Download Week 1 Day 1 - Prof. Anderson

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Re-Imagining wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
ENC1101-U4MC
Professor Nicholas Anderson
MWF 5:15-6:20
CP111
Today’s goals

Summarize the most important course policies and expectations

Introduce ourselves

Introduce (or review) rhetorical appeals

All class materials available at: ProfessorNAnderson.com

Daily Powerpoints

Class announcements

Conference schedules

Contact information

Syllabus

Please locate and bookmark this page on your phones or computers now

Then open our class ENC1101-U4MC and select the syllabus
Important course Policies

This course will require reliable access to a computer with internet access. If you cannot meet this
requirement, a different section of ENC1101 may be preferable.

You will be required to maintain an online blog of your writing and experiences in ENC. You may use
text, podcast, or vlog format for your entries.

Computer use in class is a privilege. If this becomes a distraction to students, that privilege will be
revoked

Missing 5 or more classes will result in automatic failure of the course as per departmental policy

Failure to turn in one of the four major essays will result in automatic failure of the course

Respect your peers as well as their thoughts and opinions
Introduce Yourself
1)
Name
2)
Major
3)
Where you are form
4)
What languages you speak
5)
Something interesting about you
6)
How do you plan to improve your writing or performance in ENC this
semester?
Class Discussion:
Civil Disobedience

Who is Henry David Thoreau?

Have you read “Civil Disobedience” or any of his other works?

What is the believing and doubting game? Have you ever played it before?
Civil Disobedience

"Unjust laws exist: shall we be content to obey them, or shall we endeavor to
amend them, and obey them until we have succeeded, or shall we transgress
them at once? Men generally...think that they ought to wait until they have
persuaded the majority to alter them. They think that, if they should resist,
the remedy would be worse than the evil. But it is the fault of the
government itself that the remedy is worse than the evil. It makes it worse.
Why is it not more apt to anticipate and provide for reform?....If the
injustice...is of such a nature that it requires you to be the agent of injustice
to another, then, I say, break the law. Let your life be a counter friction to
stop the machine.”

-Henry David Thoreau, “Civil Disobedience”
Believing and Doubting Game

Do you believe it is ever right, as a matter of conscience, to deliberately
break a law you regard as unjust? Why or why not?

Have you ever broken laws?

Have you ever broken a law as a matter of conscience?

What is the difference between breaking a law incidentally vs. intentionally? For
personal gain vs. conscience?
Believing Game

“We argue eagerly for our own opinions; we listen to opposing arguments
mainly to find flaws and, when we do, interrupt and attack them. We are
more interested in proving ourselves right, in winning the argument, than in
considering seriously another viewpoint, in continuing to think. The idea
behind the believing game is to suspend judgment, promote continued
thought, open oneself to the strengths and values of a perspective with which
one does not agree in part or in whole, and work at believing that
perspective.” -Alan Shapiro

When is breaking the law justified?

What is an example of an “unjust” law in your home country or the US? What
would be the consequences of breaking it?

What are other ways to fight against unjust laws aside from breaking them?
Doubting Game

"Knowing and questioning, of course, require one another. We understand
nothing except in so far as we understand the questions behind it." -I. A.
Richards

When does breaking the law become “justified?”

What would happen to our society if everyone who thought a law was unjust
broke it?

Do you consider US gun laws, abortion laws, and immigration bans to be just?
New vocabulary

Critical Thinking:

Rhetoric:

Rhetorical Appeals:

Ethos

Pathos

Logos
New vocabulary

Critical Thinking: The objective analysis and evaluation of an issue in order
to form a judgment

Rhetoric: the art and skill of using language (or symbols) to accomplish a
specific purpose

Rhetorical Appeals: three main rhetorical strategies identified by Aristotle.

Ethos: related to “ethics.” This rhetorical appeal uses ethics, morality, or personal
experience.

Pathos: related to “empathy.” This rhetorical appeals uses emotions, values,
beliefs, or the five senses.

Logos: related to “logic.” This rhetorical appeal uses logic, reason, data, numbers,
statistics, or facts.
Group activity instructions

Form up groups of 2-4 students

Whenever a group activity is assigned, you are responsible for turning in one
sheet of paper with everyone’s names and the answers to the group activity

Groupwork requires the cooperation of everyone in the group; if you do not
participate, you group can request for you to leave
Group Activity:
Civil Disobedience

In your unit 1 groups

Answer the following questions based on our prompt and discussion of “Civil
Disobedience”
1.
Give three reasons to persuade an audience that it can be considered “right”
to break “unjust” laws.

2.
Make sure to use each rhetorical appeal once
Give three reasons to persuade an audience that it is not “right” to break
laws simply because you consider them unjust.

Make sure to use each rhetorical appeal once
Homework

Obtain class textbooks and materials (we will begin using the A&B textbook on
Tuesday)