* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Example of a scientific poster
Survey
Document related concepts
Oncogenomics wikipedia , lookup
Human genome wikipedia , lookup
Site-specific recombinase technology wikipedia , lookup
History of genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup
Biology and consumer behaviour wikipedia , lookup
Gene expression programming wikipedia , lookup
Pathogenomics wikipedia , lookup
Minimal genome wikipedia , lookup
Gene expression profiling wikipedia , lookup
Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup
Adaptive evolution in the human genome wikipedia , lookup
Public health genomics wikipedia , lookup
Koinophilia wikipedia , lookup
Designer baby wikipedia , lookup
Genome (book) wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
Monsters of the Deep Could Help Protect You From the Monsters Within Dylan Pariseau and Katherine Kiley Keene State College Biology Department Abstract Sharks are an important part of our ecosystem, and some are the longest living vertebrates on our planet. The Shark Genome has evolved over hundreds of millions of years to give the organisms one of the most astounding wound healing and immune systems know to vertebrates. New studies of shark DNA shows that changes in their immunity genes may explain why their wounds heal so quickly and how adaptive immunity arose in gnathostomes. Significantly, sharks have an astoundingly low occurrence of cancer. Specifically, there are two genes in sharks that help to prevent cancer whose counterparts in humans actually can contribute to cancer. What we are investigating is the difference between the shark and human genes due to different evolutionary paths. One way to begin to investigate this difference is by looking at a model genome that evolves very slowly. One study of Elephant sharks found that they are evolving much slower than all other known vertebrates. This along with their primitive form of adaptive immunity makes them an excellent model genome to compare other vertebrates, such as sharks and humans, against. Introduction and Background •You are more likely in your lifetime to be struck by lightning than attacked by a shark •Some shark fossils date back to 420-450 million years ago •Jawed vertebrates are called gnathostomes but jaws were not the only thing to arise with this group. Immunoglobulin based adaptive immunity evolved from this group and the group eventually split in to cartilaginous fish and boney vertebrates. Sharks evolved from the cartilaginous branch while humans from the boney. Results Discussion •The phylogenetic trees show the inferred evolutionary relationship amongst various species. It also shows their phylogeny based upon similarities and differences in their genetic and possibly physical characteristics. In Figure 6 the investigation of the Bag1 gene yields results that would be expected when considering evolution. We would expect that the elephant shark would be more closely related to other sharks than to humans. We would also expect the coelacanth and platypus to be closer related to each other and humans than to sharks because of their closer relation to bony fish than cartilaginous fish. This predicted relationship is not what we saw upon analysis of the Legumain gene. Figure 7 is the phylogenetic tree that we got from our analysis and the expected evolutionary relation that the analysis of the Bag1 gene showed is not completely seen here. Instead of the elephant shark legumain gene being more closely related to sharks it is shown to be closer to that of humans and platypus. As previously mentioned the elephant shark has the slowest evolving genome of all vertebrates, and the platypus has the slowest out of all mammals. We believe that this is a factor into why the expected evolutionary relationship isn't seen here. It is however interesting that the elephant shark legumain gene is still more closely related to humans. In the future, we believe this relationship should be further investigated to gain further knowledge of this genes evolution and its effects in cancer. It must also be addressed that in the legumain tree there was no coelacanth due to the lack of sequencing of its gene. If this gene is sequenced in the future, it should be included in the tree to have a more complete investigation. We believe that this investigation demonstrates how much more we have to learn about sharks and their impacts to not only our health but evolution itself. To be able to investigate these magnificent creatures for many years to come there needs to be a healthy population. We believe that not just for their sake but for ours as well that conservation efforts need to be increased to protect these organisms that make up such a vital part of our ecosystem. Figure 2. Elephant Shark Figure 3. PETA shark conservation propaganda Genetic Investigation •Legumain and Bag1 are the genes of interest that have counter parts in humans. •In Humans the Bag1 gene actually inhibits apoptosis thus its over expression is associated with cancer. The Legumain gene is important to immune function and has been shown to be over expressed in human cancers. •To investigate these two genes we performed a phylogenetic analysis of different species that we thought could give particular insight into the evolution of these genes. •We strategically picked different species for either their relation to the two of utmost interest (sharks and humans) or for how little their genome has been derived due to their rate of evolution. Figure 6. Phylogenetic tree of Bag1 gene •Although the elephant shark is the slowest evolving vertebrate the slowest evolving mammal is the platypus. We decided to include both the platypus and the elephant shark in our analysis to compare the shark and human genes to the slowest evolving species that they are more closely related to than each other. Works Cited •Another species that we included because of its minimal amount of derivation due to evolution was the coelacanth (also called “the living fossil”) and is known to be one of the closest living fish relative of modern day mammals. Marra, N. J., Richards, V. P., Early, A., Bogdanowicz, S. M., Bitar, P. D. P., Stanhope, M. J., & Shivji, M. S. (2017). Comparative transcriptomics of elasmobranchs and teleosts highlight important processes in adaptive immunity and regional endothermy. BMC genomics, 18(1), 87. Venkatesh, B., Kirkness, E. F., Loh, Y. H., Halpern, A. L., Lee, A. P., Johnson, J., ... & Strausberg, R. L. (2006). Ancient noncoding elements conserved in the human genome. Science, 314(5807) 1892-1892. Alam, M. T., Petit, R. A., Read, T. D., & Dove, A. D. (2014). The complete mitochondrial genome sequence of the world's largest fish, the whale shark (Rhincodon typus), and its comparison with those of related shark species. Gene, 539(1), 44-49. Department of Vertebrate Zoology. (n.d.). Retrieved April 20, 2017, from http://vertebrates.si.edu/fishes/coelacanth/coelacanth_wider.html Venkatesh, B., Lee, A. P., Ravi, V., Maurya, A. K., Lian, M. M., Swann, J. B., ... & Hoon, S. (2014). Elephant shark genome provides unique insights into gnathostome evolution. Nature, 505(7482), 174-179. Trinajstic, K., Marshall, C., Long, J., & Bifield, K. (2007, April 22). Exceptional preservation of nerve and muscle tissues in Late Devonian placoderm fish and their evolutionary implications. Retrieved April 21, 2017, from http://rsbl.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/3/2/197 •In addition, we also included many shark species to find which of those investigated genes are closest to humans. •The phylogenetic trees were formed using a combination of BLAST and MEGA. Figure 1. Evolution of gnathostomes •Elephant sharks have subsets of helper T cells that are very restricted in what they can do. This combined with the fact of their slow evolution allows us to know more about the evolution of our own adaptive immunity. Figure 5. Coelacanth • Between 2000 and 2011 North American shark populations decreased by 80%. •1 in 6 species of sharks, rays and skates are considered threatened to become extinct. Figure 4. Platypus Figure 7. Phylogenetic tree of legumain gene Thank you to Dr. Loren Launen, Brian Moore, Nova Southeastern University, Keene State Bioinformatics, University of New Hampshire and Cornell University