in grain sorghum Materials & Methods • One sampling universe for every 80 acres – a field of 160 acres could be made into two fields • 48 of 54 samples per field taken from 2 fully expanded leaves, one on lower 1/3, and one upper 1/3 of plant • 6 plants were randomly selected for whole plant counts • Design allows for analysis of variation within and between plants, within and between cells, between fields, and between states • Fields classified into five growth stages – – – – – Vegetative (01) Boot (02) Flowering (03) Milk (04) Soft Dough to Maturity (05) • For data purposes use the closest of the five stages listed when collecting plant measure data Materials & Methods Data Slides • A nested ANOVA was conducted on data from125 fields, representing 6750 samples from TX and OK (fields from other states have not been included yet) Key Learnings • Most of the variation in sampling is captured within plant samples or between the two sets of within cell samples • Sampling for SCA needs to be modified based on location – OK and North Texas distribution patterns saw no substantial difference in variation; data suggests that there is less need to consider edge when sampling – South Texas showed evidence of a slight edge effect due to a higher % of accounted variance in the “column” category when compared to N Texas and Oklahoma. Next Steps • Continued field sampling for increased robustness of data and for independent validation of sampling protocol • Evaluation of aphids counts on leaves within plant for most efficient estimation of aphid density Collaborators • • • • • • • • • • • • Jessica Lindenmayer, Oklahoma State University*** Kristopher L. Giles, Oklahoma State University N.C. Elliott, USDA-ARS Ali Zarrabi, Oklahoma State University Mark Payton, Oklahoma State University Allan Knutson, Texas A&M Agrilife Xandra Morris, Texas A&M Agrilife Robert Bowling, Texas A&M Agrilife Michael Brewer, Texas A&M Agrilife Nick Seiter, University of Arkansas Sebe Brown, Louisiana State University Brian McCornack, Kansas State University Discussion